- EC - lists.bikelover.org

[Fwd: Fwd: New PA Water / Permit Process]
by Regina Hendrix 24 Aug '08

24 Aug '08

FYI.

1 0

PA DECISION AGAINST TRAILCO - 18 MEG
by William DePaulo via YouSendIt 22 Aug '08

22 Aug '08

You have a priority delivery from YouSendIt 364 PAGES OF "JUST SAYING NO" TO TRAILCO Click here to download file: https://rcpt.yousendit.com/599707339/3560ef5a9849a702f9296bcc2ec5bc71 Sent by: william.depaulo(a)gmail.com File to pick up: 1019983.pdf File will remain active for: 14 Days File too big for email? Try at http://www.yousendit.com YouSendIt Inc. : http://www.yousendit.com Terms of Service: http://www.yousendit.com/cms/termsofservice Privacy Policy : http://www.yousendit.com/cms/privacypolicy DMCA Policy: http://www.yousendit.com/cms/dmca Opt Out: http://www.yousendit.com/blocking.php?action=optout&email=EC@osenergy.org&k…

1 0

Re: [EC] Fw: TrailCo NMF revised
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

Holly Both FOIA requests were filed under the state FOIA which is almost a verbatim reproduction of the federal statute. In short, we do not have an option to sue anywhere except in state court. PSC - requested all documents pertaining to the April 15, 2008 Joint Stipulation -- the document in which PSC Staff withdrew its opposition in exchange for a laundry list of financial and other incentives. PSC Staff produced all documents (1100+) responsive to request, as did CAD (700+). The Commissioners produced a relatively small number of documents and issued a Vaughn index for the balance. Without seeing the docs it is impossible to assess whether the exemptions asserted -- deliberative privilege for internal communications -- is validly asserted. GOVERNOR - requested ALL documents pertaining to TrAILCo proposal, not merely those relating to April 15 Joint Stip. Governor produced 1100+ documents, most relating to tax he wants to impose on the transmission line if and when built. Importantly, the Gov office refused to produce a Vaughn index. Without such an index they cannot sustain their burden of proof, as all documents are presumed non-exempt unless and until an exemption is asserted and substantiated by an index. PSC Appeal -- far and away the biggest matter the PSC did not address was CO2 emissions. The PSC took the position that the proposed transmission line was "electron neutral," i.e., that the line didn't "know" where the moving electron originated. That, of course, is technically true. In West Virginia it is also totally specious because 97% of the state's electric energy is generated from coal. And the PSC's August 1 order itself relied on the economic justification associated with 4 billion dollars of construction costs for four (4) new IGCC coal plants now on the drawing boards. The PSC also totally ignored the fact that all of the purported economic benefits associated with the increased use of coal will be converted to economic leg weights when the impact of a now certain cap and trade system (or carbon tax of some sort) is adopted next year. I want to emphasize that we don't have any slack time on the appeal or preparation for PATH. TrAILCo's transcript is 3,000 pages long. I lived thru it live but I still need to serve up the case to the Supreme Court, because the PSC has intentionally buried all of the evidence in a 183-page behemoth of a decision issued on August 1. We need to go now. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Bill On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:40 PM, <Holly.Bressett(a)sierraclub.org> wrote: > > Thanks, Bill. I will need some more information regarding the FOIA > appeals. For example, what did you request and what did you receive and > what was witheld (or can you even tell what was witheld)? Did the agencies > assert any privileges or exemptions? If so, were they lawfully invoked or > do you believe the exemptions are being abused. Are we actually bringing > suit under FOIA, or the state's public records law. If it is FOIA, wouldn't > you want to file in federal court? As for the appeal of the PSC's decision, > you make note that the environmental impacts were not properly considered. > Could you elaborate? What was considered, what was not, and what law are > you relying on? > > Jim, at this point, I am still investigating the legal claims (as you can > see above). I didn't get the sense that we needed immediate approval since > the PSC's decision is not even final yet, and when it becomes final, we have > 30 days. If there is a reason to file sooner, please let me know. It is my > understanding that you are going to be talking with Aaron Isherwood about > how the National Coal Campaign may be able to help with this and the PATH > transmission line. I'll follow up with him if it impacts the Supreme Court > appeal and/or the FOIA appeals. Thanks to you both, > > Holly > > Holly Bressett > Environmental Law Fellow > Sierra Club Environmental Law Program > 85 Second St., 2nd Floor > San Francisco, CA 94105 > (415) 977-5646 (phone) > (415) 977-5793 (fax) > > > *"William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>* > > 08/21/2008 10:01 AM > To > Holly.Bressett(a)sierraclub.org cc > "Jim Sconyers" <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> > Subject > Re: Fw: TrailCo NMF revised > > > > > Holly > > Here is a revised NMF which I hope is responsive to your requests. Please > let me know if you have any additional questions or topics you'd like > fleshed out in more detail. > > All the best, > > Bill > > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, <*Holly.Bressett(a)sierraclub.org*<Holly.Bressett(a)sierraclub.org>> > wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > Jim has attached the new matter form and I'm hoping you can supplement it > with our legal strategy. I'm confused about the FOIA appeals and the > Supreme Court appeal so I was hoping you could separate everything and give > me a clear description of the legal claims. If you are anticipating actual > FOIA lawsuits in conjunction with all of this let me know, it may make sense > to do one authorization for all the legal challenges. Thanks, > > Holly > > Holly Bressett > Environmental Law Fellow > Sierra Club Environmental Law Program > 85 Second St., 2nd Floor > San Francisco, CA 94105 > (415) 977-5646 (phone) > (415) 977-5793 (fax) > ----- Forwarded by Holly Bressett/Sierraclub on 08/20/2008 11:51 AM ----- > *Jim Sconyers <**jim_scon(a)yahoo.com* <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>*>* > > 08/14/2008 07:41 AM > > To > Holly Bressett <*holly.bressett(a)sierraclub.org*<holly.bressett(a)sierraclub.org> > > cc > aaron isherwood <*aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org*<aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> > > Subject > TrailCo NMF revised > > > > > > > Here is a revised version of our TrailCo powerline NMF. It still needs to > go to our ExCom for certain approval. > > Jim Sconyers* > **jim_scon(a)yahoo.com* <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> > 603.969.6712 > > Remember: Mother Nature bats last. > > > > > -- > William V. DePaulo, Esq. > 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 > Charleston, WV 25301-2163 > Tel: 304-342-5588 > Fax: 304-342-5505* > **william.depaulo(a)gmail.com* <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>* > **www.passeggiata.com* <http://www.passeggiata.com/> > -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Re: [EC] TrailCo PATH NIETC conf call
by Jim Sconyers 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

OK - 6:00 PM tomorrow. Jim K, does that work for you? Aaron - can you set up the conference call and reply-all with call-in info, please? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: "aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org" <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:37:36 PM Subject: Re: TrailCo PATH NIETC conf call 6 or 7 pm ET tomorrow would work for me. Shall we say 6 pm ET? Aaron Isherwood Senior Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second Street, 2d Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Phone: (415) 977-5680 Fax: (415) 977-5793 CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply to the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> 08/20/2008 01:32 PM To aaron isherwood <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> cc Subject TrailCo PATH NIETC conf call Hi Aaron - So far we have 3 votes for tomorrow evening, none for anything else. Does that work for you? The replies are from the folks who are currently involved - me, im Kotcon, and Bill DePaulo. If OK, pick a time - Jim K said evening, which would be your late afternoon. As soon as we know, I can send the call in info to all who may be interested. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

3 3

Fw: Friday meeting
by Jim Sconyers 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

another route to Shot Cherry - easier from Elkins direction Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; Matt Keller <matt_keller(a)tws.org>; monwimmer(a)gmail.com; Michael Price <greyhawkwv(a)verizon.net>; mwimmer(a)hsc.wvu.edu Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:11:00 PM Subject: RE: Friday meeting If you're coming up Rt 28 from the south, it's much shorter to take FR 112 on the top of Allegheny Mountain. It means several miles on a gravel road, but it is pretty well maintained, and you stay on top of the mountain and avoid going down and back up again. FR 112 comes to a 3 way intersection where you take a right turn (you can see Spruce Lake off to the left) and the lane to Shot Cherry is just a short way on the right. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Sconyers [mailto:jim_scon@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:05 PM To: Matt Keller; monwimmer(a)gmail.com; blittle(a)citynet.net; Michael Price; mwimmer(a)hsc.wvu.edu Subject: Re: Friday meeting We're planning a free-ranging, not-very-structured conversation for Friday evening 6:00 before we turn into werewolves. Then the topics will be on the formal ExCom agenda on Saturday. Agenda and other info attached. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Matt Keller <matt_keller(a)tws.org> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; monwimmer(a)gmail.com; blittle(a)citynet.net; Michael Price <greyhawkwv(a)verizon.net>; mwimmer(a)hsc.wvu.edu Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:13:30 AM Subject: Friday meeting Hi Folks, Just wanted to check in on the status of our potential discussion of wilderness, mon issues and wvsc at Shott Cherry this weekend. If we have critical mass for the discussion, I can be there for Friday evening and Saturday morning, but will have to head out before lunch on Saturday. I am glad to give folks a comprehensive update on what is going on with the various endeavors the coalition is moving into beyond the Wild Mon campaign, which remains our top priority and will likely extend in to 2009 unless we get lucky. I can explain the details of what’s going on. My hope for our discussion would be for us to find common ground beyond Wild Mon regarding public lands protection issues that the coalition can continue to work on in its current configuration. I’m a firm believer that combining forces to work on these issues will be our most effective path. Anyway, I think its good timing to have this discussion now. I do think that having Beth, Mary and Mike be a part of this conversation is absolutely critical. Thanks and let me know what you all think….Friday is coming up pretty darn quick. Matt ____________________________ Matt Keller Wilderness Campaign Associate Director The Wilderness Society's Wilderness Support Center 304.864.5530 (office) 304.692.6750 (mobile) 866.422.6896 (fax) matt_keller(a)tws.org ***Please note new email address. I will no longer be using matt.keller(a)wvwild.org.***

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] RAN Bird-dogs Citi's Mucky Muck at Clean Energy Conf.]
by Regina Hendrix 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

Interesting.

1 0

Re: [EC] TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines
by Jim Sconyers 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

I'm open tomorrow 8/21 and all next week. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> To: Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Karen Grubb <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; ec(a)osenergy.org Cc: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Jim <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:25:14 AM Subject: Fw: TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines Interested? Next week sometime (Aaron's on Pacific time)? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org" <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Cc: regina1936(a)verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:53:47 PM Subject: TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines Jim and Regina: Re Jim's note below, I'd like to set up a call to discuss these projects with you, and whoever else you think should be on the call, to learn more about these projects and with an eye toward whether the national Club might be able to provide some funding assistance. Please let me know what days/times would be best. On my end, Thursday looks good, or net week sometime. Aaron Aaron Isherwood Senior Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second Street, 2d Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Phone: (415) 977-5680 Fax: (415) 977-5793 CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply to the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> 08/15/2008 08:53 AM To aaron isherwood <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> cc Subject Note to Aaron- * * * * We are working hard, and with limited success, to fund two of our top state initiatives, the TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines. These are critical, ongoing, costly, and of high significance to state and national SC priorities on coal and global warming. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Updatd ExCom agenda 8.2008
by Jim Sconyers 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

Hi folks- Attached is a "final" ExCom agenda for the meeting at Shot Cherry this weekend. Also: I'd like to get head counts for the meeting and meals. Please put an X in all appropriate boxes below and reply this to me. I [ ] will [ ] will not attend the meeting Saturday. Include me for the following meals. [ ] Saturday breakfast [ ] Saturday supper [ ] Sunday breakfast Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; ec(a)osenergy.org; Mary Davis <mdavis(a)hsc.wvu.edu>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Rodger Dotson <bhaddaka(a)yahoo.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; Sally Wilts <sallywilts(a)yahoo.com>; Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Nate Askins <nate.askins(a)gmail.com>; Mary Wimmer <monwimmer(a)gmail.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; Karen Grubb <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)Verizon.net>; Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Jim <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; Karen Grubb <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)Verizon.net>; Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 5:45:12 PM Subject: Updatd ExCom agenda 8.2008 Here is an updated agenda for the upcoming ExCom meeting. Note that it's a pretty full agenda. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] How Wind Farms May Really Replace Coal Mining]
by Regina Hendrix 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

Have you seen Peter Slavin's great article on Coal River Wind? Click on the link at the top and see the video. Peter mentions Sierra Club in the article. Incidentally, Peter has written an article about Blair Mountain and I don't think he's found a publisher yet. If you have any ideas, let him know. Regina

2 1

Fw: TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines
by Jim Sconyers 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

Interested? Next week sometime (Aaron's on Pacific time)? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org" <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Cc: regina1936(a)verizon.net Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:53:47 PM Subject: TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines Jim and Regina: Re Jim's note below, I'd like to set up a call to discuss these projects with you, and whoever else you think should be on the call, to learn more about these projects and with an eye toward whether the national Club might be able to provide some funding assistance. Please let me know what days/times would be best. On my end, Thursday looks good, or net week sometime. Aaron Aaron Isherwood Senior Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second Street, 2d Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Phone: (415) 977-5680 Fax: (415) 977-5793 CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply to the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> 08/15/2008 08:53 AM To aaron isherwood <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> cc Subject Note to Aaron- * * * * We are working hard, and with limited success, to fund two of our top state initiatives, the TrailCo and PATH NIETC power lines. These are critical, ongoing, costly, and of high significance to state and national SC priorities on coal and global warming. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

3 2

Fwd: court decision on sierra club v EPA and API .... clean air
by James Kotcon 20 Aug '08

20 Aug '08

This is a pretty significant ruling. The Appeals Court holds that the Clean Air Act requires that Title V Operating permits must have monitoring requirements adequate to assure that emissions limits are enforceable. EPA was proposing a rule that said that, if the existing monitoring requirements were inadequate, states could not impose more stringent ones. The Court finds that EPA has an obligation to require enforceable permits, and that if EPA has not promulgated enforceable monitoring requirements by rule, states can do so (and may be required to do so by the Clean Air Act?) when issuing permits on a case-by-case basis. Thanks Don! JBK >>> <DSGJr(a)aol.com> 8/20/2008 9:21 AM >>> ____________________________________ From: Kjm2 To: DSGJr, SubraCom Sent: 8/20/2008 6:50:29 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time Subj: court decision on sierra club v EPA and API .... clean air _http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200808/04-1243-1133914.pdf_ (http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200808/04-1243-1133914.pdf) ____________________________________ _Get the MapQuest Toolbar_ (http://mapquest.com/toolbar?ncid=mpqmap00050000000010) . Directions, Traffic, Gas Prices & More! **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here. (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)

1 0

Re: [EC] PATH Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline
by Regina Hendrix 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

Debbie, I'm cc-ing the Sierra Club's Energy Committee about your concerns and will have someone get it touch with you. Sierra Club has been actively opposing Trail and we are gearing up to fight PATH. Such a dirty deal for all West Virginians!! I live in Charleston and in my part of the state we are plagued with mountaintop removal and pollution from coal-fired generating plants. We are already exporting 70% of the electricity generated in WV. If these lines are allowed to be built, demand for coal will increase and more power plants will be needed to generate more electricity for the East Coast....... Regina Hendrix 304-343-5211 P.S. Will someone on the Energy Committee get in touch with Debbie. Kenneth Redfern wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first time I have ever written to an organization about > matters like this. > > I need your group's help or guidance in what steps I can take as a > concerned resident of Berkeley County WV. > > An open house for the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) > was held on August 6th in Martinsburg, WV. > > This was not a public forum but a meet and greet "the proposed high > power transmission line that may be in your backyard" meeting. > > I have been watching the PATH website for maps of the proposed routes > for these lines and they never had them on their website until recently. > > I have been worried about this high power transmission line from when > I first heard about this project about 1 to 2 years ago. > > The area I live in is in the bulls eye of a couple of proposed > routes. I do not live in an unpopulated area so these routes would > affect many residents in this area of Berkeley County. > > But actually most of these routes in Berkeley County are in populated > areas. > > We live in a beautiful area of Berkeley County that has beautiful > views of the mountains, that would be marred by this transmission > line. Also looking at these proposed routes these lines will > literally be in people's backyards. > > Even though the transmission line will not be in my backyard it will > still be in the area I live. > > I would like to compose a handout to make my neighbors more aware of > the possibility of this happening in our area. > > I received the Mountain State Sierran that had an article about PATH > but I cannot find it. > > Could you please offer some guidance in who to get in touch with about > my concerns and if you have any information that could help me in this > endeavor. > > I hope to hear from you soon, we don't have much time to voice our > concerns. > > I copied the paragraph below from the PATH website: > > These maps are designed to help property owners and other interested > parties learn more about the alternatives under consideration for the > line segments. The specific line route has not been selected. The > companies expect to determine the exact proposed route of the line by > late fall of 2008. > Thank you, > > Debbie Redfern > 304 Duchess Way > Martinsburg, WV 25403 > > > >

2 2

[Fwd: Fwd: Water Decision]
by Regina Hendrix 19 Aug '08

19 Aug '08

FYI. This comes from my friends, John and Sally Snyder. They have drilling on their property right now and they're quite concerned. There's a slide show at: http://www.wvsoro.org/galleries/index.php?spgmGal=gas_well_drilling

2 1

Re: [EC] Updatd ExCom agenda 8.2008
by Jim Sconyers 18 Aug '08

18 Aug '08

Meeting times added. Early start times reflect full agenda and overnight accommodations. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: "Grubb, Karen" <Karen.Grubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; ec(a)osenergy.org; Mary Davis <mdavis(a)hsc.wvu.edu>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Rodger Dotson <bhaddaka(a)yahoo.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; Sally Wilts <sallywilts(a)yahoo.com>; Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Nate Askins <nate.askins(a)gmail.com>; Mary Wimmer <monwimmer(a)gmail.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)verizon.net>; Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)verizon.net>; Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 11:33:07 AM Subject: RE: Updatd ExCom agenda 8.2008 What are the times for the meetings? From:Jim Sconyers [mailto:jim_scon@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 5:45 PM To: Jim Sconyers; ec(a)osenergy.org; Mary Davis; Barbara Fallon; Rodger Dotson; Jim Kotcon; Paul Wilson; Sally Wilts; Regina Hendrix; Nate Askins; Mary Wimmer; Beth Little; Bill Price; Dave Saville; Allan Tweddle; Autumn; Barbara Fallon; Beth Little; Bill DePaulo; Dave Saville; Duane Nichols; Jim Kotcon; Kate Stone; Paul Wilson; Regina Hendrix; Jonathan Rosenbaum; Grubb, Karen; Mike Price; Sandra Cress; Bill DePaulo; Jim; Jonathan Rosenbaum; Grubb, Karen; Mike Price; Sandra Cress Subject: Updatd ExCom agenda 8.2008 Here is an updated agenda for the upcoming ExCom meeting. Note that it's a pretty full agenda. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Re: [EC] Excom: Resolutions and State of Chapter
by Jim Sconyers 18 Aug '08

18 Aug '08

note below Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> To: duane330(a)aol.com; freesource(a)cheat.org; klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu; blittle(a)citynet.net; kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu; monwimmer(a)gmail.com; nate.askins(a)gmail.com; pjgrunt(a)gmail.com; sandra.cress(a)gmail.com; william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; mdavis(a)hsc.wvu.edu; daves(a)labyrinth.net; allantweddle(a)msn.com; bill.price(a)sierraclub.org; greyhawkwv(a)verizon.net; regina1936(a)verizon.net; carve(a)wirefire.com; jkotcon(a)wvu.edu; bhaddaka(a)yahoo.com; brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com; jim_scon(a)yahoo.com; sallywilts(a)yahoo.com Cc: ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 7:02:07 PM Subject: Re: Excom: Resolutions and State of Chapter Jonathon, et al. The "Resolutions" process appears to be the work of a bureaucratic mindset from people who have too little to do and too big an impression of their own power. Unless someone can convince me that this is truly needed, I recommend that we oppose this. My main concern is that this is the type of thing that old-timers would develop to stifle dissent and inhibit newcomers. Volunteers who are primarily focussed on saving the planet have better things to do with their time than file the proper paeprwork in triplicate two hours in advance of the meeting. I am sure they mean well, but one of the things our Chapter needs is less time spent on this kind of bureaucracy, and more time spent on advancing environmental protection activities. With regard to the Chapter assessment, we have some very good goals, but we need more help in translating complex technical/legal issues into grass-roots volunteer-building campaigns.I ditto this sentiment 200%. We need more than lawsuits and complex testimony etc. We need to activate the people. The Wilderness Campaign was doing that, and we have been making some progress with other grassroots groups on energy issues, but mostly we are on the defensive against what the other guys are doing, and need to find ways to work our issues on the turf where we are strongest. Waiting for Allegheny and AEP to file an application on PATH is not a good way to win those battles, as we will spend the bulk of our resources in an arena where the other side has all the aces. Hope these tidbits help. I will not be able to attend the ExCom next weekend. JBK >>> Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org> 08/15/08 3:19 PM >>> I am the Delegate for WVSC to the Annual Sierra Club Council Meeting this September. Attached are two documents. The first, INFO_ResolutionsProcess.pdf describes the procedure to apply in writing a Resolution that would be submitted to National at the meeting. If there is a resolution you'd really like to see passed on a National level, this is a great opportunity, so please bring it to the next ExCom, and email it to both Jim Sconyers and me, regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. The second, State-of-the-Chapter.pdf, explains what information National wants about the State of our Chapter, i.e., Conservation Goals, Working Relationships, Budget & Finances, and Other Resource Needs. Please bring input on the various areas that apply to you at the next ExCom meeting, and email both Jim and me regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. This is another great opportunity to express to National what we as a Chapter need in order to succeed. Thanks! -Jonathan

1 0

Re: [EC] Excom: Resolutions and State of Chapter
by Michael Price 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

I agree with Jim. We have in the USW a simular way of submiting resolutions for the International Conventions. And belive me it is almost impossible to get any resolution passed. The ExComm of the USW rejects 99% of resolutions. mike ===================== From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> Date: 2008/08/17 Sun PM 07:02:07 EDT To: duane330(a)aol.com, freesource(a)cheat.org, klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu, blittle(a)citynet.net, kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu, monwimmer(a)gmail.com, nate.askins(a)gmail.com, pjgrunt(a)gmail.com, sandra.cress(a)gmail.com, william.depaulo(a)gmail.com, mdavis(a)hsc.wvu.edu, daves(a)labyrinth.net, allantweddle(a)msn.com, bill.price(a)sierraclub.org, greyhawkwv(a)verizon.net, regina1936(a)verizon.net, carve(a)wirefire.com, jkotcon(a)wvu.edu, bhaddaka(a)yahoo.com, brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com, jim_scon(a)yahoo.com, sallywilts(a)yahoo.com Cc: ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: Excom: Resolutions and State of Chapter Jonathon, et al. The "Resolutions" process appears to be the work of a bureaucratic mindset from people who have too little to do and too big an impression of their own power. Unless someone can convince me that this is truly needed, I recommend that we oppose this. My main concern is that this is the type of thing that old-timers would develop to stifle dissent and inhibit newcomers. Volunteers who are primarily focussed on saving the planet have better things to do with their time than file the proper paeprwork in triplicate two hours in advance of the meeting. I am sure they mean well, but one of the things our Chapter needs is less time spent on this kind of bureaucracy, and more time spent on advancing environmental protection activities. With regard to the Chapter assessment, we have some very good goals, but we need more help in translating complex technical/legal issues into grass-roots volunteer-building campaigns. The Wilderness Campaign was doing that, and we have been making some progress with other grassroots groups on energy issues, but mostly we are on the defensive against what the other guys are doing, and need to find ways to work our issues on the turf where we are strongest. Waiting for Allegheny and AEP to file an application on PATH is not a good way to win those battles, as we will spend the bulk of our resources in an arena where the other side has all the aces. Hope these tidbits help. I will not be able to attend the ExCom next weekend. JBK >>> Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org> 08/15/08 3:19 PM >>> I am the Delegate for WVSC to the Annual Sierra Club Council Meeting this September. Attached are two documents. The first, INFO_ResolutionsProcess.pdf describes the procedure to apply in writing a Resolution that would be submitted to National at the meeting. If there is a resolution you'd really like to see passed on a National level, this is a great opportunity, so please bring it to the next ExCom, and email it to both Jim Sconyers and me, regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. The second, State-of-the-Chapter.pdf, explains what information National wants about the State of our Chapter, i.e., Conservation Goals, Working Relationships, Budget & Finances, and Other Resource Needs. Please bring input on the various areas that apply to you at the next ExCom meeting, and email both Jim and me regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. This is another great opportunity to express to National what we as a Chapter need in order to succeed. Thanks! -Jonathan

1 0

Re: [EC] ExCom draft agenda 8.2008
by Regina Hendrix 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

FYI, I've had several calls regarding the Marcellus Shale drilling. I heard from a lady in Pendleton County, Lou Ann Smith. She is very concerned and is organizing in her area. I understand from talking with her today that Clarke Barnes and Mike Ross have gotten involved and are meeting with people in the area. Unfortunately, Lou Ann does not have an E-Mail contact. Regina Jim Sconyers wrote: > Attached is a draft agenda for the upcoming WVSC ExCom meeting. Please > let me know of any additions or changes. > > Jim Sconyers > jim_scon(a)yahoo.com > 603.969.6712 > > Remember: Mother Nature bats last. > >

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Progressive Dems of WV's Front Page: Coal River Wind]
by Regina Hendrix 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

FYI

1 0

[Fwd: Re: [fom] Hobet mine permit deal approved; Layoffs averted at mountaintop-removal site on Boone-Lincoln county line]
by Regina Hendrix 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

Much, much anger about what Patriot did! This is the second time we've been had like this. This is what we can expect unless we get a 30-day review period before the permit is issued. Even so, I predict they'll be looking for ways to circumvent that. I sure hope we can effectively monitor the selenium. Regina

1 0

Re: [EC] Excom: Resolutions and State of Chapter
by James Kotcon 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

Jonathon, et al. The "Resolutions" process appears to be the work of a bureaucratic mindset from people who have too little to do and too big an impression of their own power. Unless someone can convince me that this is truly needed, I recommend that we oppose this. My main concern is that this is the type of thing that old-timers would develop to stifle dissent and inhibit newcomers. Volunteers who are primarily focussed on saving the planet have better things to do with their time than file the proper paeprwork in triplicate two hours in advance of the meeting. I am sure they mean well, but one of the things our Chapter needs is less time spent on this kind of bureaucracy, and more time spent on advancing environmental protection activities. With regard to the Chapter assessment, we have some very good goals, but we need more help in translating complex technical/legal issues into grass-roots volunteer-building campaigns. The Wilderness Campaign was doing that, and we have been making some progress with other grassroots groups on energy issues, but mostly we are on the defensive against what the other guys are doing, and need to find ways to work our issues on the turf where we are strongest. Waiting for Allegheny and AEP to file an application on PATH is not a good way to win those battles, as we will spend the bulk of our resources in an arena where the other side has all the aces. Hope these tidbits help. I will not be able to attend the ExCom next weekend. JBK >>> Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org> 08/15/08 3:19 PM >>> I am the Delegate for WVSC to the Annual Sierra Club Council Meeting this September. Attached are two documents. The first, INFO_ResolutionsProcess.pdf describes the procedure to apply in writing a Resolution that would be submitted to National at the meeting. If there is a resolution you'd really like to see passed on a National level, this is a great opportunity, so please bring it to the next ExCom, and email it to both Jim Sconyers and me, regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. The second, State-of-the-Chapter.pdf, explains what information National wants about the State of our Chapter, i.e., Conservation Goals, Working Relationships, Budget & Finances, and Other Resource Needs. Please bring input on the various areas that apply to you at the next ExCom meeting, and email both Jim and me regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. This is another great opportunity to express to National what we as a Chapter need in order to succeed. Thanks! -Jonathan

1 0

Fwd: PATH meeting in Berkeley County
by James Kotcon 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

Route for PATH Causes Static Morgan residents voice concern over proposed power line By Jenni Vincent / Journal Staff Writer POSTED: August 15, 2008 (javascript:PopupPic('Photo=509411_1.jpg')) Citizen activist Jerry Berman receives many positive responses Thursday night from people who share his concerns about the proposed Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline. Berman is shown seated at right while talking to people at an open house in Morgan County. (Journal photo by Jenni Vincent) Editor's note: An article with the response of electric utility officials who attended Thursday night's open house on the proposed Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline is scheduled to be published in Saturday's edition of The Journal. BERKELEY SPRINGS - Citizen activist Jerry Berman was constantly busy at Thursday night's informational session on the proposed Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, handing out cards to others who share his concerns about the new high-voltage power line. "You know, the electric utilities may have thought that they could just schedule this meeting at the last minute and slip it through - that no one living here would have much to say about this power line," Berman said. "But they thought wrong. We are not going to the take the path of least resistance, we're not going to take the PATH at all," he said, pausing as he gestured toward a large pile of cards filled out by people asking for additional information on the power line. Berman, who was wearing a name card that read "Citizens Against PATH," wasn't the only citizen protesting at the event. Organizers said people started arriving well before the event officially began at 5 p.m. The Homestead Restaurant - where the open house took place - was quickly filled up and folks parked all the way down the long driveway to where it meets U.S. 522. There was a line of residents waiting to enter the restaurant, with many people waiting 45 minutes or more outside as they waited their turn. Abby Chapple of the Friends of the Cacapon River worked alongside Berman, giving out literature highlighting the region's historical and natural resources. Working together, the pair urged dozens of folks to sign an online petition against the proposed power line that would run from St. Albans, near Charleston, to the Bedington substation northeast of Martinsburg. It would then continue from Bedington to a new substation to be built at Kemptown, southeast of Frederick, Md. PATH, at an estimated cost of $1.8 billion, is a joint venture by Allegheny Energy and American Electric Power. Chapple, former president and current vice president/treasurer of the Friends of the Cacapon River, said she's seen enough about the power line's possible route to be worried about its impact. "The way it may go up along the west side of Cacapon Mountain would be a disaster because it would hit something like 50 little streams. That would be just disastrous for the Cacapon River," Chapple said. "Also Route 9 is the Washington Heritage Trail, so it is historic and they shouldn't be allowed to impact that in any way," she said. "Beyond that, all the way over to Sidling Hill, it will impact the viewshed and be absolutely a disaster." If a new power line is constructed, the "corridor" of an existing line should be used, Chapple said. "We are going to demand that PATH stay on its present path. No new path for PATH," she said. Although pleased with Thursday night's response, Chapple said that she's working to get 5,000 signatures, "to show the company that we know what's going on with their proposal." The online petition can be found at _www.thepetitionsite.com._ (http://www.thepetitionsite.com./) Under search petitions, "PATH" can be typed in, in order to find the one sponsored by Friends of the Cacapon River. Close by on Thursday, protester Laura Steepleton of Berkeley Springs held a sign that read "Keep West Virginia Wild and Wonderful." Steepleton said she has a wide range of concerns, including the proposed power line's impact on nature as well as people's homes. She agreed that it represents a potential threat to the Cacapon River, especially since construction work may send sediment into its waters. "And I can't help but have my concerns about the electromagnetic field associated with a high-voltage line like this one," she said. "They say it's no more than your household appliance but I have a hard time believing that." Vernon Estel, Allegheny Energy's director of transmission projects, said it is important to remember that no final decisions have been made on PATH's route. His counterpart, Ron Poff of American Electric Power, said that might not happen until late this year. The utility officials hope to file an application with the state Public Service Commission, including the "preferred route," in December. "But the final decision, including the route for PATH, will be up to the commission members," Poff said. **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/cars-Volkswagen-Jetta-2009/expert-review?ncid=aolaut00… )

1 0

Updatd ExCom agenda 8.2008
by Jim Sconyers 17 Aug '08

17 Aug '08

Here is an updated agenda for the upcoming ExCom meeting. Note that it's a pretty full agenda. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Excom: Resolutions and State of Chapter
by Jonathan Rosenbaum 15 Aug '08

15 Aug '08

I am the Delegate for WVSC to the Annual Sierra Club Council Meeting this September. Attached are two documents. The first, INFO_ResolutionsProcess.pdf describes the procedure to apply in writing a Resolution that would be submitted to National at the meeting. If there is a resolution you'd really like to see passed on a National level, this is a great opportunity, so please bring it to the next ExCom, and email it to both Jim Sconyers and me, regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. The second, State-of-the-Chapter.pdf, explains what information National wants about the State of our Chapter, i.e., Conservation Goals, Working Relationships, Budget & Finances, and Other Resource Needs. Please bring input on the various areas that apply to you at the next ExCom meeting, and email both Jim and me regardless of whether or not you can attend the ExCom. This is another great opportunity to express to National what we as a Chapter need in order to succeed. Thanks! -Jonathan

1 0

FW: [wvec-board] APCO to buy electricity from Greenbrier wind farm
by Grubb, Karen 14 Aug '08

14 Aug '08

From: wvec-board(a)yahoogroups.com [mailto:wvec-board@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Frank Young Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:56 AM To: wvec-board(a)yahoogroups.com; WVHCBOARD(a)yahoogroups.com Cc: Duane330(a)aol.com; Bill DePaulo Subject: [wvec-board] APCO to buy electricity from Greenbrier wind farm APCO to buy electricity from Greenbrier wind farm By The Associated Press <mailto:> CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Appalachian Power Co. plans to buy electricity from a wind farm that's being developed in Greenbrier County. Appalachian Power's parent, Columbus, Ohio-based American Electric Power, announced the 20-year purchase agreement with Beech Ridge Energy LLC on Thursday. AEP says Appalachian Power plans to buy between and 100 and 147 megawatts, the entire output of the 186-megawatt project's first phase. The deal is subject to approval from the state Public Service Commission. AEP says it also hinges on renewal of the federal production tax credit for renewable energy for 2009. http://www.wvgazette.com/latest/200808140288

1 0

Mitchell plant "declarants"
by Jim Sconyers 14 Aug '08

14 Aug '08

Hi folks- We (WVSC) need "declarants" for the Mitchell plant lawsuit - power plant violating selenium limits. Declarant means someone reasonably local who could be affected by the violation - in essence anyone residing nearby. The Mitchell plant is in Cresap, WV, which is about 5 miles from Moundsville. Question: do you know anyone who fits the above description? If so could you let me know please? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

2 1

Fw: Hobet 22 lawsuit - good news!
by Jim Sconyers 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

