"Central to the story is the contention that prominent eco-advocacy groups, including Sierra, EDF and the Natural Resources Defense Council, are among those working with Exelon and state lawmakers on a legislative deal that would reverse a decision the company made in early June to close two money-losing nuclear reactors, Quad Cities and Clinton, and "ensure that the reactors remain in operation by providing financial recognition for the zero-carbon electricity they produce."
http://fair.org/home/wsj-fakes-a-green-shift-toward-nuclear-power/
"But major assertions in the Journal article turn out to be either factually inaccurate, or to omit or spin important details. First, though Harder refers multiple times to nuclear power being "carbon-free" (echoing the websites of nuclear plant owners such as http://www.exeloncorp.com/companies/exelon-generation/nuclear/Pages/default .aspx Exelon and http://www.pge.com/en/safety/systemworks/dcpp/index.page?WT.mc_id=Vanity_di ablocanyon Pacific Gas & Electric), that is not the case."
Frank Young