It just leaped out of my fingers. I didn’t have time to expand, but I couldn’t hold back.
From: John Christensen [mailto:jbc329@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:49 AM To: Beth Little; 'Paul Wilson'; 'Coal Alerts'; 'WV Chapter Energy Committee' Subject: RE: [EC] from ScienceDaily e-newsletter: Clean energy least costly to power America's electricity needs
Was that meant as an understatement Beth, it is dirtier than coal when all the studies are completed sometime in the next few years, why is it taking so long for EPA to act to curb methane releases, drilling waste, fracking fluid et al?????? JB
-----Original Message----- From: Beth Little Sent: Sep 19, 2013 9:12 PM To: 'Paul Wilson' , 'Coal Alerts' , 'WV Chapter Energy Committee' , 'John Christensen' Subject: RE: [EC] from ScienceDaily e-newsletter: Clean energy least costly to power America's electricity needs
Natural gas is not clean energy.
From: ec-bounces@osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:30 AM To: Coal Alerts; WV Chapter Energy Committee; John Christensen Subject: [EC] from ScienceDaily e-newsletter: Clean energy least costly to power America's electricity needs
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_environment/~3/zfPzgoSsWig/130917124817.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email Clean energy least costly to power America's electricity needs
Posted: 17 Sep 2013 09:48 AM PDT
Findings show carbon pollution from power plants can be cut cost-effectively by using wind, solar and natural gas. It’s less costly to get electricity from wind turbines and solar panels than coal-fired power plants when climate change costs and other health impacts are factored in, according to a new study.