EC April 2012

ec@lists.wvsierraclub.org

4 participants
12 discussions

Fwd: ACT:: Register for Wednesday, May 2 webinar and discussion about "Using Communications To Win Your Campaigns!"
by Paul Wilson 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

this should be of interest for future work on WV Energy Efficient issues. fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Verena Owen <verena_owen(a)prodigy.net> Date: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:35 PM Subject: ACT:: Register for Wednesday, May 2 webinar and discussion about "Using Communications To Win Your Campaigns!" To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org Please join us Wednesday, May 2nd at 8 PM ET/ 7 CT/ 5 PT for the Beyond Coal Campaign's monthly call and webinar. I am looking forward talking to you all, Verena Using Communications To Win Your Coal and Clean Energy Campaigns!Join us for a Webinar on May 2 <https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/821646358>*Space is limited.* Reserve your Webinar seat now at: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/821646358Please join us for a webinar on Wednesday, May 2, at 8 PM ET/7 CT/ 5PT. Our special guest presenter will be Orli Cotel from the Club's Communications Department. The topic will be "Using Communications to Win Your Campaigns," and she will discuss the latest polling and research on messaging, talk about the current structure of the Communications department and the resources available to the Beyond Coal Campaign, as well as how communications tools can help influence decision makers and move targets in the right direction. After her presentation we will have our usual Q and A session.*Title:*Using Communications To Win Your Campaigns!*Date:*Wednesday, May 2, 2012*Time:*8:00 PM - 9:00 PM EDTAfter registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the Webinar.*System Requirements* PC-based attendees Required: Windows® 7, Vista, XP or 2003 ServerMacintosh®-based attendees Required: Mac OS® X 10.5 or newer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Verena OwenVolunteer Co-LeadBeyond Coal Campaign Verena.Owen(a)sierraclub.orgSierraclub.org/coal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

1 0

Fwd: President Obama can stop the massive mountaintop removal Spruce Mine
by Paul Wilson 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

incase you do not get the CREDO emails....fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Josh Nelson, CREDO Action <act(a)credoaction.com> Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:02 AM Subject: President Obama can stop the massive mountaintop removal Spruce Mine To: Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)gmail.com> ** [image: Protect West Virginia from mountaintop removal coal mining!] <http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881576&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=1> Clicking here will automatically add your name to this petition to the White House Council on Environmental Quality:<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881577&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=2> * "As a West Virginia resident, I'm writing to voice my opposition to the destruction of mountains at the Spruce Mine in Logan County. Support EPA's veto of the Spruce Mine and direct the Army Corps of Engineers to revoke the mine's permit." <http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881577&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=3> * Automatically add your name: <http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881577&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=4> [image: Take action now!] <http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881577&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=5> Learn more about this campaign<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881576&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=6> [image: CREDO Action | more than a network, a movement.] *Tell President Obama: Protect West Virginia from a massive mountaintop removal mine. .<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881576&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=7> * Dear Paul, Arch Coal is moving forward with the largest mountaintop removal coal mining operation in West Virginia's history — but *President Obama's White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has the power to step in and block this disastrous project.* The Environmental Protection Agency had already vetoed a permit for the Spruce Mine in Logan County, but last month, a federal judge overruled the agency paving the way for the project.1 The court's decision means that the destruction of mountains and burying of streams with 110 million yards of mining waste could begin very soon — unless the Council on Environmental Quality steps in. *Tell the Council on Environmental Quality: Protect West Virginia from mountaintop removal at the Spruce Mine. Click here to automatically sign the petition.* <http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881577&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=8> In situations where agencies within the federal government differ on environmental matters, it is the role of the Council on Environmental Quality to weigh in and resolve the matter. And by directing the Army Corps of Engineers to revoke the Spruce Mine permit, the CEQ can stop this highly polluting and disastrous project once and for all. *Mountaintop removal mining is a process in which coal companies use explosives to literally blow the tops off of the mountains, dumping the leftover rocks and dirt into streams and valleys below. The practice is linked with high mortality rates, contaminated drinking water and increased flooding, among other problems.2* EPA's veto of the permit for expanded mountaintop removal mining at the Big Spruce Mine in Logan County was the right decision for public health and the environment, but unless the Council on Environmental Quality steps in, this massive mine will soon begin operations. West Virginians have been dealing with the devastation of mountaintop removal mining for far too long. Let's make sure the CEQ know that we expect it to use its power to protect West Virginia's residents, mountains and waterways from dirty and destructive mountaintop removal mining. Click below to automatically sign the petition to the White House Council on Environmental Quality: *http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881577&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=9* *Thank you* for fighting for public health and the environment in West Virginia. Josh Nelson, Campaign Manager CREDO Action from Working Assets <http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=11&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=10> 1. Judge Overturns EPA Veto of Spruce Mine Permit<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881578&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=11>, West Virginia Gazette, 3/23/12 2. Community Impacts of Mountaintop Removal<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=5537553&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=12>, Appalachian Voices ------------------------------ [image: Facebook]<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881579&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=13> *Share on Facebook* Post to your wall<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881579&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=14> [image: Twitter]<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881580&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=15> *Tweet this* Post to Twitter<http://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=6881580&id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx&t=16> © 2012 CREDO. All rights reserved. To remove yourself (Paul Wilson) from this list, please visit our subscription management page at: http://act.credoaction.com/s?i=38944-3414728-V0xAANx To change your email address or update your contact info, please visit: http://act.credoaction.com/subscrip/coa.html?id=38944-3414728-V0xAANx -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