<note from SC attorney Aaron Isherwood - we need letters to editors, online comments, etc. about this important victory in the MTR battles> Hey gang, Many comments have already been posted online reacting to Ken Ward's story about our TRO. From what I've seen, a lot are angry rants. It would be great if folks could submit comments. Naturally, we want to avoid the "jobs vs the envt" frame, and instead advocate solutions (like the Coal River Wind project). Aaron Aaron Isherwood Senior Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second Street, 2d Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Phone: (415) 977-5680 Fax: (415) 977-5793 Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org" <aaron.isherwood(a)sierraclub.org> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; regina1936(a)verizon.net; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> Cc: bpricesc(a)earthlink.net; bill.mccabe(a)sierraclub.org; vafw(a)naxs.net; oliverbernstein(a)austin.rr.com Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 3:36:27 PM Subject: Hobet 22 lawsuit - good news! Dear Jim, Regina and Bill: Sorry for the delay in giving you a report - yesterday was more than a little crazy - but in case you haven't heard, some good news in our case...! This will be tricky because of the threatened union worker lay-offs. Oliver Bernstein with our media team is working with Bill Price and our allies on a press strategy. Also, thought you'd enjoy the article at the bottom - from Virginia. Best, Aaron Aaron Isherwood Senior Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second Street, 2d Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Phone: (415) 977-5680 Fax: (415) 977-5793 CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply to the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200808111074 Judge blocks Hobet mine expansion A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a permit to expand the Hobet 21 mountaintop removal mine along the Boone-Lincoln county line. By Ken Ward Jr. Staff writer A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a permit to expand the Hobet 21 mountaintop removal mine along the Boone-Lincoln county line. U.S. District Judge Robert C. Chambers issued a temporary retraining order requested by the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and other groups. Chambers blocked the permit to allow more time to consider evidence and legal arguments in the latest federal court lawsuit over mountaintop removal coal mining. The judge set a hearing for Aug. 20 to consider whether his ruling should be extended to a longer preliminary injunction. "These are serious and substantial questions and this court is required to consider that," Chambers said during a telephone hearing Monday afternoon. Late last week, environmental group lawyers filed a new suit to try to block the Hobet expansion project, known as Hobet 22. They challenged a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit issued under the federal Clean Water Act, arguing that the corps did not properly consider the mine's impacts or give the public adequate opportunities to comment on the proposal. Corps officials held a 30-day comment period on the mine in late 2006. But key parts of the mine plan - especially details of how Hobet will mitigate the loss of streams harmed by the operation - were not available until a year later. A final version of that mitigation plan was not available until March 2008. "Until the permit is issued, no one knows what is going on," said Joe Lovett, a lawyer for the citizen groups. "The public doesn't have a meaningful opportunity to raise concerns." Corps attorney Ann Navaro told Chambers that the Hobet permit is different from other agency mining authorizations that have been challenged in court. Hobet has not proposed traditional valley fills that typically bury streams at strip-mining operations. A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a permit to expand the Hobet 21 mountaintop removal mine along the Boone-Lincoln county line. U.S. District Judge Robert C. Chambers issued a temporary retraining order requested by the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and other groups. Chambers blocked the permit to allow more time to consider evidence and legal arguments in the latest federal court lawsuit over mountaintop removal coal mining. The judge set a hearing for Aug. 20 to consider whether his ruling should be extended to a longer preliminary injunction. "These are serious and substantial questions and this court is required to consider that," Chambers said during a telephone hearing Monday afternoon. Late last week, environmental group lawyers filed a new suit to try to block the Hobet expansion project, known as Hobet 22. They challenged a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit issued under the federal Clean Water Act, arguing that the corps did not properly consider the mine's impacts or give the public adequate opportunities to comment on the proposal. Corps officials held a 30-day comment period on the mine in late 2006. But key parts of the mine plan - especially details of how Hobet will mitigate the loss of streams harmed by the operation - were not available until a year later. A final version of that mitigation plan was not available until March 2008. "Until the permit is issued, no one knows what is going on," said Joe Lovett, a lawyer for the citizen groups. "The public doesn't have a meaningful opportunity to raise concerns." Corps attorney Ann Navaro told Chambers that the Hobet permit is different from other agency mining authorizations that have been challenged in court. Hobet has not proposed traditional valley fills that typically bury streams at strip-mining operations. The mine would generate about 30.5 million cubic yards of waste rock and dirt. Most of it would be returned to the mined area, to restore it to its approximate original contour. About 3 million cubic yards of excess rock and dirt would be dumped into existing valley fills on adjacent permits. But the Hobet 22 operation would still "permanently eliminate" more than 4.2 miles of streams, according to corps permit documents. Company officials proposed to mitigate this damage with a plan to "reconstruct" and "create" streams once the mining is done. In a previous case, Chambers has found little evidence that such plans work. Hobet lawyer Bob McLusky told Chambers that Hobet the mining complex involved is the largest United Mine Workers operation in West Virginia. McLusky said that up to 300 UMW jobs could be at stake, but did not provide details as to how long mining could continue without the new permit. "I can't tell you there will be people laid off in 10 days, but at some point in an injunction procedure, people will lose their jobs," McLusky said. A UMW lawyer noted a formal appearance at Monday's hearing, but did not otherwise speak. Corps permit records say that Hobet 22 would employ 75 workers, and mine 2.4 million tons of coal over a three-year period. McLusky also told Chambers that "significant work" has already been done at the site, under a state mining permit issued in June 2007 and the corps permit issued Aug. 1. "This site is already substantially disturbed," McLusky said. "You can't un-ring the bell here." August 12, 2008 Judge blocks Hobet mine expansion A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a permit to expand the Hobet 21 mountaintop removal mine along the Boone-Lincoln county line. The mine would generate about 30.5 million cubic yards of waste rock and dirt. Most of it would be returned to the mined area, to restore it to its approximate original contour. About 3 million cubic yards of excess rock and dirt would be dumped into existing valley fills on adjacent permits. But the Hobet 22 operation would still "permanently eliminate" more than 4.2 miles of streams, according to corps permit documents. Company officials proposed to mitigate this damage with a plan to "reconstruct" and "create" streams once the mining is done. In a previous case, Chambers has found little evidence that such plans work. Hobet lawyer Bob McLusky told Chambers that Hobet the mining complex involved is the largest United Mine Workers operation in West Virginia. McLusky said that up to 300 UMW jobs could be at stake, but did not provide details as to how long mining could continue without the new permit. "I can't tell you there will be people laid off in 10 days, but at some point in an injunction procedure, people will lose their jobs," McLusky said. A UMW lawyer noted a formal appearance at Monday's hearing, but did not otherwise speak. Corps permit records say that Hobet 22 would employ 75 workers, and mine 2.4 million tons of coal over a three-year period. McLusky also told Chambers that "significant work" has already been done at the site, under a state mining permit issued in June 2007 and the corps permit issued Aug. 1. "This site is already substantially disturbed," McLusky said. "You can't un-ring the bell here." Reach Ken Ward Jr. at kw...(a)wvgazette.comor 348-1702. August 11, 2008 Bristol Herald Courier An End To Mountaintop Removal Mining? By Debra McCown ABINGDON, Va. – Mountaintop removal could be ended by as early as next year, said a leader in an environmental group working to halt the destructive mining practices. “Now there is an increasingly powerful and vocal national movement to stop mountaintop removal,” said Matt Wasson, an ecologist and director of programs for Appalachian Voices. “I’m saying we’re going to have it stopped by the end of next year ... the end of 2009.” “Mountaintop removal” is, to some, a controversial term. It refers to the blasting away of mountain ridges to get to the coal underneath, a process that evolved with technological advancements over the decades from traditional contour mining. What makes this type of mining cost-effective is a valley-fill permit, which allows the overburden – dirt and rock removed to expose the coal – to be dumped into adjacent valleys. The practice has been criticized as degrading to the environment and hazardous to nearby residents, who must endure the noise, dust and danger of blasting on the mountains above their homes, as well as flooding when stream courses are changed. “Mountaintop removal mining is a national disgrace,” said Aaron Isherwood, staff attorney for the Sierra Club. “If the American people knew what was happening in Appalachia, I feel certain that they would demand an end to this practice.” Coal producers argue that their industry is one of the nation’s most regulated – and as long as they follow regulations, they should be allowed to extract the fuel that fires half of the nation’s electricity generation. Wasson pins his hopes on two distinct possibilities – a pending U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on a West Virginia court case and the election of a new U.S. president who will take office in January. Other activists agree that both have the potential to put a stop to the issuance of new permits for mountaintop removal mining. “I think if we get a new president, It’ll be stopped, and I guess we’re going to get a new president by next year,” said Joe Lovett, director of the Appalachian Center for the Economy and the Environment. Legal ramifications With a long list of plaintiffs and defendants, the West Virginia lawsuit seeks to put a stop to valley-fill permits, which are issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Central to the issue is the question of whether the discard from mining should be considered waste under the 1977 Clean Water Act, which limits the release of pollutants into streams. “I don’t know what will happen in the future,” Lovett said. “I can tell you we haven’t had any significant permits issued since March 2007 because the court found that the federal government was illegally issuing permits at that time.” When a federal court in West Virginia issued an order rescinding permits in question, the permits were sent back to the Corps. The Corps of Engineers contested the ruling in the Richmond appellate court. The case also includes an issue related to sediment discharge. Lovett said three different decisions on valley fills have been overturned by the 4th Circuit since 2000, “but we’re much more optimistic this time.” He said if the appeals court upholds the decision, the federal government, which he said loosened its regulations during the current administration, would have to completely change its permitting processes. “How can they approve the filling of hundreds and a couple thousand miles of mountain streams in this region and say that’s not significantly degrading the water?” Lovett said. “All I can say is the Corps hasn’t been doing its job up until now.” He said in addition to the West Virginia case, which will also affect Virginia, legal action also is under way in Kentucky, and the proposed Ison Rock Ridge mining permit in Wise County, Va., is being watched closely as it moves through the regulatory process, as is the court ruling expected soon in a lawsuit over logging on the site. Andrew Ames, spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, said the four permits remanded back to the Corps were not stopped; they were just sent back for review. “I wouldn’t be able to comment on what we think the 4th Circuit’s going to rule, but that appeal and those four individual permits do not affect the Army Corps’ ability to issue further individual permits, and they have been doing that,” Ames said. “The plaintiffs again have filed suit over those, and that is still in litigation.” Surface mining’s future Mark Taylor, chief of the energy resource section in the regulatory branch for the Corps, said several valley-fill projects have been authorized by his Huntington, W.Va., district since the West Virginia ruling. “Have we issued any coal mining permits since the ruling? Yes, we have. Do we feel it complies with the judge’s ruling? Yes, we do,” Taylor said. “In the regulatory department, we follow the rules and regulations as passed on to us by Congress and ... the judges. … Whatever they decide is what we will do. We are neither for projects nor against projects.” David Spears, policy manager for the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy, said even a ruling from the 4th Circuit favorable to the plaintiffs would not stop all surface mining here. “They would still be able to do traditional surface mining, which is what we call contour surface mining, where they mine around the mountains and reclaim the land when they’re done,” Spears said. “They put the material back up into the mined area.” Barbara Altizer, executive director of the Eastern Coal Council, said if surface mining were stopped, the effect would be catastrophic for the region. “It would be devastating, and not just to Southwest Virginia counties. It would impact Washington County, it would impact the Tri-Cities area. The coal dollar flows in lots of directions,” she said. “There’s so many things that coal is used for.” She said coal has helped the entire nation to grow and prosper, and, along with providing relatively inexpensive energy, it could be the key to future energy independence with the help of technology. She said the extraction of coal by surface mining also has tangible local benefits. “When you live in a mountainous region, sometimes you appreciate the flat land,” she said. “We’ve got airports. We’ve got housing developments. We’ve got shopping centers [because of land flattened by mining].” Jim Norvelle, spokesman for Dominion Virginia Power, which is building a new coal-fired power plant in Wise County, said he would not speculate on the future of valley-fill permits. But, he said, the plant will be able to use a wide variety of fuels. “One of the reasons we pushed so hard for circulating fluidized bed clean-coal technology for this power station is its ability to burn a wide variety of fuels,” Norvelle said. “We will be able to design our fuel plan around a wide range of coal, waste coal and biomass, and can make adjustments as the market for those fuels changes.” Activists say that while opposition to mountaintop removal is reaching critical mass, it will ultimately take action by a new administration in Washington to clarify Clean Water Act regulations to define mine spoil as waste or prohibit mountaintop removal outright. “The next administration could clarify the federal regulations and make it clear that mountaintop removal mining was never foreseen when the surface mining laws were passed and is not permitted under those laws,” Lovett said. “We can fight with agencies all we want, but it’s going to take some will in Washington to get things done.” dmccown(a)bristolnews.com| (276) 791-0701

1 0

FW: See this
by Grubb, Karen 12 Aug '08

12 Aug '08

-----Original Message----- From: mountainpartyexcom(a)googlegroups.com [mailto:mountainpartyexcom@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of unclesteve197(a)yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:29 AM To: mountainpartyexcom(a)googlegroups.com Cc: Daniel Chiotos; Mr. Jeremy Brannon; Aimee Cobb; Heather Sprouse; Leah Devine; Malyka Knapp-Smith; jesse4wvgov(a)yahoo.com; braingymslp(a)yahoo.com; jennieks1(a)yahoo.com; glassamulet(a)hotmail.com; joelbrown88(a)yahoo.com; paulb(a)mc.net; braindeadkid(a)gmail.com; mendelkramer(a)comcast.net; genny_judge(a)yahoo.com; scooter(a)the-exchange-us.com; blkcloud(a)sonic.net; ronnells_mom(a)yahoo.com; Rose Edington; mar3356(a)citynet.net; dmitchell7327(a)suddenlink.net; jerrygrady(a)hotmail.com; hickok6(a)verizon.net; jack.l.hickok(a)wv.gov; mcmillian9(a)yahoo.com; sarapearlbird(a)hotmail.com; xkatwalkx(a)aol.com; angelaplu(a)yahoo.com; 'Marian Keyes'; zroom910(a)aol.com; unclesteve197(a)yahoo.com; wilgerca(a)suddenlink.net; priustech(a)merc.com; Williamson, Gabby; Jeremy Brannan Subject: See this ON MTR - worth reading the comments!!! http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/08/11/10933/

1 0

Re: [EC] [Fwd: TrAIL decision]
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 11 Aug '08

11 Aug '08

Jim I spoke to the guy at the Dominion Post and another guy at WVMetroNews. I plan to file a petition for reconsideration which will keep the Aug 1 order from becoming final (and thereby allowing TrAILCo to commence eminent domain) until the petition is denied. It also extends the time for appeal for 30 days past the decision on the petition for reconsideration, an extension I need because I will be out of town at the end of the month for two of three weeks. I will probably need to seek a stay at the PSC and/or the WVSCOA after the petition for reconsideration is decided. Bill On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:52 PM, James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> wrote: > Thanks Bill. I got a call from Dominion Post and WV News Service. I think > we need to maximize press exposure, because the Morgantown radio says > TrAILCO plans to start work "immediately". > > When can we file? > > Meanwhile, I also got a call from another local person who was unaware that > the Grafton Route was even being considered, let alone approved, until she > heard the WV Public Radio broadcast this morning, and the route crosses her > property. > > JBK > > >>> "William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> 8/4/2008 2:12 > PM >>> > Jim > > I'll call this guy... > > Bill > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net > >wrote: > > > Bill or Jim, Would you give this guy a call. I will let him know he will > > be hearing from one or both of you soon. Regina > > > > Regina, > > > > My name is Jeff Jenkins, reporter, WV MetroNews in Charleston.... > > > > I'm looking for some reaction..(a phone interview) from the Sierra Club > in > > connection with the PSC's decision on the TrAIL project.. could you > please > > call me at WV MetroNews in Charleston.....If not you----someone else with > > the organization would be fine...thanks for you time.. Jeff > > > > > > 342-0580 > > > > > > > -- > William V. DePaulo, Esq. > 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 > Charleston, WV 25301-2163 > Tel: 304-342-5588 > Fax: 304-342-5505 > william.depaulo(a)gmail.com > www.passeggiata.com > > -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

2 1

[Fwd: Winter 2009 Canvass Chapter Notification/Feedback Page]
by Regina Hendrix 09 Aug '08

09 Aug '08

I have sent an E-Mail asking if there's any canvassing planned for WV. I believe they have canvassed here in the past and it was not at all coordinated with the Chapter. I've sent an E-Mail inquiring if there's any WV canvassing planned and mentioned the supply of MTR brochures we have. If they are canvassing in state we might want them to distribute info on Trail and PATH and our promotion of an alternative energy program for WV. Regina

1 0

[Fwd: Re: [fom] TrailCo and PATH powerlines]
by Regina Hendrix 07 Aug '08

07 Aug '08

Would someone on the energy committee send some ingo to Mike Harman and his wife, Barbara. They are great Charleston activists for several local organizations and can be very helpful in the PATH fight. They live near the John Amos Power Plant. Regina

1 0

Re: [EC] [fom] TrailCo and PATH powerlines
by Regina Hendrix 07 Aug '08

07 Aug '08

Hi Mike, good to hear from you. I've cc'd the Energy Committee and I'm sure you'll be hearing from someone on the committee soon because we need all the info, experience and support we can get. You must have picked this up from the FOM list where I pasted in the Sierra Club's press release? Regina Mike Harman wrote: > Thanks, Regina, for this finely-stated message. This ( the power line > proposals) is obviously one of the most significant developments in > our energy future, and it must be stopped. > > I have a thick file here from the late 70's concerning the Coalition > of American Electric Consumers, which initially sprung up to stop a > pumped-storage hydro project in Virginia, but which eventually > blossomed into a six-state coalition systematically taking on AEP in > every public venue, with a coherent, comprehensive approach to > conservation, rate reform, and more effective regulation. It was > moderately successful, in my opinion, for as long as it lasted. Dave > Grubb and I helped staff this in WV. > > I have a couple of copies of their multi-colored general flyer which > lays out their overall mission and strategy, if others are interested. > I recently corresponded with Richard Austen, who lead this effort, and > he would be willing to meet with some folks to review their history & > tactics. Now that I'm retired, I would be very interested in helping > as best I can. > > Thanks again! > > Mike Harman > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Regina Hendrix" > <regina1936(a)verizon.net> > To: "All of FOM list" <fom(a)lists.riseup.net>; > <mountainjustice(a)lists.riseup.net> > Cc: "Jim Sconyers" <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; "Mary Davis" > <mdavis(a)hsc.wvu.edu>; "James Kotcon" <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; "William V. > DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 11:19 AM > Subject: [fom] TrailCo and PATH powerlines > > > Once again our Public Service Commission has betrayed the trust of West > Virginians. See http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200808011022 for the >

1 0

PATH
by Regina Hendrix 07 Aug '08

07 Aug '08

I had a call this A.M. from Katherine Kapo of So. Jackson County. She recently learned about PATH and she (along with others in her community) is interested in organizing in opposition. She attended one of the power line info meetings recently and she mentioned that the company has organized a great show of power--not surprising I guess. I've sent her a copy of SC's press release. She would like some pointers on how to organize in her community and anything else that would be helpful. I'm thinking maybe Bill Price would have some advice for her. Katherine's phone is Home-304-988-0009 and Cell-304-380-6686. Regina Hendrix

2 1

Re: [EC] TrAIL line
by Grubb, Karen 06 Aug '08

06 Aug '08

We were eager to work with your council in the past and wish to continue the fight with you. I am sending this to the whole Sierra Club Energy Committee so that all will know of your interest and have an opportunity to respond to you. We are continuing to raise money to fight TrAIL and PATH and welcome you as an ally. We have need of more funds for consultants and legal expenses. I am also sending our press release in case you have not seen it. Karen Grubb Sierra Club Executive Committee From: Rob Marmet [mailto:rmarmet@pecva.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:40 AM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: TrAIL line Karen-I got your name off the Sierra Club West Virginia web site. Could you pass along this email to the appropriate contact? I am with Piedmont Environmental Council in Virginia. We have been fighting the TrAIL line here. I see that you have gotten an adverse ruling from the West Virginia Public Service Commission. We got a similar result from the Hearing Examiner in Virginia. Piedmont Environmental Council is willing to work with the Sierra Club in West Virginia to continue to oppose the TrAIL line. If there is any interest, please have the appropriate person contact me. Thanks. Robert G. Marmet Piedmont Environmental Council 45 Horner Street PO Box 460 Warrenton, VA 20188 540 347 2334 Phone 540 454 9536 Cell

2 1

Fwd: Senate Testimony
by James Kotcon 06 Aug '08

06 Aug '08

FYI. JBK >>> "John Balasko" <mjmb(a)westco.net> 8/5/2008 10:02 PM >>> Jim, The following testimony may be useful for Mr. DePaulo's appeal. http://stopaptrail.org/images/LoehrTesitmony_ENR_committee_07.31.08-0001.pdf John George C. Loehr eLucem 4101 Killington Rd. NW, Albuquerque, NM 87114 Phone (505) 792-0643 ~ Fax (505) 792-0644 ~ e-mail: gloehr(a)eLucem.com Hearings of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee July 31, 2008

1 0

Fwd: revised small grant program
by Paul Wilson 06 Aug '08

06 Aug '08

fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Verena Owen <baumling(a)aol.com> Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:15 PM Subject: Fwd: revised small grant program To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org We have revised our small grants program to include projects that address mining issues. Please take a look at the new RFP and application here: http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-resources.aspx Verena Verena Owen Advisor, Sierra Club National Coal Campaign ------------------------------ It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and gadgets that make the grade on AOL Shopping<http://shopping.aol.com/back-to-school?ncid=aolins00050000000007> . ------------------------------ It's time to go back to school! Get the latest trends and gadgets that make the grade on AOL Shopping<http://shopping.aol.com/back-to-school?ncid=aolins00050000000007> . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

TRAILCO - Sierra Club Petition for Reconsideration of August 1 PSC Decision
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 06 Aug '08

06 Aug '08

Aaron Last Friday, August 1, the PSC issued a decision granting Allegheny Energy's TrAILCo subsidiary the authority to build the 165 mi electric transmission line from PA, across 114 miles of WV, to the western side of Va. It's a $1 billion project intended, by TrAILCo's own testimony, to provide the infrastructure for four new IGCC coal-fired electric generation plants. The Sierra Club intervened, participated in the ten-day marathon hearing, and along with a number of others thought we actually may have defeated this thing back in January. Importantly, the PSC staff filed a comprehensive brief against approval after the close of evidence. However, after the close of the evidence, TrAILCo embarked on an extensive course of communications -- ex parte in our view, simply negotiations in theirs -- which resulted in the PSC staff attorney reversing their prior position and supporting the proposed line. We obtained nearly 2000 documents under the FOIA relating to the closed-door meetings, and another 1100 from the Governor's office whom many suspected was orchestrating things off stage. In short, by the time the Aug 1 decision came down, we were no longer surprised to see TrAILCo prevail. Under PSC rules, TrAILCo can begin eminent domain proceedings the moment the decision becomes final. PSC rules provide that the decision is not final if a party files a petition for reconsideration within ten days. I filed a quickly drawn petition for reconsideration yesterday - see copy attached. I could fwd the PSC decision also, but it's 183 pages long and a 13 MB file. Let me know if you'd like to see it. It takes about 20 minutes to download from the PSC site. An appeal goes to the WV Supreme Court and must be filed 30 days after the order becomes final. It will now become final 30 days after the PSC rules on the petition for reconsideration. I plan to prepare an appeal. I was not under the impression that a new matter form was required for an appeal, but some folks suggested I check with you. We'd also probably want to pursue the two FOIA requests in court as both the PSC (with a Vaughn index) and the Governor's office (without a Vaughn index) withheld many documents. I could do the FOIA requests on the basis of whatever fees are awarded by the court, if any. Do we need a new matter sheet for any or all of this? Thanks. Bill (and congrats on the victory in Virginia. Great, great work) -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Sierra Club Petition for Reconsideration filed today - August 5, 2008
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 05 Aug '08

05 Aug '08

I have attached a Petition for Reconsideraton filed today with the PSC. Under PSC rules, TrAILCo can commence eminent domain proceedings as soon as the August 1 order is final, i.e., within 30 days (the time set for an appeal to the WV Supreme Court. Rule 19.3 allows a party to seek reconsideration within 10 days of issuance of an order, i.e., August 11 here. By filing the petition for reconsideration within the ten day deadline, we extend the time for appeal to 30 days after the decison on the petition for reconsideration. The additional time will be critical to putting together a brief that addresses the 3000 page transcript and the nearly 3000 pages of FOIA documents. The attached document has been filed and served, and can be released to any one who wants it. Bill -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

ExCom meeting at Shot Cherry info
by Jim Sconyers 05 Aug '08

05 Aug '08

Our next WVSC ExCom meeting is August 22 - 24 at Shot Cherry Cabin in the Mon National Forest. It is near Riverton and Spruce Knob. Information about the cabin, amenities, meals, and a rough schedule is attached. An agenda call will be made soon. Note that the cabin has no electricity - so, among other things, no charging of laptop batteries. Paul - could you post the info on the website, please? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

The Energy Pander Bears
by Jim Sconyers 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

Meet the Energy Pander Bears! There's silly Georgie Pander Bear - drill in the coastal waters - it'll solve the gas problem! There's old Johnny Pander Bear - don't inflate your tires properly - but do hug a radionuclide! And there's little Barry Pander Bear - tap the oil reserve like it was a honey tree - make everyone happy! No more fantastical than Goldilocks, the Three Little Pigs, ... But we knew those stories were fairy tales! Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Fwd: who needs power lines...
by James Kotcon 04 Aug '08

04 Aug '08

>>> "Vivian Stockman" <vivian(a)ohvec.org> 8/4/2008 7:25 AM >>> Within 10 years, homeowners could power their homes in daylight with solar photovoltaic cells, while using excess solar energy to produce hydrogen and oxygen from water to power a household fuel cell. If the new process developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology finds acceptance in the marketplace, electricity-by-wire from a central source could be a thing of the past. more http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/aug2008/2008-08-02-01.asp

1 0

Sierra Press Release
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 02 Aug '08

02 Aug '08

Here is the release issued last night to Ken Ward at the Gazette -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Fw: A washingtonpost.com cartoon link from: jim_scon@yahoo.com
by Jim Sconyers 01 Aug '08

01 Aug '08

1 0

Re: [EC] PSC DECISION ON TRAILCO DUE
by Jim Sconyers 01 Aug '08

01 Aug '08

attached with some notes in bold Also - I guess it's OK to say we're appealing this to the Supreme Court - but to do so will require approvals from WV ExCom and, maybe, national SC. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: "William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> To: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> Cc: Duane Nichols <Duane330(a)aol.com>; WV Chapter Energy Committee <EC(a)osenergy.org>; Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 12:23:40 PM Subject: Re: PSC DECISION ON TRAILCO DUE Ken Ward sent an email asking if we would have comments -- assuming the PSC acts today. I have drafted a press release which is attached. Please respond with any comments promptly. Bill On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:03 AM, James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> wrote: I concur. I will bet a six-pack of your favorite legal beverage that Mile Layton of the Dominion Post will call me before I even have a chance to read the decision. Would this be a good time to focus attention once again on the PSC Staff flip-flop? I think it is fair to point out that the Commissioners rely on accurate and objective input from their Staff, and Melton's testimony that the line is not needed till 2014, and that they were influenced by the economic "goodies" offered by Allegheny in determining "need" is clearly inappropriate, both legally and scientifically. (Need to work on that sound bite). JBK >>> "William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> 8/1/2008 3:22 AM >>> Technically the PSC is not required to decide TrAILCo until Aug 2, Saturday. But the *probability is that they will issue a decision today in TrAILCo's favor* -- there's no reason to ruin a weekend with a formality that can be dispensed with on Friday. It is very likely we will get calls from some *media*. Assuming the decision is to approve TrAILCo's application -- and I expect nothing else -- I believe we should express *disappointment with the PSC decision, without questioning their good faith*, and indicate that *we will in all probability will appeal *to the WV Supreme Court. And we will continue our fight to stop other unnecessary and environmentally degrading transmission lines in the future, i.e. PATH from AEP in the fal. I also be strongly that we should *avoid anything that could be viewed as personal attacks *on the intelligence or character of PSC Commissioners McKinney and Staats, whom we will appear in front of for many years. There is plenty on the merits to criticize here. We should* focus on the big themes* -- 1. the *temporary, short term character of the purported benefits* and 2. the *permanence of the long term environmental costs*, both physically on the ground in West Virginia and world-wide in terms of global warming. 3. * the alternative energy solutions -- the low hanging fruit of conservation, wind and solar -- simply waiting to be picked*. 4. the risks of *failing to divesify *West Virginia's energy base away a 97% dependence on coal at a time when coal is about to be hit with massive cost increases, increases that W. Va. consumers and businesses will have no way to avoid. In short, let's use this exercise as an opportunity for education. Bill -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

4 3

PSC DECISION ON TRAILCO DUE
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 01 Aug '08

01 Aug '08

Technically the PSC is not required to decide TrAILCo until Aug 2, Saturday. But the *probability is that they will issue a decision today in TrAILCo's favor* -- there's no reason to ruin a weekend with a formality that can be dispensed with on Friday. It is very likely we will get calls from some *media*. Assuming the decision is to approve TrAILCo's application -- and I expect nothing else -- I believe we should express *disappointment with the PSC decision, without questioning their good faith*, and indicate that *we will in all probability will appeal *to the WV Supreme Court. And we will continue our fight to stop other unnecessary and environmentally degrading transmission lines in the future, i.e. PATH from AEP in the fal. I also be strongly that we should *avoid anything that could be viewed as personal attacks *on the intelligence or character of PSC Commissioners McKinney and Staats, whom we will appear in front of for many years. There is plenty on the merits to criticize here. We should* focus on the big themes* -- 1. the *temporary, short term character of the purported benefits* and 2. the *permanence of the long term environmental costs*, both physically on the ground in West Virginia and world-wide in terms of global warming. 3. * the alternative energy solutions -- the low hanging fruit of conservation, wind and solar -- simply waiting to be picked*. 4. the risks of *failing to divesify *West Virginia's energy base away a 97% dependence on coal at a time when coal is about to be hit with massive cost increases, increases that W. Va. consumers and businesses will have no way to avoid. In short, let's use this exercise as an opportunity for education. Bill -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

2 3

Fwd: Final WVNS usage report for Report: West Virginia Drivers Spend Higher Percentage
by Paul Wilson 31 Jul '08

31 Jul '08

pretty good coverage on this WVNS story, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Public News Service <wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org> Date: Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:23 PM Subject: Final WVNS usage report for Report: West Virginia Drivers Spend Higher Percentage To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com Dear West Virginia News Service supporters, Attached is the usage report for a story related to Global Warming/Air Quality that was aired on 7/24/2008. As you will see from the attached report, the story entitled Report: West Virginia Drivers Spend Higher Percentage of Income on Gas was aired by at least 764 stations. Plus 29 stations took both soundbites and ran at least two versions of the story. Additionally, the RSS story text or audio was accessed 4 times. These numbers are conservative since we know stories are commonly run 3-4 times on each station during the course of a day As always, keep sending story ideas to our producer: Rob Ferrett WVNS Executive Producer Toll Free: 800-317-6705 Local: 800-317-6705 Fax: 540.301.0801 wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org The banner or story summary for this story is: Charleston, WV – West Virginians are listed as some of the most vulnerable in the country when it comes to high gas prices, according to a new report from the Natural Resources Defense Council. The study looked at percentage of income spent on fuel, as well as state policies to encourage better gas mileage for cars and trucks. Comments from Deron Lovaas (darin LOH-voss), transportation security director with NRDC. --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org and put the word "remove" in the subject line. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fw: Sign Our Petition: Stop Mountaintop Removal Mining
by Jim Sconyers 31 Jul '08

31 Jul '08

Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "Greg Haegele, Sierra Club" <membership.services(a)sierraclub.org> To: jim_scon(a)yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 8:00:22 AM Subject: Sign Our Petition: Stop Mountaintop Removal Mining Sierra Club Mountaintop removal mining is devastating and permanent - please sign our petition and help put a stop to the irreversible damage caused by this form of mining. Dear Jim, Mountaintop removal mining is exactly that, instead of digging tunnels to mine for coal, the tops of whole mountains are blown off with explosives to expose the seams of coal hidden underneath. Beautiful mountain ranges are reduced to leveled worksites while the dirt, rock, trees and other debris are bulldozed into the surrounding valleys, blocking and contaminating local rivers and streams, flooding and polluting the water in local communities, and threatening countless animals and plants. This practice was banned for over a quarter of a century until President Bush legalized mountaintop removal mining again in 2002. It is now estimated that this process will destroy more than 1.4 million acres of American mountain ranges, chiefly in the Appalachian area. That’s why I am asking you to please act now and sign our petition urging Congress to stop this deadly practice. To make it more difficult for the coal mining companies to use mountaintop removal, we are pushing Congress to pass the Clean Water Protection Act. This important legislation, if passed, will make mountaintop removal impossible by preventing mining companies from dumping their waste into the surrounding valleys and the rivers and streams which flow through them. Since there is nowhere else to dump the resulting huge deposits of waste, the practice will become impractical to continue. Help us bring a permanent end to this process - tell your representatives to pass the Clean Water Protection Act - now! The Coal Industry has financed an army of lobbyists and a major ad campaign to sway the opinion of lawmakers and the public to their side. You may have seen one of the many “Clean Coal” television ads that have saturated our airwaves in recent months. But simply adding the word “clean” or any other positive adjective to the word “coal” doesn’t change the many negative unhealthy effects of this dirty fossil fuel. Fact is, coal emissions are the top contributors to global warming. Increasing our dependence on coal will intensify and expand the effects of global warming. That’s why we must oppose mountaintop removal coal mining. Please sign our petition and put a stop to mountaintop removal - right now! Thank you for your support. Sincerely, Greg Haegele Director of Conservation P.S. Mountaintop removal mining permanently destroys vast tracts of our rapidly disappearing wildlands and wildlife habitat, and poses dire consequences for our environment. Please take action today and urge your representatives to oppose this hideous and destructive form of mining. You received this email because you have previously supported the Sierra Club's efforts and/or expressed interest in future communications from us. We appreciate that you have chosen to receive email from us. If, however, you received this email in error or do not wish to receive future emails like this, click here to be removed from this type of email contact. Sierra Club 85 Second Street, 2nd Fl. San Francisco, CA 94105 membership.services(a)sierraclub.org (415) 977-5653 http://www.sierraclub.org/ Update My Profile| Manage My Email Preferences | Update My Interests

1 0

Energy membership list.
by Barbara Fallon 31 Jul '08

31 Jul '08

Energy Committee, Clean up time: Please resond to me by Friday, August 1st, if you are interested in staying on the energy committee. If I do not hear from you I will ask Jonathan to take you off the email list. Regards, Barbara

2 1

Re: [EC] [fom] What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal
by Jim Sconyers 30 Jul '08

