ALL
BECAUSE I WAS OUT OF TOWN FOR THREE WEEKS, AND WANTED TO BE SURE I HADN'T MISSED A FILING, I EARLIER TODAY CALLED PHIL MELICK, THE LEAD ATTY AT JACKSON KELLY IN THE TRAIL CASE AT THE PSC, TO ASK IF THEY EITHER HAD FILED, OR INTENDED TO FILE, AN OPPOSITION TO THE SIERRA CLUB'S PETITION TO INTERVENE.
PHIL CALLED BACK A MOMENT AGO TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT PLAN TO OPPOSE THE SIERRA CLUB'S INTERVENTION, BASED IN LARGE PART ON THEIR RESPECT FOR THE CLUB AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION.
GIVEN THE FACT THAT THEY'VE OPPOSED VIRTUALLY ALL PETITIONS, INCLUDING (I THINK) THE PETITION TO INTERVENE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE, I GUESS I AM SURPRISED.
IN ANY EVENT, IT'S A PLUS.
SEE YOU ON AUG 11
BILL
I noticed the absence on the PSC web page, but did not particularly want to call their attention to it.
The more interesting one is the CPV Warren intervention. If a gas-fired power plant in Virginia intervenes, it creates the potential for the relative air pollution impacts to be addressed.
We may be coming up on a deadline for "Interogatories". Is this something we should develop? It would be very interesting to see Allegheny's response to any questions related to greenhouse gases, or the impact of carbon taxes on the economics of the line.
JBK
"William V. DePaulo, Esq." william.depaulo@gmail.com 8/1/2007 2:30 PM >>>
ALL
BECAUSE I WAS OUT OF TOWN FOR THREE WEEKS, AND WANTED TO BE SURE I HADN'T MISSED A FILING, I EARLIER TODAY CALLED PHIL MELICK, THE LEAD ATTY AT JACKSON KELLY IN THE TRAIL CASE AT THE PSC, TO ASK IF THEY EITHER HAD FILED, OR INTENDED TO FILE, AN OPPOSITION TO THE SIERRA CLUB'S PETITION TO INTERVENE.
PHIL CALLED BACK A MOMENT AGO TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT PLAN TO OPPOSE THE SIERRA CLUB'S INTERVENTION, BASED IN LARGE PART ON THEIR RESPECT FOR THE CLUB AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION.
GIVEN THE FACT THAT THEY'VE OPPOSED VIRTUALLY ALL PETITIONS, INCLUDING (I THINK) THE PETITION TO INTERVENE OF THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE, I GUESS I AM SURPRISED.
IN ANY EVENT, IT'S A PLUS.
SEE YOU ON AUG 11
BILL