1 0

Energy Efficiency Planning Meeting
by James Kotcon 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

To the Energy Committee: Here is a new opportunity to make a real difference. Working with Energy Efficient West Virginia (EEWV) the WV Chapter wants to develop a major campaign to promote energy efficiency. That's where you come in. While it is important to fight bad mining practices and polluting power plants, we will not really make substantive progress as long as people want more and more electricity and coal is the low cost provider. No realistic effort to address global warming is possible without fundamental restructuring and reductions in our energy use. The good news is that EE is actually cheaper, faster, safer, and cleaner than any other source of energy. So how do we get there, especially here in West Virginia? WV SC and EEWV will hold a joint EE campaign planning meeting in Flatwoods at 3-6 PM, Saturday, April 28. Start making plans to attend. We need new ideas, new volunteers, and fresh leadership, and this is your chance to be part of something great. The options range from local education efforts, to working with the PSC, to statewide legislative in initiatives. What we do depends on what YOU want to do, so come be a part of the planning. Let me know if you can participate, or if you know someone else who should be involved. Mark you calendars now, more details soon. Jim Kotcon 304-293-8822 (office) 304-594-3322 (home)

1 0

Fwd: NPS Denies PATH's Request for Continued Abeyance of the EIS
by James Kotcon 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

News Flash. PATH is still dead. JBK >>> Elena Saxonhouse <elena.saxonhouse(a)sierraclub.org> 4/16/2012 4:44 PM >>> Good to see PATH still looking dead. A new EIS and substation will be major hurdles if they decide to resurrect the project. Elena Saxonhouse Staff Attorney Sierra Club 85 Second Street, 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415-977-5765 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Keryn Newman <stoppath(a)frontiernet.net> Date: Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:28 PM Subject: NPS Denies PATH's Request for Continued Abeyance of the EIS To: CONS-ELP-TRANS-LINES-FORUM(a)lists.sierraclub.org On Feb. 27, the NPS denied PATH's request for continued, indefinite abeyance of their application and thereby denied PATH's permit without prejudice. See letter from NPS here ( http://www.stoppathwv.com/documents/NPS-PATH-Denial.pdf ). If this is old news to any of you, pardon the duplication, however it's news to us. NPS sat on this information and only posted it on the project website some time after March 15, without any notice. If PATH is resurrected, they have to submit a new application for an EIS. This is the second of PATH's three lifelines that has been cut. They failed to file further appeals on the Frederick Co., MD, BZA decision at the end of March, so that process is over, with the BZA denial standing. The only support PATH continues to receive is their FERC Formula Rate cost recovery and incentives, which FERC is apparently content to leave in place until PATH makes a Sec. 205 filing to abandon the project. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the CONS-ELP-TRANS-LINES-FORUM list, send any message to: CONS-ELP-TRANS-LINES-FORUM-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

2 1

Fwd: RE: Deb Nardone
by James Kotcon 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

