EC February 2009

ec@lists.wvsierraclub.org

15 participants
54 discussions

FW: NYT (Friedman -- While Detroit Slept)
by James Kotcon 05 Jan '10

05 Jan '10

From my father-in-law. JBK >>> "Bob Elliott" <rdelliott(a)socal.rr.com> 12/12/2008 7:29 AM >>> <http://www.nytimes.com/> <http://www.nytimes.com/> The New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/> _____ December 10, 2008 Op-Ed Columnist While Detroit Slept By <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/tho maslfriedman/index.html?inline=nyt-per> THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN As I think about our bailing out Detroit, I can't help but reflect on what, in my view, is the most important rule of business in today's integrated and digitized global market, where knowledge and innovation tools are so widely distributed. It's this: Whatever can be done, will be done. The only question is will it be done by you or to you. Just don't think it won't be done. If you have an idea in Detroit or Tennessee, promise me that you'll pursue it, because someone in Denmark or Tel Aviv will do so a second later. Why do I bring this up? Because someone in the mobility business in Denmark and Tel Aviv is already developing a real-world alternative to Detroit's business model. I don't know if this alternative to gasoline-powered cars will work, but I do know that it can be done - and Detroit isn't doing it. And therefore it will be done, and eventually, I bet, it will be done profitably. And when it is, our bailout of Detroit will be remembered as the equivalent of pouring billions of dollars of taxpayer money into the mail-order-catalogue business on the eve of the birth of eBay. It will be remembered as pouring billions of dollars into the CD music business on the eve of the birth of the iPod and iTunes. It will be remembered as pouring billions of dollars into a book-store chain on the eve of the birth of Amazon.com and the Kindle. It will be remembered as pouring billions of dollars into improving typewriters on the eve of the birth of the PC and the Internet. What business model am I talking about? It is Shai Agassi's electric car network company, called Better Place. Just last week, the company, based in Palo Alto, Calif., announced a partnership with the state of Hawaii to road test its business plan there after already inking similar deals with Israel, Australia, the San Francisco Bay area and, yes, Denmark. The Better Place electric car charging system involves generating electrons from as much renewable energy - such as wind and solar - as possible and then feeding those clean electrons into a national electric car charging infrastructure. This consists of electricity charging spots with plug-in outlets - the first pilots were opened in Israel this week - plus battery-exchange stations all over the respective country. The whole system is then coordinated by a service control center that integrates and does the billing. Under the Better Place model, consumers can either buy or lease an electric car from the French automaker Renault or Japanese companies like Nissan (General Motors snubbed Agassi) and then buy miles on their electric car batteries from Better Place the way you now buy an Apple cellphone and the minutes from AT&T. That way Better Place, or any car company that partners with it, benefits from each mile you drive. G.M. sells cars. Better Place is selling mobility miles. The first Renault and Nissan electric cars are scheduled to hit Denmark and Israel in 2011, when the whole system should be up and running. On Tuesday, Japan's Ministry of Environment invited Better Place to join the first government-led electric car project along with Honda, Mitsubishi and Subaru. Better Place was the only foreign company invited to participate, working with Japan's leading auto companies, to build a battery swap station for electric cars in Yokohama, the Detroit of Japan. What I find exciting about Better Place is that it is building a car company off the new industrial platform of the 21st century, not the one from the 20th - the exact same way that Steve Jobs did to overturn the music business. What did Apple understand first? One, that today's technology platform would allow anyone with a computer to record music. Two, that the Internet and MP3 players would allow anyone to transfer music in digital form to anyone else. You wouldn't need CDs or record companies anymore. Apple simply took all those innovations and integrated them into a single music-generating, purchasing and listening system that completely disrupted the music business. What Agassi, the founder of Better Place, is saying is that there is a new way to generate mobility, not just music, using the same platform. It just takes the right kind of auto battery - the iPod in this story - and the right kind of national plug-in network - the iTunes store - to make the business model work for electric cars at six cents a mile. The average American is paying today around 12 cents a mile for gasoline transportation, which also adds to global warming and strengthens petro-dictators. Do not expect this innovation to come out of Detroit. Remember, in 1908, the Ford Model-T got better mileage - 25 miles per gallon - than many Ford, G.M. and Chrysler models made in 2008. But don't be surprised when it comes out of somewhere else. It can be done. It will be done. If we miss the chance to win the race for Car 2.0 because we keep mindlessly bailing out Car 1.0, there will be no one to blame more than Detroit's new shareholders: we the taxpayers. _____ Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try <http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000 010> it now.