30 Jul '08

Right - except "clean energy" would probably be interpreted as supportive of coal, since the host group thinks they're doing clean energy. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Vernon Haltom <vernoncrmw(a)gmail.com> To: Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> Cc: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; Brad Wood <woodb20(a)gmail.com>; Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; fom(a)lists.riseup.net; danny(a)seac.org; ec(a)osenergy.org; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Matt Keller <matt.keller(a)wvwild.org>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:41:54 PM Subject: Re: [fom] What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal Good luck to all who go--wish I could but am just not able to. Messaging: since this is a coal industry event he's going to, it sure wouldn't hurt to have some "stop mountaintop removal" signs, "no such thing as clean coal," maybe some "clean energy now!" signs, etc. Maybe even some "coal kills people" signs. There is the possibility that some national news outlets might see/film it (probably not CNN as they're funded by the coal industry, but maybe), what with energy/gas prices in the news. Anyway, good luck. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> wrote: Jim and all, There is some energy from a few to go to this, but mostly people are recognizing that this may not be the best use of their time and resources. There may be a ad hoc group of people (probably around 20 or so) that may show up to "welcome" Bush, but I don't think this is going to be a major action. Does anyone have those little calculators that show the number of days until Bush departs. Bill Price, Sierra Club EJ Program 922 Quarrier Street, Suite 304 Charleston, WV 25311 Phone 304-342-3182 Cell 304-389-8822 Fax 304-342-3183 ________________________________ From:Jim Sconyers [mailto:jim_scon@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 2:04 PM To: Brad Wood Cc: Regina Hendrix; Bill Price; fom(a)lists.riseup.net; danny(a)seac.org; ec(a)osenergy.org; Allan Tweddle; Autumn; Barbara Fallon; Beth Little; Bill DePaulo; Dave Saville; Duane Nichols; Jim Kotcon; Kate Stone; Matt Keller; Paul Wilson Subject: Re: [fom] What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal Unfortunately, I am not coming to poke W in the eye, much as I'd enjoy it. I Mapquested it and it would be a 500 mile round trip - just can't face that - sorry. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Brad Wood <woodb20(a)gmail.com> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org>; fom(a)lists.riseup.net; danny(a)seac.org; ec(a)osenergy.org; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Matt Keller <matt.keller(a)wvwild.org>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:13:51 PM Subject: Re: [fom] What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal Would anyone like to meet me in Lewisburg or White Sulfur tomorrow? We can talk to police, put up fliers, find out things, etc... I can do all this by myself, but I know there are fomers around Lewisburg who might help if they can. And as for a message, I would like to be more blunt. I've seen some wonderful signs at coal river that are just begging to be held up (though some of the best are Massey specific...) On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: What is the message/sound bite/sign text? Seems like "Coal Stinks" might not be quite right. "Blowin in the Wind" "Here Comes the Sun" Energy Forecast: Sunny and Windy" uh.... Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:17:13 PM Subject: [Fwd: Re: [mountainjusticesummer] Fwd: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal] Looks as if interest is building. I am interested. Regina -----Inline Message Follows----- I know there will be a good handful of MJers at the festival, and I'll bet you ten dollars we can recruit more rabblerousers... Are there already plans in the works that we could coordinate with? mander On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dana Kuhnline <dana.kuhnline(a)gmail.com> wrote: Oh my lord! I have some signs around that could be utilized. Dana ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM Subject: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal To: FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Interesting. Maybe we should make some fliers that could be printed and brought to clifftop and maybe hung up in coffeeshops etc. at Greenbrier cty. Is there anyway we could find out where people interested in going should meet up and where a safe place to park and stand would be? As I recall, the Amtrak station is basically right across from the Greenbrier, so that would be a decent launching spot, any thoughts? They have a gatekeeper there, so I doubt they will let anyone on the grounds or anywhere near where the FOCers will be but a highway presence would be nice to have anyway and maybe Bush will drive by and his security agents will see the signs. http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=greenbrier+resort,+white+s… Dana On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amanda Cagle <caglear(a)gmail.com> wrote: The Greenbrier Resort is in White Sulphur Springs, which is only 50 miles away from the annual Appalachian Old Time Music festival in Clifftop, WV, which just happens to run from the 29th through the 3rd. I know there will be a good handful of MJers at the festival, and I'll bet you ten dollars we can recruit more rabblerousers... Are there already plans in the works that we could coordinate with? mander On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dana Kuhnline <dana.kuhnline(a)gmail.com> wrote: Oh my lord! I have some signs around that could be utilized. Dana ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM Subject: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal To: FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a begger. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggers needs restructuring. -Dr. Martin Luther King; April 4, 1967 -- Vernon Haltom Co-director Coal River Mountain Watch 304-854-2182 www.crmw.net www.mountainjusticesummer.org For a Clean, Just, Sustainable Appalachia

3 3

Re: [EC] [fom] What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal
by Jim Sconyers 30 Jul '08

30 Jul '08

Unfortunately, I am not coming to poke W in the eye, much as I'd enjoy it. I Mapquested it and it would be a 500 mile round trip - just can't face that - sorry. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Brad Wood <woodb20(a)gmail.com> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org>; fom(a)lists.riseup.net; danny(a)seac.org; ec(a)osenergy.org; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Matt Keller <matt.keller(a)wvwild.org>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:13:51 PM Subject: Re: [fom] What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal Would anyone like to meet me in Lewisburg or White Sulfur tomorrow? We can talk to police, put up fliers, find out things, etc... I can do all this by myself, but I know there are fomers around Lewisburg who might help if they can. And as for a message, I would like to be more blunt. I've seen some wonderful signs at coal river that are just begging to be held up (though some of the best are Massey specific...) On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: What is the message/sound bite/sign text? Seems like "Coal Stinks" might not be quite right. "Blowin in the Wind" "Here Comes the Sun" Energy Forecast: Sunny and Windy" uh.... Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:17:13 PM Subject: [Fwd: Re: [mountainjusticesummer] Fwd: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal] Looks as if interest is building. I am interested. Regina -----Inline Message Follows----- I know there will be a good handful of MJers at the festival, and I'll bet you ten dollars we can recruit more rabblerousers... Are there already plans in the works that we could coordinate with? mander On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dana Kuhnline <dana.kuhnline(a)gmail.com> wrote: Oh my lord! I have some signs around that could be utilized. Dana ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM Subject: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal To: FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Interesting. Maybe we should make some fliers that could be printed and brought to clifftop and maybe hung up in coffeeshops etc. at Greenbrier cty. Is there anyway we could find out where people interested in going should meet up and where a safe place to park and stand would be? As I recall, the Amtrak station is basically right across from the Greenbrier, so that would be a decent launching spot, any thoughts? They have a gatekeeper there, so I doubt they will let anyone on the grounds or anywhere near where the FOCers will be but a highway presence would be nice to have anyway and maybe Bush will drive by and his security agents will see the signs. http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=greenbrier+resort,+white+s… Dana On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amanda Cagle <caglear(a)gmail.com> wrote: The Greenbrier Resort is in White Sulphur Springs, which is only 50 miles away from the annual Appalachian Old Time Music festival in Clifftop, WV, which just happens to run from the 29th through the 3rd. I know there will be a good handful of MJers at the festival, and I'll bet you ten dollars we can recruit more rabblerousers... Are there already plans in the works that we could coordinate with? mander On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dana Kuhnline <dana.kuhnline(a)gmail.com> wrote: Oh my lord! I have some signs around that could be utilized. Dana ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM Subject: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal To: FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a begger. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggers needs restructuring. -Dr. Martin Luther King; April 4, 1967

1 0

PATH meeting in Buckhannon
by James Kotcon 29 Jul '08

29 Jul '08

I attended the PATH public meeting in Buckhannon last night, and had gone so far as to update the fact Sheet we wrote for TrAIL last year. For better or worse, the meeting was very poorly attended, probably about 30 citizens when I took a count, and about 45 "green shirts" representing PATH. They are doing a very good job of presenting this as an environmentally responsible project, and had tables and displays talking about energy conservation and CFL light bulbs, but the real goal is to sell PATH. Interestingly, the proposed routes represent a spiderweb of intersecting links all over central West Virginia. One southern route goes just south of Elkins and follows Route 33 East through the Mon Forest. All other routes meet up with, and parallel the TrAIL route from souther Preston County, to Mt. Storm and then East through the Eastern Panhandle. I asked if this new line would be in addition to TrAIL and they said yes, both new lines would parallel the existing line from Mt. Storm to Meadowbrook as much as possible, as the PSC has clearly indicated a preference for avoiding new greenfields routes. (Perhaps someone should mention this to the Bhavana Society). My biggest mistake was not talking to the TV cameras first. They were interviewing someone when I got there shortly after 5, but disappeared promptly, I suspect to get the film to the Clarksburg studio in time for the 6 PM broadcast. If people go to any of the other meetings, be sure to talk to reporters and let them know how much opposed we are, as that will make the story much more interesting t the reporters, and generate news for us. But the PATH green shirts were very good at suppressing controversy and steering anyone with questions off to one little corner or another, so the meeting was really pretty boring and ineffective. It was a great way to stifle public debate, and we will need to stimulate some if we are to be effective. My recommendation to those I talked to was to get their County Commissions to pass resolutions opposing the line, similar to what Monongalia, Preston, Tucker, Hampshire and other Counties did for TrAIL. And if your County Commissioner is leery of opposing this, tell them to talk to the Commissioners in those Counties that have already done so, and get them to talk about why everyone is opposed to the line. JBK

1 0

Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: info somewhere about more plants
by Barbara Fallon 29 Jul '08

29 Jul '08

Well, here is some good news! Can anyone comment on Pat's question? ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org" <Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 4:49:06 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants Barbara - I see that the PATH project originates at the John Amos station, so the coal plant link couldn't be clearer. We can allocate $10,000 for litigation costs. Also - has the idea of a case against FERC fot its subsidies been explored ? Pat Gallagher Director of Environmental Law Sierra Club 85 Second Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415.977.5709 415.977.5793 fax pat.gallagher(a)sierraclub.org CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or confidential attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply and notify the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon@yaho o.com> To Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org 07/21/2008 06:51 cc AM Subject Re: Fw: Fw: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants Pat, Thanks for understanding our perdicament. Can the Law program support us with $10,000? Over time our financial needs are going to be much greater than this amount, but a $10,000 base combined with our local and state fundraising, should put us in the ball-park for expert witness fees. Funding from the Law Program will be a great morale boost as well. As for the Mountaineer plant inquiry, this is a reply from Jim Kotcon. "The Mountaineer IGCC plant was being developed by AEP, while TrAILCo is a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegheny Energy. Thus, Mountaineer was never an explicit part of the justification for TrAIL. Instead, TrAIL based their economic benefits analysis on four unnamed "potential" plants. In the evidentiary hearings, TrAILCo did not explicitly back away form the idea of four new plants, but tended to emphasize the transmission constraints from either new plants or existing unused capacity. They never really were pinned down, and the regional transmission operator, PJM, only indicated a generalized need for new transmission. They argued that it was not possible to identify specific plants from which the electrons would flow, only that plants in the region needed the transmission capacity to supply the East Coast markets. TrAILCo and PATH both argue that the lines are needed even for new commercial wind farms, although the combined capacity of the lines is ten times that needed for all existing and currently planned wind farms." JBK Thank you for your concern and support Pat. Barbara ----- Original Message ---- From: "Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org" <Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:53:04 PM Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants Thanks Barbara - I see the bind you're in. How much money are you looking for ? I think something should be doable. One thing I noticed - the Trail line was justified in part by the Mountaineer plant. But that plant was rejected by the PSC, correct ? So has there been an effort to reopen/raise that issue ? Pat Gallagher Director of Environmental Law Sierra Club 85 Second Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415.977.5709 415.977.5793 fax pat.gallagher(a)sierraclub.org CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or confidential attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply and notify the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon@yaho o.com> To pat.gallagher(a)sierraclub.org 07/17/2008 12:27 cc PM Subject Fw: Fw: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants Pat, Jim has summarized our tentative and unsavory situation. I feel like we are in a holding pattern, yet we need to raise funds in order to be ready for several different outcomes. We are doing chapter fundraising and also directed fundraising. I can't find outside sources of funding because public foundations do not want to fund litagation and expert witnesses. It was a hard blow to find out that we did not get the SES or the National Coal grants. I appreciate your interest in this case and in the difficulty we have in fundraising. If you have any suggestions for fundraising I will pursue them. Otherwise, is there something the Law Program can do for us. I do not know if you have had time to read the grant proposal to National Coal. I have it attached. Best REgards, Barbara ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> To: Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; William DePaulo Esq <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:51:31 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants No specific information has been filed for PATH, that I am aware of, as they have not yet filed their application. The PATH website FAQs page sidesteps this issue with double talk about the need to improve "reliability", so it is not clear that they will even raise the issue of additional power plants. They do, however, discuss "increasing demand" as well as retirements of existing power plants as part of te justification for the line. Regardless of whether the increased electricity comes from new plants, or increased generation from existing coal-fired plants, increasing demand means more coal burned. Hence, we should not get bogged down in nit-picking over whether the generation is from new plants versus older ones, in either case it means more coal is burned. Furthermore, the initial justification for the NIETC was an effort to move an additional 5000 MW of "coal-by-wire" from the mid-Ohio Valley to the East Coast. While there are some long-range concerns over transmission (although none would occur sooner than 4 to 8 years from now), the real issue is that coal is cheaper than the existing sources on the East Coast, so if they can overcome the transmission constraints, the coal could displace the more expensive (and cleaner) generating plants on the East Coast. This "economic congestion" is the real driver behind the lines, not the hypothetical peak demand reliability issues. And that would mean even more coal being burned, not just to meet the increased demand, but to substitute for existing higher-priced generation. I believe that our only hope is to delay PATH and TrAIL for a couple more years until we can get Congress to revise the NIETC laws. As long as the utilities are guaranteed an "Incentive Rate of Return" and powers of eminent domain, they will eventually win. Note, the PATH website timeline (http://pathtransmission.com) has them filing in December 2008, so most of our legal expenses would be incurred in 2009. It is also important to note that PATH will actually be filing two separate applications, one for the Amos-to-Bedington (north of Martinsburg, WV) segment, the other from Bedington to a new substation at Kemptown MD. Hence, WV will bear a double load in fighting this line, while the Maryland Chapter will also need to get involved for the second segment. But under this strategy, I suspect that much of the line will be built even if only WV gives approval. In any event, an awful lot will depend on what the WV-PSC does with the TrAIL application, and how we respond. I think the priority for funding in the second half of 2008 should be for appeals of a TrAIL decision. If I were a betting man, my current prediction is that the PSC will rule in favor of TrAIL, and we will have to appeal to the WV Supreme Court. Even if they rule in our favor and against TrAIL, I expect TrAILCo to appeal, and we will need to be involved in that appeal as intervenors. The TrAIL case this year will set the precedents that drive a PATH case next year. And the TrAIL case is the one where they do claim that part of the benefits will derive from four new power plants. Hope this helps. Let me know if you need citations for any of the above. JBK >>> Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> 7/16/2008 4:07 PM >>> Pat is interested in helping us fund the legal aspects of PATH. I have sent him our recent grant request but I am not sure that he has had time to read it. Pat needs information from us re: more coal plants if PATH is constructed. I sent him info re: TrAILCO, but he needs it for PATH if he is going to be able to get us some money. Do you guys have any infor on construction of coal power plants if PATH goes through... ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: "Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org" <Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:10:32 AM Subject: Re: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants Thanks - This pertains to TrailCo - do we have any similar evidence re PATH ? I'm a believer in what you're doing - I just need to tie it directly to coal plants to use coal litigation funds. Pat Gallagher Director of Environmental Law Sierra Club 85 Second Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415.977.5709 415.977.5793 fax pat.gallagher(a)sierraclub.org CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or confidential attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please reply and notify the sender and delete all versions on your system. Thank you. -----Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: ----- To: pat.gallagher(a)sierraclub.org From: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Date: 07/16/2008 07:21AM Subject: Fw: [EC] info somewhere about more plants Pat, more info on the connection of TrAILCO and more coal fired power plants. Barbara ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 3:18:35 PM Subject: Re: [EC] info somewhere about more plants My apologies for the delay, hope this is still timely. The testimony submitted by TrAILCo witness Tom Witt calculated the economic benefits of the transmission line. In it, he claimed that the line would support four new 600 MW coal-fired power plants, and further claimed that the economic benefits from these plants were part of the economic benefits to be derived from the line. TrAILCo has not specifically proposed additional plants, but their line was clearly intended to increase sales of coal-fired electricity from WV and Ohio plants to the East Coast. TrAILCo also presented the scenario that the line would merely support increased operation of existing plants. In either case, it would mean a lot more coal being burned to generate electricity to be sold on the East Coast where it would compete with cleaner, but more expensive power plants. This is the main reason that CPV Warren had intervened in the case. They argued that the line would make their proposed natural gas-fired plant in Warren VA economically unviable. The argument appeared to be sufficiently sound that Dominion Energy (Allegheny's partner in TrAILCo) bought the rights to the CPV Warren plant. The specific documentation for the above is filed as part of the official record on the PSC web page, but it is buried among a large number of documents. Let me know if you want me to dig out the specific citations. JBK (See attached file: Coal foundation608.doc)

1 0

What's our greeting? Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal
by Jim Sconyers 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

What is the message/sound bite/sign text? Seems like "Coal Stinks" might not be quite right. "Blowin in the Wind" "Here Comes the Sun" Energy Forecast: Sunny and Windy" uh.... Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com>; Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:17:13 PM Subject: [Fwd: Re: [mountainjusticesummer] Fwd: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal] Looks as if interest is building. I am interested. Regina -----Inline Message Follows----- I know there will be a good handful of MJers at the festival, and I'll bet you ten dollars we can recruit more rabblerousers... Are there already plans in the works that we could coordinate with? mander On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dana Kuhnline <dana.kuhnline(a)gmail.com> wrote: Oh my lord! I have some signs around that could be utilized. Dana ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM Subject: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal To: FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Interesting. Maybe we should make some fliers that could be printed and brought to clifftop and maybe hung up in coffeeshops etc. at Greenbrier cty. Is there anyway we could find out where people interested in going should meet up and where a safe place to park and stand would be? As I recall, the Amtrak station is basically right across from the Greenbrier, so that would be a decent launching spot, any thoughts? They have a gatekeeper there, so I doubt they will let anyone on the grounds or anywhere near where the FOCers will be but a highway presence would be nice to have anyway and maybe Bush will drive by and his security agents will see the signs. http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=greenbrier+resort,+white+s… Dana On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amanda Cagle <caglear(a)gmail.com> wrote: The Greenbrier Resort is in White Sulphur Springs, which is only 50 miles away from the annual Appalachian Old Time Music festival in Clifftop, WV, which just happens to run from the 29th through the 3rd. I know there will be a good handful of MJers at the festival, and I'll bet you ten dollars we can recruit more rabblerousers... Are there already plans in the works that we could coordinate with? mander On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Dana Kuhnline <dana.kuhnline(a)gmail.com> wrote: Oh my lord! I have some signs around that could be utilized. Dana ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM Subject: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal To: FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke -- Dana Kuhnline Alliance for Appalachia PO Box 11701 Charleston, WV 25339 Call: (304) 546-8473 Fax: (304) 342-3183 www.ilovemountains.org Support youth working for climate justice! www.seac.org Nobody made a greater mistake than doing nothing because you can only do a little. Edmund Burke

2 1

Re: [EC] [fom] USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU
by Michael Price 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

Regina, Good to hear from you. Glad to see you involved in sending out the info on all of these issues. Aaron Iserwood, attorny for the Sierra Club has asked me to be a declarent in the Powellton Coal case. I know several people who live at Jodie on Rich Creek and I can talk with them about this issue. I do not know Bob Gates but I would like to talk with him and see if we can communicate about this issue with him. Regards, mike ===================== From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> Date: 2008/07/28 Mon PM 12:46:49 EDT To: Bob Gates <photonzx(a)ntelos.net> Cc: All of FOM list <fom(a)lists.riseup.net>, Margaret Janes <mjanes(a)hardynet.com>, ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: [EC] [fom] USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU And there's a Head Start at the bottom of the steep descent. Bob Gates wrote: > I just came across Gauley Mountain this morning on the way back from > the Appalachian String Band Festival at Clifftop for a couple of days > break. While I did not see the mine, there were quite a few coal > trucks going up and down the mountain between Ansted and Gauley > Bridge. It is amazing that they would run them up and down such a > steep windy road. Will see what I can spot when I go back later this > week. > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Regina Hendrix" > <regina1936(a)verizon.net> > To: "Margaret Janes" <mjanes(a)hardynet.com> > Cc: "All of FOM list" <fom(a)lists.riseup.net>; <ec(a)osenergy.org> > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:21 PM > Subject: [fom] USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU > > >> Margaret, I just got the Corps' notice on a project at the Muddlety >> Surface Mine No. 1, pending permit number S-3004-07, in Nicholas >> County on Muddlety Creek, a tributary of the Gauley. They also >> reference the NPDES Permit WV1022229. Every time I get one of these >> notices I'm traumatized. >> >> I've added the FOM list and Sierra Club's energy committee as cc's >> because I'm probably not the only one who'd like an update on our >> case in the 4th Circuit. >> Also, I'm hoping you will give us a short update on where this >> project on the Gauley stands, i.e., is this project on hold until we >> get a decision in the 4th Circuit? (They mention proposed Valley >> Fills 1 and 2.) In this instance would the NPDES permit be on hold >> also? >> >> Thanks, once again, for sharing your knowledge of these proposed and >> accomplished criminal acts. >> >> Regina Hendrix >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

1 0

Re: [EC] [fom] USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU
by Regina Hendrix 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

And there's a Head Start at the bottom of the steep descent. Bob Gates wrote: > I just came across Gauley Mountain this morning on the way back from > the Appalachian String Band Festival at Clifftop for a couple of days > break. While I did not see the mine, there were quite a few coal > trucks going up and down the mountain between Ansted and Gauley > Bridge. It is amazing that they would run them up and down such a > steep windy road. Will see what I can spot when I go back later this > week. > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Regina Hendrix" > <regina1936(a)verizon.net> > To: "Margaret Janes" <mjanes(a)hardynet.com> > Cc: "All of FOM list" <fom(a)lists.riseup.net>; <ec(a)osenergy.org> > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:21 PM > Subject: [fom] USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU > > >> Margaret, I just got the Corps' notice on a project at the Muddlety >> Surface Mine No. 1, pending permit number S-3004-07, in Nicholas >> County on Muddlety Creek, a tributary of the Gauley. They also >> reference the NPDES Permit WV1022229. Every time I get one of these >> notices I'm traumatized. >> >> I've added the FOM list and Sierra Club's energy committee as cc's >> because I'm probably not the only one who'd like an update on our >> case in the 4th Circuit. >> Also, I'm hoping you will give us a short update on where this >> project on the Gauley stands, i.e., is this project on hold until we >> get a decision in the 4th Circuit? (They mention proposed Valley >> Fills 1 and 2.) In this instance would the NPDES permit be on hold >> also? >> >> Thanks, once again, for sharing your knowledge of these proposed and >> accomplished criminal acts. >> >> Regina Hendrix >> >> >> >> > >

1 0

Re: [EC] [Fwd: [fom] Officials announce new $800 million coal-to-gasoline plant]
by Jim Sconyers 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

Weep is right - for the poor misguided fools who "represent" us, for we the citizens who elect them, and for the venality of forcing WV taxpayers to subsidize this. Nice touch - a coal sequestration "plan" - even though all would agree that this is the worst kind of dirty-pie-in-the-dirty-sky for the near future. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:21:51 PM Subject: [EC] [Fwd: [fom] Officials announce new $800 million coal-to-gasoline plant] Read it and weep. Your tax money will contribute to this effort. Regina

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Officials announce new $800 million coal-to-gasoline plant]
by Regina Hendrix 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

Read it and weep. Your tax money will contribute to this effort. Regina

1 0

Re: [EC] Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal
by Jim Sconyers 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

more at http://www.wvcoal.com/content/view/366/58/ Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org>; Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; ec(a)osenergy.org; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Karen Grubb <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)Verizon.net>; Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com>; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Matt Keller <matt.keller(a)wvwild.org>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; Rory McIlmoil <rorygep(a)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:18:30 AM Subject: Re: Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal http://www.shopfloor.org/tag/west-virginia-coal-association/ See above. It says he will speak at 10:25 on Thursday. It also mentions a Scouts activity on the North Portico. I suspect this will insure he will be late. Jim Sconyers wrote: > Can anyoe find out details - times, etc.? > > Jim Sconyers > jim_scon(a)yahoo.com > 603.969.6712 > > Remember: Mother Nature bats last. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> > To: Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; Jim Sconyers > <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> > Cc: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; ec(a)osenergy.org; Bill > DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Karen Grubb > <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)Verizon.net>; > Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com>; Allan Tweddle > <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara > Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; > Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; > Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; > Matt Keller <matt.keller(a)wvwild.org>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; > Rory McIlmoil <rorygep(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 4:01:16 PM > Subject: RE: Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal > > We just found out about this. If you guys want to organize something, > I can see if coalfield groups want to plug into it. > > > > Bill Price, Sierra Club EJ Program > 922 Quarrier Street, Suite 304 > Charleston , WV 25311 > Phone 304-342-3182 > Cell 304-389-8822 > Fax 304-342-3183 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Jonathan Rosenbaum [mailto:freesource@cheat.org] > *Sent:* Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:40 PM > *To:* Jim Sconyers; Bill Price > *Cc:* Regina Hendrix; ec(a)osenergy.org; Bill DePaulo; Karen Grubb; Mike > Price; Sandra Cress; Allan Tweddle; Autumn; Barbara Fallon; Beth > Little; Dave Saville; Duane Nichols; Jim Kotcon; Kate Stone; Matt > Keller; Paul Wilson; Rory McIlmoil > *Subject:* Re: Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal > > > > Last year at the CTL Conference > (http://www.clean-coal.info/drupal/2007ctlconference) Bill Price from > Environmental Justice was involved with putting together an organized > protest that included a fly-over. Maybe he already has put together > something for the annual Coal Conference. I am adding him to this thread. > > Interesting to note that the interim President of WVU will be a > speaker, too, along with Bush, but no real surprise. > > -Jonathan > > Jim Sconyers wrote: > > We gotta be there! Can you come to the Greenbrier to protest against > Bush energy "policy," clean coal, coal, nuclear, ... and FOR clean > green energy? > > Does anyone have the schedule to know what time W is to be there? > > Can someone post this on friendly websites? > > > > Jim Sconyers > jim_scon(a)yahoo.com <mailto:jim_scon@yahoo.com> > 603.969.6712 > > Remember: Mother Nature bats last. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> > <mailto:regina1936@verizon.net> > To: ec(a)osenergy.org <mailto:ec@osenergy.org> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:46:22 PM > Subject: [EC] [Fwd: Re: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal] > > Oh, Oh, we don't need this. > > > > -----Inline Message Follows----- > > Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? > To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com <mailto:trouserdude@gmail.com>> > > Daily Mail Business Editor > > President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal > Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, > White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. > > "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the > importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," > Jones said. > > Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said > today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to > West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as > an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the > important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in > this nation's energy picture." > > The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: > > * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. > > * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American > Electric Power. > > * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd > Co. is a mining consulting company. > > * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, > will talk about national issues relating to coal. > > * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental > Protection. > > * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the > recently released book, "Red Helmet." > > Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com > <http://dailymail.com/News/statenews/contact/ohfvarff+qnvylznvy+pbz+return=/…> > or 348-4836. > > > > Malyka Knapp-Smith > 907 Scenic Drive > Charleston WV 25311 > > Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! > www.seac.org/pledge <http://www.seac.org/pledge> > > Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! > http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 > > Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Daniel Chiotos > SEAC Appalachia Organizer > 1615 Franklin Ave , Apt D > Charleston , WV , 25311 > (304)886-3389 > {www.seac.org <http://www.seac.org/>} > > Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! > http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 > > > Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! > {www.seac.org/pledge <http://www.seac.org/pledge>} > > > "We may be poor but we are not for sale" > -Great Song > > > > > -- > My URL: myspace.com/coalriverpaul <http://myspace.com/coalriverpaul> > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > Here we go again, our health and mountains on the drawing board. > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org > <mailto:danny@seac.org>> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Malyka Knapp-Smith* <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com > <mailto:mknappsmith@yahoo.com>> > Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM > Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? > To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com <mailto:trouserdude@gmail.com>> > > Friday July 25, 2008 > > President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia > > He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future > > by George Hohmann > <http://dailymail.com/News/statenews/contact/ohfvarff+qnvylznvy+pbz+return=/…> > > Daily Mail Business Editor > > President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal > Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, > White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. > > "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the > importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," > Jones said. > > Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said > today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to > West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as > an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the > important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in > this nation's energy picture." > > The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: > > * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. > > * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American > Electric Power. > > * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd > Co. is a mining consulting company. > > * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, > will talk about national issues relating to coal. > > * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental > Protection. > > * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the > recently released book, "Red Helmet." > > Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com > <http://dailymail.com/News/statenews/contact/ohfvarff+qnvylznvy+pbz+return=/…> > or 348-4836. > > > > Malyka Knapp-Smith > 907 Scenic Drive > Charleston WV 25311 > > Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! > www.seac.org/pledge <http://www.seac.org/pledge> > > Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! > http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 > > Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Daniel Chiotos > SEAC Appalachia Organizer > 1615 Franklin Ave , Apt D > Charleston , WV , 25311 > (304)886-3389 > {www.seac.org <http://www.seac.org/>} > > Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! > http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 > > > Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! > {www.seac.org/pledge <http://www.seac.org/pledge>} > > > "We may be poor but we are not for sale" > -Great Song > > > > > -- > My URL: myspace.com/coalriverpaul <http://myspace.com/coalriverpaul> > > > > > >

1 0

Re: [EC] Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal
by Jim Sconyers 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

Can anyoe find out details - times, etc.? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Bill Price <bill.price(a)sierraclub.org> To: Jonathan Rosenbaum <freesource(a)cheat.org>; Jim Sconyers <jim_scon(a)yahoo.com> Cc: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net>; ec(a)osenergy.org; Bill DePaulo <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Karen Grubb <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; Mike Price <greyhawkwv(a)Verizon.net>; Sandra Cress <sandra.cress(a)gmail.com>; Allan Tweddle <allantweddle(a)msn.com>; Autumn <blisssister(a)hotmail.com>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>; Dave Saville <daves(a)labyrinth.net>; Duane Nichols <duane330(a)aol.com>; Jim Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; Kate Stone <klastone(a)cisunix.unh.edu>; Matt Keller <matt.keller(a)wvwild.org>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)lycos.com>; Rory McIlmoil <rorygep(a)gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 4:01:16 PM Subject: RE: Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal We just found out about this. If you guys want to organize something, I can see if coalfield groups want to plug into it. Bill Price, Sierra Club EJ Program 922 Quarrier Street, Suite 304 Charleston , WV 25311 Phone 304-342-3182 Cell 304-389-8822 Fax 304-342-3183 ________________________________ From:Jonathan Rosenbaum [mailto:freesource@cheat.org] Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 3:40 PM To: Jim Sconyers; Bill Price Cc: Regina Hendrix; ec(a)osenergy.org; Bill DePaulo; Karen Grubb; Mike Price; Sandra Cress; Allan Tweddle; Autumn; Barbara Fallon; Beth Little; Dave Saville; Duane Nichols; Jim Kotcon; Kate Stone; Matt Keller; Paul Wilson; Rory McIlmoil Subject: Re: Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal Last year at the CTL Conference (http://www.clean-coal.info/drupal/2007ctlconference) Bill Price from Environmental Justice was involved with putting together an organized protest that included a fly-over. Maybe he already has put together something for the annual Coal Conference. I am adding him to this thread. Interesting to note that the interim President of WVU will be a speaker, too, along with Bush, but no real surprise. -Jonathan Jim Sconyers wrote: We gotta be there! Can you come to the Greenbrier to protest against Bush energy "policy," clean coal, coal, nuclear, ... and FOR clean green energy? Does anyone have the schedule to know what time W is to be there? Can someone post this on friendly websites? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:46:22 PM Subject: [EC] [Fwd: Re: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal] Oh, Oh, we don't need this. -----Inline Message Follows----- Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave , Apt D Charleston , WV , 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- My URL: myspace.com/coalriverpaul -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Here we go again, our health and mountains on the drawing board. On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> wrote: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave , Apt D Charleston , WV , 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- My URL: myspace.com/coalriverpaul

2 1

Re: [EC] WV Gazette Article on Trail and Path
by Jim Sconyers 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

Check this out for a hilarious look at the deadly serious energy crisis. http://nozzlerage.com/ Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Re: [EC] USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU
by Regina Hendrix 28 Jul '08

28 Jul '08

Thank you, Margaret. I wondered why those lists starting showing up in the Corps mailings. Margaret Janes wrote: > Hi Regina - Once we get through the oral arguments in the 4th circuit it > will be several months to the decision - perhaps early 2009. Until that > time WVDEP will issued SMCRA and NPDES permits - Chambers decision will have > no direct influence on that. In order to start mining, however, companies > generally will need to build sediment ponds first and they can't do that > without a 404 permit. At this point because a few months ago Judge Chambers > ordered the Corps to notify us immediately if they issue permits - we know > what is issued pretty much in real time. You may also have noticed that the > Corps is now issuing weekly notices on what individual permits they are > issuing (after violating regulations on notification for many years). So if > the Corps issues permits between now and the decision we could add them to > the Chambers case. There are now 14 mines involved in the case in one way > or the other. Margaret > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Regina Hendrix [mailto:regina1936@verizon.net] > Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:22 PM > To: Margaret Janes > Cc: All of FOM list; ec(a)osenergy.org > Subject: USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU > > Margaret, I just got the Corps' notice on a project at the Muddlety > Surface Mine No. 1, pending permit number S-3004-07, in Nicholas County > on Muddlety Creek, a tributary of the Gauley. They also reference the > NPDES Permit WV1022229. Every time I get one of these notices I'm > traumatized. > > I've added the FOM list and Sierra Club's energy committee as cc's > because I'm probably not the only one who'd like an update on our case > in the 4th Circuit. > > Also, I'm hoping you will give us a short update on where this project > on the Gauley stands, i.e., is this project on hold until we get a > decision in the 4th Circuit? (They mention proposed Valley Fills 1 and > 2.) In this instance would the NPDES permit be on hold also? > > Thanks, once again, for sharing your knowledge of these proposed and > accomplished criminal acts. > > Regina Hendrix > > > > > >

1 0

Bush at Greenbrier next Thursday to Speak about Coal
by Jim Sconyers 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

We gotta be there! Can you come to the Greenbrier to protest against Bush energy "policy," clean coal, coal, nuclear, ... and FOR clean green energy? Does anyone have the schedule to know what time W is to be there? Can someone post this on friendly websites? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last. ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:46:22 PM Subject: [EC] [Fwd: Re: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal] Oh, Oh, we don't need this. -----Inline Message Follows----- Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- My URL: myspace.com/coalriverpaul -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Here we go again, our health and mountains on the drawing board. On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Daniel Chiotos <danny(a)seac.org> wrote: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Malyka Knapp-Smith <mknappsmith(a)yahoo.com> Date: Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:19 PM Subject: joy of joys....can we go protest??????? To: Daniel Chiotos <trouserdude(a)gmail.com> Friday July 25, 2008 President George W. Bush headed to West Virginia He will speak about importance of coal in national energy future by George Hohmann Daily Mail Business Editor President George W. Bush will speak at the West Virginia Coal Association's annual meeting next Thursday at The Greenbrier Resort, White House spokesman Blair Jones said today. "The president will talk about overall energy issues and the importance of clean coal technologies and nuclear power technologies," Jones said. Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association, said today, "We're so very honored that the President has chosen to come to West Virginia and to the West Virginia Coal Association's meeting as an opportunity to talk about energy and the needs we have and the important part that West Virginia coal miners and coal mines play in this nation's energy picture." The meeting will be July 31 through Aug. 3. Also scheduled to speak: * West Virginia University Interim President Peter Magrath. * Michael Morris, president and chief executive officer of American Electric Power. * Jim Boyd of John T. Boyd Co. will discuss coal markets. John T. Boyd Co. is a mining consulting company. * Hal Quinn, senior vice president of the National Mining Association, will talk about national issues relating to coal. * Randy Huffman, secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection. * Homer Hickam, one of the original Rocket Boys and author of the recently released book, "Red Helmet." Contact writer George Hohmann at busin...(a)dailymail.com or 348-4836. Malyka Knapp-Smith 907 Scenic Drive Charleston WV 25311 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! www.seac.org/pledge Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Sí Se Puede - Obama 08 -- Cheers, Daniel Chiotos SEAC Appalachia Organizer 1615 Franklin Ave, Apt D Charleston, WV, 25311 (304)886-3389 {www.seac.org} Support the Coal River Wind Campaign - Sign It! http://www.coalriverwind.org/?page_id=28 Power Vote Pledge for Clean & Just Energy - Sign It! {www.seac.org/pledge} "We may be poor but we are not for sale" -Great Song -- My URL: myspace.com/coalriverpaul

4 3

WV Gazette Article on Trail and Path
by Regina Hendrix 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

July 25, 2008 Power line projects moving foward CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- As a decision is expected this week on one huge power line, West Virginia residents are learning about the next transmission project in the pipeline. By Ken Ward Jr. <http://www.wvgazette.com/News/contact/xjneq+jitnmrggr+pbz+return=/News/2008…> Staff writer [cnImage] Download detailed maps of the proposed PATH routes <http://wvgazette.com/News/200807240459> [cnImage] What do you think? Click here to leave a comment. <http://wvgazette.com/comments?build=yes&ContID=200807240460> CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- As a decision nears on one huge power line across northern West Virginia, plans are taking shape for another high-voltage transmission line from Charleston to Martinsburg. Later this week, the state Public Service Commission is scheduled to announce its ruling on the $1.3 billion Trans-Allegheny Interstate Project, or TrAIL. That 500-kilovolt-transmission line runs from southwestern Pennsylvania, across northern West Virginia into Virginia. And last week, developers began a series of "open house" meetings to discuss the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, being promoted as PATH. That line would run 290 miles from near the John Amos power plant outside St. Albans to a substation proposed southeast of Frederick, Md. Allegheny Energy proposed the TrAIL project, and PATH is a joint venture between Allegheny and American Electric Power. Supporters say that these projects are needed so the nation's aging electricity grid can continue to provide cheap and reliable power to big Eastern cities and their growing suburbs. But TrAIL has - and PATH is almost certain to - draw intense opposition from West Virginians who fear huge power lines and towers will mar scenic views, lower their property values, and continue what they say is an environmentally damaging reliance on coal-fired electricity. "The Sierra Club will be monitoring this issue closely, and we expect to be involved when the application is filed with the PSC; however a final decision will likely be made at that time," said Jim Kotcon, a spokesman for the group. "A lot may depend on the precedents set in the TrAIL case, as that could revise our opportunities for effectively influencing the outcome." Under state law, the PSC must decide if the TrAIL project "will economically, adequately and reliably contribute to meeting the present and anticipated requirements for electric power of the customers served" and if it is "desirable for present and anticipated reliability of service for electric power for its service area or region." Commissioners must also decide if the project "will result in an acceptable balance between reasonable power needs and reasonable environmental factors." As originally proposed, the West Virginia portion of TrAIL would run about 114 miles through six counties, from north of Morgantown, through Monongalia, Preston and Tucker counties, and then across Grant, Hardy and Hampshire counties into Virginia. Commissioners have set Saturday as their deadline for issuing a ruling in the case.