To Energy Committee: Attached are Natural Gas Campaign Plans developed recently by the Colorado and Ohio Chapters of Sierra Club. While some of this strikes me as highly diffuse, with too many policy objectives and not enough priority setting or focus, these do give some good examples of what goes into, and comes out of, a campaign planning process. Enjoy. Jim Kotcon >>> Deb Nardone <deb.nardone(a)sierraclub.org> 4/12/2012 4:36 PM >>> Thanks Jim, I’m already committed to a call from 5 – 6:30 ET with the Lone Star Chapter, but am very interested in participating on future calls. I’m currently working with a few other chapters on the gas strategies/campaign planning, so can pass along items of interest. The Colorado Chapter just went through a comprehensive planning process, their plan is attached. The OH Chapter also has a draft strategy, attached. Once these plans are completed, we’re working with Advancement to draft a state specific funding proposal, and will hopefully bring in the $ for chapter based gas staff. Please let me know when you set up your next call, and am willing to help out if needed as you plan for upcoming gas work. All the best, Deb From: James Kotcon [mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 1:19 PM To: Chuck Wyrostok; 'Elizabeth Little'; 'Jim Sconyers'; deb.nardone(a)sierraclub.org; 'Jim Kotcon' Subject: Re: Deb Nardone Deb: As Chair of the Chapter's Marcellus campaign, I think it would be great to have you join us tonight. Let me know if you need the current agenda and call-in info for 6 PM, and I would like to add a few minutes to have you discuss those c-3 dollars, as we are targeting a large part of this year's activities toward that kind of work. Jim Kotcon 304-293-8822 (office) 304-594-3322 (home) >>> "Chuck Wyrostok" <wyro(a)appalight.com> 4/11/2012 8:28 PM >>> I had a lengthy conversation with Deb Nardone today. She called to see if we needed any technical help with comments to the DEP on the centralized pits proposal. I said we had a pretty good handle on it..thanks. She also said there may be national c3 money available for the Marcellus campaign. She said there would have to be a state strategy and work plan in place to before trying to secure funds. I told her that we were in the process of renewing the campaign and had planned a conference call for Thursday. She said she would be available to be on it, but realized that state chapters sometimes need to steer their own ship. If we want her on the call, will someone invite her tomorrow? I'll be on the road doing my weekly "take the veterans to the hospital" day. I'm thinking that this first organizational call tomorrow may not be the best one as far as her use of time. Chuck Chuck Wyrostok Sierra Club Outreach Organizer Toll free 877 252 0257 E: outreach(a)marcellus-wv.com www.marcellus-wv.com

1 0

Re: [EC] NEw Jersey coal??
by Paul Wilson 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

I saw this announcement via Linkedin and wonder what the strategic benefit can be for having a Coal Campaign Organizer in NJ but nothing in WV?? *The Beyond Coal Campaign is hiring an Associate Organizing Rep in New Jersey*<http://www.linkedin.com/e/-51mdjt-h0pq69ph-5i/ava/105098655/669627/eml-anet…> Started by Joshua Ramey-Renk, Director of Talent Acquisition and Development at Sierra C I am getting a bit frustrated with the all this sc bs. fyi, paul -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

2 1

Fwd: WVNS story: Economist: Clean Air Rules Don't Slow Economy by Raising the Power Costs
by Paul Wilson 06 Apr '12

06 Apr '12

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Public News Service <wvns(a)newsservice.org> Date: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 4:22 AM Subject: WVNS story: Economist: Clean Air Rules Don't Slow Economy by Raising the Power Costs To: PaulWilson <pjgrunt(a)gmail.com> Interesting story out of WV.... Economist: Clean Air Rules Don't Slow Economy by Raising the Power Costs Public News Service-WV http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25762-1 Join the discussion: facebook.com/PublicNewsService<http://www.facebook.com/PublicNewsService> Twitter: @pns_news <http://twitter.com/#!/pns_news> @pns_WV<http://twitter.com/#!/pns_WV> Google+: plus.to/publicnewsservice <http://plus.google.com/106260479325451709866> (04/06/12) CHARLESTON, W. Va. – West Virginia's critics of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) charge that its new rules to force power plants to cut air pollution will cause electricity rates to rise, thereby slowing the economy. But economist Josh Bivens, with the Economic Policy Institute (EPA), disagrees. Bivens says the jobs created by new investments in pollution reduction will more than offset the losses. His research indicates the argument that "regulations kill jobs" is often a myth, which he says is the case with the clean air rules. "The reason why electricity becomes more expensive is because the utilities have to hire people. The boost from the extra jobs created by the investments, I estimate, outweighs the negatives." Bivens' findings are detailed in a new report, Going Green Won't Kill Jobs During Hard Times <http://tinyurl.com/ckkm24a>, published in *New Scientist*magazine. According to Bivens, some argue that government-mandated investments could pull resources from other productive places in the economy – although he notes that is only the case if the economy is growing quickly. He points out that the problem with this downturn, like all slow periods, is that private money is sitting idle. In effect, he says, the EPA is forcing some of that idle money to become productive again. "Financial capital is not scarce. Corporate liquid savings are at all-time highs; we've got historically low interest rates. There's just no evidence that these investments are going to necessarily crowd out some other private investment." Bivens' analysis does not include the health benefits of breathing cleaner air, although he says those will have a significant impact, as well. "By those measures, this seems like a really big winner, mostly driven by the benefits to health and quality of life identified by EPA." Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, Sen. Joe Manchin and all three West Virginia members of Congress have publicly attacked the EPA's Clean Air Act rules. Click here to view this story on the Public News Service RSS site and access an audio version of this and other stories: http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25762-1<http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25762-1> --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org <remove(a)publicnewsservice.org?subject=remove>and put the word "remove" in the subject line. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