3 2

Fwd: Carbon Capture and Sequestration Video Link - FYI
by James Kotcon 28 Feb '09

28 Feb '09

This is a nice visual, but it is obviously glossing over some of the risks. While much of the description is accurate, I don't think any responsible geologist would conclude that there is no risk to groundwater. The concluding sentence is "The technology is available NOW." The key word is "Available". If that is the case, industry should put their money where their mouth is, and we should insist on it as BACT. JBK >>> Carl DuPoldt <cdupoldt(a)yahoo.com> 2/28/2009 9:05 AM >>> Here's an educational video link on Carbon Capture and Sequestration. I hope that it will will help stimulate people to action. Whatdo you think? http://www.ccs-education.net/media/ccs_video_01.html Carl DuPoldtGreenBuildingSolutions&Supplies www.greenbuildingss.com ******************************************************** To unsubscribe from SANET-MG: 1- Visit http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html to unsubscribe or; 2- Send a message to <listserv(a)sare.org> from the address subscribed to the list. Type "unsubscribe sanet-mg" in the body of the message. Visit the SANET-MG archives at: http://lists.sare.org/archives/sanet-mg.html. Questions? Visit http://www.sare.org/about/sanetFAQ.htm. For more information on grants and other resources available through the SARE program, please visit http://www.sare.org.

2 2

WV Stimulus Projects
by Jim Sconyers 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Looking at the Gov's website for stimulus information: So far not a cent listed for efficiency, conservation, weatherization, public transportation, etc. One can only hope those are yet to come... Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 304.906.6628 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. --- On Wed, 2/25/09, WV Democratic Party <wvparty(a)wvdemocrats.com> wrote: From: WV Democratic Party <wvparty(a)wvdemocrats.com> Subject: Obama's Speech/WV Stimulus Projects To: jim_scon(a)yahoo.com Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 4:00 PM wvdemocrats.com #yiv1688370206 TD.dems_content A { COLOR:#0556b9;FONT-FAMILY:verdana, tahoma, helvetica;} #yiv1688370206 TD.dems_content A:hover { COLOR:#000000;} President Obama Delivers Speech to Joint Session of Congress "We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before." -- President Obama (click here for his entire address http://www.wvdemocrats.com/ ) State of West Virginia Releases List of Projects Funded by Stimulus Check this website www.wvgov.org and look for updates on the stimulus dollars for WV Stay up to date on Democratic events across by visiting our web calendar http://www.wvdemocrats.com/calendar.php wvdemocrats.com This email was sent to jim_scon(a)yahoo.com. If you feel you've received this email in error, you can unsubscribe at any time.