1 0

USACE Pub. Notice 2007-134-GAU
by Regina Hendrix 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

Margaret, I just got the Corps' notice on a project at the Muddlety Surface Mine No. 1, pending permit number S-3004-07, in Nicholas County on Muddlety Creek, a tributary of the Gauley. They also reference the NPDES Permit WV1022229. Every time I get one of these notices I'm traumatized. I've added the FOM list and Sierra Club's energy committee as cc's because I'm probably not the only one who'd like an update on our case in the 4th Circuit. Also, I'm hoping you will give us a short update on where this project on the Gauley stands, i.e., is this project on hold until we get a decision in the 4th Circuit? (They mention proposed Valley Fills 1 and 2.) In this instance would the NPDES permit be on hold also? Thanks, once again, for sharing your knowledge of these proposed and accomplished criminal acts. Regina Hendrix

1 0

Re: [EC] Hildebrand and Opekiska Hydroelectric Projects
by James Kotcon 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

I would very much like to look it over. The City of Morgantown is interested in this as a "green power " project. If they cqn meet Low Impact Hydropower Institue guidelines, we should consider supporting the project. JBK >>> Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> 07/27/08 2:45 PM >>> I got an envelope from San Francisco yesterday that contains a July 11 letter from a consulting firm called Devine Tarbell & Associates, Inc. (For some reason they sent it to San Fran instead of WV Chapter.) The stated purpose of the letter is to: "1. Notify interested governmental agencies, local governments, tribal governments, non-governmental organizations and individuals of the upcoming licensing proceedings; and "2. Request your help in identifying existing, relevant and reasonably available information related to the Hildebrand and Opekiska Project areas. There are maps and other information attached and they are asking that the questionnaire be completed and returned withing 30 days. (The letter is dated Jul 11). Someone please let me know who on Energy Committee should receive this so I can get this in the mail tomorrow. Regina 304-343-5211 _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

1 0

Hildebrand and Opekiska Hydroelectric Projects
by Regina Hendrix 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

I got an envelope from San Francisco yesterday that contains a July 11 letter from a consulting firm called Devine Tarbell & Associates, Inc. (For some reason they sent it to San Fran instead of WV Chapter.) The stated purpose of the letter is to: "1. Notify interested governmental agencies, local governments, tribal governments, non-governmental organizations and individuals of the upcoming licensing proceedings; and "2. Request your help in identifying existing, relevant and reasonably available information related to the Hildebrand and Opekiska Project areas. There are maps and other information attached and they are asking that the questionnaire be completed and returned withing 30 days. (The letter is dated Jul 11). Someone please let me know who on Energy Committee should receive this so I can get this in the mail tomorrow. Regina 304-343-5211

1 0

[Fwd: Charleston Gazette article]
by Regina Hendrix 27 Jul '08

27 Jul '08

See Mountain State Sierran, July-Aug 2008 issue, "A battle Won, But the War Rages On". The attached Gazette article describes the next engagement of this long running battle. It just keeps coming back. Regina

1 0

[Fwd: Re: [fom] Bush Heading to WV to Speak about Coal]
by Regina Hendrix 26 Jul '08

26 Jul '08

Oh, Oh, we don't need this.

2 1

[Fwd: [fom] rising costs of energy production]
by Regina Hendrix 25 Jul '08

25 Jul '08

Thought you might like to see this. Rory is working on the Coal River Mountain Watch Wind Project. Regina

1 0

Fwd: Stop Mountaintop Removal Mining Petition
by Paul Wilson 25 Jul '08

25 Jul '08

It would be great if folks on this list could help circulate this petition. thanks, paul Hi everyone, Just wanted to let you all know that we've just sent out a link to the new petition featured on StopMountaintopRemoval.org to one of our largest Sierra Club email lists. The link was featured in this week's Sierra Club Insider, and can be viewed here: http://action.sierraclub.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=64341.0. Lets hope we get a great response rate! Very best, Lauren ___________________________ Lauren Trevisan Associate Representative National Coal Campaign 408 C Street, NE Washington, DC 20002 tel: 202.675.6278 fax: 202.547.6009 lauren.trevisan(a)sierraclub.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

US-EPA releases report
by Duane330＠aol.com 24 Jul '08

24 Jul '08

EPA RELEASES REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN HEALTH The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released a report developed by _The U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP)_ (http://www.climatescience.gov/) titled "Analyses of the Effects of Global Change on Human Health and Welfare and Human Systems." The report identifies strategies on how to respond to the challenges of a changing climate and identifies near- and long-term research goals that address data and knowledge gaps. The report is thus far the most up-to-date scientific assessment on the impact of global change on human health, welfare and settlements in the country. For more information, go to _Information on Analyses of the Effects of Global Change on Human Health and Welfare and Human Systems_ (http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=197244) and _The Office of Research and Development's Global Change Research Program_ (http://www.epa.gov/ord/npd/globalresearch-intro.htm) **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)

1 0

Path public meetings scheduled
by James Kotcon 15 Jul '08

15 Jul '08

The Potomac Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) is a $1.8 billion theft of your ratepayer dollars in order to pump more coal-fired electricity to the East Coast, undercutting cleaner generation sources in those areas. The Company is guaranteed a Rate of return of 14.3 % on any investment, regardless of whether the line ever gets built, so you can be sure they will just keep spending your money to promote this project! Public meetings are now scheduled across West Virginia in the coming weeks. Tell everyone you know, and tell local legislators to attend and to oppose this boondoggle. JBK More information is at: http://pathtransmission.com/meetings/ Open Houses 5 to 8 p.m. July 21 – Stonewall, W.Va. - Stonewall Jackson State Park, Roanoke Building July 22 – Glenville, W.Va. - Glenville State College, Mollohan Community Center July 23 – Spencer, W.Va. - Heritage Park Community Building July 24 – Flatwoods, W.Va. - Days Inn July 28 – Buckhannon, W.Va. - Location To Be Announced July 29 – Elkins, W.Va. - American Legion Post 29 July 30 – Mount Storm, W.Va. - Mount Storm Fire Hall July 31 – Romney, W.Va. - South Branch Inn Aug. 4 – St. Albans, W.Va. - WV State University's College Union Aug. 5 – Davis, W.Va. - Davis Fire Hall Aug. 6 – Martinsburg, W.Va. - Comfort Inn Aug. 7 – Gore, Va. - Location To Be Announced Aug. 11 – Harpers Ferry, W.Va. - Quality Hotel & Conference Center Aug. 12 – Frederick, Md. - Holiday Inn Conference Center Aug. 13 – Boonsboro, Md. - American Legion Post 10 Aug. 14 – Lovettsville, Va. - Location To Be Announced

1 1

Fwd: ocs--update
by Paul Wilson 11 Jul '08

11 Jul '08

This is a good opportunity to add comments about moving away from coal in the paragraph that you can add/edit. Use the link below to send a letter to Shelly Moore Capito or your respective representative. thanks, paul w. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Keren Murphy <Keren.Murphy(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:44 PM Subject: ocs--update To: CONS-WPST-MARINE-FORUM(a)lists.sierraclub.org *Arctic and OCS Action Day: July 8----Update* Keren O'Brien Murphy On Tuesday, July 8, concerned citizens across the country welcomed Congress back from its July Fourth recess with calls to their Representatives urging them not to open the coastal plain of the Arctic Refuge or protected coasts to offshore drilling. We will have the approximate final number of calls made to offices tomorrow Environmental groups, including Sierra Club, circulated alerts to their arctic and OCS activists asking them to call their members of congress. We ran a similar alert nationally asking people to take action and tell their member of congress to oppose any attempts to open the arctic or protected coasts to drilling. This alert is featured on Sierra Club's website, facebook page, Facebook Action Center and ran in this weeks Currents. The national alert can be found here: * https://secure2.convio.net/sierra/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr009=i2adahp8… *<https://secure2.convio.net/sierra/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr009=i2adahp8…> Attached is the alert that was circulated to Arctic activists. Also on July 8th, lobbyists from Sierra Club, Alaska Wilderness League, Audubon Society, Earth Justice, Defenders of Wildlife and Environment America hit the hill. Making lobby visits to targeted offices with the message that we need real solutions, not drilling. Specifically asking them to oppose efforts to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, lift the offshore drilling moratorium and lift the moratorium on new oil shale development. *Context: * This week the Interior Appropriations Committee has tentatively scheduled a mark up of the Interior Appropriations Bill. Once again we are expecting a slew of drilling amendments; Peterson's offshore drilling amendment being the most famous. However, we are hearing that the bill will be delayed for the immediate future due in part to these drilling amendments. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fw: WV Chapter National Coal Campaign Funding
by Barbara Fallon 09 Jul '08

09 Jul '08

FYI.. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Verena Owen <baumling(a)aol.com> To: brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 10:17:06 PM Subject: Re: WV Chapter National Coal Campaign Funding Dear Barbara, Thanks for submitting a well thought-out small grant request. As you know, small grants are funded out of a limited pot of money. While we think that your proposal has merit, we feel we cannot pay for litigation and related expert witnesses, the small grant program is not meant for that. However, the Club's Environmental Law Program is interested in working with you and may be able to help you. Please contact Pat Gallagher at Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org, he is waiting to hear from you. Thanks for all you do for the environment! Best Verena Verena Owen Advisor, Sierra Club National Coal Campaign Verena Owen Advisor, Sierra Club National Coal Campaign -----Original Message----- From: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> To: baumling(a)aol.com Sent: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 8:21 am Subject: WV Chapter National Coal Campaign Funding Vernea, Thank you for considering our request. Barbara Fallon Energy Chair WV Chapter Sierra Club ________________________________ The Famous, the infamous, the lame - in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar Now!

1 0

Fw: Fwd: SES request from West Virginia
by Barbara Fallon 09 Jul '08

09 Jul '08

WE did not get this grant, nor did we get the Coal grant (will forward.) Our grant proposals were good, but our specific needs are not appropriate (does not sit well with me.) Pat Gallagher (Sierra Law Program, Director) is interested in helping us here, and I am waiting to hear from him. I am extremely disappointed in SES. Otherwise, we still need to do the March fundraising letter. Barbara Jim, thanks for getting an update in the Sierran. Attached are the grants and a thankyou letter to recent donars. ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Stephen Crowley <scrow(a)sover.net> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 1:44:08 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: SES request from West Virginia Barbara, briefly, there was considerable discussion and no resolution about whether powerlines fall within the domain of SES (v. AWL). Some felt this was a good quandary to overlook and go ahead with funding, others felt otherwise. There were also questions raised about whether lawsuits were the best use of our limited funds. There were once again double the requests compared to available funds, so other proposals that had clear and more unanimous support got funded. Yours was not the only good proposal that did not get funded; almost all were excellent proposals, and only half were funded. Steve At 09:03 AM 7/8/2008, you wrote: Steve, This is disappointing and disheartening news. Funding from SES-CIC made the difference in our campaign last year. I am not sure that we can maintain our campaign without SES-CIC funding. Outside sources of funding for litigation and expert witnesses are very hard, if not impossible, to find. I know that the grant we submitted was a good one and the work that we are doing is good work. I had submitted quarterly reports to you in a timely manner last year. What can I tell my committee about why we did not get additional funding this year? I need more to say than we "did not fit in the mix." SES-CIC helped us get to a crossroads on this campaign and now we have to decide what to do. Best Regards, Barbara ----- Original Message ---- From: Stephen Crowley <scrow(a)sover.net> To: jason(a)wyovoters.org; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 6:25:00 PM Subject: Re: Fwd: SES request from West Virginia Jason and Barbara, The SES team met in January and determined that this was not in the mix for this year. My apologies if this word did not get to you right away. Steve Crowley At 03:37 PM 7/3/2008, you wrote: Hi Steve, I just saw this in my inbox. Not sure what happened here. Anything come to mind that I can tell Barbara? Best wishes for the holiday weekend. Jason Marsden ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com > Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:04 AM Subject: SES request from West Virginia To: Jason Marsden <jcmarsden(a)gmail.com> Jason, I hope this note finds you well and with some environmental successes under your belt. Last year (June) you were very helpful to the WVa. Chapter of the Sierra Club by reviewing our SES-CIC request for funding. Apparently our request had gotten lost in the shuffle and you unshuffled it. Well, this seems to have happened again. I am wondering if you are still on the SES committee and if so, if you could look into the status of our funding request. I submitted our letter on inquiry on 1/4/08. I sent a follow up note on 6/23/08. I have still not heard any news one way or another. We are in a position to negotiate with expert witnesses again, and we are reluctant to do so until we know our funding base. Attached is the letter of inquiry I submitted last January. Thank you Jason, and best regards, Barbara Fallon PS. Status from last year....I wouldn't say that Allegheny is winning, but they are not loosing either!!! You know how this goes. -- Jason Marsden Executive Director Wyoming Conservation Voters www.wyovoters.org (307) 265-0870 PO Box 2664 Casper, Wyo. 82602-2664 Content-Type: application/msword; name="Letter of inquiry SES 08.doc" X-Attachment-Id: 0.1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Letter of inquiry SES 08.doc"

1 0

TrAILCo
by James Kotcon 05 Jul '08

05 Jul '08

>From the PSC web page. Senator Byrd got the following message and asked the PSC to give him info to respond. The interesting part is the line in the Oakland MD paper that says the line will run through "a small part of Maryland..." JBK Snapshot Report: lncominu Constituent Message Report Date:6/312008 Mr. James Hc 70 Box 577 Canaan Valley WV sg22cnv@canaantv. tv Dear Mr. Morvay: L-BUS Morvay 26260 USA Message Body: Date Received: 6/2/2008 10:07:21 AM I found the following in the Online Edition of the Oakland, MD Republican. > The assistant director (Frank Shap, Economic Development) also reported that a company contracted to build 500-kilovolt power lines was interested in locating in the Southern Garrett Industrial Park. The lines will run through Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia, and a small portion of Garrett County as part of the PJM grid extension project. > Shap said the company wants a building in the Oakland area to use as its headquarters/maintenance facility while employees would be working in West Virginia. > "That will be a multi-year construction job in support of that operation," he said. > > I realize that it is probably a forgone conclusion that the power line will be built, but can't it for once have West Virginia get something, rather than the appearance that anything power related seems to leave our state.

1 0

Fwd: Coal Campaign Media update
by Paul Wilson 04 Jul '08

04 Jul '08

fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ginny Cramer <virginia.cramer(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:17 PM Subject: Media update To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org Hi all, New media materials are now up on our Clubhouse page-- please check them out. http://www.clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/ New talking points: http://www.clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-talking-po ints-063008.doc<http://www.clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-talking-p…> New coal industry ads debunked on our Ad Watch: http://www.clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-ad-respons es.aspx (Watch the ads on our public web site www.sierraclub.org/coal/adwatch) Also, find new letters to the editor and sample op/eds in the Messaging Headquarters: http://www.clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-messaging. aspx Need materials but don't see them on our page? Let us know. Have a great 4th, ginny --------------------- Virginia Cramer Associate Press Secretary Sierra Club tel: 804-225-9113 x 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: Story opportunities for July/Aug
by Paul Wilson 03 Jul '08

03 Jul '08

contact Rob with your story ideas asap. paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Public NewsService Web Site <wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org> Date: Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:04 PM Subject: Story opportunities for July/Aug To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com Hi there – We're putting together the story calendar for July for West Virginia News Service, and we have some brainstorming thoughts to share….we have openings for lots of stories this summer. Please let us know if you have something coming up, especially if it's a story that can go out Monday, July 7th – which is a great day to position stories for maximum radio station use because it's the Monday after a long holiday weekend. Pocketbook issues, or any issue that can relate to family budgets, will play well with stations right now. ** High gasoline prices have dramatically changed Americans' views on energy and the environment, with more people now viewing oil drilling and new power plants as a greater priority than energy conservation, according to a new survey. This is a topic worth some "exploration" itself. It's based on the supply-and-demand belief of the American public. Gas usage is already down one percent in the U.S. and prices aren't going down – the public needs to understand that gas prices are not related to supply. If anyone wants to tackle this angle, let us know – I think it's worth it, especially after so many families will spend their 4th of July holiday closer to home to save on gas expenses. **How will that affect the state's tourism industry? Hunting and fishing seasons and outfitters? **Maybe you have tips for how families can save on energy expenses. And why they should do everything they can because it looks like the home heating bill for those using oil could be huge this winter. **How are rising prices for everything changes the budget of the state's nonprofits – which also act as the family safety-nets during tough times? Inflation is stealing food off food pantry shelves. **Tips on how to stretch grocery budgets for families? For farmers and ranchers? **State and city budgets are beginning to feel the pinch of the downturn. How should they react? Historically, they start cutting the very services that help sustain people through the downturn. Can we help educate on a different angle? If you want to brainstorm some more, I'm standing by. Thanks for taking a look and keep us posted - Happy holiday! Deborah Courson Smith and Dave Law, West Virginia News Service 888-692-8362 --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org and put the word "remove" in the subject line. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: GA court cites carbon in coal-plant ruling
by James Kotcon 01 Jul '08

01 Jul '08

This is BIIIGGGGG!!!!! Can we use it in the TrAILCo case? JBK >>> Ginny Cramer <virginia.cramer(a)SIERRACLUB.ORG> 7/1/2008 11:04 AM >>> Hi all, I wanted to share one of the stories coming out of the great victory in Georgia yesterday. Apologies if you've already seen this. - ginny Georgia court cites carbon in coal-plant ruling Tue Jul 1, 2008 12:00am BST HOUSTON, June 30 (Reuters) - A Georgia state court on Monday invalidated a permit to build a 1,200-megawatt coal-fired power plant, citing the developers' failure to limit emissions of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas blamed for global warming. An environmental group immediately praised the decision, predicting it would lead to reconsideration of many coal-fired power plants under development in the country. The order, from Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore, reversed an air permit issued earlier this year by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to Longleaf Energy Resources, a joint venture of Houston-based Dynegy Inc (DYN.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and LS Power Group. The judge disagreed with regulators' action to reject carbon dioxide as a pollutant that is subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, citing a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision. In that order, the Supreme Court said carbon dioxide is a pollutant under the existing federal law. A Dynegy spokesman said the company was reviewing the ruling and had no comment on the future of the project, a traditional, pulverized coal plant to be built in Early County, Georgia. The Sierra Club, which is fighting construction of many new coal plants, along with Friends of the Chattahoochee Inc, challenged the Longleaf air permit, which put no restrictions on the expected emissions of 8-million-plus tons of carbon dioxide. "This is the first court of any stripe to interpret the Supreme Court's ruling as it applies to coal-burning power plants," said Bruce Nilles, director of the Sierra Club's national coal campaign. Nilles likened the importance of the Georgia court ruling to Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius' decision last year to reject a new coal plant in that state on grounds that global warming is a public health threat. "In one swift decision, it changes the debate around global warming regulation in the United States because it now means that every coal plant has to consider its CO2 impacts," Nilles said. The Sierra Club hopes the ruling will accelerate the debate to create a strong federal bill to protect the climate, Nilles said. (Reporting by Eileen O'Grady in Houston and Bernie Woodall in Los Angeles; Editing by Christian Wiessner) --------------------- Virginia Cramer Associate Press Secretary Sierra Club tel: 804-225-9113 x 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/

1 0

Fwd: Bill News 21 -- KY & MA approve energy bills
by James Kotcon 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

Check out he bill just passed by our neighbor Kentucky. JBK >>> Paula Carrell <Paula.Carrell(a)sierraclub.org> 6/27/2008 7:42 PM >>> CONTENTS 1. KY Acts on Energy Efficiency 2. MA Energy Bill a Mixed Bag 1. KY Acts on Energy Efficiency -- HB 2 signed by the Governor And here's a challenge for other southern states: * Establishes high performance buildings standards and timeframes for state-funded construction, and requires that by 2018, state-leased buildings meet those same standards; * An opportunity for boards of education to conserve more of their funding for instructional and other purposes by requiring enrollment in the very-successful Kentucky Energy Efficiency Program that is offered by the Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center and which has demonstrated the ability to conserve energy and save money for its current enrollees through common-sense efforts and monitoring of energy usage; * Residential Energy Efficiency -- Kentucky Income Tax Credits for a percentage of installed costs of upgraded insulation, energy-efficient windows and doors, and heating and cooling systems; * Commercial Property Energy Efficiency -- State Income Tax Credits for a percentage of installed costs of energy-efficiency interior lighting systems and HVAC systems; * Energy Star Home and Manufactured Home Credits -- for builders of ENERGY STAR homes and purchasers of ENERGY STAR manufactured homes. * A directive to the Public Service Commission to consider next-generation residential utility meters when reviewing utility demand management plans. The first step to ratepayers being able to better control their energy bills, and to utilities being able to manage their load in order to avoid or defer costly investments in meeting peak power demands, is so-called “smart metering” that offers customers and utilities a way to work in partnership to manage electricity demand and utility bill costs. * State Income Tax Credits for a percentage of installed costs of active and passive solar space heating systems, solar water heating systems, wind turbines, and solar photovoltaics systems. . . . and there's more. Full bill text at http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/08RS/HB2.htm 2. MA Enacts Problematic Energy Bill -- Gov. expected to sign next week Jay McCaffrey says, "We support the bill, it will make significant strides to put Massachusetts on a path to a sustainable energy future. However, the hydro language is weak on environmental safeguards, and the bill includes a coal gasification proposal that was a total inside deal for a plant here in MA that wants gov handouts to jump start its crummy program. Unfortunately that standard is bad enough to wipe out some of the other gains in the bill." Bill Summary * Instructs the state to meet at least 25 percent of its electric load with demand-side resources like energy efficiency and load management by the year 2020, and 20 percent of the load through renewable and alternative energy generation by the same year. Utility companies would have to acquire 15 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2020. * Energy distributors would have to consider all energy options for power, and electric companies would be required to buy resources based on cost effectiveness and stability, with enforcement mechanisms attached. Fossil fuel use in buildings would be cut by 10 percent from 2007 levels by the year 2020, and total energy consumption would have to fall at least 10 percent by the year 2017. * Regional Green House Gas Initiative: Establishes a RGGI trust fund and requires 100% auction. At least 80% of the auction revenues will go to utility-administered efficiency and Demand Response programs, with the rest going to communities affected by RGGI-forced plant closings and "green communities". * Least Cost Procurement: The bill dramatically increases energy efficiency potential in Massachusetts by changing the way utilities (NStar, National Grid, etc) purchase energy. Now they will have to purchase efficiency when possible to cover load requirements. This should spur increased Energy Efficiency opportunities in Massachusetts. * Coal Gasification: The bill does allow coal gasification to receive benefits under RPS. This was a defeat for the advocacy community. The emission cap is weaker than we would have liked, allowing co2 emissions levels equal to those of the Massachusetts Natural Gas plant average. Instead of requiring coal gasification projects to operate as cleanly as a new combined cycle natural gas power plant, they only have to operate as cleanly as an average natural gas plant. Some other states don’t even allow base-load power plants to be built unless they meet a more stringent standard than this, so it is disappointing that Massachusetts would set a lower bar for such projects to qualify for incentives. However, the bill does include some important protections, including a requirement for carbon capture and sequestration. * Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust Fund: The Mass Renewable Trust will still exist but with tighter controls and oversight by a new governing board. The Governing board will create 5-year plans for the regular board and could take Trust money for the new "Green Communities" program. Several new technologies included in fundable items for Renewable Energy Trust (geothermal, for example and improvements to the internal combustion engine). * International Energy Conservation Code (IECC): Massachusetts will adopt and enforce the IECC within 1 yr of each revision, and the state has discretion to adopt more stringent provisions to the extent the relevant agencies “conclude they are warranted” * Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS): Extends the RPS so that it will continue to grow at 1% per year past 2009. Full bill text at http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/185/st02pdf/st02768.pdf

1 0

Re: [EC] AP Trail
by Grubb, Karen 30 Jun '08

30 Jun '08

I can suggest where to look and forward your email in case someone knows of a more recent map. http://www.aptrailinfo.com/ http://www.aptrailinfo.com/index.php?page=propertyowners http://www.aptrailinfo.com/index.php?page=propertyowners_west_virginia Karen Grubb Sierra Club ________________________________ From: Tom Frame [mailto:Tom.Frame@RaymondJames.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:47 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: AP Trail I am a property owner on the Monongalia / Marion county line and was just alerted that the most recent path of the power line might parallel the existing line which borders my property right by White Day Creek. Can you tell me exactly where I can find a good map of the currently proposed route ? Tom Frame Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. 304-599-7991 800-950-5516 Raymond James Financial Services does not accept orders and/or instructions regarding your account by e-mail, voice mail, fax or any alternate method. Transactional details do not supersede normal trade confirmations or statements. E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure or confidential. Raymond James Financial Services reserves the right to monitor all e-mail. Any information provided in this e-mail has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by Raymond James Financial Services and is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Raymond James Financial Services and its employees may own options, rights or warrants to purchase any of the securities mentioned in e-mail. This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from your computer.

2 1

Re: [EC] energy/coal
by Grubb, Karen 25 Jun '08

25 Jun '08

I hope Jonathan has already put you on the energy committee list, but as Conservation Chair, you should be on that list and get wilderness updates. Can you be Chair and Conservation Chair? ________________________________ From: Jim Sconyers [mailto:jim_scon@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:17 AM To: Barbara Fallon; Grubb, Karen; bill.price(a)sierraclub.org Subject: energy/coal Hi folks- I'm still catching up to speed after being away. I know there is an Energy Committee and an Environmental Justice staffer. As Conservation Chair I hope to learn "what's going on" in those entities. Presently I think it would be accurate to say that the only thing I do know is the work on the TrailCo and Path transmission lines. If you could share more information about your issues/programs/campaigns, I would certainly appreciate it. On a related note, I'm wondering if we have a specific Coal Campaign. Or are the power lines an aspect of opposition to coal, as would be Bill's work I assume. I wonder if one of these days we could recruit more volunteers, lobby Manchin and others, do corporate accountability, picket, etc. Maybe that's already happening. One reason for asking is I'm trying to figure out what we would want potential volunteers to do if we got some resulting from the Coal Film Festival and the MTR Tours among other things. Thanks for educating me about what's going on with WVSC. Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.

1 0

Fwd: Story calendar openings - let's brainstorm!
by Paul Wilson 24 Jun '08

24 Jun '08

fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Public NewsService Web Site <wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org> Date: Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:33 PM Subject: Story calendar openings - let's brainstorm! To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com Greetings! We have openings in our story calendar for the remained of June, as well as into July. July 7th will be a great day to position stories as radio stations will be coming back to an empty story folder after the July 4th long holiday weekend. If sending me an email reply - please CC debbienews(a)gmail.com, as we've noticed some email glitches on the regular wyns(a)publicnewsservice.orgaddress and I want to make sure I don't miss a thing! Let us know if there are events, reports, editorials, campaigns, education projects, or anything else on your calendars. The more info, the better! Some notes on current news that may help with brainstorming. The economic downtown - rising prices for just about everything - increases economic pressure on families. Those already predisposed to abuse issues are at a higher risk during tough family budget times. More complaints coming in about Google Earth - from people worried about privacy, and those who being stalked. Google will remove pictures of a person's home by request - but they don't make a big public campaign about it - and maybe we should. If a person leaves a domestic violence situation, or is being stalked, they ought to be able to keep a picture of their safe location out of the public world. James Hansen, one of the world's leading climate scientists, is calling for the chief executives of large fossil fuel companies to be put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature, accusing them of actively spreading doubt about global warming in the same way that tobacco companies blurred the links between smoking and cancer. Pocketbook issues are big because of rising consumer prices – nonprofits are hit hard to deliver services, especially with increasing demand, because the prices hit them, too. "Staycation" is a buzz word this summer as people look for ways to avoid rising travel costs. The number of underinsured U.S. adults--people who have health coverage that does not adequately protect them from high medical expenses--has risen dramatically, finds a new Commonwealth Fund study. As of 2007, there were an estimated 25 million underinsured adults in the United States, up 60 percent from 2003. Microsoft's Bill Gates retires this week – to focus full-time on philanthropy. Will he inspire more philanthropy, spark a revival? New research suggests that the average supermarket shopper is willing to pay a premium price for locally produced foods, providing some farmers an attractive option to enter a niche market that could boost their revenues. Interesting since food prices are rising anyway – how does this fit in with being a healthy, conscious consumer? The study also showed that shoppers at farm markets are willing to pay almost twice as much extra as retail grocery shoppers for the same locally produced foods. Thanks for taking a look! Deborah Courson Smith/ Regional Editor Public News Service/ West Virginia News Service 888-692-8362 dcourson(a)publicnewsservice.org debbienews(a)gmail.com www.publicnewsservice.org --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org and put the word "remove" in the subject line. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

info somewhere about more plants
by Barbara Fallon 24 Jun '08

24 Jun '08

I am trying to recall something I read about more powerplants being build if the transmission lines are approved. Can someone direct me to that info. I need a writable byte for a grant...

1 0

FW: PATH Web Site Contact Form
by Grubb, Karen 23 Jun '08

23 Jun '08

________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:00 PM To: nhooff(a)somersetdev.com; WVBiker98(a)aol.com; bellamy(a)frontiernet.net; tbusithi(a)shepherd.edu Cc: Grubb, Karen; martinburke(a)frontiernet.net; bSPICHER(a)frontiernet.net; jcampbell(a)somersetdev.com Subject: Re: PATH Web Site Contact Form Will do. Beth and I were in Canada (Montreal and Quebec) for a week's vacation. Rainy, but the food was great. so we were unable to go to the meetings. Generally, I understand no information was given on possible routes, but I am sure there were many statements on the need to avoid Antietam. The meetings for the West Virginia route will be held later in the summer. Deliberations on the TrAIL transmission line to the South continue with the results expected by not later than August 2nd. Presumably, many of the arguments in favor and against will be the same for PATH as for TrAIL, so that is being watched closely. In a message dated 6/23/2008 10:36:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, nhooff(a)somersetdev.com writes: Michael: Thanks for keeping me informed. I hope you can also add Martin Burke and Barbara Spicher who live on Terrapin Neck as well to your emails on this subject. We all want to keep a close eye on this. I have been forwarding your info to them. Did you go to the informational meetings on June 17 and 18th? I hope all is well with you... Nancy Hooff Somerset Development Company 4115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 210 Washington, DC 20016 Phone: 202-363-2090 Fax: 202-363-1110 www.somersetdev.com ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:26 PM To: WVBiker98(a)aol.com; bellamy(a)frontiernet.net; nhooff(a)somersetdev.com; tbusithi(a)shepherd.edu Cc: kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu Subject: Fwd: PATH Web Site Contact Form ________________________________ From: taholliday(a)aep.com To: mjlippe(a)aol.com Sent: 6/4/2008 2:14:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Re: PATH Web Site Contact Form Hello Mr. Lippe, We appreciate your interest in the PATH project. We're in the process of preparing for two initial informational meetings that will take place in Maryland on June 17 and 18. I've provided the information below. We'll be publishing notices of the meetings in local newspapers and on radio stations in the very near future. These first two meetings will provide general information about the project, but the meetings will not feature specific line routes at this time, as the companies are currently studying routing alternatives. Frederick County Holiday Inn and Conference Center (adjacent to Francis Scott Key Mall) 5400 Holiday Drive Frederick, MD * June 17th * 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM Washington County The American Legion-Post 10 710 North Main Street Boonsboro, MD * June 18th * 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM We also plan to hold a series of open houses in late July and early August throughout the West Virginia and Maryland study area to present preliminary siting alternatives and to solicit feedback from area residents. Specific dates, locations and times for those meetings have not been finalized yet. I hope this is helpful. Sincerely, Thomas A. Holliday, APR Director Corporate Communications American Electric Power 1 Riverside Plaza - 19th Fl. Columbus, OH 43215-2373 PH: (614) 716-1403 aud. 222 Email: taholliday(a)aep.com <mjlippe(a)aol.com> 06/04/2008 12:15 To PM <askpath(a)pathtransmission.com> cc <jpolk(a)aep.com> Subject PATH Web Site Contact Form PATH Web Site Contact Form ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Michael Lippe E-mail: mjlippe(a)aol.com Phone #: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Comment: Please advise me the schedule and places for your public meetings or surveys for deciding on issues for the routing of PATH, particularly from Bedington to Kemptown. Thank you! Message sent: 6/4/2008 12:15:36 PM

1 0

Re: [EC] energy committee
by James Kotcon 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Duane did decline. Perhaps a committee meeting is in order to plot future startegies. I talked briefly with Bill dePaulo aout where to go from here re TrAIL. He is interested in rsuing some appeals and I think they have merit, but little further action is needed until the PSC issues a decision on August 2. Perhaps a meeting in July is a good idea. Does anyone want to propose a date. JBK >>> "Grubb, Karen" <Karen.Grubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> 06/16/08 3:30 PM >>> Barbara and I are concerned that there is still no energy chair. Jim K. was going to ask Duane and I think he said no. Barbara wants more direction on where we are going with TrAIL and PATH to help her in grant writing. She says that Bill has asked her to also do fundraising for the membership committee, but I'm not sure she has time to be involved with that also. I was hoping that Bill could be energy chair if he is not involved in us paying him, but Barbara says it would not look good on grant applications for him to be the chair and attorney. Also, I don't feel comfortable committing $10,000 to Blackwater Canyon at this time. $5000 would be acceptable since Friends of Blackwater are contributing $5000. Do you know how the vote is going on that motion? People do not always reply to all when voting, so I may have missed a vote. Thanks, Karen P.S. I was able to vote on the Democrat Primary since I was just asked if I wanted a Democrat or Republican ballot. Were you able to vote Dem, Jim?