1 0

Fwd: WVNS story: Are EPA Coal Plant Rules what the Public Wants?
by James Kotcon 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

Not sure if you saw this, but this is an important public opinion poll done for the American Lung association. Significant majorities support EPA's proposed new greenhouse gas rules, and even larger majorities support mercury and air toxics rules. Most people view these as health rules, and we need to keep emphasizing that aspect as we talk about the rules. Ohio and PA voters were surveyed separately, and even these coal-friendly states support EPA rules. JBK >>> Public News Service <wvns(a)newsservice.org> 4/4/2012 4:29 AM >>> Are EPA Coal Plant Rules what the Public Wants? Public News Service-WV http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25687-1 Join the discussion: facebook.com/PublicNewsService ( http://www.facebook.com/PublicNewsService ) Twitter: @pns_news ( http://twitter.com/#!/pns_news ) @pns_WV ( http://twitter.com/#!/pns_WV ) Google+: plus.to/publicnewsservice ( http://plus.google.com/106260479325451709866 ) (04/04/12) CHARLESTON, W.Va. - The Environmental Protection Agency's new rules to protect Americans from carbon pollution emitted by new coal plants are getting a chilly reception from some in West Virginia. Sen. Joe Manchin has criticized them, and Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin is calling on the public to object to them. However, a new bipartisan survey ( http://www.lung.org/healthy-air/outdoor/resources/clean-air-survey-mar2012.… ) finds tougher air-pollution standards are exactly what American voters want. The results show that 72 percent agree with the EPA's new carbon-pollution limits, according to Peter Iwanowicz, assistant vice president of the American Lung Association, which commissioned the survey. "EPA has taken this step to address carbon pollution from power plants but, as we saw in our poll, the public expects EPA to do more when it comes to dealing with power-plant emissions and other pollution problems." Iwanowicz says the survey also found that a 2-to-1 majority believes these first-ever limits will create jobs rather than destroy them, by encouraging innovation. Opponents argue the measures will raise electricity prices and slow the coal industry. The public sees this as a health issue, Iwanowicz says, adding that that's the right way to look at it. "With carbon pollution or any pollution from power plants, it's simple: Power-plant pollution kills, and it makes people sick. So for us, enforcing these clean-air protections are going to improve public health." He says the combination of pollution and raising the air temperature, which carbon dioxide does, leads to more smog - which can be deadly. "For people with asthma, especially children, smog triggers asthma attacks. For seniors with chronic lung disease, their symptoms are worse when smog levels are high. More people are hospitalized for respiratory ailments during levels with high smog than otherwise. It's a serious public health threat that needs to be addressed." Survey results are online at lung.org ( http://www.lung.org/healthy-air/outdoor/resources/clean-air-survey-mar2012.… ). Click here to view this story on the Public News Service RSS site and access an audio version of this and other stories: http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25687-1 ( http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/25687-1 ) --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org and put the word "remove" in the subject line.