4 4

Fw: Ohio DP&L settlement - Summary of Case
by Jim Sconyers 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 304.906.6628 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. --- On Fri, 2/27/09, Ned Ford <Ned.Ford(a)FUSE.NET> wrote: From: Ned Ford <Ned.Ford(a)FUSE.NET> Subject: Ohio DP&L settlement - Summary of Case To: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 11:19 AM On Monday, February 23rd Sierra Club settled an Electric Security Plan case with Dayton Power and Light (DP&L), along with industrial, commercial, residential, low income and local government representatives and the Ohio Environmental Council. This case resulted from passage of Senate Bill 221 in May of 2008. The Sierra Club's primary goal was to ensure fulfillment of the energy efficiency and renewable energy requirements of SB 221. The case involved important rate reforms and other issues, some of which affect our basic strategy to improve the financial rewards for DP&L to meet and/or exceed the energy saving provisions of the new law and to maximize renewable resource use. DP&L sells about $1 billion worth of electricity each year, about 9% of Ohio's $11 billion electric spending. SB 221 requires DP&L (and the other regulated electric companies) to use energy efficiency programs to reduce their gross sales one third of one percent in 2009. The reduction goal increases each year until 2019 when new annual savings should increase 2% each year thereafter. The settlement does not change the company's requirement under SB221, but provides strong assurances that the savings will occur as stated. (About 12% of Ohio's electricity is sold by municipally owned public power companies or co-ops, which are not affected by SB 221 or State regulation). DP&L has agreed to a customer advisory group which will provide ongoing recommendations to improve program performance and cost-effectiveness. The impact will not be determined until after the year's end, but this settlement should cause DP&L to spend about $5 million on efficiency programs in 2009, which can be expected to cause about $15 million in customer cost savings, spread over some future years. Some of the savings will be retained by the company or shared with the company, depending on your perspective, to compensate for the loss of expected sales. Program costs are generally paired with avoidable costs for electricity generation, and are therefore not a direct cost to the utility, but rather replace customer costs for fuel and operation and maintenance with the cost of the efficiency programs. SB 221 also requires each Ohio regulated electric company to provide 0.25% of it's generation from renewable energy in 2009 (rising to 12.5% in 2025), but since no commercial wind exists in Ohio in 2009, the first year requirements will be met with purchases of renewable electricity from nearby states. DP&L is the smallest of the four companies directly affected by SB 221, and was the last to file a new plan. Duke settled it's ESP case last October along similar lines, although the Duke settlement includes an incentive payment for overcompliance, which we strongly support as a good economic deal for Duke customers and the environment. DP&L proposed cost recovery for efficiency programs in a different manner and was not interested in defining a plan for overcompliance, but agreed to some changes we proposed to keep that possibility open in the future. DP&L is one of the two major Ohio utilities which have some good wind resources in their service area, and apparently plans to develop some of those resources in the next few years. DP&L's plan includes provisions for net metering of customer-generated renewable power, and grid modifications to facilitate renewable energy. Terms for those elements of the plan were improved in the settlement. This case was advanced through a very effective alliance of consumer and environmental organizations which developed last year when rules to implement SB 221 were developed. This alliance has allowed sharing of analytical resources, and has probably added considerable speed to the high pressure negotiations. The alliance, led by Ohio Consumers' Counsel Janine Migden-Ostrander, a Sierra Club member, one time Ohio Chapter Vice Chair, and the Club's attorney for approximately 26 utility interventions in the 1990's, has substantially enhanced Ohio's move toward a sustainable and affordable energy future. Electric utility efficiency programs are well known in parts of the U.S. but are slow in coming to the lower Midwest coal producing states. In the last year Illinois, Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania have embarked along similar paths. Illinois and Ohio have the strongest laws, which will take them to the level of efficiency activity that the strongest states presently have. Saving this much electricity will be enough to eliminate all new growth of greenhouse gases from electricity generation in these states, and perhaps much more, depending on the economy and how well the public and the regulators come to understand the economic benefits of these programs. For more information contact: Ned Ford Energy Advisor Sierra Club, Ohio Chapter 513/600-4200 Ned.Ford(a)fuse.net - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS list, send any message to: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

1 0

Fwd: FW: The Coen brothers' newest release
by Paul Wilson 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

New clean coal dig on YouTube. enjoy, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Cathy Zoi, The We Campaign <info(a)wecansolveit.org> Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:47 PM Subject: FW: The Coen brothers' newest release To: Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)gmail.com> We're very excited about the Reality Coalition's latest ad, which was directed by Academy Award-winning filmmakers Joel and Ethan Coen. Please check it out <http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52c1/2189…>and join Reality today. -Cathy [image: Reality]<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52c0/2189…> Dear Reality Member, When it comes to making cutting edge films like "Fargo," "No Country for Old Men," and "The Big Lebowski," Joel and Ethan Coen are the real deal. Now, they've got one more title on that impressive list. "Air Freshener" is directed by the Coen brothers, and we're proud to say it's Reality's latest ad -- calling out the coal industry's ridiculous claims that coal is clean as only the Coen brothers can. Watch it now: [image: "Air Freshener" Spot]<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52c1/2189…> http://action.ThisIsReality.org/coenbrothers<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52c1/2189…> A lot has happened since we launched the Reality Campaign to call out the coal industry for their dirty lies. The devastating coal ash spill in Tennessee last December was a painful reminder that using "clean" to describe coal doesn't make it true. And last week, the Environmental Protection Agency's decision to reconsider carbon dioxide regulation was a tremendous wake-up call to the coal industry. Now is a crucial moment. Our message is working, and we've got to take this opportunity to turn up the heat. With help from folks like the Coen brothers, it's a little easier (and funnier). Will you help spread the word, too? Watch how this Air Freshener "cleans," and join the Reality Campaign to help push the coal industry to come clean about dirty coal. http://action.ThisIsReality.org/coenbrothers<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52c1/2189…> It's time for the coal industry to make an immediate investment in new technology, to show real commitment to clean energy solutions. The ball is in their court. Thanks, Brian Hardwick Reality Coalition P.S. After you watch the video, check out the Reality blog<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52cf/2189…>, the newest addition to ThisIsReality.org<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52ce/2189…> . ThisIsReality.org<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52c0/2189…> | About<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52cd/2189…> ------------------------------ This email was sent to: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com To unsubscribe, go to: http://wecansolveit.org/unsubscribe<http://www.wecansolveit.org/page/m2/396e8997/6ffe8e5f/9cec5d9/19ba52cc/2189…> -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha

1 0

New Home
by Regina Hendrix 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

I apologize for being so unavailable lately. I've been in Maryland with my sister off and on for the past three months. She is undergoing chemo and has just finished her course of treatment. She's still having lots of effects and residual problems. In the meantime, during my trips to Howard County, Md., I've been looking at real estate in Jefferson County, WV. I have located a home that I'm planning to settle on sometime at the end of March. I had hoped to put a link on here for you to see but it seems the MLS system has taken it down, even though I've not yet settled. I will still be in the Charleston area on E-Day at the Capitol and hope to see you all there. Regina Hendrix

1 0

[Fwd: Earth Day at the Clay Center]
by Regina Hendrix 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

FYI. Bill Price and I had a Sierra Club Earth Day table last year at the Clay Center. As I remember, SC was the only environmental group there. The good old DEP was there and the state energy folks were there. I would be interested again this year but the timing is very close to my move to Charles Town. This would be a good opportunity for the Coal River Wind Project. Regina Hendrix

1 0

Fw: New interactive map brings source of CO2 levels into your living room
by Jim Sconyers 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 304.906.6628 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Eric Uram <Eric.Uram(a)HEADWATER.US> wrote: From: Eric Uram <Eric.Uram(a)HEADWATER.US> Subject: New interactive map brings source of CO2 levels into your living room To: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 10:28 PM New interactive map brings source of CO2 levels into your living room Posted on February 20th, 2009 Scientists at Purdue University have teamed up with Google Earth to create a new interactive map of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. Google Earth users can now click to see how emissions from factories, power plants, transportation, homes and businesses contribute to an individual county or state’s output. The map can also be customized to show the locations of power plants and airports. Zooming around reveals, for example, that air travel produces nearly half of the carbon dioxide emissions from Los Angeles County , Calif. READ MORE » Eric Uram Sierra Club National Toxics Team/Zero Waste Team International Heavy Metals Liaison to the UCIC John Muir Chapter - Conservation Chair - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS list, send any message to: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/

1 0

Fw: the "hookup"
by James Kotcon 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Well-written article that highlights the contrast between what Allegheny wants and what they say we "need". I especially liked that line "But the blackout argument is bogus, Overland contends. “A review of recent blackouts…shows that they occurred during off-peak times when utilities were overloading the lines.” In other words, they were selling more electricity to distant buyers than the system could transmit." I would like to get the data showing when blackouts actually occur, relative to peak load periods. JBK >>> "Vickie Wolfe" <wolfev(a)verizon.net> 2/24/2009 1:53 AM >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Sam Stetson To: Charles Pique ; haught(a)wvgazette.com ; IBtreehugger(a)gmail.com Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 7:45 PM Subject: the "hookup" Another View From the Bridge: What Does Needing Mean Posted Mon, 02/23/2009 - 08:59 by carol white http://discuss.epluribusmedia.net/node/3724 Mark Dewey has kindly let me post his latest editorial in the Blue Ridge Leader -- a Follup to his Last Post on the Alleghany Power's Plans to Connect West Virginia coal-powered generators to Maryland and New Jersey.This time he discusses how the federal "regulatory" process has worked as a result of the hookup between big coal and the Bush Crowd.. The View From the Ridge By Mark Dewey February 20, 2009 What Does Needing Mean? Henry David Thoreau, America’s first conservationist, believed that much of what we say we need is not merely unnecessary but actually harmful. That may be the case with new electricity transmission projects like PATH. Carol Overland, a lawyer specializing in utility regulation, believes that before building any more high voltage towers, we should determine not only how much electricity we need, but also what the word ‘need’ means in this context. That the word means one thing to the people who want to build the towers and something else to us is cause for concern, since we’ll have to pay for the towers, look at the towers, and live with the lifestyle the towers will impose. To most of us, need means local load service to light our houses, heat our water, and freeze our food—maybe also to run our wastewater treatment facility and the dryers at the Laundromat. And years ago, that’s what need meant to power companies, too, because regulation let them provide electricity only to people in their service area. But those controls were abolished, freeing power companies to sell electricity the same way Chrysler sells cars: on the open market. “North American Electric Reliability Corporation… admits that the transmission system is sufficient to meet local load-serving needs,” Carol Overland writes on the website Gristmill, “but the transmission grid is not sufficient for market purposes.” So Allegheny Energy needs to expand its transmission system. Paul Evanson, Chairman, President, and CEO of Allegheny Energy, said as much on February 11, at a meeting with investment bankers from Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, and other financial institutions. “Our transmission projects are key to Allegheny’s growth,” Evanson said, “so it’s very important that we maintain our construction schedule for TrAIL’s in-service date of June 11 and make the state regulatory filings for PATH in the coming months.” Evanson also said that Allegheny had secured “incentive rate treatment from FERC which included a 14.3 per cent return” on whatever they spend to build PATH—a return paid by us. “2009 will be a very challenging time,” Evanson said, “[but] I’m confident we can weather the economic downturn and keep our multiple long-term growth catalysts substantially intact.” How does Allegheny do that? The first step is to get a Certificate of Need from the State Corporation Commission, which approves only new construction that’s “reasonable and prudent,” Overland says. “Opportunity to play the market is not reasonable and prudent…[so] transmission projects for market trading are couched in terms of local load-serving need.” The need to expand local service is usually justified by the threat of blackouts. For example, to win approval for TrAIL, Allegheny argued that the mid-Atlantic region would be vulnerable to blackouts during hours of peak demand by the year 2013. Building to satisfy peak demand means spending billions on infrastructure to continuously satisfy needs that may exist for only a few hours every year. The rest of the time that extra capacity is used to make Allegheny Energy more attractive to investors at Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank. But the blackout argument is bogus, Overland contends. “A review of recent blackouts…shows that they occurred during off-peak times when utilities were overloading the lines.” In other words, they were selling more electricity to distant buyers than the system could transmit. And projections of increased local demand may also be dubious. “Despite their propensity to overstate need,” Overland says, “several utility CEOs recently admitted that use has decreased between 3 and 9 percent.” “We also need renewable generation,” Overland points out, “and we have an equally compelling need to reduce CO2 emissions, and the toxic waste of electrical generation, needs not readily recognized in energy planning.” And we need to cultivate a conservative attitude to reduce waste. After all, wasting something is the opposite of needing it. If we put compact fluorescent bulbs in all our lights, we’d save enough energy to forestall any argument about blackouts caused by growing local need. In fact, Overland suggests, conservation could reduce today’s so-called need by 10 percent. But if we allow Allegheny Energy to define the term need, we’ll soon be paying $1.5 billion for more 160-foot iron towers to make the company look good to Citigroup. And once those towers are in place, the direction of energy planning and policy will be set in iron and stone. “We remain dedicated to enhancing shareholder value in years ahead,” President Evanson assured the moneymen. That’s what “need” means to him. Let’s tell him what it means to us.