3 2

Re: [EC] energy committee
by Barbara Fallon 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

I am coordinating fundraising now. This is my window of opportunity. Currently I am coordinating a conference call with the fundraising committee. Perhaps prior to that call a conference call should be made with the entire energy committee and the EXCOM. Karen as the vice chair of the Energy coommittee will you please coordinate a conference call of the energy committee. A meeting in July is also in order. As I recall I owe Jim K. a chicken dinnner. Barbara ----- Original Message ---- From: "William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> To: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> Cc: ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:03:20 AM Subject: Re: [EC] energy committee JIM THE BIG EXCEPTION TO "LITTLE TO DO RIGHT NOW" IS TO LOCATE AND HIRE AN EXPERT FOR PATH. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL JIM BUFORD, CPV'S GUY, AND ASK WHAT HE'D CHARGE, OR WHO HE'D RECOMMEND. BILL On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:32 AM, James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> wrote: Duane did decline. Perhaps a committee meeting is in order to plot future startegies. I talked briefly with Bill dePaulo aout where to go from here re TrAIL. He is interested in rsuing some appeals and I think they have merit, but little further action is needed until the PSC issues a decision on August 2. Perhaps a meeting in July is a good idea. Does anyone want to propose a date. JBK >>> "Grubb, Karen" <Karen.Grubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> 06/16/08 3:30 PM >>> Barbara and I are concerned that there is still no energy chair. Jim K. was going to ask Duane and I think he said no. Barbara wants more direction on where we are going with TrAIL and PATH to help her in grant writing. She says that Bill has asked her to also do fundraising for the membership committee, but I'm not sure she has time to be involved with that also. I was hoping that Bill could be energy chair if he is not involved in us paying him, but Barbara says it would not look good on grant applications for him to be the chair and attorney. Also, I don't feel comfortable committing $10,000 to Blackwater Canyon at this time. $5000 would be acceptable since Friends of Blackwater are contributing $5000. Do you know how the vote is going on that motion? People do not always reply to all when voting, so I may have missed a vote. Thanks, Karen P.S. I was able to vote on the Democrat Primary since I was just asked if I wanted a Democrat or Republican ballot. Were you able to vote Dem, Jim? _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

SIERRA CLUB RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF HILDEBRAND MOTION TO REOPEN
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 14 Jun '08

14 Jun '08

Folks: I attach the Sierra Club's filing Friday, June 13, supporting a motion to reopen TrAILCo filed by Thomas Hildebrand -- a pro se intervenor who lives in Va but has a planned retirement home in WV. The Hildebrand motion and the materials on which it is based are also attached. The same motion was filed with -- and granted by -- the Virginia State Corporation Commission in Virginia's TrAILCo proceeding. The underlying reason to reopen is simple -- PJM, the operator of the electric grid who in 2006 ordered Allegheny to build the Trail line, filed a May 21, 2008 "update" report with the Maryland PSC. The May 21, 2008 projects, under at least one scenario, that TrAILCo's line is not needed to avoid the 2006 RTEP's projection of reliabiilty issues in June 2011. In somewhat plainer English, the 2006 projection upon which TrAILCo's application was filed in March 2007 is now obsolete -- according to PJM's May 21, 2008 report. As noted, Virginia's State Corporation Commission (equivalent to our PSC) reopened the TrAILCo case there, based on the Maryland filing by PJM. We will see what our own PSC does. If they decline to reopen, it is an important procedural flaw on the record for appeal. If they reopen and admit the report, they then have to grapple with the fact that it contradicts TrAILCo's case for "need", irrespective of the environmental impact. Best regards, Bill ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: William V. DePaulo, Esq. <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> Date: Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:20 AM Subject: SIERRA CLUB RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF HILDEBRAND MOTION TO REOPEN To: jwatkins(a)psc.state.wv.us Dear Mr. Watkins: I enclose a pdf copy of the Sierra Club's response in support of Thomas Hildebrand's June 11, 2008 motion to reopen the case to take judicial notice of the May 21, 2008 PJM report filed with the Maryland public service commission, which report has caused the Virginia State Corporation Commission to reopen the evidentiary proceeding relating to the TrAILCo application pending before it. Copies of this submission are being filed with the Commission today and served on all parties. Please call if you have any questions regarding this filing. Very truly yours, William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Fwd: House Natural Resources Committee -- The Weekly Preivew, June 9-13
by Paul Wilson 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

Scroll down and check out the special report on oil stockpiles and drilling. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Groff, Allyson <Allyson.Groff(a)mail.house.gov> Date: Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:23 PM Subject: House Natural Resources Committee -- The Weekly Preivew, June 9-13 To: * * *The Weekly Preview*** *June 9 – 13, 2008* *On the House Floor:* - On Monday, the *House of Representatives* is expected to consider under suspension of the rules the following 5 bills under the jurisdiction of the House Natural Resources Committee: o H.R. 3022 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03022:>(Costa): To designate the John Krebs Wilderness in the State of California, to add certain land to the Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park Wilderness, and for other purposes. o H.R. 2632 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02632:>(T. Udall): To establish the Sabinoso Wilderness Area in San Miguel County, New Mexico, and for other purposes. o H.R. 3682 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03682:>(Bono Mack): To designate certain Federal lands in Riverside County, California, as wilderness, to designate certain river segments in Riverside County as a wild, scenic, or recreational river, to adjust the boundary of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, and for other purposes. o H.Res. 1158<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.res.01158:>(Boozman): Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the Ozark National Forest in Arkansas. o H.R. 5680 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05680:>(Grijalva): To amend certain laws relating to Native Americans, and for others purposes. *This Week's Hearings**: * *Can't make it to our hearings or markups in person? Stay connected with our live video and audio webcasts, available at http://resourcescommittee.house.gov.* - On Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources* will hold an oversight hearing on "How Should the Federal Government Address the Health and Environmental Risks of Coal Combustion Waste?" As coal continues to be a critical component of this nation's energy supply, the federal government has a responsibility to ensure the safe disposal of the roughly 125 million tons of waste generated by coal combustion every year. In light of recent reports by the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Research Council on the problems associated with the disposal of coal combustion waste, the Subcommittee will examine the appropriate role of the federal government in assuring the safe disposal of this waste. The hearing will examine the risks posed by waste disposal in mines and landfills, and how the federal government can foster common sense solutions to safeguard our water supplies and communities. The following witnesses are scheduled to testify: Prof. Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law; Ms. Shari Wilson, Secretary of the Environment, State of Maryland; Mr. David Goss, Executive Director, American Coal Ash Association; Mr. Charles Norris, Consultant, GeoHydro, Inc.; Dr. Thomas Burke, Director, Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Ms. Lisa Evans, Project Attorney, Earthjustice; and Mr. Norman Harvey, Community Activist, Maryland. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 10, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building)* - Also on Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Insular Affairs* will hold an oversight hearing on the "Implementation of the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003 between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia." This is the first implementation hearing held by the Committee since new Compact terms were agreed to and enacted in 2003. The following witnesses are scheduled to testify: The Honorable Fabian Nimea, Director, Office of Statistics, Budget & Economic Management, Official Development Assistance, & Compact Management, Federated States of Micronesia; Mr. Tom Bussanich, Director, Budget Grants Management Division, Office of Insular Affairs, Department of the Interior; Mr. Glyn T. Davies, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of State; and Dr. David B. Gootnick, Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. Government Accountability Office. ** Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 10, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - Later on Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans *will hold an oversight hearing on the annual International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting that will be held in Santiago, Chile from June 23-27, 2008. The hearing will focus on positions expected to be taken by the U.S. delegation at the upcoming 60th annual meeting of the IWC. One prominent issue that is likely to be debated at the IWC meeting is efforts by Norway, Iceland and Japan to lift the 1986 whaling moratorium and replace it with a regulated commercial industry. On May 14, 2008, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV), Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Subcommittee Chairwoman Madeleine Bordallo (D-GU), and other Members introduced a resolution (H. Con. Res. 350<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.con.res.00350:>) calling on U.S. leadership to use all appropriate measures to put an end to commercial whaling around the globe. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing or to view the press release<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&…>with more information about H. Con. Res. 350. *(June 10, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - On Wednesday, the *Committee on Natural Resources *will meet in open markup session to consider the following 9 bills: o H.R. 3981 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03981:>(B. Miller): To authorize the Preserve America Program and Save America's Treasures Program, and for other purposes. *"Preserve America and Save America's Treasures Act"* o H.R. 5451 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05451:>(Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. *"Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008" * o H.R. 4199 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.04199:>(Turner): To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to add sites to the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes. o H.R. 2964 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.2964:> (E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. *"Captive Primate Safety Act"* o H.R. 5741 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05741:> (Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. *"Shark Conservation Act of 2008"* o H.R. 1423 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.01423:> (Visclosky): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease a portion of a visitor center to be constructed outside the boundary of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore in Porter County, Indiana, and for other purposes.* "Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center Lease Act"* o H.R. 3702 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03702:> (Rehberg): To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana, to Jefferson County, Montana, for use as a cemetery.* "Montana Cemetery Act of 2007"* o H.R. 5710 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05710:> (T. Udall): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Authority for the planning, design, and construction of the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, and for other purposes. *"Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System Authorization Act"* o H.R. 5511 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05511:> (Lamborn): To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by a collapsed drainage tunnel in Leadville, Colorado, and for other purposes. *"Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel Remediation Act of 2008"* Visit the Committee's Web site to view the markup report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the markup. ( *June 11, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - On Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources* will hold an oversight hearing on "Spinning Straw Into Black Gold: Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Carbon Dioxide." Enhanced recovery methods involve the injection of a fluid into the reservoir in order to force more oil to the surface, and can also be used as a way to sequester carbon dioxide and keep it out of the atmosphere. While any number of liquids or gases can be used for enhanced oil recovery, this hearing will focus on the growing use of carbon dioxide for these purposes. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building)* - Also on Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Insular Affairs* will hold an oversight hearing on the "Implementation of the Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Republic of Palau (ROP)." The purpose of the hearing is gather testimony on the overall performance of both the ROP government and the U.S. in carrying out the terms of the existing Compact. The financial provisions in the existing Compact, unless renewed, will expire on September 30, 2009. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - Later on Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Water and Power* will hold an oversight hearing on "Hydropower: Providing 75% of America's Current Renewable Energy. Exploring its role as a continued source of Clean, Renewable Energy for the Future." Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* *In Case You Missed It**:* - On June 4, 2008, the *Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans*approved the following 4 bills: ** - H.R. 2964 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02964:>(E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. (*Captive Primate Safety Act*) - H.R. 5350 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05350:>(R. Scott): To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to sell or exchange certain National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration property located in Norfolk, Virginia, and for other purposes. o H.R. 5451 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05451:>(Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. (*Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008*) o H.R. 5741 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05741:>(Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. (*The Shark Conservation Act of 2008*) Visit the Committee's Web site to view the markup report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> . - Also on June 4, 2008, the *Committee on National Resources* released "The Truth About America's Energy: Big Oil Stockpiles Supplies and Pockets Profits" outlining why increased domestic drilling on public lands will not lead to lower gasoline prices. Visit the Committee's Web site to view the special report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_am…>prepared by the Committee's Majority Staff. ** *Quotable Quotes:* "Even if increased domestic drilling activity could affect the price of gasoline, there is yet no justification to open additional federal lands because oil and gas companies have shown that they cannot keep pace with the rate of drilling permits that the federal government is handing out." *–** As stated in a new report, "The Truth About America's Energy: Big Oil Stockpiles Supplies and Pockets Profits," released last week by the House Natural Resources Committee Majority Staff. Visit the Committee's Web site to view the **special report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_am…> .*** *Calendar**:* *Click on the text within the calendar to be linked directly to our Web site.* *Monday* *6/09* *Tuesday* *6/10* *Wednesday* *6/11* *Thursday* *6/12* *Friday* *6/13* * * Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing (11:00 AM) Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Oversight Hearing (2:00 PM) * * Full Committee Markup of 9 Bills (11:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…><http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Water and Power Oversight Hearing (2:00 PM) *To unsubscribe from this newsletter, please send an email to naturalresources.news(a)mail.house.gov and place "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. * *Allyson L. Groff* Communications Director Committee on Natural Resources U.S. House of Representatives 202.226.9019 http://resourcescommittee.house.gov -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: House Natural Resources Committee -- The Weekly Preivew, June 9-13
by Paul Wilson 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

Scroll down and check out the special report on oil stockpiles and drilling. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Groff, Allyson <Allyson.Groff(a)mail.house.gov> Date: Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:23 PM Subject: House Natural Resources Committee -- The Weekly Preivew, June 9-13 To: * * *The Weekly Preview*** *June 9 – 13, 2008* *On the House Floor:* - On Monday, the *House of Representatives* is expected to consider under suspension of the rules the following 5 bills under the jurisdiction of the House Natural Resources Committee: o H.R. 3022 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03022:>(Costa): To designate the John Krebs Wilderness in the State of California, to add certain land to the Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park Wilderness, and for other purposes. o H.R. 2632 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02632:>(T. Udall): To establish the Sabinoso Wilderness Area in San Miguel County, New Mexico, and for other purposes. o H.R. 3682 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03682:>(Bono Mack): To designate certain Federal lands in Riverside County, California, as wilderness, to designate certain river segments in Riverside County as a wild, scenic, or recreational river, to adjust the boundary of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, and for other purposes. o H.Res. 1158<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.res.01158:>(Boozman): Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the Ozark National Forest in Arkansas. o H.R. 5680 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05680:>(Grijalva): To amend certain laws relating to Native Americans, and for others purposes. *This Week's Hearings**: * *Can't make it to our hearings or markups in person? Stay connected with our live video and audio webcasts, available at http://resourcescommittee.house.gov.* - On Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources* will hold an oversight hearing on "How Should the Federal Government Address the Health and Environmental Risks of Coal Combustion Waste?" As coal continues to be a critical component of this nation's energy supply, the federal government has a responsibility to ensure the safe disposal of the roughly 125 million tons of waste generated by coal combustion every year. In light of recent reports by the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Research Council on the problems associated with the disposal of coal combustion waste, the Subcommittee will examine the appropriate role of the federal government in assuring the safe disposal of this waste. The hearing will examine the risks posed by waste disposal in mines and landfills, and how the federal government can foster common sense solutions to safeguard our water supplies and communities. The following witnesses are scheduled to testify: Prof. Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law; Ms. Shari Wilson, Secretary of the Environment, State of Maryland; Mr. David Goss, Executive Director, American Coal Ash Association; Mr. Charles Norris, Consultant, GeoHydro, Inc.; Dr. Thomas Burke, Director, Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Ms. Lisa Evans, Project Attorney, Earthjustice; and Mr. Norman Harvey, Community Activist, Maryland. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 10, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building)* - Also on Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Insular Affairs* will hold an oversight hearing on the "Implementation of the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003 between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia." This is the first implementation hearing held by the Committee since new Compact terms were agreed to and enacted in 2003. The following witnesses are scheduled to testify: The Honorable Fabian Nimea, Director, Office of Statistics, Budget & Economic Management, Official Development Assistance, & Compact Management, Federated States of Micronesia; Mr. Tom Bussanich, Director, Budget Grants Management Division, Office of Insular Affairs, Department of the Interior; Mr. Glyn T. Davies, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of State; and Dr. David B. Gootnick, Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. Government Accountability Office. ** Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 10, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - Later on Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans *will hold an oversight hearing on the annual International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting that will be held in Santiago, Chile from June 23-27, 2008. The hearing will focus on positions expected to be taken by the U.S. delegation at the upcoming 60th annual meeting of the IWC. One prominent issue that is likely to be debated at the IWC meeting is efforts by Norway, Iceland and Japan to lift the 1986 whaling moratorium and replace it with a regulated commercial industry. On May 14, 2008, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV), Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Subcommittee Chairwoman Madeleine Bordallo (D-GU), and other Members introduced a resolution (H. Con. Res. 350<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.con.res.00350:>) calling on U.S. leadership to use all appropriate measures to put an end to commercial whaling around the globe. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing or to view the press release<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&…>with more information about H. Con. Res. 350. *(June 10, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - On Wednesday, the *Committee on Natural Resources *will meet in open markup session to consider the following 9 bills: o H.R. 3981 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03981:>(B. Miller): To authorize the Preserve America Program and Save America's Treasures Program, and for other purposes. *"Preserve America and Save America's Treasures Act"* o H.R. 5451 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05451:>(Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. *"Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008" * o H.R. 4199 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.04199:>(Turner): To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to add sites to the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes. o H.R. 2964 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.2964:> (E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. *"Captive Primate Safety Act"* o H.R. 5741 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05741:> (Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. *"Shark Conservation Act of 2008"* o H.R. 1423 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.01423:> (Visclosky): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease a portion of a visitor center to be constructed outside the boundary of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore in Porter County, Indiana, and for other purposes.* "Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center Lease Act"* o H.R. 3702 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03702:> (Rehberg): To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana, to Jefferson County, Montana, for use as a cemetery.* "Montana Cemetery Act of 2007"* o H.R. 5710 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05710:> (T. Udall): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Authority for the planning, design, and construction of the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, and for other purposes. *"Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System Authorization Act"* o H.R. 5511 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05511:> (Lamborn): To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by a collapsed drainage tunnel in Leadville, Colorado, and for other purposes. *"Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel Remediation Act of 2008"* Visit the Committee's Web site to view the markup report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the markup. ( *June 11, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - On Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources* will hold an oversight hearing on "Spinning Straw Into Black Gold: Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Carbon Dioxide." Enhanced recovery methods involve the injection of a fluid into the reservoir in order to force more oil to the surface, and can also be used as a way to sequester carbon dioxide and keep it out of the atmosphere. While any number of liquids or gases can be used for enhanced oil recovery, this hearing will focus on the growing use of carbon dioxide for these purposes. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building)* - Also on Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Insular Affairs* will hold an oversight hearing on the "Implementation of the Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Republic of Palau (ROP)." The purpose of the hearing is gather testimony on the overall performance of both the ROP government and the U.S. in carrying out the terms of the existing Compact. The financial provisions in the existing Compact, unless renewed, will expire on September 30, 2009. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - Later on Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Water and Power* will hold an oversight hearing on "Hydropower: Providing 75% of America's Current Renewable Energy. Exploring its role as a continued source of Clean, Renewable Energy for the Future." Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* *In Case You Missed It**:* - On June 4, 2008, the *Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans*approved the following 4 bills: ** - H.R. 2964 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02964:>(E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. (*Captive Primate Safety Act*) - H.R. 5350 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05350:>(R. Scott): To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to sell or exchange certain National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration property located in Norfolk, Virginia, and for other purposes. o H.R. 5451 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05451:>(Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. (*Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008*) o H.R. 5741 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05741:>(Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. (*The Shark Conservation Act of 2008*) Visit the Committee's Web site to view the markup report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> . - Also on June 4, 2008, the *Committee on National Resources* released "The Truth About America's Energy: Big Oil Stockpiles Supplies and Pockets Profits" outlining why increased domestic drilling on public lands will not lead to lower gasoline prices. Visit the Committee's Web site to view the special report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_am…>prepared by the Committee's Majority Staff. ** *Quotable Quotes:* "Even if increased domestic drilling activity could affect the price of gasoline, there is yet no justification to open additional federal lands because oil and gas companies have shown that they cannot keep pace with the rate of drilling permits that the federal government is handing out." *–** As stated in a new report, "The Truth About America's Energy: Big Oil Stockpiles Supplies and Pockets Profits," released last week by the House Natural Resources Committee Majority Staff. Visit the Committee's Web site to view the **special report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_am…> .*** *Calendar**:* *Click on the text within the calendar to be linked directly to our Web site.* *Monday* *6/09* *Tuesday* *6/10* *Wednesday* *6/11* *Thursday* *6/12* *Friday* *6/13* * * Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing (11:00 AM) Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Oversight Hearing (2:00 PM) * * Full Committee Markup of 9 Bills (11:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…><http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Water and Power Oversight Hearing (2:00 PM) *To unsubscribe from this newsletter, please send an email to naturalresources.news(a)mail.house.gov and place "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. * *Allyson L. Groff* Communications Director Committee on Natural Resources U.S. House of Representatives 202.226.9019 http://resourcescommittee.house.gov -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: House Natural Resources Committee -- The Weekly Preivew, June 9-13
by Paul Wilson 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

Scroll down and check out the special report on oil stockpiles and drilling. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Groff, Allyson <Allyson.Groff(a)mail.house.gov> Date: Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:23 PM Subject: House Natural Resources Committee -- The Weekly Preivew, June 9-13 To: * * *The Weekly Preview*** *June 9 – 13, 2008* *On the House Floor:* - On Monday, the *House of Representatives* is expected to consider under suspension of the rules the following 5 bills under the jurisdiction of the House Natural Resources Committee: o H.R. 3022 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03022:>(Costa): To designate the John Krebs Wilderness in the State of California, to add certain land to the Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park Wilderness, and for other purposes. o H.R. 2632 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02632:>(T. Udall): To establish the Sabinoso Wilderness Area in San Miguel County, New Mexico, and for other purposes. o H.R. 3682 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03682:>(Bono Mack): To designate certain Federal lands in Riverside County, California, as wilderness, to designate certain river segments in Riverside County as a wild, scenic, or recreational river, to adjust the boundary of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, and for other purposes. o H.Res. 1158<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.res.01158:>(Boozman): Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the Ozark National Forest in Arkansas. o H.R. 5680 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05680:>(Grijalva): To amend certain laws relating to Native Americans, and for others purposes. *This Week's Hearings**: * *Can't make it to our hearings or markups in person? Stay connected with our live video and audio webcasts, available at http://resourcescommittee.house.gov.* - On Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources* will hold an oversight hearing on "How Should the Federal Government Address the Health and Environmental Risks of Coal Combustion Waste?" As coal continues to be a critical component of this nation's energy supply, the federal government has a responsibility to ensure the safe disposal of the roughly 125 million tons of waste generated by coal combustion every year. In light of recent reports by the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Research Council on the problems associated with the disposal of coal combustion waste, the Subcommittee will examine the appropriate role of the federal government in assuring the safe disposal of this waste. The hearing will examine the risks posed by waste disposal in mines and landfills, and how the federal government can foster common sense solutions to safeguard our water supplies and communities. The following witnesses are scheduled to testify: Prof. Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law; Ms. Shari Wilson, Secretary of the Environment, State of Maryland; Mr. David Goss, Executive Director, American Coal Ash Association; Mr. Charles Norris, Consultant, GeoHydro, Inc.; Dr. Thomas Burke, Director, Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Ms. Lisa Evans, Project Attorney, Earthjustice; and Mr. Norman Harvey, Community Activist, Maryland. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 10, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building)* - Also on Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Insular Affairs* will hold an oversight hearing on the "Implementation of the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003 between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia." This is the first implementation hearing held by the Committee since new Compact terms were agreed to and enacted in 2003. The following witnesses are scheduled to testify: The Honorable Fabian Nimea, Director, Office of Statistics, Budget & Economic Management, Official Development Assistance, & Compact Management, Federated States of Micronesia; Mr. Tom Bussanich, Director, Budget Grants Management Division, Office of Insular Affairs, Department of the Interior; Mr. Glyn T. Davies, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of State; and Dr. David B. Gootnick, Director, International Affairs and Trade, U.S. Government Accountability Office. ** Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 10, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - Later on Tuesday, the *Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans *will hold an oversight hearing on the annual International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting that will be held in Santiago, Chile from June 23-27, 2008. The hearing will focus on positions expected to be taken by the U.S. delegation at the upcoming 60th annual meeting of the IWC. One prominent issue that is likely to be debated at the IWC meeting is efforts by Norway, Iceland and Japan to lift the 1986 whaling moratorium and replace it with a regulated commercial industry. On May 14, 2008, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV), Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Subcommittee Chairwoman Madeleine Bordallo (D-GU), and other Members introduced a resolution (H. Con. Res. 350<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.con.res.00350:>) calling on U.S. leadership to use all appropriate measures to put an end to commercial whaling around the globe. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing or to view the press release<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&…>with more information about H. Con. Res. 350. *(June 10, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - On Wednesday, the *Committee on Natural Resources *will meet in open markup session to consider the following 9 bills: o H.R. 3981 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03981:>(B. Miller): To authorize the Preserve America Program and Save America's Treasures Program, and for other purposes. *"Preserve America and Save America's Treasures Act"* o H.R. 5451 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05451:>(Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. *"Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008" * o H.R. 4199 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.04199:>(Turner): To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to add sites to the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes. o H.R. 2964 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.2964:> (E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. *"Captive Primate Safety Act"* o H.R. 5741 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05741:> (Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. *"Shark Conservation Act of 2008"* o H.R. 1423 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.01423:> (Visclosky): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease a portion of a visitor center to be constructed outside the boundary of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore in Porter County, Indiana, and for other purposes.* "Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center Lease Act"* o H.R. 3702 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.03702:> (Rehberg): To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana, to Jefferson County, Montana, for use as a cemetery.* "Montana Cemetery Act of 2007"* o H.R. 5710 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05710:> (T. Udall): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Authority for the planning, design, and construction of the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, and for other purposes. *"Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System Authorization Act"* o H.R. 5511 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05511:> (Lamborn): To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by a collapsed drainage tunnel in Leadville, Colorado, and for other purposes. *"Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel Remediation Act of 2008"* Visit the Committee's Web site to view the markup report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the markup. ( *June 11, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - On Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources* will hold an oversight hearing on "Spinning Straw Into Black Gold: Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Carbon Dioxide." Enhanced recovery methods involve the injection of a fluid into the reservoir in order to force more oil to the surface, and can also be used as a way to sequester carbon dioxide and keep it out of the atmosphere. While any number of liquids or gases can be used for enhanced oil recovery, this hearing will focus on the growing use of carbon dioxide for these purposes. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1334 Longworth House Office Building)* - Also on Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Insular Affairs* will hold an oversight hearing on the "Implementation of the Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Republic of Palau (ROP)." The purpose of the hearing is gather testimony on the overall performance of both the ROP government and the U.S. in carrying out the terms of the existing Compact. The financial provisions in the existing Compact, unless renewed, will expire on September 30, 2009. Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* - Later on Thursday, the *Subcommittee on Water and Power* will hold an oversight hearing on "Hydropower: Providing 75% of America's Current Renewable Energy. Exploring its role as a continued source of Clean, Renewable Energy for the Future." Visit the Committee's Web site to access witness testimony<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…>following the conclusion of the hearing. *(June 12, 2008, at 2:00 p.m., Room 1324 Longworth House Office Building)* *In Case You Missed It**:* - On June 4, 2008, the *Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans*approved the following 4 bills: ** - H.R. 2964 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.02964:>(E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. (*Captive Primate Safety Act*) - H.R. 5350 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05350:>(R. Scott): To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to sell or exchange certain National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration property located in Norfolk, Virginia, and for other purposes. o H.R. 5451 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05451:>(Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. (*Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008*) o H.R. 5741 <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.05741:>(Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. (*The Shark Conservation Act of 2008*) Visit the Committee's Web site to view the markup report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> . - Also on June 4, 2008, the *Committee on National Resources* released "The Truth About America's Energy: Big Oil Stockpiles Supplies and Pockets Profits" outlining why increased domestic drilling on public lands will not lead to lower gasoline prices. Visit the Committee's Web site to view the special report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_am…>prepared by the Committee's Majority Staff. ** *Quotable Quotes:* "Even if increased domestic drilling activity could affect the price of gasoline, there is yet no justification to open additional federal lands because oil and gas companies have shown that they cannot keep pace with the rate of drilling permits that the federal government is handing out." *–** As stated in a new report, "The Truth About America's Energy: Big Oil Stockpiles Supplies and Pockets Profits," released last week by the House Natural Resources Committee Majority Staff. Visit the Committee's Web site to view the **special report<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/images/stories/Documents/truth_about_am…> .*** *Calendar**:* *Click on the text within the calendar to be linked directly to our Web site.* *Monday* *6/09* *Tuesday* *6/10* *Wednesday* *6/11* *Thursday* *6/12* *Friday* *6/13* * * Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing (11:00 AM) Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife and Oceans Oversight Hearing (2:00 PM) * * Full Committee Markup of 9 Bills (11:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…><http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Insular Affairs Oversight Hearing (10:00 AM)<http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/index.php?option=com_jcalpro&Itemid=27&…> Subcommittee on Water and Power Oversight Hearing (2:00 PM) *To unsubscribe from this newsletter, please send an email to naturalresources.news(a)mail.house.gov and place "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. * *Allyson L. Groff* Communications Director Committee on Natural Resources U.S. House of Representatives 202.226.9019 http://resourcescommittee.house.gov -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: Activist Call Agenda REMINDER: Coal campaign CALL IS TONIGHT
by Paul Wilson 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

I plan to attend this call. Is anybody else going to attend? you won't get a report from me as I am busy catching up after 3 days in DC lobbying. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Verena Owens <Baumling(a)aol.com> Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:51 PM Subject: Fwd: Activist Call Agenda REMINDER: Coal campaign CALL IS TONIGHT To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM(a)lists.sierraclub.org Please join us to hear from our guest speakers tonight, Kim and Liz! Kim will be talking about the newest focus group results, specifically on coal messaging. Liz will give an introduction to the Club's leadership development program and then lead an interactive session on team norms. Call-in details below. Verena Verena Owen Advisor, Sierra Club National Coal Campaign 1.847.872.1707 ph 1.224.717.1147 cell *Verena.Owen(a)Illinois.SierraClub.org * ------------------------------ Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008<http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102> . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubsribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: SUBSCRIBE COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS Dana Snead <dsneadsc(a)EARTHLINK.NET> To: CONS-EQST-AIR-MW-COAL-COMM(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:00:20 -0700 Subject: Activist Call Agenda Please join the National Coal Campaign for our next monthly coal activist coal on Wednesday, June 11th at 8:00 p.m. eastern. 866 501 6174 224 0743# Agenda 1. Focus Group Results: Kim Haddow 2. Leadership Development: Liz Pallatto 3. Update: Bruce Nilles & Pat Gallagher 4. Open Forum - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the CONS-EQST-AIR-MW-COAL-COMM list, send any message to: CONS-EQST-AIR-MW-COAL-COMM-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

FW: Proud of the Sierra Club
by Grubb, Karen 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