1 0

Awesome letter Re: Manchin says he'll fight new EPA rules
by Jim Sconyers 04 Apr '12

04 Apr '12

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Elisa Young <elisayoung1(a)yahoo.com> Date: Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:29 AM Subject: Fw: Re: Manchin says he'll fight new EPA rules To: COAL-COMBUSTION-WASTE(a)lists.sierraclub.org Maybe send Manchin a word or two. I fired off this letter to Manchin from his website with the subject line: Employment statistic request. You can send your own here: http://manchin.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact-form Dear Senator Manchin: I read an article in the Charleston Gazette this morning where you expressed concern about the number of jobs that would be lost if environmental protections to protect public health and safety that the EPA has approved move forward, and your vow to fight these protections: http://sundaygazettemail.com/News/201204030140 My family has long lived on the border of Ohio and West Virginia (Meigs/Mason/Gallia Counties) where 4 of AEPs power plants are concentrated (2nd largest concentration in the United States, second only to Morgantown, WV). I have personally witnessed the lives of people in community being harmed and even shortened due to coal dependency and specifically American Electric Power's emissions. Ohio has consistently taken home the prize for the worst air quality in the nation, and within that ranking, our county has the highest asthma rate in the state, the highest lung cancer death rate, the shortest life expectancy, the highest uninsured rate for children and families, and rank the second highest in the state for all cancer deaths combined (second only to another rural, coal-producing county in Southern Ohio). The air quality in our schools under the power plants was ranked as being in the top third percentile for the worst air quality in the nation (post scrubbers). I lost one neighbor to lung cancer who never touched a cigarette in her life. Her husband also died of respiratory illness. I lost 6 neighbors to cancer, had cancer myself (and 2 more precancerous conditions that we have no family history of - did I mention I don't have health insurance?), and remember when one friend's husband died, her sharing this story: Both she and her best friend's husbands were dying of cancer in the same hospital, one room apart from each other (one lived almost immediately under the power plants, the other about 2 miles out from the power plants on the Ohio side of the river - the majority of the pollutants fall within 15). When Sue's husband died (an hour before Lola's), she shared that within the next month, they would have exceeded their lifetime maximum health care benefits of $1 million. She didn't want her husband to go, but had no idea how they would have made it once their health insurance ended. Another story (just to put a face on this), a friend who's husband worked at the Gavin plant in Cheshire (a village my family helped found when they moved here in 1798 and that AEP bought and depopulated recently due to "clean coal" experiments gone wrong), who died from cancer, told me that as he was dying, she promised to get him a black granite headstone with yellow roses. The cemetery where he was buried was immediately behind the power plant he gave his life to. Within a year of his death, the roses had been eaten off the granite. When Dorothy called the company to have the granite headstone recarved, they asked her what on earth she'd done to it. SHE hadn't done anything. Did I mention the cemetery is next to the school? I remember when my best friend got cancer, I drove her to the hospital to get the pathology results from her biopsy, and then had to call her husband, who did consulting work as an engineer and was traveling, to give him the news, because she couldn't speak except to hand me the phone and tell me to do it. She was sitting their staring into the air on one side of me, and he was yelling at me to put his wife on the phone on the other side, while I'm trying to process that I will probably lose my best friend. I should probably tell you that both her dogs died from cancer, too. One died while she was receiving radiation and chemo treatments in Chicago - I had to give she and her husband the vet report when Hoofie was diagnosed with terminal lymphoma, and was the last one to see her alive. The other, Wheezy, died from cancer after she moved away to New England. Her oncologist had told her if she wanted to get healthy she would have to move away from here. So yes, I lost my best friend. I was dumbfounded to read, "Those workers installed more than $1 billion worth of scrubbers and other equipment to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 90 percent, he said." What those scrubbers meant was worse air emission problems around John Amos (Maybe you've forgotten) http://www.opinionbug.com/2379/mysterious-blue-haze-frightens-charleston-wv… http://www.google.com/search?q=John+amos+haze+charleston&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&… These were the same emissions problems caused by the scrubbers on the Ohio side of the river - a stone's throw away - that lead to the purchase and depopulation of Cheshire - a village my family founded in 1798 that AEP destroyed after the scrubbers were installed. The scrubbers cause that blue haze you all experienced down in Charleston, same as they did here, triple the amount of solid waste, and create much more toxic waste. Since the scrubbers were installed, the radiation levels have skyrocketed to being 1000 times higher than the EPA says is "acceptable." http://manchin.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact-form I could send you a volume about the people I've know who have died here, but I'm sure you are a busy man. I would like to hear your side of the statistics, since it bears no resemblance to the reality that exists in my community, compliments of coal. I would like to see the actual numbers your quote is based on that states, "Between 2006 and 2011, at AEP power plants in West Virginia, you created 27.7 million work hours on environmental construction projects," Manchin told his audience. Your jobs are killing us. Sincerely, Elisa Young P.O. Box 518 Athens, Ohio 45701 --- On *Wed, 4/4/12, Vivian Stockman <vivian(a)ohvec.org>* wrote: From: Vivian Stockman <vivian(a)ohvec.org> Subject: [fom] Manchin says he'll fight new EPA rules To: fom(a)lists.riseup.net Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 11:26 AM April 3, 2012 Manchin says he'll fight new EPA rules By Paul J. Nyden<http://www.wvgazette.com/News/contact/cwalqra+jitnmrggr+pbz+return=/News/20…> WINFIELD, W.Va. -- Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Tuesday he will vigorously oppose new greenhouse-gas rules proposed last week by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. During a speech at the John Amos Power Plant near Winfield, Manchin stressed the importance of national energy independence and the impact coal, gas and other energy resources have on creating good-paying jobs. Today, Manchin said, coal generates 45 percent of all energy used in the United States and "is projected to produce the lion's share of energy decades into the future." Between 2006 and 2011, Manchin said Tuesday, AEP had as many as 3,200 construction workers at its John Amos plant, now one of the world's cleanest coal plants. Those workers installed more than $1 billion worth of scrubbers and other equipment to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 90 percent, he said. "Between 2006 and 2011, at AEP power plants in West Virginia, you created 27.7 million work hours on environmental construction projects," Manchin told his audience. "This plant is an example that when government works as a partner, not an adversary, we can put thousands of people back to work, and find the balance between the economy and environment." Last week, EPA officials proposed what the agency called a "common-sense" requirement that any new coal-fired power plants include equipment to control their greenhouse-gas emissions. "Right now there are no limits to the amount of carbon pollution that future power plants will be able to put into our skies -- and the health and economic threats of a changing climate continue to grow," EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said at the time. "We're putting in place a standard that relies on the use of clean, American-made technology to tackle a challenge that we can't leave to our kids and grandkids." m <http://www.wvgazette.com/storyfooter/News> ore here: http://www.wvgazette.com/News/201204030140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-COMBUSTION-WASTE list, send any message to: COAL-COMBUSTION-WASTE-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Jim Sconyers jimscon(a)gmail.com 304.698.9628 Remember, Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Fwd: [ECOLOG-L] Call for contributions to special issue on Hydrofracking
by Paul Wilson 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