1 0

Fwd: E&E Daily: EPA requires CO2 consideration for Michigan coal plant
by James Kotcon 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Sierra Club wins another one, this time in Michigan. I think it is time to put WV-DEP on notice that we will insist on this as part of any CTL permits. JBK >>> Fred Heutte <phred(a)SUNLIGHTDATA.COM> 2/20/2009 5:59 PM >>> http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2009/02/20/1/ COAL: Citing GHG emissions, EPA board remands Mich. permits (02/20/2009) Robin Bravender, E&E reporter U.S. EPA's Environmental Appeals Board has ordered Michigan regulators to reconsider air pollution permits issued to a proposed coal-fired power plant in the Upper Peninsula for failing to consider emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued federal air permits to Northern Michigan University, authorizing construction of a new boiler to burn coal, wood and natural gas at the Ripley Heating Plant in Marquette, Mich. EPA's appeals board earlier this week sided with the Sierra Club, which argued MDEQ had failed to conduct proper reviews for CO2 and nitrous oxide emissions from the boiler. "It underscores the days of ignoring CO2 are over, and we're thankfully in a new era when science is back in vogue," said Bruce Nilles, director of Sierra Club's Move Beyond Coal campaign. The board based its ruling on its decision last year on permits for a planned expansion by the Deseret Power Electric Cooperative in Bonanza, Utah. In that case, the board said EPA has discretion to regulate CO2 from coal-fired power plants and ordered the Region 8 office in Denver to reconsider its decision against requiring CO2 controls on the planned expansion of the Bonanza plant. The Michigan decision came the day after EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson announced the agency would reconsider a memorandum issued during the Bush administration that described why the government should not regulate CO2 from new coal-fired plants. Industry groups had welcomed the Bush EPA's memo, arguing that the appeals board's decision in the Deseret case had opened up the possibility for a host of new Clean Air Act regulations on small pollution sources like schools and hospitals. But environmentalists said the memo violated the appeals board's decision. By rejecting MDEQ's permits and not referencing the Bush administration memo, "the appeals board is following Lisa Jackson's lead," Nilles said. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

EC February 2009