________________________________ From: Wildlife and Endangered Species Forum [mailto:CONS-WPST-WES-FORUM@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG] On Behalf Of <Sam> <Booher> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:49 AM To: CONS-WPST-WES-FORUM(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Subject: Proud of the Sierra Club I am very proud that the Sierra Club after much discussion decided to NOT support the Cap and Trade of Carbon pollution Sam Booher, GA "Leading environmentalists" in the U.S. are urging Congress to try to curb global warming by creating a massive public-private bureaucracy to trade pollution permits amongst polluters, instead of simply taxing unwanted emissions. A DISASTER BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE NATION'S LEADING ENVIRONMENTALISTS By Peter Montague This week the U.S. Senate -- arguably the most powerful 100 people on the planet -- began a debate on a bill to curb global warming. The N.Y. Times wrote June 3 <http://www.precaution.org/lib/senate_opens_climate_debate.080603.htm> , "The debate, which could last all week, will force senators to take a stand on some of the most difficult, expensive and potentially life-altering questions the world will face in coming decades." In an editorial May 28 <http://www.precaution.org/lib/climate_leadership_needed.080528.htm> , the New York Times had summarized the issue this way: "The scientific case for action, strong five years ago, is even more persuasive now. Authoritative assessments from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, among other studies, have left little doubt that the world is heating up, that man-made emissions are largely responsible and that swift action is necessary to avoid widespread environmental damage." The bill being debated in the Senate is known as Lieberman-Warner. It is being promoted aggressively by Democrat Barbara Boxer. The bill is co-sponsored by John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. According to the Times June 2 <http://www.precaution.org/lib/allies_differ_on_carbon_caps.080602.htm> , the details of the bill were crafted by a coalition of "some of the most powerful corporate leaders in America [who] have been meeting regularly with leading environmental groups in a conference room in downtown Washington for over two years..." So this is a bill written by our "leading environmentalists." The only "leading environmentalists" named by the Times are staff of the Natural Resources Defense Council, but we know Environmental Defense has had a heavy hand in this, too. The bill would create an enormous new public/private bureaucracy to curb the emission of global warming gases, chiefly carbon dioxide (CO2). The system is called "cap and trade." The basic intent is not a bad one -- to put a price on carbon, which is currently being dumped into the atmosphere for free. There are two basic ways to put a price on carbon -- simply tax it, or wrap it in a large bureaucracy devoted to "cap and trade." The "cap and trade" idea is to force carbon dioxide (CO2) emitters to purchase pollution permits, each of which is a legally-enforceable right to pollute the atmosphere with CO2 -- but only up to a certain level (the "cap"). If polluters reduce their emissions below their permitted level, they can sell their unused permits to other polluters (the "trade"). Every once in a while the total "cap" gets lowered by the iron hand of government (at least in theory) and the "trade" part supposedly allows for super-efficient reductions in CO2 emissions: Those who can reduce their emissions cheaply will do so, and those who can't will buy extra pollution permits in the open market (thus worsening pollution in some unfortunate communities, relative to more fortunate communities). Advocates of "cap and trade" say such a system will minimize the overall cost to the polluters while ratcheting down CO2 emissions rapidly enough to avert climate chaos. At least that's the theory. (It is worth noting that the costs of pollution in the unfortunate communities [asthma, pulmonary disease, cancer, school days lost, emergency room visits, etc.] are kept "off the books" in all these "efficiency" calculations. To some "leading environmentalists" and their corporate-polluter partners, unfortunate communities have a value of zero.) You won't read about it in the New York Times, but there are serious mainstream critics of the "cap and trade" approach who say it is neither economically efficient nor workable. For example, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) -- Congress's own office of economic analysis -- published its study <http://www.precaution.org/lib/cbo_carbon_tax_study.080213.pdf> three months ago concluding <http://www.precaution.org/lib/cbo_favors_carbon_tax.080213.htm> that: ** A carbon tax -- not cap and trade -- is the "most efficient" method to address global warming, both in limiting economic costs and for achieving environmental benefits. What is a carbon tax? A carbon tax is a tried-and-true way of putting a price on carbon emissions. Such a tax can be remarkably simple: you weigh the amount of carbon-containing fuel (coal, oil, or natural gas) as it comes out of the ground (or as it is comes off the ship), calculate the tax per ton of carbon, and collect the tax. End of story. The cost if the tax gets passed along to the purchaser via the market. Or, with considerably more effort, you could tax carbon directly at the point of purchase. Either way, you don't have to measure anyone's emissions -- an exceedingly complex and costly procedure providing untold opportunities for thousands of polluters to fudge the data. The tax has an additional advantage: no one gains a legally enforceable "right to pollute." With a tax, the nation's electric utilities -- and cement, aluminum and steel companies -- couldn't ever be able to go to court to try to stop government from taking away their "right to pollute," a property right they could claim to own because they purchased it with good money. On its face, a cap and trade program is immensely complex. As Robert Samuelson writes in the June 9 issue of Newsweek <http://www.precaution.org/lib/cap_and_tax.080609.htm> , "The chief political virtue of cap-and-trade -- a hugely complex scheme to reduce greenhouse gases -- is its very complexity." Within all the complexity comes endless opportunity for shenanigans. (The BBC reported <http://www.precaution.org/lib/carbon_trading_flawed.080605.htm> this week how the carbon trading scheme built into the Kyoto Treaty is being gamed by polluters at considerable profit to themselves but no benefit to planet Earth.) In a cap and trade program, someone has to sell or auction (or give away free) the pollution permits each year. Someone else has to keep track of who has received how many permits and who has sold how many of their permits to whom. (Permits can be "banked" and used years later, so someone must pay close attention.) Someone else has to measure all the tens of thousands of permitted CO2 emissions to make sure they aren't exceeding permitted levels. Buying and selling rights to pollute will create an enormous private bureaucracy -- a trading exchange -- supported by an army of bankers, lawyers, engineers, accountants, analysts, ad men, publicists, lobbyists, sales people, hucksters and camp followers. The first year of a "cap and trade" program is estimated to create a new "market" in pollution rights worth a $220 billion. A market worth $220 billion per year is as large as the market for computer processors. There's real money to be made here by the clever and the unscrupulous. The British journal New Scientist reported in April <http://www.precaution.org/lib/can_carbon-trading_save_planet.080419.txt > that "what began as a niche market is now attracting major financial institutions such as Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, and Barclays Capital..." plus JP Morgan Chase and others. In other words, the new carbon market is being created by the same people who created the ever-deepening mortgage lending disaster. Have they shown that they have society's best interests at heart, or have they shown a cruel focus on making money, no matter the cost to others? It's a fair question. New Scientist summarized the root question this way: "As Nicholas Stern, former chief economist at the World Bank, puts it: climate change is 'the greatest market failure the world has ever seen.' The question now is whether capitalism is able to make amends. Can it provide a mechanism that rewards people for reducing their carbon emissions instead of increasing them? Or will it simply give big polluters a way of dodging their responsibilities?" And New Scientist ends its devastating critique of "cap and trade" with a stark warning about the consequences of manipulation and deception within the carbon trading market: "With Enron, it was the shareholders who suffered. But if the atmosphere continues to be filled with greenhouse gases and the planet's climate crashes as Enron did, no one will be spared." On May 4th, two attorneys working for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] wrote an "open letter to Congress <http://www.precaution.org/lib/epa_lawyers_oppose_cap_trade.080513.pdf> " explaining why "cap and trade" can't work. Attorneys Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel each have roughly two decades of experience in environmental enforcement, and Zabel has extensive experience with prior cap and trade programs run by EPA. Williams and Zabel told Congress that a "cap and trade" system "is an open invitation to fraud and would significantly delay reductions [in carbon emissions]." They went on to list (and document) half a dozen other reasons why a "cap and trade" program will be nothing more than a gift to the financial industry and the polluters but will not reduce CO2 emissions quickly enough to avert climate chaos. So the U.S. Senate is debating how to curb global warming, but is restricting the debate to a single approach -- "cap and trade" -- an approach that was devised by the corporate polluters themselves, locked in a room for two years with their house environmentalists. "Cap and trade" sets up a system that offers endless opportunities to game the system and make even more money by burning fossil fuels, while claiming to be curbing global warming fast enough to avert climate chaos. By the time the system has matured and we learn that it did not work, the billionaires created by the system will be living comfortably in the globally-warmed mountains of Switzerland while the rest of us are learning to deal with more and bigger Katrinas, creeping inundation of all the world's coastal cities, and widespread famine from crop failures caused by drought. This disaster is being created right before our eyes by the "leading environmentalists" in the United States. Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Ross Gelbspan reports in the Boston Globe <http://www.precaution.org/lib/trading_away_our_chances.19990516.htm> that at least one leading environmental organization in the U.S. -- Environmental Defense -- is planning to make money brokering carbon trades. Let's point out for the record that many, many environmentalists in the U.S. oppose this dangerous, self-serving gamble with the future of the planet. Two collaborations of environmental justice advocates (originating on the East <http://www.precaution.org/lib/climate_justice_forum_statement.080602.ht m> and West <http://www.precaution.org/lib/cal_ej_declaration.080219.htm> coasts of the U.S.) have taken unequivocal positions against carbon trading. Clearly, a national (and global) climate justice <http://www.precaution.org/lib/climate_justice.070305.htm> movement is emerging. Let's hope it gathers momentum in time to stop the "leading environmentalists" in the U.S. from creating an irreversible catastrophe. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubsribe from the CONS-WPST-WES-FORUM list, send any message to: CONS-WPST-WES-FORUM-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

1 0

FW: {Fraud?} Help get $125 million for green jobs / $2B for green cities!
by Grubb, Karen 11 Jun '08

11 Jun '08

________________________________ From: Van Jones, Green For All [mailto:team@greenforall.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:32 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: {Fraud?} Help get $125 million for green jobs / $2B for green cities! Green For All banner<http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5379/images/green-for-all-ban ner2.jpg> Dear Karen, Raise your voice to support green-collar jobs<http://www.greenforall.org/images/hardhat%20DC.jpg> In the halls of Washington, D.C., there is an awful lot of "talk" these days about green-collar jobs. But in a few weeks, Congress will have the chance to put its money where its mouth is - for the first time. We need your help to tell Congressional leaders to do the right thing. Last year, with your support, Green For All and our allies helped ensure that the 2007 Energy Bill included two critical provisions: the Green Jobs Act and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program. Once they are fully funded, these two provisions will dramatically boost the prospects for green-collar job development in the United States. The Energy Bill authorized funding levels for both of these provisions. Now Congress needs to appropriate the money for them. As soon as two weeks from now, Appropriations committees in Congress will vote whether or not to fund these two vital programs. Click here to tell your representative to vote for full funding for the Green Jobs Act and the "Green Block Grant" Program in this year's Appropriations Bill. <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=8DnsNhR7fEuU9mFk% 2BDkPpJ%2BlLzYG3uiI> A fully funded Green Jobs Act will distribute $125 million per year to identify needed skills, develop training programs, and train workers for jobs in a range of green industries. That's enough money to train 30,000 people in green trades - every year. It targets a broad range of populations for eligibility, but it has a special focus on creating "green pathways out of poverty." In other words, this Act can connect the people who MOST need work - to the work that MOST needs to get done. A fully funded Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program will distribute $2 billion per year to cities and local governments for energy conservation, energy audits, fuel conservation programs, and the use of renewable energy. These "Green" block grants could create tens of thousands of green-collar jobs - accessible to low-income city residents who most need opportunities and careers. Click here to tell your representative to vote for full funding for the Green Jobs Act and the "Green Block Grant" Program in this year's Appropriations Bill. <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ezoB%2B6%2BiZ%2Ba ugPRhJGjFmZ8YdQxyCzZa> We must work hard to make sure that Congress understands the importance of funding these green-collar jobs programs. The budget submitted to Congress by the Bush Administration eliminates and under-funds a broad range of worthy programs. Therefore, Congress must wrestle with many competing priorities as its members attempt to make up for this shortfall and pass an Appropriations Bill for 2009. The Green Jobs Act and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program are essential investments in green-collar job creation and job training. These programs will be fundamental to building an inclusive green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty. Click here to send an email to your representatives and senators telling them to support appropriations for these critical green-collar jobs programs. <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=pdnEHbLXwPeU9mFk% 2BDkPpJ%2BlLzYG3uiI> Thank you for taking action. Sincerely, Van Jones President, Green For All P.S. Please take action now <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=YztY96yz5bSU9mFk% 2BDkPpJ%2BlLzYG3uiI> and then forward this email to your friends, family, and colleagues. ________________________________ Photo credit: Eliza Simon Green For All can't survive without the support of people like you. Please take a moment to support us today: click here <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=wRbfb68GEziU9mFk% 2BDkPpJ%2BlLzYG3uiI> to donate. ________________________________ Did someone forward this to you, but you're not on our list? To receive our messages in the future, follow this link:MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "org2.democracyinaction.org" claiming to be http://www.greenforall.org/contact-us/sign-up <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=3j4whXE9sZeU9mFk% 2BDkPpJ%2BlLzYG3uiI> To unsubscribe from this list, reply to this message with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line, OR follow this link: http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5379/unsubscribe.jsp?unsubscribe <http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=N96TUTd62GSU9mFk% 2BDkPpJ%2BlLzYG3uiI> Web Bug from http://org2.democracyinaction.org/dia/TrackImage?key=12628729<http://www .mailscanner.tv/1x1spacer.gif>

1 0

FW: PATH Web Site Contact Form
by Grubb, Karen 05 Jun '08

05 Jun '08

________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Wed 6/4/2008 2:26 PM To: WVBiker98(a)aol.com; bellamy(a)frontiernet.net; nhooff(a)somersetdev.com; tbusithi(a)shepherd.edu Cc: Grubb, Karen Subject: Fwd: PATH Web Site Contact Form ________________________________ From: taholliday(a)aep.com To: mjlippe(a)aol.com Sent: 6/4/2008 2:14:47 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Re: PATH Web Site Contact Form Hello Mr. Lippe, We appreciate your interest in the PATH project. We're in the process of preparing for two initial informational meetings that will take place in Maryland on June 17 and 18. I've provided the information below. We'll be publishing notices of the meetings in local newspapers and on radio stations in the very near future. These first two meetings will provide general information about the project, but the meetings will not feature specific line routes at this time, as the companies are currently studying routing alternatives. Frederick County Holiday Inn and Conference Center (adjacent to Francis Scott Key Mall) 5400 Holiday Drive Frederick, MD * June 17th * 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM Washington County The American Legion-Post 10 710 North Main Street Boonsboro, MD * June 18th * 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM We also plan to hold a series of open houses in late July and early August throughout the West Virginia and Maryland study area to present preliminary siting alternatives and to solicit feedback from area residents. Specific dates, locations and times for those meetings have not been finalized yet. I hope this is helpful. Sincerely, Thomas A. Holliday, APR Director Corporate Communications American Electric Power 1 Riverside Plaza - 19th Fl. Columbus, OH 43215-2373 PH: (614) 716-1403 aud. 222 Email: taholliday(a)aep.com <mjlippe(a)aol.com> 06/04/2008 12:15 To PM <askpath(a)pathtransmission.com> cc <jpolk(a)aep.com> Subject PATH Web Site Contact Form PATH Web Site Contact Form ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Name: Michael Lippe E-mail: mjlippe(a)aol.com Phone #: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Comment: Please advise me the schedule and places for your public meetings or surveys for deciding on issues for the routing of PATH, particularly from Bedington to Kemptown. Thank you! Message sent: 6/4/2008 12:15:36 PM

3 2

River Valley Bio-Refinery
by James Kotcon 04 Jun '08

04 Jun '08

This company proposes to build and operate a biodiesel refinery next to the Bayer Chemical plant in New Martinsville. It would produce 20 million gallons per year of biodiesel, mostly from soybean and cottonseed oil. The draft air permit is at the link below. The major emissions would be methanol and some VOCs, but these seem pretty minimal. My main concern is that the monitoring requirements are pretty vague and may be unenforceable. Does anyone know of other potential emissions from such a plant? Is this something we should support? http://www.wvdep.org/Docs/15016_River%20Valley%20CP%202745%20051-00121.pdf JBK

1 0

SIERRA CLUB POST HEARING BRIEF
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 04 Jun '08

04 Jun '08

ATTACHED IS THE POST HEARING BRIEF FILED ON BEHALF OF THE SIERRA CLUB IN THE TRAILCO CASE AT THE PSC. -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

2 2

Re: [EC] increased pollution
by James Kotcon 04 Jun '08

04 Jun '08

That is one heck of a lot of trees. Using data from EPA's Airmarkets web page, that would amount to something on the order of 100,000-200,000 tons of wood per year JBK >>> "Nutter, Thomas M." <TNUTTER(a)alleghenyenergy.com> 6/4/2008 9:43 AM >>> Sally, Keith emailed me yesterday with basically the same question- so I'll copy my reply. If there are other questions please let me know. Tom Keith, I believe the permit that we applied for is to construct a biomass cofiring process at Albright Station. As part of an evaluation of the feasibility of the use of renewable energy sources, a demonstration, funded by the USDOE, was performed at Albright which involved the co-firing of 10% woody biomass (sawdust), by weight. Allegheny Energy installed the necessary ancillary equipment to store and deliver the biomass, including a separate injection co-firing system on Unit 3, a tangentially-fired boiler with a generating capacity of 140 MW (net). The demonstration provided favorable results with respect to sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and other pollutants. After completion of the project, the equipment was left intact to be utilized in this modification. The project is not a major modification and does not cause a significant increase in any of the regulated pollutants. Although the addition of the capability to co-fire biomass in each of the three boilers at the Albright power Station will cause changes in emissions, we contend that a PSD review will not be triggered for any of these regulated pollutants while co-firing a maximum of 10% biomass (by weight) in each of the three boilers. The Analysis of Potential PSD Applicability Determination and Emissions Point Data Summary Sheets were presented to the WVDEP, including information on particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions. I can't seem to follow the DEP website link to find these documents but I could provide them if you're interested. Tom Tom Nutter Regional Engineer Allegheny Energy Supply An Allegheny Energy Company Fort Martin/Albright Region Phone: (304) 329-4263 Fax: (304) 329-4278 Email: tnutter(a)alleghenyenergy.com -----Original Message----- From: Sally Wilts [mailto:swilts@cheat.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:43 AM To: Nutter, Thomas M. Subject: increased pollution I received the DEP notice abiut increased particulates from the powerstation. Are you burning more poor quality coal or increasing production, or what is causing more particulates? -- Sally Wilts, Administrative Assistant Friends of the Cheat 119 S. Price St. Kingwood, WV 26537 304-329-3621

1 0

[Fwd: DEP Public Notice - County - Preston - Notice of Intent toApprove Permit #R13-2752]
by James Kotcon 03 Jun '08

03 Jun '08

I have not seen or heard anything about this modification at the Albright power plant. While the amounts are relatively small, Albright is one of the oldest and dirtiest in the Allegheny fleet. Furthermore, they are quite close to both Dolly Sods and Otter Creek Wilderness Areas, meaning the even relatively small increases could lead to violations of Class I Air Quality Standards. Furthermore, our settlement agreement with Longview may be relevant, as Longview used up most of the allowable increment. Does anyone know what Allegheny is proposing? JBK >>> Sally Wilts <swilts(a)cheat.org> 6/3/2008 1:03 PM >>> Have you seen this notice? It seems strange that they are increasing their emissions. Any idea what's up? -- Sally Wilts, Administrative Assistant Friends of the Cheat 119 S. Price St. Kingwood, WV 26537 304-329-3621

1 0

NYTimes: Mounting Costs Slow the Push for Clean Coal
by Paul Wilson 30 May '08

30 May '08

New York Times, May 30, 2008 The Energy Challenge Mounting Costs Slow the Push for Clean Coal By MATTHEW L. WALD<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/matthew_l_wald…> WASHINGTON — For years, scientists have had a straightforward idea for taming global warming<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?…>. They want to take the carbon dioxide that spews from coal-burning power plants and pump it back into the ground. President Bush is for it, and indeed has spent years talking up the virtues of "clean coal." All three candidates to succeed him favor the approach. So do many other members of Congress. Coal companies are for it. Many environmentalists favor it. Utility executives are practically begging for the technology. But it has become clear in recent months that the nation's effort to develop the technique is lagging badly. In January, the government canceled its support for what was supposed to be a showcase project, a plant at a carefully chosen site in Illinois where there was coal, access to the power grid, and soil underfoot that backers said could hold the carbon dioxide for eons. Perhaps worse, in the last few months, utility projects in Florida, West Virginia, Ohio, Minnesota and Washington State that would have made it easier to capture carbon dioxide have all been canceled or thrown into regulatory limbo. Coal is abundant and cheap, assuring that it will continue to be used. But the failure to start building, testing, tweaking and perfecting carbon capture and storage means that developing the technology may come too late to make coal compatible with limiting global warming. "It's a total mess," said Daniel M. Kammen, director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley. "Coal's had a tough year," said John Lavelle, head of a business at General Electric<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/general_electric_comp…>that makes equipment for processing coal into a form from which carbon can be captured. Many of these projects were derailed by the short-term pressure of rising construction costs. But scientists say the result, unless the situation can be turned around, will be a long-term disaster. Plans to combat global warming generally assume that continued use of coal for power plants is unavoidable for at least several decades. Therefore, starting as early as 2020, forecasters assume that carbon dioxide emitted by new power plants will have to be captured and stored underground, to cut down on the amount of global-warming gases in the atmosphere. Yet, simple as the idea may sound, considerable research is still needed to be certain the technique would be safe, effective and affordable. Scientists need to figure out which kinds of rock and soil formations are best at holding carbon dioxide. They need to be sure the gas will not bubble back to the surface. They need to find optimal designs for new power plants so as to cut costs. And some complex legal questions need to be resolved, such as who would be liable if such a project polluted the groundwater or caused other damage far from the power plant. Major corporations sense the possibility of a profitable new business, and G.E. signed a partnership on Wednesday with Schlumberger<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/schlumberger_ltd/inde…>, the oil field services company, to advance the technology of carbon capture and sequestration. But only a handful of small projects survive, and the recent cancellations mean that most of this work has come to a halt, raising doubts that the technique can be ready any time in the next few decades. And without it, "we're not going to have much of a chance for stabilizing the climate," said John Thompson, who oversees work on the issue for the Clean Air Task Force, an environmental group. The fear is that utilities, lacking proven chemical techniques for capturing carbon dioxide and proven methods for storing it underground by the billions of tons per year, will build the next generation of coal plants using existing technology. That would ensure that vast amounts of global warming gases would be pumped into the atmosphere for decades. The highest-profile failure involved a project known as FutureGen, which President Bush himself announced in 2003: a utility consortium, with subsidies from the government, was going to build a plant in Mattoon, Ill., testing the most advanced techniques for converting coal to a gas, capturing pollutants, and burning the gas for power. The carbon dioxide would have been compressed and pumped underground into deep soil layers. Monitoring devices would have tested whether any was escaping to the atmosphere. About $50 million has been spent on FutureGen, about $40 million in federal money and $10 million in private money, to draw up preliminary designs, find a site that had coal, electric transmission and suitable geology, and complete an Environmental Impact Statement, among other steps. But in January, the government pulled out after projected costs nearly doubled, to $1.8 billion. The government feared the costs would go even higher. A bipartisan effort is afoot on Capitol Hill to save FutureGen, but the project is on life support. The government had to change its approach, said Clarence Albright Jr., the undersecretary of the Energy Department, to "limit taxpayer exposure to the escalating cost." Trying to recover, the Energy Department is trying to cut a deal with a utility that is already planning a new power plant. The government would offer subsidies to add a segment to the plant dedicated to capturing and injecting carbon dioxide, as long as the utility bore much of the risk of cost overruns. It is unclear whether any utility will agree to such a deal. The power companies, in fact, have been busy pulling back from coal-burning power plants of all types, amid rising costs and political pressure. Utility executives say they do not know of a plant that would qualify for an Energy Department grant as the project is now structured. Most worrisome to experts on global warming, the utilities have recently been canceling their commitments to a type of plant long seen as a helpful intermediate step toward cleaner coal. In plants of this type, coal would be gasified and pollutants like mercury, sulfur and soot removed before burning. The plants would be highly efficient, and would therefore emit less carbon dioxide for a given volume of electricity produced, but they would not inject the carbon dioxide into the ground. But the situation is not hopeless. One new gasification proposal survives in the United States, by Duke Energy<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/duke_energy_corporati…>for a plant in Edwardsport, Ind. In Wisconsin, engineers are testing a method that may allow them to bolt machinery for capturing carbon dioxide onto the back of old-style power plants; Sweden, Australia and Denmark are planning similar tests. And German engineers are exploring another approach, one that involves burning coal in pure oxygen, which would produce a clean stream of exhaust gases that could be injected into the ground. But no project is very far along, and it remains an open question whether techniques for capturing and storing carbon dioxide will be available by the time they are critically needed. The Electric Power Research Institute, a utility consortium, estimated that it would take as long as 15 years to go from starting a pilot plant to proving the technology will work. The institute has set a goal of having large-scale tests completed by 2020. "A year ago, that was an aggressive target," said Steven R. Specker, the president of the institute. "A year has gone by, and now it's a very aggressive target." -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Re: [EC] Transmission tax
by Jim Sconyers 29 May '08

29 May '08

Looks like grandstanding, doesn't it? Can it be taken seriously? - Rate reductions for West Virginia’s citizens so that they will pay less, not more, for the power they will receive from the line. Are we receiving juice from this line? I thought it was just to pass power through to the East. - Free electricity for all landowners who are affected by the placement of the line. How do you force the company to give free juice? Or are the landowners going to forward their electric bills to Charleston? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 ----- Original Message ---- From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> To: william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:56:05 AM Subject: [EC] Transmission tax Below is the Governor's press release regarding his proposal to impose a transmission tax if TrAIL is approved. The first line specifically states that the Governor's Office released this proposal in a response to the Sierra Club FOIA. My question is : "Does the Governor have any other details of this proposed tax? Would it apply only to TrAIL, or to all transmission from the state? If it is specific to TrAIL, would it not violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the US Constitution? The line would originate in PA and end in VA, so how could one state impose a tax on the privilege of electrons crossing the state, especially if the power is generated in Ohio or PA, not WV? If it applies to all transmission lines, why should other existing transmission companies pay a tax just because TrAIL is being installed? This proposal raises so many questions that I do not know where to begin or how to respond, but you can be sure that these questions will be asked tomorrow, if not at the hearing, then by reporters afterward. Would it be appropriate to request more info on this from the Governor's Office? JBK May 23, 2008 GOVERNOR PLANS TO PROPOSE TRANSMISSION TAX IF TRAIL LINE IS APPROVED Manchin says he wants to protect interests of all West Virginians Contact: Lara Ramsburg, 304-558-2000 CHARLESTON, W.Va. – In response to a Freedom of Information Act Request from the Sierra Club of West Virginia, the Governor’s Office has released information on a proposed transmission tax that Gov. Joe Manchin intends to pursue should either the federal government or the state Public Service Commission approve the TrAIL Line project. “This is something I have been thinking about and discussing for some time, primarily because of the possibility of the federal government superseding any decision that may be made on the state level,” Manchin said. In May 2007, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order interpreting the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to say that the FERC had the power to issue a permit for construction of a new power line even if a state lawfully denied a site transmission application. “If the line goes through, I want to do all that I can to make sure that we have a plan in place that will provide a benefit to the communities affected, and the state as a whole, for providing a key piece of America’s energy infrastructure.” The governor’s proposed plan comprises four components: - Rate reductions for West Virginia’s citizens so that they will pay less, not more, for the power they will receive from the line. - Extra revenue for the counties that house the line. - Extra revenue for the state that will allow it to provide additional services to all its citizens. - Free electricity for all landowners who are affected by the placement of the line. “If the TrAIL line is approved, either by the PSC or the federal government, we will stand ready to make sure that our citizens aren’t taken advantage of and instead receive a benefit from its placement in West Virginia,” Manchin said. # # # _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

2 1

Re: [EC] Transmission tax
by Grubb, Karen 29 May '08

29 May '08

I had a call from a reporters about this (Walt Williams of the WV State Journal). I talked to him and Bill and gave Walt Bill's phone number. I also received an email from Emily Corio asking for information, and I gave her Bill's and Jim's email. I did not know about Jim Ellars or why we wanted him to take the stand. Hi Karen, I found your name on a Sierra Club Web page about the proposed Allegheny Power transmission line. I think the WV Sierra Club is an intervenor in this case, and I'm wondering if I can get some information about the Club's position and intentions for the hearing on the joint stipulation agreement this Friday. I understand that the WV Sierra Club wanted to Jim Ellars to take the stand Friday but that was rejected. Why Ellars and what now? Thanks, Emily Corio Senior Producer West Virginia Public Broadcasting Morgantown, WV 26508 (304) 284-1459 (o) (304) 284-1454 (f) ecorio(a)wvpubcast.org ________________________________ From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of Jim Sconyers Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:37 AM To: James Kotcon; william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: [EC] Transmission tax Looks like grandstanding, doesn't it? Can it be taken seriously? - Rate reductions for West Virginia's citizens so that they will pay less, not more, for the power they will receive from the line. Are we receiving juice from this line? I thought it was just to pass power through to the East. - Free electricity for all landowners who are affected by the placement of the line. How do you force the company to give free juice? Or are the landowners going to forward their electric bills to Charleston? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 ----- Original Message ---- From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu> To: william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 10:56:05 AM Subject: [EC] Transmission tax Below is the Governor's press release regarding his proposal to impose a transmission tax if TrAIL is approved. The first line specifically states that the Governor's Office released this proposal in a response to the Sierra Club FOIA. My question is : "Does the Governor have any other details of this proposed tax? Would it apply only to TrAIL, or to all transmission from the state? If it is specific to TrAIL, would it not violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the US Constitution? The line would originate in PA and end in VA, so how could one state impose a tax on the privilege of electrons crossing the state, especially if the power is generated in Ohio or PA, not WV? If it applies to all transmission lines, why should other existing transmission companies pay a tax just because TrAIL is being installed? This proposal raises so many questions that I do not know where to begin or how to respond, but you can be sure that these questions will be asked tomorrow, if not at the hearing, then by reporters afterward. Would it be appropriate to request more info on this from the Governor's Office? JBK May 23, 2008 GOVERNOR PLANS TO PROPOSE TRANSMISSION TAX IF TRAIL LINE IS APPROVED Manchin says he wants to protect interests of all West Virginians Contact: Lara Ramsburg, 304-558-2000 CHARLESTON, W.Va. - In response to a Freedom of Information Act Request from the Sierra Club of West Virginia, the Governor's Office has released information on a proposed transmission tax that Gov. Joe Manchin intends to pursue should either the federal government or the state Public Service Commission approve the TrAIL Line project. "This is something I have been thinking about and discussing for some time, primarily because of the possibility of the federal government superseding any decision that may be made on the state level," Manchin said. In May 2007, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order interpreting the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to say that the FERC had the power to issue a permit for construction of a new power line even if a state lawfully denied a site transmission application. "If the line goes through, I want to do all that I can to make sure that we have a plan in place that will provide a benefit to the communities affected, and the state as a whole, for providing a key piece of America's energy infrastructure." The governor's proposed plan comprises four components: - Rate reductions for West Virginia's citizens so that they will pay less, not more, for the power they will receive from the line. - Extra revenue for the counties that house the line. - Extra revenue for the state that will allow it to provide additional services to all its citizens. - Free electricity for all landowners who are affected by the placement of the line. "If the TrAIL line is approved, either by the PSC or the federal government, we will stand ready to make sure that our citizens aren't taken advantage of and instead receive a benefit from its placement in West Virginia," Manchin said. # # # _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

2 1

Fwd: Stopping Munis from building coal: Lansing BWL proposed plant
by Paul Wilson 29 May '08

29 May '08

would longview be an appropriate example? If so fwd info to Anne. thanks, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anne Woiwode <Anne.Woiwode(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:57 PM Subject: Stopping Munis from building coal: Lansing BWL proposed plant To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM(a)lists.sierraclub.org Lansing, Michigan's municipal power company has just announced plans to build a new 250 MW coal plant at the state's capital. We are looking for examples of successful fights in other munis to oppose coal plant proposals. Please share your examples with Anne Woiwode at anne.woiwode(a)sierraclub.org Thank you Anne Woiwode, State Director Sierra Club Michigan Chapter (517) 484-2372 . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-FORUM-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

TrAILCO Proceeding
by William DePaulo via YouSendIt 29 May '08

29 May '08

Hello from William, Message from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com: FOIA documents from Gov Manchin's office You have 1 file(s) called <a href='http://download.yousendit.com/75047E1C66C31A22'>MANCCHIN FOIA.zip</a> from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com waiting for download. You can click on the following link to retrieve your file. The link will expire in 14 days and will be available for 500 number of downloads.. Link: http://download.yousendit.com/75047E1C66C31A22 Do not reply to this automatically-generated email. If you have any questions, please email us at paidsupport(a)yousendit.com ----- File too big for email? Try YouSendIt at http://www.yousendit.com YouSendIt 1919 So. Bascom Avenue, 3rd Floor Campbell, CA, 95008

1 0

Transmission tax
by James Kotcon 29 May '08

29 May '08

Below is the Governor's press release regarding his proposal to impose a transmission tax if TrAIL is approved. The first line specifically states that the Governor's Office released this proposal in a response to the Sierra Club FOIA. My question is : "Does the Governor have any other details of this proposed tax? Would it apply only to TrAIL, or to all transmission from the state? If it is specific to TrAIL, would it not violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the US Constitution? The line would originate in PA and end in VA, so how could one state impose a tax on the privilege of electrons crossing the state, especially if the power is generated in Ohio or PA, not WV? If it applies to all transmission lines, why should other existing transmission companies pay a tax just because TrAIL is being installed? This proposal raises so many questions that I do not know where to begin or how to respond, but you can be sure that these questions will be asked tomorrow, if not at the hearing, then by reporters afterward. Would it be appropriate to request more info on this from the Governor's Office? JBK May 23, 2008 GOVERNOR PLANS TO PROPOSE TRANSMISSION TAX IF TRAIL LINE IS APPROVED Manchin says he wants to protect interests of all West Virginians Contact: Lara Ramsburg, 304-558-2000 CHARLESTON, W.Va. – In response to a Freedom of Information Act Request from the Sierra Club of West Virginia, the Governor’s Office has released information on a proposed transmission tax that Gov. Joe Manchin intends to pursue should either the federal government or the state Public Service Commission approve the TrAIL Line project. “This is something I have been thinking about and discussing for some time, primarily because of the possibility of the federal government superseding any decision that may be made on the state level,” Manchin said. In May 2007, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order interpreting the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to say that the FERC had the power to issue a permit for construction of a new power line even if a state lawfully denied a site transmission application. “If the line goes through, I want to do all that I can to make sure that we have a plan in place that will provide a benefit to the communities affected, and the state as a whole, for providing a key piece of America’s energy infrastructure.” The governor’s proposed plan comprises four components: - Rate reductions for West Virginia’s citizens so that they will pay less, not more, for the power they will receive from the line. - Extra revenue for the counties that house the line. - Extra revenue for the state that will allow it to provide additional services to all its citizens. - Free electricity for all landowners who are affected by the placement of the line. “If the TrAIL line is approved, either by the PSC or the federal government, we will stand ready to make sure that our citizens aren’t taken advantage of and instead receive a benefit from its placement in West Virginia,” Manchin said. # # #

1 0

Re: [EC] Old Dominion Sierran
by James Kotcon 29 May '08

29 May '08

There is also a really cool article on "How Green Is Your Computer." JBK >>> Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> 05/28/08 9:59 PM >>> Take at look at the front page article re wind energy siting in the Mid-Atlantic in the May-June issue of Old Dominion Sierran. http://virginia.sierraclub.org/newsletter/ODSMay-Jun-web.pdf Regina _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

1 0

Old Dominion Sierran
by Regina Hendrix 28 May '08

28 May '08

Take at look at the front page article re wind energy siting in the Mid-Atlantic in the May-June issue of Old Dominion Sierran. http://virginia.sierraclub.org/newsletter/ODSMay-Jun-web.pdf Regina

1 0

Re: [EC] Coal Front Group Feels the Heat
by Paul Wilson 28 May '08

28 May '08

Coal Front Group Feels the Heat<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=hwDFfYcTXJcWCcZ%2Ba3…> Source: Facing South, May 22, 2008 Americans for Balanced Energy Choices<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=qK2g5oqr3V6tR7Nuzq8R…>(ABEC) -- a coal and power industry front group -- is busy organizing opposition to America's Climate Security Act of 2007<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=BGwNwDfCseliCbZnrBZ3…>proposed by Senators Joe Lieberman<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=b5xfOev3PDd3CFUHraBt…>and John Warner<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=60K6ovjV5PE9j2I4NpiA…>. The Institute for Southern Studies (ISS) reports that Pete MacDowell, an activist with the NC (North Carolina) Waste Awareness and Reduction Network, received a phone call from ABEC asking if he would put his name to a fax to Lieberman and Warner opposing the bill. Asked whether ABEC was an environmental group, the caller said "yes" and denied it had any links to power utilities. In response to ISS's revelation, Steve Gates from ABEC's parent group, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=hp%2Fhg%2Fyr4K3ZMQaK…>, stated that "one new staff member -- who is no longer working on this project -- decided to 'wing it' when asked some questions that were off her script. This staff person clearly should have answered 'Yes' when asked if ABEC was related to the utility industry." -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Re: [EC] [Fwd: [fom] AEP scrubbers - one heads up for northern WV residents]
by Jim Sconyers 27 May '08

27 May '08

I thought northern WV was not suitable for MTR - is that wrong? Jim Sconyers jim_scon(a)yahoo.com 603.969.6712 ----- Original Message ---- From: Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> To: ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:49:03 PM Subject: [EC] [Fwd: [fom] AEP scrubbers - one heads up for northern WV residents] Well, this is not good news. Regina -----Inline Attachment Follows----- Just wanted to give a heads up on something that is related to a big part of my thesis. The new scrubber installations at AEP plants will do what the AP article at http://www.redorbit.com/news/business/1402498/scrubbers_to_clean_john_amos_… says, it will shift state demand for coal from southern counties to northern ones. Over the past two years the number of northern strip-mines has declined, but the amount of production and # of employees per mine have increased, suggestion an expansion in size of northern strip-mines. So if you know of anyone up there living near coal seams, might wanna give them a heads up about this as it will surely cause an increase in stripping and MTR up there. Not to mention the other consequences coming from scrubber installation/operation and disposal of the by-products, which surely will be more than the "harmless gypsum" that this article suggests. Of course, the shift isnt going to reduce MTR in the southern counties all that much, if at all. Only about 22% of coal produced in WV is burned in WV, and obiously much of that is from southern counties, so in my estimate, this will result in no more than a 5% shift of MTR production to northern mines, or about 2.5 million tons. Of course, that is significant in one major sense. 2.5 million tons approximates the annual production of a medium size MTR mine if I'm not mistaken. So, one mountain saved given current consumption and export conditions. Those were rough calc's, dont quote me on those. if the coal is to be produced, its better that production is spread evenly across the state. the point is still to reduce the consumption of coal and get an outright ban on MTR. I've pasted the supporting quote for all of this below. -- Rory Shifting Coal Demand Another outcome of the national push to scrub is a shift in demand from more expensive, lower sulfur central Appalachian coal to less expensive, higher sulfur northern Appalachian coal - or, in West Virginia, from southern to northern coal. Amos's scrubbers will go into operation during the coming two years: unit 3, the largest, in January 2009, unit 2 the following spring and unit 1 in spring 2010. The plant currently burns up to 8 million tons of coal a year, most of it from Boone County. Once the scrubbers are up and running, AEP will have the option of shifting to a less expensive coal. -- "Animals suffer and their screams fill the air. Forests are being destroyed. Mountains are ripped open for the metals streaming in their veins. And man cherishes and celebrates those who do the greatest of damage to nature and humanity." - Leonardo Da Vinci (1500)

2 1

Sierra FOIA to Gov Manchin re TrAILCo
by William DePaulo via YouSendIt 27 May '08

27 May '08

Hello from William, Message from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com: The attached documents were produced Friday, May 23, 2008 in response to the FOIA request of the Sierra Club. By letter dated May 27, 2008 the Sierra Club has requested a Vaughn index of unspecified documents withheld as exempt. You have 1 file(s) called <a href='http://download.yousendit.com/F22EFC9B6BC4BB99'>MANCCHIN FOIA.zip</a> from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com waiting for download. You can click on the following link to retrieve your file. The link will expire in 14 days and will be available for 500 number of downloads.. Link: http://download.yousendit.com/F22EFC9B6BC4BB99 Do not reply to this automatically-generated email. If you have any questions, please email us at paidsupport(a)yousendit.com ----- File too big for email? Try YouSendIt at http://www.yousendit.com YouSendIt 1919 So. Bascom Avenue, 3rd Floor Campbell, CA, 95008

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] AEP scrubbers - one heads up for northern WV residents]
by Regina Hendrix 27 May '08

27 May '08

Well, this is not good news. Regina

1 0

2 week vacation!!!
by Barbara Fallon 22 May '08

22 May '08

I feel like I am cheating or something. I am going to be on vacation for two weeks. So, I will pick up the fundraising ball when I return. Sorry, no computer on the remote island to which I am heading....