This seems to be in the editing stage so we should see it sometime in the near future. fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Dow <ddow420(a)comcast.net> Date: Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:44 AM Subject: Fwd: [ECOLOG-L] Call for contributions to special issue on Hydrofracking To: Patricia Matejcek Gmail <patachek3(a)gmail.com>, Paul Wilson < pjgrunt(a)gmail.com>, Alison Robb <nature(a)cape.com> fyi Begin forwarded message: *From: *Scott Bearer <sbearer(a)TNC.ORG> *Date: *April 2, 2012 10:12:30 PM EDT *To: *ECOLOG-L(a)LISTSERV.UMD.EDU *Subject: **[ECOLOG-L] Call for contributions to special issue on Hydrofracking* * * Dear Colleagues, Apologies for the limited timeframe in this Call for Papers. We will be editing an upcoming issue of the journal Environmental Practice< http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ENP>, published by Cambridge University Press and the official journal of the National Association of Environmental Professionals<http://www.naep.org/>. For publication in December 2012, this special issue of Environmental Practice will focus on the various environmental, socio-economic, and policy issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing and unconventional gas development. We hope that you find Environmental Practice, and particularly this "Hydrofracturing" issue, to be of interest and will consider submitting a manuscript. The deadline for manuscript submission is 15 May 2012. Sample issues of the journal can be found at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ENP Guidelines for publication can be found at: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayMoreInfo?jid=ENP&type=ifc Sincerely yours, Scott Bearer, The Nature Conservancy Tamara Gagnolet, The Nature Conservancy Scott L. Bearer, Ph.D. Senior Scientist The Nature Conservancy Community Arts Center 220 West Fourth Street, 3rd Floor Williamsport, PA 17701 sbearer(a)tnc.org (570) 321-9092 (Office/Mobile) nature.org -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

EC April 2012