The Physicians for Social Responsibility have asked WVEC to endorse the attached Principles. Based on my review, these are such common sense that it makes me wonder why they are not already the rule, but I suspect that the parts about community involvement and independent monitoring have raised alarm at DOE.
Whaddya Tink?
JBK
dsgjr@aol.com> 1/11/2010 10:45 PM >> ( mailto:dsgjr@aol.com> )
From: mpinnell@psr.org To: dsgjr@aol.com Sent: 1/11/2010 2:03:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time Subj: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
Dear Don,
Gary Zuckett suggested I contact you. We at PSR are working on issuing a policy statement on safeguarding nuclear waste at reactor sites in the next few weeks and are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position. Attached you will find the Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors. We are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position, and right now we don’t have a representative for West Virginia. The Obama administration has stated, in its opposition to Yucca Mountain, that it will be reevaluating nuclear waste policy in the U.S. so it is a critical time to make a statement in support of safe and sane waste management practices. It would be fantastic if West Virginia Environmental Council could sign on and if you would like to forward this statement to other groups you work with, that would be great too. We’re hoping to issue these to the public next week, so the sooner you can reply, the better. Morgan Pinnell Safe Energy Program Coordinator Physicians for Social Responsibility Phone: 202-587-5232 Email: mpinnell@psr.org
William Tucker in "Terrestrial Energy" (a pro nuclear energy book) says that France has minimal waste to deal with because of reprocessing, and that there are valuable materials in nuclear waste for medical and industrial uses. I am not proposing going to nuclear energy, but I'm concerned that banning reprocessing might be like banning the use of stem cells - a move based on other than scientific grounds. I would like to hear more info from scientists in the related fields before supporting that. The other principles do sound like common sense.
_____
From: ec-bounces@osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 9:51 AM To: ec@osenergy.org Subject: [EC] Fwd: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
The Physicians for Social Responsibility have asked WVEC to endorse the attached Principles. Based on my review, these are such common sense that it makes me wonder why they are not already the rule, but I suspect that the parts about community involvement and independent monitoring have raised alarm at DOE.
Whaddya Tink?
JBK
dsgjr@aol.com mailto:dsgjr@aol.com 1/11/2010 10:45 PM >>> > 1/11/2010
10:45 PM >>
_____
From: mpinnell@psr.org To: dsgjr@aol.com Sent: 1/11/2010 2:03:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time Subj: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
Dear Don,
Gary Zuckett suggested I contact you. We at PSR are working on issuing a policy statement on safeguarding nuclear waste at reactor sites in the next few weeks and are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position. Attached you will find the Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors. We are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position, and right now we don't have a representative for West Virginia. The Obama administration has stated, in its opposition to Yucca Mountain, that it will be reevaluating nuclear waste policy in the U.S. so it is a critical time to make a statement in support of safe and sane waste management practices. It would be fantastic if West Virginia Environmental Council could sign on and if you would like to forward this statement to other groups you work with, that would be great too. We're hoping to issue these to the public next week, so the sooner you can reply, the better.
Morgan Pinnell
Safe Energy Program Coordinator
Physicians for Social Responsibility
Phone: 202-587-5232
Email: mailto:mpinnell@psr.org mpinnell@psr.org
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.135/2615 - Release Date: 01/12/10 02:35:00
I have also seen a movie about France's nuclear energy program and reprocessing. I agree with Beth, we may want to look into this a little more but I do totally agree with the rest of the paper.
Kevin Fooce fooce@hotmail.com 304-675-6687
EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD Join me
From: blittle@citynet.net To: jkotcon@wvu.edu; ec@osenergy.org Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:22:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [EC] Fwd: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
William Tucker in "Terrestrial Energy" (a pro nuclear energy book) says that France has minimal waste to deal with because of reprocessing, and that there are valuable materials in nuclear waste for medical and industrial uses. I am not proposing going to nuclear energy, but I'm concerned that banning reprocessing might be like banning the use of stem cells - a move based on other than scientific grounds. I would like to hear more info from scientists in the related fields before supporting that. The other principles do sound like common sense.
From: ec-bounces@osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 9:51 AM To: ec@osenergy.org Subject: [EC] Fwd: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
The Physicians for Social Responsibility have asked WVEC to endorse the attached Principles. Based on my review, these are such common sense that it makes me wonder why they are not already the rule, but I suspect that the parts about community involvement and independent monitoring have raised alarm at DOE.
Whaddya Tink?
JBK
dsgjr@aol.com> 1/11/2010 10:45 PM >>
From: mpinnell@psr.org To: dsgjr@aol.com Sent: 1/11/2010 2:03:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time Subj: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
Dear Don,
Gary Zuckett suggested I contact you. We at PSR are working on issuing a policy statement on safeguarding nuclear waste at reactor sites in the next few weeks and are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position. Attached you will find the Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors. We are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position, and right now we don’t have a representative for West Virginia. The Obama administration has stated, in its opposition to Yucca Mountain, that it will be reevaluating nuclear waste policy in the U.S. so it is a critical time to make a statement in support of safe and sane waste management practices. It would be fantastic if West Virginia Environmental Council could sign on and if you would like to forward this statement to other groups you work with, that would be great too. We’re hoping to issue these to the public next week, so the sooner you can reply, the better. Morgan Pinnell Safe Energy Program Coordinator Physicians for Social Responsibility Phone: 202-587-5232 Email: mpinnell@psr.org
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.135/2615 - Release Date: 01/12/10 02:35:00
My only concern is the funding for monitoring by state or local governments. Our experience here with the DEP would not bode well for safety and security in a state or locale that has similar regulatory agencies. Maybe better would be the creation of some kind on NGO to monitor independently. When I lived in NH there was a citizen group that monitored releases from Seabrook.
Jim Sconyers jim_scon@yahoo.com 304.698.9628
Remember: Mother Nature bats last.
--- On Tue, 1/12/10, James Kotcon jkotcon@wvu.edu wrote:
From: James Kotcon jkotcon@wvu.edu Subject: [EC] Fwd: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors To: ec@osenergy.org Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 9:51 AM
The Physicians for Social Responsibility have asked WVEC to endorse the attached Principles. Based on my review, these are such common sense that it makes me wonder why they are not already the rule, but I suspect that the parts about community involvement and independent monitoring have raised alarm at DOE. Whaddya Tink? JBK
dsgjr@aol.com> 1/11/2010 10:45 PM >>
From: mpinnell@psr.org To: dsgjr@aol.com Sent: 1/11/2010 2:03:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time Subj: Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors
Dear Don,
Gary Zuckett suggested I contact you. We at PSR are working on issuing a policy statement on safeguarding nuclear waste at reactor sites in the next few weeks and are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position. Attached you will find the Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors. We are really hoping to get at least 1 group from all 50 states on board with our position, and right now we don’t have a representative for West Virginia. The Obama administration has stated, in its opposition to Yucca Mountain, that it will be reevaluating nuclear waste policy in the U.S. so it is a critical time to make a statement in support of safe and sane waste management practices. It would be fantastic if West Virginia Environmental Council could sign on and if you would like to forward this statement to other groups you work with, that would be great too. We’re hoping to issue these to the public next week, so the sooner you can reply, the better. Morgan Pinnell Safe Energy Program Coordinator Physicians for Social Responsibility Phone: 202-587-5232 Email: mpinnell@psr.org -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC@osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec
-
Beth Little -
James Kotcon -
Jim Sconyers -
kevin fooce