1 0

Re: [EC] New Coal Small Grants Program
by Grubb, Karen 22 May '08

22 May '08

I sent it to Barbara. ________________________________ From: Barbara Fallon [mailto:brbr_fallon@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:39 PM To: Grubb, Karen Cc: ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: New Coal Small Grants Program I am looking into this grant. I need the clubhouse login account and password. Anybody out there have it? ----- Original Message ---- From: "Grubb, Karen" <Karen.Grubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 5:45:57 PM Subject: FW: New Coal Small Grants Program Would our work with TrAIL and PATH qualify us for this grant? -----Original Message----- From: Announcements from the National Coal Campaign team. [mailto:COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG] On Behalf Of Alice McKeown Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:24 PM To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Subject: New Coal Small Grants Program The National Coal Campaign is pleased to announce a new small grants program for 2008. Please see the link below for further details including eligibility and how to apply. Projects must align with the following primary goals of the National Coal Campaign: prevent the construction of a new fleet of coal-fired power plants in the United States, divert investments into clean energy alternatives, retire or replace existing coal plants, prevent the construction of coal-to-liquids plants. Grants for mining related projects will be available under a different program coming soon. http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-resources. aspx Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis and all funds must be spent by the end of the year. If you have any questions, please email coal grants program volunteer coordinator Verena Owen at baumling(a)aol.com Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

1 0

Re: [EC] New Coal Small Grants Program
by Barbara Fallon 22 May '08

22 May '08

I am looking into this grant. I need the clubhouse login account and password. Anybody out there have it? ----- Original Message ---- From: "Grubb, Karen" <Karen.Grubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 5:45:57 PM Subject: FW: New Coal Small Grants Program Would our work with TrAIL and PATH qualify us for this grant? -----Original Message----- From: Announcements from the National Coal Campaign team. [mailto:COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG] On Behalf Of Alice McKeown Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:24 PM To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Subject: New Coal Small Grants Program The National Coal Campaign is pleased to announce a new small grants program for 2008. Please see the link below for further details including eligibility and how to apply. Projects must align with the following primary goals of the National Coal Campaign: prevent the construction of a new fleet of coal-fired power plants in the United States, divert investments into clean energy alternatives, retire or replace existing coal plants, prevent the construction of coal-to-liquids plants. Grants for mining related projects will be available under a different program coming soon. http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-resources. aspx Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis and all funds must be spent by the end of the year. If you have any questions, please email coal grants program volunteer coordinator Verena Owen at baumling(a)aol.com Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

1 0

Blair Mountain Nomination Website
by Regina Hendrix 20 May '08

20 May '08

Hello friends: Check this one out: http://www.friendsofblairmountain.org/index.html I knew they were doing a website but I didn't imagine how informative, graphic and extensive it would be. Regina P.S. Vivian/Paul, how about putting a link on the OVEC and WVSC website?

1 0

Fwd: E-News Bulletin 05/19/08
by Paul Wilson 20 May '08

20 May '08

Check out the Sustainable Building law in Minnesota. Seems I remember this was on the list of E-Councils Renewable Energy campaign. There is a link to the MN bill. Now we just need a champion in the WV legislature! cheers, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Architecture2030 <info(a)architecture2030.org> Date: Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:01 PM Subject: E-News Bulletin 05/19/08 To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com [image: Architecture 2030] <http://www.architecture2030.org/home.html> [image: The 2030 Challenge]<http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html> [image: The 2010 Imperative]<http://www.architecture2030.org/2010_imperative/index.html> [image: 2030 Research Center]<http://www.architecture2030.org/current_situation/cutting_edge.html> [image: Regional Solutions]<http://www.architecture2030.org/regional_solutions/homeowners.html> [image: News + Resources] <http://www.architecture2030.org/news/news.php> · About Us <http://www.architecture2030.org/about.php> · Contact Us <info(a)architecture2030.org> · Subscribe <http://www.architecture2030.org/subscribe.php> · FAQs <http://www.architecture2030.org/news/faqs.html> · 2030 E-News <http://www.architecture2030.org/news/e-news.html> · Home <http://www.architecture2030.org/home.html> The 2030 Challenge<http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html> The 2010 Imperative <http://www.architecture2030.org/2010_imperative/index.html> Research Center <http://www.architecture2030.org/current_situation/cutting_edge.html> Regional Solutions<http://www.architecture2030.org/regional_solutions/homeowners.html> News/Resources <http://www.architecture2030.org/news/news.php> [image: Architecture 2030 E-News Bulletin 4] "Now that global warming is a recognized crisis, our nation can focus on solutions. More and more cities, states, firms and businesses are adopting and implementing the 2030 Challenge targets." -Edward Mazria Major Victory in the Midwest The Minnesota Sustainable Building 2030 Bill The Architecture 2030 Challenge is now law in the state of Minnesota. On May 8, Governor Tim Pawlenty signed the Minnesota Sustainable Building 2030 bill, which requires that buildings receiving state funding meet energy efficiency targets of the 2030 Challenge with a 60% reduction in 2010, 70% in 2015, 80% in 2020 and 90% in 2025. Minnesota proponents of the Architecture 2030 Challenge testified in support of the bill to the Minnesota Senate and House Energy Committees. Architecture 2030 would like to thank Perkins+Will, The Weidt Group, Studio 2030, Minnesota Center for Energy and Environment, the University of Minnesota Center for Sustainable Building Research, LHB Architects, Architectural Alliance, the Green Institute, Indigenous Environmental Network and the many other individuals and organizations whose efforts helped secure this historic legislation. Minnesota now joins the ranks of California, Illinois, Dallas, Santa Barbara, Richmond, the Federal Government and others who are working to implement the 2030 Challenge targets. The Minnesota Sustainable Building 2030 Bill was authored by Representative Bill Hilty and Senator Yvonne Pretner Solon and co-authored by Senators Scott Dibble, Dave Senjem, Ellen Anderson and Julie Rosen and Representatives Brita Sailer, Kate Knuth, Alice Hausman, Bob Gunther, Matt Dean, Linda Slocum, Maria Ruud and David Bly. View the Sustainable Building 2030 bill online (SF 2706<http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/departments/scr/billsumm/summary_display.…>and HF 3401<https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H3401.0.html&sessi…> ). National Wildlife Federation Bestows Top Honor to Edward Mazria At their annual awards banquet in Keystone, Colorado last Saturday, the National Wildlife Federation awarded Architecture 2030 founder, Edward Mazria, with their most prestigious honor: the National Conservation Achievement Award. Mr. Mazria received this accolade in the Special Achievement category for his seminal work on the Building Sector's role in global warming. The National Wildlife Federation's Conservation Achievement Awards have been presented annually since 1965. Recipients in 2007 included Vice President Al Gore, author and activist Bill McKibben, environmental champion Laurie David and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Download the Architecture 2030 press release here<http://www.architecture2030.org/pdfs/NWF_release.pdf>. Innovative Company Offers Free Software to Support the 2010 Imperative Integrated Environmental Solutions is offering a free software license for their <Virtual Environment > to any school signed on to the 2010 Imperative. For more information, read the official IES press release here<http://www.iesve.com/content/default.asp?page=s62&newsid=2960&back=s596> . May 19, 2008 FREE Subscribe Unsubscribe <http://www.architecture2030.org/subscribe.php> [Printer Friendly version<http://www.architecture2030.org/news/printerfriendly/news_051908.pdf> ] [image: Highlights] Read The 2030 Blueprint The 2030 Blueprint study gives a comparative analysis of three approaches to addressing climate change – building energy efficiency, 'clean' coal (with carbon capture and sequestration) and nuclear power – while laying a new roadmap for solving the global warming and US economic crises. Read it now <http://www.architecture2030.org/pdfs/2030Blueprint.pdf> Watch the Face It Webcast The Face It webcast is available for viewing at our website. Watch it now <http://www.architecture2030.org/faceit/webcast.php> Adopt The 2030 Challenge Choose to have your firm/organization listed as an official adopter, and describe your progress (obstacles/successes) as you implement The Challenge. Sign up here <http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html> Adopt The 2010 Imperative Choose to have your school listed as an official adopter, and describe your progress (obstacles/successes) as you implement The Imperative. Sign up here <http://www.architecture2030.org/2010_imperative/index.html> · · · Go to the News/Resources <http://www.architecture2030.org/news/index.php>section of our website to get the latest news updates on issues regarding climate change and the building sector. · · · Comments and suggestions for future Architecture 2030 E–news issues should be sent to: info(a)architecture2030.org Architecture 2030 607 Cerrillos Road Santa Fe, NM 87505 www.architecture2030.org Having trouble viewing this email? - Click here to view an online version. <http://www.architecture2030.org/news/news_051908.html> Help us spread this important news by sending this E-News Bulletin to a colleague or friend. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail was sent to pjgrunt(a)gmail.com because you are subscribed to at least one of our mailing lists. If at any time you would like to remove yourself from our mailing list, please feel free to do so by visiting: http://www.architecture2030.org/listmessenger/public/unsubscribe.php?g=1&ad… -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Nuclear power in the wings
by duane330＠aol.com 19 May '08

19 May '08

Carbon Caps May Give Nuclear Power a Lift By REBECCA SMITH, Wall Street Journal, May 19, 2008; Page A4 As Congress debates whether to limit carbon-dioxide emissions, one of the most vocal supporters of such legislation -- the nuclear-power industry -- is poised to reap a multibillion-dollar windfall if restrictions take effect. Some nuclear operators are already forecasting how much their profits could increase under various versions of greenhouse-gas legislation that are under consideration. Among the nuclear operators that stand to profit most are Exelon Corp., FPL Group Inc., Constellation Energy Group, Entergy Corp., FirstEnergy Corp., NRG Energy Inc. and Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. Carbon limits could usher in a period of "supernormal profits" for nuclear operators in markets where rates are deregulated and have more ability to rise, says Hugh Wynne, utilities analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. But he warns that profits, if perceived as excessive, run the risk of inciting a public backlash, perhaps including calls for a windfall-profits tax. Congress is considering several measures that would impose a so-called cap-and-trade system, which would limit the amount of carbon dioxide companies are allowed to emit. Lawmakers this summer are expected to take up a bill sponsored by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I., Conn.) and John Warner (R., Va.) that initially gives the power industry about half the allowances it needs and requires generators to purchase the remainder on an open market or cut emissions. Nuclear operators stand to gain from greenhouse-gas legislation in two ways. For starters, their plants don't spew carbon dioxide, so they would not have to buy emissions allowances, giving them a competitive advantage over competitors that burn fossil fuels. In addition, a cap-and-trade system would probably push up wholesale electricity prices in deregulated markets, as coal- and natural-gas-burning utilities jack up prices to recover the additional cost of allowance purchases. In deregulated markets, generators with the highest costs set the market price, so lower-cost nuclear operators could enjoy the higher prices charged by coal- and gas-burning utilities without the higher costs. In states that didn't deregulate their electricity markets, nuclear plants mostly are part of regulated utilities and furnish electricity to utility customers at prices tied to their underlying costs, eliminating the opportunity for such profit. Chicago-based Exelon, the nation's biggest nuclear-plant operator by output, could reap as much as $2 billion a year in added earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, says Mr. Wynne. His calculation assumes that the cost of carbon emissions would be $25 per million metric tons of emissions, an allowance price typical in Europe. Exelon has not released its own profit estimates. Executives agree that carbon legislation would burnish earnings, but they say the benefit would be less than $2 billion. They say higher profits are fair because they recognize a multibillion-dollar investment Exelon has made in nuclear power and could fund new plants. "We have invested in a low-carbon fleet and our rates reflect that," said Elizabeth "Betsy" Moler, executive vice president at Exelon. "Our rates are higher than rates for coal utilities." New Orleans-based Entergy -- which is seeking regulatory approvals to spin off six nuclear plants into the nation's first stand-alone nuclear-power company, dubbed Enexus Energy Corp. -- says an allowance price of about $30 could net the new company $600 million a year of added profit. FPL Group, Juno Beach, Fla., calculates its potential boost in earnings, before certain expenses, at $130 million to $727 million, depending on allowance prices and how much electricity is sold. The money would come from FPL's unregulated generation unit, which has interests in three nuclear plants and renewable-energy installations, such as wind farms, not its regulated Florida utility. For Baltimore-based Constellation, higher profits from its nuclear plants would be partly offset by higher costs for its coal-fired units. Even so, it estimates gross profit would rise by more than $225 million a year, if carbon emissions cost $25 a ton. Penalizing carbon emissions would improve the economics of nuclear-power development. A study by the Congressional Budget Office, released this month, concluded that nuclear plants could make electricity more cheaply than any other form of power generation if carbon allowances cost $45 apiece. Opinions differ about how quickly a cap-and-trade system could cause wholesale electricity prices to rise or what allowances would cost. The intent of the Lieberman-Warner bill is to cut greenhouse-gas emissions to 65% below 1990 levels by 2050. Nuclear-plant owners aren't the only ones that stand to benefit. Natural-gas-fired generators would benefit if they sell electricity where coal-fired plants set prices. That is because gas plants release only about half as much carbon dioxide as coal plants and would need fewer allowances, so their profit margin would widen. Utilities are lobbying Congress to influence the allowance-allocation method adopted. Exelon favors an approach under which government officials would sell or allocate a greater portion of emissions permits to utilities with retail customers, rather than to power generators that sell wholesale power to utilities. That would help customers of Exelon's two retail utilities, Commonwealth Edison in Chicago and PECO in Philadelphia, since the utility could sell the allowances to generators and use the proceeds to offset higher energy costs for their customers. It would allow prices to rise on the wholesale market, financially rewarding Exelon's nuclear unit. Big coal-burning utilities oppose full auctioning of allowances, saying it could drive up their costs and produce an enormous spike in electricity prices, harming many consumers. Economists generally favor selling allowances rather than giving them away. That is because selling them sends "price signals" to consumers, encouraging conservation and construction of cleaner forms of power generation, helping society achieve permanent greenhouse-gas reductions. "It's not a bad thing to give more money to nuclear operators if you're trying to give them incentive to invest in new nuclear generation," says Greg Gordon, a utilities analyst for Citigroup Investment Research in New York. Under the Lieberman-Warner bill, the Environmental Protection Agency would create 125 billion allowances, enough for all 38 years of the program, commencing in 2012. About 5.2 billion allowances would be available the first year. The number would drop by 96 million each year until only 1.56 billion remained in 2050, the final year of the program. The program is intended to make emissions progressively costlier to drive the market to make permanent reductions. Exelon Chairman John Rowe says the power sector may have to spend as much as $400 billion by 2030 replacing polluting plants with cleaner ones. The sum is nearly equal to the market capitalization of U.S. utilities. Write to Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith(a)wsj.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New Wave of Nuclear Plants Faces High Costs By REBECCA SMITH, Wall Street Journal, May 12, 2008; Page B1 A new generation of nuclear power plants is on the drawing boards in the U.S., but the projected cost is causing some sticker shock: $5 billion to $12 billion a plant, double to quadruple earlier rough estimates. Nuclear power is regaining favor as an alternative to other sources of power generation, such as coal-fired plants, which have fallen out of favor because they are major polluters. But the high cost could lead to sharply higher electricity bills for consumers and inevitably reignite debate about the nuclear industry's suitability to meet growing energy needs. Nuclear plants haven't been built in meaningful numbers in the U.S. since the 1980s. Part of the cost escalation is bad luck. Plants are being proposed in a period of skyrocketing costs for commodities such as cement, steel and copper; amid a growing shortage of skilled labor; and against the backdrop of a shrunken supplier network for the industry. The price escalation is sobering because the industry and regulators have worked hard to make development more efficient, in hopes of eliminating problems that in the past produced harrowing cost overruns. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, for example, has created a streamlined licensing process to make timelier, more comprehensive decisions about proposals. Nuclear vendors have developed standardized designs for plants to reduce construction and operating costs. And utility executives, with years of operating experience behind them, are more astute buyers. Now, 104 nuclear reactors are operating in the U.S. Most are highly profitable but that was not the case until fairly recently. For the 75 units built between 1966 and 1986, the average cost was $3 billion or triple early estimates, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Many plants operate profitably now because they were sold to current operators for less than their actual cost. The latest projections follow months of tough negotiations between utility companies and key suppliers, and suggest efforts to control costs are proving elusive. Estimates released in recent weeks by experienced nuclear operators -- NRG Energy Inc., Progress Energy Inc., Exelon Corp., Southern Co. and FPL Group Inc. -- "have blown by our highest estimate" of costs computed just eight months ago, said Jim Hempstead, a senior credit officer at Moody's Investors Service credit-rating agency in New York. Moody's worries that continued cost increases, even if partially offset by billions of dollars worth of federal subsidies, could weaken companies and expose consumers to high energy costs. On May 7, Georgia Power Co., a unit of Atlanta-based Southern, said it expects to spend $6.4 billion for a 45.7% interest in two new reactors proposed for the Vogtle nuclear plant site near Augusta, Ga. Utility officials declined to disclose total costs. A typical Georgia Power household could expect to see its power bill go up by $144 annually to pay for the plants after 2018, the utility said. Bill Edge, spokesman for the Georgia Public Service Commission, said Georgia "will look at what's best for ratepayers" and could pull support if costs balloon to frightening heights. The existing Vogtle plant, put into service in the late 1980s, cost more than 10 times its original estimate, roughly $4.5 billion for each of two reactors. FPL Group, Juno Beach, Fla., estimates it will cost $6 billion to $9 billion to build each of two reactors at its Turkey Point nuclear site in southeast Florida. It has picked a reactor design by Westinghouse Electric Co., a unit of Toshiba Corp., after concluding it could cost as much as $12 billion to build plants with reactors designed by General Electric Co. The joint venture GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy said it hasn't seen FPL's calculations but is confident its units "are cost-competitive compared with other nuclear designs." Exelon, the nation's biggest nuclear operator, is considering building two reactors on an undeveloped site in Texas, and said the cost could be $5 billion to $6.5 billion each. The plants would be operated as "merchant" plants and thus would not have utility customers on the hook to pay for them, as is the case in both Florida and Georgia. Instead, they would have to cover expenses through wholesale power sales. Several things could derail new development plans. Excessive cost is one. A second is the development of rival technologies that could again make nuclear plants look like white elephants. A drop in prices for coal and natural gas, now very expensive, also could make nuclear plants less attractive. On the other hand, if Congress decides to tax greenhouse-gas emissions, that could make electricity from nuclear plants more attractive by raising costs for generators that burn fossil fuels. Nuclear plants wouldn't have to pay the charges because they aren't emitters. Some states are clearing a path for nuclear-power development, even before costs are fully known. They are inspired by a growing fear of climate change. "The overwhelming feeling in Florida is that nuclear power is popular and that's why it's going to go ahead," said J.R. Kelly, head of the Office of Public Counsel in Tallahassee, which represents consumers. "Our main concern is the tremendous cost." In Florida, state officials are allowing utilities to collect money from customers to cover development and construction costs. In the past, regulators typically required utilities to bear the costs until plants were finished. Many utilities said they are watching with interest. Ralph Izzo, chief executive of Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. in New Jersey, said his company may not be big enough to build a nuclear plant, even though it is a nuclear operator. "We're concerned by the rise in construction costs," he said. Write to Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith(a)wsj.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> • The News: Estimated costs to build the next generation of nuclear power plants have soared to $5 billion to $12 billion a plant. • The Debate: Questions are emerging over the affordability of nuclear power, despite its popularity as an alternative to polluting coal-fired plants. • What to Watch: If Congress taxes greenhouse-gas emissions, nuclear plants, which aren't emitters, will become more attractive. But if coal and natural-gas prices decline, nuclear-plant economics will get worse. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

1 0

Senator McCain’s Climate Record
by Duane330＠aol.com 18 May '08

18 May '08

Senator McCain’s Climate Record Despite John McCain’s pro-environment rhetoric, protester Bret Thompson thinks McCain’s voting record on the environment merits “24 %.” (Photo: Liza Alwes) Republican presidential contender John McCain made it clear he's not like President George Bush when it comes to global warming - the candidate has pledged to limit greenhouse gas emissions. But critics ask why Senator McCain won't do more to support renewable energy. Living on Earth’s Washington correspondent Jeff Young reports from Washington. [Remember Jeff from his days at WV public radio.] Hear the interview at the following web-site: [Living On Earth, NPR] _http://www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID=08-P13-00020&segmentID=3_ (http://www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID=08-P13-00020&segmentID=3) **************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)

1 0

Re: [EC] Fwd: New Coal Small Grants Program
by James Kotcon 17 May '08

17 May '08

I think this is worth a shot, or at least a follow-up call. The testmony in January's TrAILCo hearing made it very clear that the US-DOE specifically requested that utilities and FERC assess "what it would take to move an additional 5000 MW of coal-fired electricity from the Ohio Valley to the East Coast." TrAILCo's testimony is that this line would allow construction of another 4 coal-fired power plants. Even if such plants were not built, the line would expand the capacity factor of existing plants to allow a comparable amount of coal to be burned. Given the lower efficiency of these old dirty plants, expanding thier operation would likely be even worse than building new plants. But a project should focus on building grass-roots support, and holding Manchin accountable, not just legal and expert witness fees. While winning court cases is important, West Virginia desperately needs to expand our base of grass roots volunteers, especiually in the mid-eastern panhandle anbd in the central part of the state (PATH will go from the John Amos plant near Putnam County north through very rural and poorly organized counties in west-central WV.) And while I do not like conspiracy theorists, it is clear from our FOIA that PSC Staff felt substantial pressure due to their perception that Manchin supported the TrAILCo line. TrAILCo began pushing Staff for a settlement shortly after the hearings concluded, yet, as recently as April 7, the PSC cheif engineer said that they had no need to settle and that TrAILCo should withdraw the application. Then April 15, the settlement is announced. Whaddya Tink? JBK >>> Regina Hendrix <regina1936(a)verizon.net> 05/17/08 1:32 AM >>> I still have a hard time understanding why the National Coal Campaign does not recognize that defeating TrailCo and PATH would prevent construction of coal-fired power plants. If we don't build the coal fired power plants in WV, our neighbors to the East will build plants in their area which will most likely not be coal fired. Paul Wilson wrote: > fyi, paul > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Alice McKeown* <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org > <mailto:Alice.McKeown@sierraclub.org>> > Date: Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:23 PM > Subject: New Coal Small Grants Program > To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org > <mailto:COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS@lists.sierraclub.org> > > > The National Coal Campaign is pleased to announce a new small grants > program for 2008. Please see the link below for further details > including > eligibility and how to apply. > > Projects must align with the following primary goals of the National Coal > Campaign: prevent the construction of a new fleet of coal-fired power > plants in the United States, divert investments into clean energy > alternatives, retire or replace existing coal plants, prevent the > construction of coal-to-liquids plants. Grants for mining related > projects > will be available under a different program coming soon. > > > http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-resources.aspx > > > Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis and all funds must be > spent by the end of the year. > > If you have any questions, please email coal grants program volunteer > coordinator Verena Owen at baumling(a)aol.com <mailto:baumling@aol.com> > > Many thanks, > Alice > ________________________________ > Alice McKeown > Sierra Club > National Coal Campaign > tel: 202.675.6271 > fax: 202.547.6009 > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: > COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG > <mailto:COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG> > > Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: > http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp > > To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: > http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp > > > > -- > Paul Wilson > Sierra Club > 504 Jefferson Ave > Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 > Phone: 304-725-4360 > Cell: 304-279-6975 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > EC mailing list > EC(a)osenergy.org > http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec > _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

2 1

Fwd: New Coal Small Grants Program
by Paul Wilson 17 May '08

17 May '08

fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:23 PM Subject: New Coal Small Grants Program To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org The National Coal Campaign is pleased to announce a new small grants program for 2008. Please see the link below for further details including eligibility and how to apply. Projects must align with the following primary goals of the National Coal Campaign: prevent the construction of a new fleet of coal-fired power plants in the United States, divert investments into clean energy alternatives, retire or replace existing coal plants, prevent the construction of coal-to-liquids plants. Grants for mining related projects will be available under a different program coming soon. http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-resources.aspx Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis and all funds must be spent by the end of the year. If you have any questions, please email coal grants program volunteer coordinator Verena Owen at baumling(a)aol.com Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

2 1

TrAILCo Service List
by William DePaulo via YouSendIt 16 May '08

16 May '08

Hello from William, You have 1 file(s) called <a href='http://download.yousendit.com/6D1C49246FB82ECC'>SIERRA FOIA REQUEST.zip</a> from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com waiting for download. You can click on the following link to retrieve your file. The link will expire in 14 days and will be available for 500 number of downloads.. Link: http://download.yousendit.com/6D1C49246FB82ECC Do not reply to this automatically-generated email. If you have any questions, please email us at paidsupport(a)yousendit.com ----- File too big for email? Try YouSendIt at http://www.yousendit.com YouSendIt 1919 So. Bascom Avenue, 3rd Floor Campbell, CA, 95008

1 0

Fwd: Newly revised Coal Questions & Answers
by Paul Wilson 16 May '08

16 May '08

fyi, good talking points on this updated Q&A factsheet on Coal. best,paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:36 PM Subject: Newly revised Coal Questions & Answers To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org I am pleased to announce that we have revised our coal questions and answers fact sheet. This new version includes a timely update to the question about the FutureGen plant, which was cancelled earlier this year. Please check the new version out on our Clubhouse Headquarters or on our public website: http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/coal-resources.aspx http://www.sierraclub.org/coal/faq/ Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Re: [EC] Proposed SD/MN Coal-Fired Power Plant Dealt Setback
by Paul Wilson 14 May '08

14 May '08

fyi, paul Seems that the Club has been successful in some Transmission line issues. In the States*Proposed SD/MN Coal-Fired Power Plant Dealt Setback *On May 9, two administrative judges in Minnesota recommended against the transmission lines needed<http://action.sierraclub.org/site/R?i=LRYKls9Ru0JvHlVZ8mJihQ..>for the proposed Big Stone II coal-fired power plant on the grounds that "the five regional power companies in a partnership to build the coal-fired plant had not proved the transmission lines were needed and had failed to show that less expensive conservation measures and renewable energy such as wind could not meet any demand for additional electricity." Big Stone II is proposed for Milbank, S.D., just miles from the border with Minnesota. Our North Star chapter has been part<http://action.sierraclub.org/site/R?i=FEGGY4daEEKhUWbx30yDQw..>of a broad coalition fighting the plant. Part of the proposal was a large new transmission line from the plant to the Twin Cities. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

DRAFT OF SIERRA CLUB INITIAL BRIEF ON APR 15 PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 14 May '08

14 May '08

Please review the attached draft of the brief we will file Friday of this week and forward any comments or suggestions to me no later than COB Wednesday. Tx Bill -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 1

Fwd: REMINDER: Next Coal Activists Call Wednesday, May 14th (TONIGHT)
by Paul Wilson 14 May '08

14 May '08

fyi, paul ps. note the info on small grants for chapters ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:13 AM Subject: REMINDER: Next Coal Activists Call Wednesday, May 14th (TONIGHT) To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org A friendly reminder that our next coal activists call will be tonight, Wednesday, May 14. Among other agenda items we will discuss an exciting new local and regional funding opportunity being rolled out by the National Coal Campaign. Bring questions about this and any local issues for our open forum. http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/Default.aspx ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please join the National Coal Campaign for our next monthly coal activist coal on Wednesday, May 14th at 8:00 p.m. eastern. This month we will report back on recent news as well as talk about an exciting new small grants opportunity. As always, please bring any questions you have for our open forum. 866 501 6174 224 0743# Agenda 1. Legal update: Pat Gallagher & Bruce Nilles 2. Mercury news & report back: Pat Gallagher & Ginny Cramer 3. Small grants and how you can apply for funding from the Coal Team: Verena Owen 4. Open Forum Also, please make sure to check out our Coal Headquarters on Clubhouse for any coal-related needs. http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/Default.aspx Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp Sign up to receive Sierra Club Insider, the flagship e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the Club's latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent editions at http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/ -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] BRH editorial: Pouring more money into Co-Gen plant may not be right course]
by Regina Hendrix 13 May '08

13 May '08

FYI

1 0

More DEP misdeeds
by Regina Hendrix 12 May '08

12 May '08

See this site: http://www.wvpubcast.org/newsarticle.aspx?id=1920

1 0

Fwd: TAKE ACTION: No Dirty Coal Fuels in the Defense Authorization Bill!
by Paul Wilson 07 May '08

07 May '08

This is BIG. Another way for the Coal-To-Liquids crowd to get a foot in the door via Defense appropriates. Please send your letter. Also you will have to send it separately to Rockefeller but there are instructions on how to cut and paste your message in his email system. thanks, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:04 PM Subject: TAKE ACTION: No Dirty Coal Fuels in the Defense Authorization Bill! To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org Take Action: No Dirty Fuels in the Defense Authorization Bill Not satisfied with resounding losses last year, coal-to-liquids proponents are now trying to tack incentives for their dirty fuels onto the Defense Authorization bill. Coal-to-liquids, or liquid coal, would cause double the global warming pollution as conventional transportation fuels and would dramatically increase destructive coal mining in our nation. These proponents are also taking aim at "Section 526," a provision in the recently passed energy bill that prohibits federal agencies from spending taxpayer dollars on purchasing contracts for dirty fuels that would increase global warming pollution. Tell Congress to reject incentives for liquid coal and to preserve section 526! https://secure2.convio.net/sierra/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction… - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

2 1

FW: The Herald-Mail ONLINE: Allegheny unsure where power line will be
by Grubb, Karen 06 May '08

06 May '08

________________________________ From: Michael Lippe [mailto:mjlippe@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:26 AM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: The Herald-Mail ONLINE: Allegheny unsure where power line will be mjlippe(a)aol.com sent you the following story from The Herald-Mail ONLINE <http://www.herald-mail.com/> : Comments: Follow up to my email this morning. Cheers. ________________________________ 05/02/2008 Allegheny unsure where power line will be Some worry that project will threaten environmentally and historically significant areas WASHINGTON COUNTY - The specific path of a high-voltage transmission line that will run from southeast West Virginia to Frederick County, Md., might not be determined until the end of this year, an Allegheny Power spokesman said Wednesday. You can view the full story here <http://www.herald-mail.com/?cmd=displaystory&story_id=192705&format=htm l> .

1 0

PSC AND CAD RESPONSE TO SIERRA CLUB FOIA REQUEST
by William DePaulo via YouSendIt 06 May '08

06 May '08

Hello from William, Message from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com: 1128 PAGES FROM PSC AND 647 FROM CAD You have 1 file(s) called <a href='http://download.yousendit.com/9EFC56FA59BF5FB4'>SIERRA FOIA REQUEST.zip</a> from william.depaulo(a)gmail.com waiting for download. You can click on the following link to retrieve your file. The link will expire in 14 days and will be available for 500 number of downloads.. Link: http://download.yousendit.com/9EFC56FA59BF5FB4 Do not reply to this automatically-generated email. If you have any questions, please email us at paidsupport(a)yousendit.com ----- File too big for email? Try YouSendIt at http://www.yousendit.com YouSendIt 1919 So. Bascom Avenue, 3rd Floor Campbell, CA, 95008

1 0

FW: Michael Lippe; Allegheny Power Transmission Lines
by Grubb, Karen 05 May '08

05 May '08

FYI. What is our status? ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 10:05 PM To: Grubb, Karen Cc: mdavis(a)hsc.wvu.edu; brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com; jkotcon(a)wvu.edu; pjgrunt(a)lycos.com; william.depaulo(a)gmail.com Subject: Re: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Hi Karen, Its me again, from Shepherdstown. I guess we are in the end game now with regard to TrAIL. I was appalled by the PSC Staff's change of position. Basically selling out a principled draft order for a few dollars and jobs. In response, I have written to the PSC, and am attaching a copy of that letter. I am hoping the Sierra Club will continue its fight against TrAIL. I feel I have done about as much as I can, which included going to Moorefield and testifying, donating to the WV Sierra chapter, and writing letters. The main purpose of this letter to you, however, is to ask whether the Club is planning on joining or leading the fight against PATH. I really hope so. As you know, Allegheny is now actively looking at alternative routes in both West Virginia and Maryland. I have already had 2 letters published in Maryland papers (the Baltimore Sun and Frederick News-Post) alerting Maryland readers to the potential danger of PATH to Antietam National Battlefield, and I am writing to the Hagerstown newspaper shortly about a misleading article they just published about PATH. However, what is needed is a campaign on the order of the very persuasive one you wagered with the technical data to support the lack of need for this line as well as the environmental damage that will ensue. By the way, we have 2 eagles and 3 eaglets currently nesting at the National Conservation Training Center here in Shepherdstown, and a dedicated group of online watchers who would be very likely to join a national outcry against any routing that would remotely disturb the eagles! Hoping for a positive response. Sincerely, Michael Lippe In a message dated 10/22/2007 7:50:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu writes: This is the contact information on our Treasurer for questions on your gift. Chapter Treasurer Mary Davis, 599-6384, mdavis(a)wvu.edu We are making progress on fundraising and have identified several expert witnesses, so we are feeling positive at present. As for an intervention on PATH, that would be up to the Sierra Club and whether we would have the funding to mount another intervention after this one for TrAIL Co. It will also depend on how this intervention goes. To my knowledge Path has not yet applied to the PSC. If TrAIL is defeated, I think it would be easier to stop PATH. Here are the public hearings on TrAIL. Since those of us from this area will probably not make the hearing in Moorefield, it could be helpful for you to recruit people from your area to go to that hearing. 1. On October 23, 2007, at 1:30 pm and again at 6:30 pm, in the Erickson Alumni Center, West Virginia University, Fine Arts and Patteson Drive, Morgantown, West Virginia. 2. On October 24, 2007, at 1:30 pm and again at 6:30 pm, in the Reception Room, 1"' Floor, Taylor County Senior Citizens, Inc., at the intersection of US Routes 119 and 250 South in Grafton, West Virginia. 3. On October 29, 2007, at 1:30 pm and again at 6:30 pm, in the Spruce Room, Canaan Valley Resort & Conference Center, Route 32 North, Canaan Valley, Davis, West Virginia. 4. On October 30, 2007, at 1:30 pm and again at 6:30 pm, in the Conference Room, South Branch Inn, 1500 US Route 220 North, Moorefield, West Virginia. 5. On November 28 and 29, 2007, beginning at 9:00 am on both days, in the HMC Hearing Room, Public Service Commission Building, 201 Brooks Street, Charleston, West Virginia. Thank you, Karen ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:34 AM To: Grubb, Karen Cc: jkotcon(a)wvu.edu; brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com Subject: Re: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Karen, Sorry for the delay on this. I am in the process of instructing my Donor Advised Fund, the Michael Lippe Charitable Fund to send you a check for $250.00. They may want to contact the West Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club concerning certain details. Could you give me the chapter's phone number and the person with whom they should talk, in case they have to do this? Thanks! I should tell you that with regard to PATH, I have written to our Congresswoman, Shelly Moore Capito, who responded by saying that she forwarded my letter of concern to the WV PSC. I have also talked with the Antietem National Battlefield Director (across the Potomac River in Maryland), who said that they had mobilized and were fighting the proposed PATH route in Maryland and through their national offices of the National Park Service and he seemed guardedly optimistic that at least the lines would not be put through the National Battlefield. The Jefferson County Planning Commission has also apparently weighed in with the WV PSC against the PATH proposal. You mentioned that you were going to contact your attorney, Bill DePaulo, about a possible intervention concerning PATH. I wondered if you had heard anything back from him. When I wrote to Allegheny Power, they responded that the final route had not been determined, so I am not sure whether that means that a formal application is still to be made or whether the application has been made, but everything is still in process. Thank you and please let me know how everything is going. Michael In a message dated 9/29/2007 1:50:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu writes: Michael, I will forward your question about including PATH in our intervention to our attorney, Bill DePaulo. I don't believe that PATH has been submitted to PSC yet, so I don't know if it can be brought up at the Intervention. Here is the fundraising information you requested. Karen This is a fight we cannot afford to lose. The expenses are many: expert witnesses who will substantiate these and related arguments, our travel to PSC meetings, educational materials, copying, faxing, and possibly extensive litigation. These are all beyond the West Virginia Chapter's funds. Thus far, we have secured some funds from National Sierra Smart Energy Solutions, and Environmental Law Program, the WV Highlands Conservancy, and private citizens. We are working with the Sierra Club Office of Foundations and Corporate Relations for additional funds. Expert witness costs alone can easily amount to tens of thousands of dollars. A donation from you will help protect West Virginia. For tax-deductible donations, please make checks payable to "The Sierra Club Foundation," and on the Memo line of the check write "WV Chapter." Do not write anything on the check about "Trail" or "Energy." The Sierra Club Foundation is tax exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and gifts to The Foundation are tax-deductible under Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) of the Code. IRS regulations require that you retain a written acknowledgement from The Foundation to support your claim of a tax deduction. A receipt of your gift will be mailed to you shortly. The Foundation confirms that you received no goods or services in return for your gift. Please send your donation to: Sierra Club, West Virginia Chapter P. O. Box 4142 Morgantown, WV 26504 Be sure to include your return address so we can send you a tax-deductible receipt. Thank You. Barbara Fallon, WV Chapter, Energy Committee Chair Karen Grubb, WV Chapter, Conservation Chair ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Sat 9/29/2007 10:29 AM To: Grubb, Karen Cc: jkotcon(a)wvu.edu Subject: Re: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Karen, Thank you for this information. I am wondering whether it is possible for the Sierra Club to specifically include and make reference to both the PATH and TRAIL proposals in its testimony before the WV PSC. As well as the potential route going right through our National Conservation Training Center, which Senator Byrd worked so hard to get funded, it is also apparently going to go through Antietem Battlefield in Maryland, which would have a devastating impact on this well-protected national treasure. I agree with you 100% concerning the need for the companies to make a more compelling case on the need for this line in the first place. We are talking with the Jefferson County planning officials about this, but so far they are saying it is a State level matter, not something they will jump in on, which is too bad. Please advise where contributions for this fight should be sent. Thank you, Michael Lippe In a message dated 9/17/2007 12:39:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu writes: Yes PATH is the other southern line I was referring to. But since, as the attached email says, this line will go to New Jersey, it could go through Jefferson County. I believe the electric lines are up to the PSC, although if the local commission and your representatives in Charleston come out against it, that could carry some weight with PSC. Unfortunately, our governor mostly seems to favor the lines since that means WV will sell more coal. If NIETC if approved by Congress, what the states say may not matter, as the federal government would have the power of eminent domain. NIETC includes the whole top half of WV, and states north and east of it. This federal designation is what has given Allegheny and American Electric the impetus to propose these power lines. Karen: I think you are correct, the Allegheny TrAIL project was at first proposed as indicated, but has since been changed to the current more southern route. The other project to watch is the joint AE-AEP 765-kv line (PATH) from the John Amos plant near Charleston to somewhere in New Jersey. If TrAIL is approved, I suspect that PATH will be next. Furthermore, if the NIETC is approved, Jefferson County could easily be in the route for this or other lines. Hence, stopping TrAIL is important, even if this particular line is not in your back yard. JBK ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:09 AM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: Re: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Karen, I had first thought so myself, but now think that there must be two separate lines, TRAIL and PATH, so I googled Bedington, which is the electric substation near us mentioned in the 2006 Allegheny Power letter and found the following, http://www.alleghenyenergy.com/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2007/PJM_Bd_Approva l_0607.pdf, I am going to try and follow up this week to see where this stands with the local county planning commission. Do they have any jurisdiction over this, to your knowledge, or would it all be up to the WV Public Service Commission? You mentioned an NIETC. Do you know if this includes Jefferson and Berkeley Counties, I assume it does, and whether it includes anything that Allegheny wants to do anywhere in it? Thank you! Michael Lippe In a message dated 9/16/2007 7:25:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu writes: Dear Mr. Lippe, In looking at your attachment, I see it is dated March 6, 2006. I believe that the proposed route has been changed to the more southern route and no longer is planned to go through part of Maryland and Jefferson County. I have also heard that Allegheny Power is avoiding all federal lands along the route. http://www.marstellerclientarea.com/Trail_Map/TRAIL_Map_animation.html I will consult with our Energy Committee to see if they have more information I can give you. The actual eastern NIETC covers at least 2/3 of WV (Mid-Atlantic Area National Corridor includes counties in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, Virginia, and all of New Jersey, Delaware, and the District of Columbia.). The Allegheny TrAIL is the actual proposed route of one transmission line, with another being proposed much farther south in WV by American Electric Power. http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/4.26.07_National_Corridors.pd f The WV Sierra Club is fighting all additional power lines, regardless of where they are placed. We welcome your help and involvement. We are currently conducting a funding drive to collect money to pay for expert witness testimony for our intervention against Allegheny Power with the WV Public Service Commission. Karen Grubb WV Sierra Conservation Chair ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 10:02 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Ms. Grubb, There was a recent article in the Shepherdstown Chronicle about an Allegheny Power request for designation of a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor to go through the Eastern Panhandle and Jefferson County, apparently quite near to where we live. Looking at the rough map on the proposal, which I downloaded at http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/allegheny.pdf, it appears that the corridor might go through the nearby National Conservation Training Center (where there is a pair of nesting bald eagles) and then cross the Potomac very near if not through Antietem National Battlefield Park. When I started to look this up, I quickly came to your site and the battle concerning the transmission lines being planned, apparently along another route, further to the South. I am assuming that the two corridors are not related, at least geographically, but am not sure and am wondering whether the Sierra Club has looked into the issues concerning the Eastern Panhandle corridor. Thank you for any light you can shed on this and any assistance you can provide in directing me in the right direction to try and find out more about all of this. Perhaps needless to say, we are quite worried about the implications of this proposal. Best regards, Michael Lippe

1 0

Fwd: Story Ideas for May and the Summer
by Paul Wilson 01 May '08

01 May '08

fyi, put your thinking caps on!! paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Public NewsService Web Site <wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org> Date: Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:01 AM Subject: Story Ideas for May and the Summer To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com Hi all. Rob Ferrett here with West Virginia News Service. I'm looking to set up my radio story calendar for May, and to look for ideas for the summer in general, since that can be a slow, vacation-packed time for some people and groups! Also, if you have anything for next week, I'd love to get rolling on that--I'll have a day or two on the road, so if there's anything I can work ahead on, that would be great! Thanks-- Rob Ferrett West Virginia News Service 888-317-6705 --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org and put the word "remove" in the subject line. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Membership on energy committee
by Barbara Fallon 30 Apr '08

30 Apr '08

This Energy sub-committee for TrailCo and Path has worked very hard over these past two years to rally against the TrailCo proposed powerline. We have made significant inroads, but the work is not done. Moreover, the PATH project is looming. The EX Com is having a meeting during the weekend of May 9th in Lewisburg. I hope to be attending. We will have a full agenda of Sierra Club business that includes significant Energy Committee issues. I would like to report to the Ex Com a list of those committee members who are still able to serve on the energy sub-committee for TrailCo and Path. Moreover, I want to be able to tell them what each member will be doing for the sub-committee. So, I need to hear back from you by Thursday, May 8th with this information. I would prefer to hear back from you either way, that is, let me know if you can or cannot be on the committee. If you can be on the committee please let me know what function you are interested in filling (and there are many!!) Please let me know asap. Thank you, and thank you for the good work that you do. Barbara ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

2 1

TrAILCo Scheduling Order on Proposed Settlement
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 25 Apr '08

25 Apr '08

The PSC entered the attached scheduling order today requesting briefs on the proposed settlement order by May 16, replies by May 22 and a hearing on May 27 at 930 AM. -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

2 1

Envirobytes, US-EPA, Week ending April 18th
by Duane330＠aol.com 25 Apr '08

25 Apr '08

WEBSITE SHOWS REGION 3 ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND THEIR AIR QUALITY STATUS EPA’s Air Protection Division is presenting the region’s air quality data in an innovative way. Its public web site database now enables users of Google Earth mapping software to view an interactive map of electric utilities in region 3. After downloading google.earth software at _http://earth.google.com_ (http://earth.google.com/) (http://www.epa.gov/epahome/exitepa.htm) and fulfilling other conditions, the EPA Google Earth file data is provided at _http://www.epa.gov/reg3artd/divinfo/recentadditions.htm#egu-data_ (http://www.epa.gov/reg3artd/divinfo/recentadditions.htm#egu-data) . When opened, each electric utility is represented as a point on a map which, when clicked, reveals a chart showing the selected facility’s annual emissions of six major air pollutants. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY SYSTEM TO BE UPGRADED A new National Emissions Inventory System (NEIS) will be replacing the current version in October. The system allows states to report their most commonly found pollutants _(criteria pollutants)_ (http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/) , as well as the hazardous air pollutant emissions from all sources in their states. Data from the NEI are used for air dispersion modeling, regional strategy development, setting regulation, air toxics risk assessment, and tracking trends in emissions over time. For more information, go to _http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/net/neiwhatis.html_ (http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/net/neiwhatis.html) **************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)

1 0

fyi
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 24 Apr '08

24 Apr '08

A MODERATE, ENLIGHTENED CONSERVATIVE'S VIEW OF CHANGING ENVIRONMENTAL PRIORITIES.... -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

2 1

Coal Profits
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 21 Apr '08

21 Apr '08

Arch Coal Nearly Triples Profit On Strong Demand, Higher Prices By *DONNA KARDOS* April 21, 2008 10:22 a.m. *Arch Coal* Inc. nearly tripled its first-quarter net income, driven by the skyrocketing price of coal amid strong growth in the company's central Appalachian and western bituminous operations. In addition, the coal producer raised its full-year earnings forecast, citing pricing gains and expectations for the coal markets, as Chairman and Chief Executive Steven F. Leer said the company "is strategically prepared to respond to evolving coal market dynamics." The coal producer posted net income of $81.1 million, or 56 cents a share, up from $28.7 million, or 20 cents a share, a year earlier. Revenue climbed 22% to $699.4 million. The mean estimates of analysts polled by Thomson Financial were for earnings of 46 cents a share on $687 million in revenue. Gross profit margin rose to 26.4% from 21.4%. The company sold 9.2% more coal than a year earlier, as average sales prices increased 9.7%. Operating margins jumped 57% to $3.32 a ton, driven by expanded margins in the company's central Appalachian and western bituminous operations. Looking ahead, Arch Coal raised its guidance for full-year earnings of $2.40 to $2.80 a share, up from its February forecast of $2 to $2.50. Analysts' latest expectations were $2.43. "Our raised guidance range reflects pricing gains in the international and domestic metallurgical coal marketplace, anticipated strong operating performances in our central Appalachian and western bituminous regions as well as continued solid execution in our Powder River Basin operations," Mr. Leer said. The company confirmed its prior forecast for 2008 sales volume of 135 million to 140 million tons, excluding coal purchased from third parties. Mr. Leer added, "Over the longer-term, Arch is well-positioned to supply affordable, reliable and vital energy to America for decades to come." Coal, whose price surge has already outrun those of crude oil and natural gas, began generating an even louder buzz in February as a rash of bad weather in China reduced its production globally. The recent run-up in fuel prices means higher costs for consumers and industries heavily dependent on electricity. But surging coal prices have also generally meant good times for miners such as Arch Coal. *Write to* Donna Kardos at donna.kardos(a)dowjones.com -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

[Fwd: Re: [fom] Washington Post: Stripping Mountains to Power D.C.]
by Regina Hendrix 20 Apr '08

20 Apr '08

Click on the link to the Wash. Post front page. Regina

2 1

[Fwd: [fom] Washington Post: Stripping Mountains to Power D.C.]
by Regina Hendrix 20 Apr '08

20 Apr '08

See the Wash Post article attached, esp. the end of the article describing intimidation on the road to the Kayford site. There's ample evidence that the coal whores are inciting their employees to violence just in case the environmentalists should prevail in the May 13 appeal in the Fourth Circuit. The FOCCERs have shown up at rallies, prayer vigils, any kind of gathering and they're closely monitoring our websites, esp. the OVEC website. Regina

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Great Resource Website: Coal Swarm]
by Regina Hendrix 19 Apr '08

19 Apr '08

Good site to keep track of coal-fired power plants which have been proposed. Regina

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Rahall wins big conservation award (Gazette)]
by Regina Hendrix 19 Apr '08

19 Apr '08

I have to put this out so you can see how Rahall came off during the lobbying week. Those who were in the meeting with him went away insulted. He totally blew off his constituents. Regina

1 0

LINK TO NEWS ARTICLES
by Regina Hendrix 19 Apr '08

19 Apr '08

Below is a link which is updated daily. If there's something in the Gazette or any other news source in the USA that is relevant to conservations issues, you'll find it here. http://www.ohvec.org/ovec_news.html Regina

1 0

Fwd: Earth Day: Wear Blue to Vote for NO COAL
by Paul Wilson 18 Apr '08

18 Apr '08

Everybody seen this? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Architecture2030 <info(a)architecture2030.org> Date: Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:08 PM Subject: Earth Day: Wear Blue to Vote for NO COAL To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com [image: Architecture 2030] [image: Architecture 2030] <http://www.architecture2030.org/home.html> [image: Reverberate] <http://www.byoblue.org/index.php> [image: Events]<http://www.byoblue.org/index.php> [image: Petition] <http://www.byoblue.org/petition.php> [image: 2030 Challenge / 2010 Imperative] <http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html> [image: Reverberate Competitions]<http://www.architecture2030.org/faceit/reverberate.php> Events <http://www.byoblue/index.php> Petitions<http://www.byoblue.org/petition.php> 2030 / 2010 <http://www.architecture2030.org/2030_challenge/index.html> Competitions <http://www.architecture2030.org/faceit/reverberate.php> [image: Blank] EARTH DAY IS ALMOST HERE! Wear BLUE for Earth Day 2008 to Vote for NO COAL Want to stop global warming? Wear BLUE for Earth Day 2008! Join millions of people around the world who will be wearing BLUE to signify their vote for NO COAL. Events will be happening April 19th through April 22nd, so... If you're attending the Earth Day event on the National Mall in Washington, DC on April 20th, wear BLUE. If you're attending another major Earth Day event, wear BLUE. When you dress in the morning on Earth Day, wear BLUE. No matter what you're doing for Earth Day 2008, wear BLUE. A BLUE shirt, top, sweater or jacket... whatever. Just wear BLUE. Then, on April 22, make your voice heard. Pick up the phone: Call Congress at 202.224.3121 and ask for an immediate 'Moratorium on Coal' - a halt to the construction of any new conventional coal-fired power plants. Through this Call for Climate <http://ww2.earthday.net/%7Eearthday/node/80> event, Earth Day hopes to generate over a million phone calls to Congress! Your BLUE vote will count. Fifty-nine conventional coal plants were canceled in 2007. That's over a third of the 151 planned. That happened before millions of people joined together to say No Coal. BYO Blue for Earth Day 2008. Be the vote that tips the balance. . . . . . Help us get the message out: - send this message to everyone you know - download <http://www.byoblue.org/downloads/BYOBlue_web.zip> the banner ads and display them prominently on your website, Facebook, MySpace etc. - attend an Earth Day event wearing BLUE and - on April 22nd, wear BLUE all day - to work, lunch and dinner - and make the call to Congress at 202.224.3121, asking for an immediate 'Moratorium on Coal'. [image: No Coal] <http://ww2.earthday.net/%7Eearthday/node/80> <http://www.psr.org/> <http://www.1sky.org/> Bulletin 8 · April 18, 2008 FREE Subscribe Unsubscribe <http://www.architecture2030.org/subscribe.php> [Printer Friendly version<http://www.architecture2030.org/news/printerfriendly/news_041808.pdf> ] Having trouble viewing this email? - Click here to view an online version.<http://www.architecture2030.org/news/news_041808.html> Help us spread this important news by sending this message to a colleague or friend. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail was sent to pjgrunt(a)gmail.com because you are subscribed to at least one of our mailing lists. If at any time you would like to remove yourself from our mailing list, please feel free to do so by visiting: http://www.architecture2030.org/listmessenger/public/unsubscribe.php?g=1&ad… -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Fwd: [Newton Group] permit denied over CCS uncertainties]
by Regina Hendrix 18 Apr '08

18 Apr '08

Wanted to be sure you saw this.....

1 0

PSC ORDER RE DECISION NOT EARLIER THAN AUG 2 08
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Attached is a PSC order entered today directing that TrAILCo file a revised motion to extend the time for a decision to not earlier than Aug 2, 2008, in order to allow comments, a hearing on and evidence regarding the proposed settlement. -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

FOIA REQUEST FOR DOCS PERTAINING TO JOINT STIPULATION
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

I today filed with the PSC the attached FOIA request for documents pertaining to the Joint Stipulation of Settlement filed on April 15, 2008. -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Delegate Margaret Staggers
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Delegate Staggers: I know of your love for WV and your interest in health matters, so I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. You are in a unique position to do so because of your specialized knowledge of health issues. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been very concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. Please let me know if we can provide further information on this proposed settlement. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

Delegate Danny Wells
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Delegate Wells: I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. I am copying members of Sierra Club's Energy Committee and our Environmental Justice Coordinator, Bill Price. If we can provide further information on this proposed settlement, please let me know. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter of Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

Delegate Nancy Guthrie
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Delegate Guthrie: I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. I am copying members of Sierra Club's Energy Committee and our Environmental Justice Coordinator, Bill Price. If we can provide further information on this settlement, please let me know. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter of Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

Delegate Carrie Webster
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Delegate Webster: I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. I am copying members of Sierra Club's Energy Committee and our Environmental Justice Coordinator, Bill Price. If we can provide further information on this settlement, please let me know. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter of Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

Delegate Bonnie Brown
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Delegate Brown: I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. I am copying members of Sierra Club's Energy Committee and our Environmental Justice Coordinator, Bill Price. If we can provide further information on this settlement, please let me know. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter of Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

Senator Brooks McCabe
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Senator McCabe: I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been very concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. I am copying members of Sierra Club's Energy Committee and our Environmental Justice Coordinator, Bill Price. We would like to meet with you at your convenience and brief you on this issue. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter of Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

Senator Dan Foster
by Regina Hendrix 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

Dear Senator Foster: I know of your love for WV and your interest in health matters, so I'm forwarding you some information on the proposed TrAIL Co. power line that, if approved, will cross our state in the north. The PATH line proposal will soon be presented and PATH starts at the John Amos plant. I believe we are being sold short by our PSC and I am hoping you will speak out on behalf of the citizens. You are in a unique position to do so because of your specialized knowledge of health issues. These power lines will call for increased production of coal, therefore, more MTR and more destruction of our mountains, our heritage, our culture, etc. If these lines are constructed we will be generating more power here in WV--more pollution for us to breath and increased health problems. More blue haze incidents!!!! I know you've been very concerned about the problems of citizens with no health insurance. Treatment of these citizens is another of the externalized costs of coal. We would like to meet with you at your convenience and brief you on this issue. Regina Hendrix Chapter Chair WV Chapter Sierra Club Home: 343-5211

1 0

COPY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 17 Apr '08

17 Apr '08

FOLKS FOR YOU REFERENCE IN FUTURE CONVERSATIONS, I ATTACH A COPY OF 1. THE 4-15-08 PROPOSED TRAILCO-PSC STAFF SETTLEMENT 2. THE 4-16-08 GAZETTE ARTICLE SUMMARIZING THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 3. THE 4-16-08 SIERRA CLUB'S PRESS RELEASE ON THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 4. THE 4-17-08 GAZETTE ARTICLE ON THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

TrAILCo Settles with PSC Staff, CAD, and WVEUG
by James Kotcon 15 Apr '08

15 Apr '08

Below is a portion of the cover letter of a Proposed Settlement Agreement filed by TrAILCo about an hour ago. JBK ****** The enclosed Joint Stipulation and Agreement for Settlement recites the relevant procedural background and concerns of its parties, and then sets forth in detail a number of substahtive provisions in modification of those parties' previously asserted positions on various issues. While the document speaks for itself, its notable provisions include: TrAILCo, along with Monongahela Power Company and The Potomac Edison Company, have agreed to increase the financial benefits associated with the certification, construction, and operation of the West Virginia Segments of TrAIL through financial commitments estimated to be approximately $42 million to West Virginia ratepayers, the State, and its citizens, as well as commitments for an additional investment estimated at $50 million and additional annual payroll and benefits estimated at $12 million. TrAILCo has further committed to adopt, wholly or in part, numerous proposals of Staff and/or other parties concerning the routing, engineering, construction, operation, and maintenance of TrAIL. The Staff, CAD, and WVEUG have agreed to affirmatively support the need for TrAIL pursuant to W: Vu. Code 6 24-2-1 la(d)(l). All of the stipulating parties jointly recommend to the Commission that the siting of the West Virginia Segments of TrAIL along the originally proposed route, as modified by the Grafton Area Route, will result in an acceptable balance between reasonable power needs and reasonable environmental factors pursuant to W: Vu. Code @24-2-lla(d)(2). (TrAILCo stands by its commitments to Laurence and Angela Williams set forth in a previously filed partial stipulation.) The enclosed stipulation includes several important terms and conditions, and recites the bases for the modification of the stipulating parties’ several positions. In order to facilitate the Commission’s consideration, TrAILCo has moved for a tolling of its right to a decision within the period otherwise provided in W: Vu. Code 0 24-2-1 l(f) and (g), to June 2,2008.

1 0

FW: Western Greenbrier Co-Generation Plant
by Grubb, Karen 14 Apr '08

14 Apr '08

Western Greenbrier Co-Generation Plant--See attached fact sheet for more information. Also go to www.wvhighlands.org <http://www.wvhighlands.org/> and click on Suit Aims to Block Greenbrier Plant and The Rest Of The Story. The WGC plant proponents are mounting a petition campaign to convince Senator Byrd to help them raise another $25 million, despite the fact that they are way over budget, out of money and have defaulted on their loans, which were guaranteed by the WV Development Office. The $25 million is so they can borrow $300 million with municipal bonds through Citigroup and get a grant from the US DOE for over $100 million. This use of taxpayers funds for a bad idea must stop. Letters are better than petitions. Please write a letter to Senator Byrd (and you can send copies to Rahall and Manchin). AND SEND A COPY TO ME (blittle(a)citynet.net) SO WE WILL KNOW HOW OUR LETTER CAMPAIGN IS GOING. AND FORWARD THIS TO ANYONE YOU CAN THINK OF. Byrd's address in Charleston (works better than DC; email and fax work too): Senator Robert C. Byrd 300 Virginia St, #2630 Charleston, WV 25301 fax: 304-343-7144 email: from his website - http://byrd.senate.gov/ Rahall's address: Representative Nick Rahall 301 Prince St. Beckley, WV 25801 fax: 202-225-9061 email: nrahall(a)mail.house.gov Manchin's address: Governor Joe Manchin 1900 Kanawha Boulevard E Charleston, WV 25305 Email: Governor(a)WVGov.org Beth Little HC 64 Box 281 Hillsboro, WV 24946 304-653-4277

2 1

FW: promoting Debra Williams visits here in WV
by Grubb, Karen 09 Apr '08

09 Apr '08

Here is a story about her in the Gazette sent to me by the FSU Director of Communication, Sarah Hensley. http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200804081087 ________________________________ From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of Margaret Manousoff Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 2:39 PM To: 'WVEC Email List' Subject: Re: [EC] promoting Debra Williams visits here in WV Dear everyone, Thank you all SO much for helping to make Deborah's visit happen! We are incredibly grateful. I am attaching the latest version of her itinerary. Some details are missing on events next week, but I hope to have everything in order soonest. Best, Margaret Margaret Manousoff Outreach and Advocacy Coordinator Alaska Conservation Solutions 308 G St., Suite 219 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 929-9370 Fax: (907) 929-1562 www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com <http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com>

1 0

Re: [EC] promoting Debra Williams visits here in WV
by Allan Tweddle 08 Apr '08

08 Apr '08

Margaret Please cc. all of the e-mail names on this memo, as each has access to a separate e-mailing action list. list. To those receiving this mailing, who might not have received earlier posts, attached is a very brief resume of Debra Williams, AND THE poster announcing her speaking engagement at the University of Charleston THIS WEEK...on THURSDAY. This very accomplished and honored Harvard Law School Graduate will be in West Virginia from the 10th to the 15th speaking at several venues. Hope you all can attend one of the functions. ALLAN Outreach and Advocacy Coordinator Alaska Conservation Solutions 308 G St., Suite 219 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 929-9370 Fax: (907) 929-1562 <http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com<http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com/>> http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com<http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com/> Deborah L. Williams, President Ms. Williams has been actively involved in conservation and sustainable community for over 35 years, and is now focusing on global warming. She received her B.A. from Pomona College, summa cum laude, with a concentration in Biology and Economics. Subsequently she was graduated from Harvard Law School, with honors, and was the principal founder of and co-editor-in-chief of the Harvard Environmental Law Review <http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/elr/<http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/elr/>> <http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/elr/<http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/elr/>> . After serving in the Department of Interior's Solicitors Honors Program in Washington D.C., Ms. Williams represented the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Alaska. Between 1981 and 1994, Ms. Williams was the Executive Director of the Alaska Consumer Advocacy Program and of the Alaska Lung Association, while serving on many boards and commissions, including Trustees for Alaska (president of the board) and the Municipal Health Commission (chair of the Environmental Health Committee.) In 1994, Ms. Williams received a Presidential appointment and became the Special Assistant to the Secretary of Interior for Alaska, in which position she advised the Secretary about managing over 220 million acres of national lands in Alaska and working with Alaska tribes and others associated with the Department's broad natural and cultural resource jurisdiction. She also was a Trustee on the Exxon Valdez Trustee Council and other boards. For over six years, Ms. Williams served as the Executive Director of the Alaska Conservation Foundation, winning many awards in that role. Currently Ms. Williams is President of Alaska Conservation Solutions, an organization devoted primarily to addressing global warming. Ms. Williams has published numerous law review and other articles, has been featured repeatedly in the media (including 60 Minutes, the New York Times and the BBC), and has taught graduate-level courses at both the University of Alaska and Alaska Pacific University. Deborah greatly enjoys backpacking, skiing, gardening, traveling, and serving on boards and in service organizations such as Rotary and the American Land Conservancy. ----- Original Message ----- From: Vivian Stockman<mailto:vivian@ohvec.org> To: 'Margaret Manousoff'<mailto:margaret@alaskaconservationsolutions.com> Cc: 'Allan Tweddle'<mailto:allantweddle@msn.com> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 10:06 AM Subject: promoting Debra Williams visits here in WV Hi Margaret. I work with OVEC, one of the groups hosting one of Ms. Williams speaking engagements here. If possible, please send me info on all her talks in WV--date, time, location, sponsoring groups, and I will put that info out to our West Virginia members and post in our our global warming and WV page. thank you so much! PS we've already had a little article in the Huntington newspaper. --VS

2 1

OBAMA Organizing Fellowship.
by Regina Hendrix 08 Apr '08

08 Apr '08

FYI, pasted in below is an invitation I got from the Obama Campaign. Sounds interesting and could be very effective, I think. I hope this come thru okay on the list serves. If not, E-Mail me and I'll attach the notice I got. Regina Regina -- Apply <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/13JfBz/VEsH/>West Virginia's primary is coming up on Tuesday, May 13th, and it's crucial that supporters across the state stay focused on this important contest. But I also want to let you know about an exciting project that we'll be kicking off in all 50 states this summer. It's called the Obama Organizing Fellowship. When I was a young man, I was inspired by the Civil Rights Movement and the idea of people working at a grassroots level to bring about change. I got my chance on the South Side of Chicago, as a community organizer, and it was the transformative experience of my career. It allowed me to put my values to work and to see that real change comes not from the top-down, but from the bottom-up, when ordinary people come together around a common purpose. The experience changed the course of my life -- and I want to share that kind of opportunity with you. That's why we're introducing a program that's going to train a new generation of leaders -- not only to help us win this election, but to help strengthen our democracy in communities across the country. If you apply and are selected, you'll be trained in the basic organizing principles that this campaign and our movement for change are built on. You will be assigned to a community where you'll organize supporters. Assignments will begin in June, and you'll be required to work a minimum of six weeks over the summer. This program is designed to give you real world organizing experience that will have a concrete impact on this election. *Apply to be an Obama Organizing Fellow* and put progressive values to work in the real world: *http://my.barackobama.com/fellows* <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/13JfBz/VEsE/> If you can't take the time away from work or your family that's required for the fellowship program, you can still get involved. * *Reach out to someone you know* who may be interested in this program, and let them know we could use their help: *http://my.barackobama.com/fellowsinvite* <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/Z1yNxn/VEsF/> * *House an Organizing Fellow* -- If you have a spare room, you can help by offering housing to an Organizing Fellow near their training or near their eventual assignment. We haven't set locations for all of the trainings and assignments, but if you sign up, our staff will be in touch as the campaign grows: *http://my.barackobama.com/fellowshousing* <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/cgFv9m/VEsC/> * *Support this program* by making a donation to this campaign: *https://donate.barackobama.com/fellowsdonate* <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/SYUUEW/VEsD/> Being a community organizer wasn't easy, but it was the most valuable education I ever received. It taught me that together, ordinary people can do extraordinary things. Organizing changed my life, and I hope it changes yours. Thanks, Barack Obama P.S. -- You don't have to wait until this summer to make a difference for our campaign. Right now, supporters across West Virginia are volunteering to get as many West Virginians as possible ready for Primary Day on May 13th. Sign up now to come to an organizational meeting this weekend: *http://wv.barackobama.com/WVorgmeetings* <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/VQrmwg/VEsA/> Paid for by Obama for America This email was sent to: regina1936(a)verizon.net To unsubscribe, go to: http://my.barackobama.com/unsubscribe <http://my.barackobama.com/page/m/f1e088aa74f7f1ad/mOT8qL/VEsB/>

1 0

Washington Post 4-6-08 New Focus on Coal's Part in Warming
by Paul Wilson 08 Apr '08

08 Apr '08

Washington Post ENVIRONMENT Sunday, April 6, 2008; Page A06 New Focus on Coal's Part in Warming Greater Advances In Technology Are Seen as Critical[image: James E. Hansen of NASA's Goddard Institute said nations could use less coal if energy efficiency got more attention.] James E. Hansen of NASA's Goddard Institute said nations could use less coal if energy efficiency got more attention By Juliet Eilperin<http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/juliet+eilperin/> Washington Post Staff Writer James E. Hansen<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/James+E.+Hansen?tid=informl…>, perhaps the best-known scientific advocate for curbing greenhouse-gas emissions, sent a letter recently to the head of one of the nation's largest power companies, calling on him to confront the role that his coal-fired plants play in global warming. Hansen proposed they meet. On Wednesday, James E. Rogers<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/James+E.+Rogers?tid=informl…>of Duke Energy<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Duke+Energy+Corporation?tid…>accepted Hansen's invitation, though he made clear he does not foresee calling off plans to build more of the power plants that Hansen considers a main culprit in climate change. The exchange, carried out in full public view, highlights both a recent shift in the climate debate and the difficulty of translating this change into concrete action. Rogers does not question humans' contribution to global warming, and he has pledged to largely "decarbonize" his company's operations by mid-century. But he is not moving as fast as environmental activists would like, and some academics are now arguing that scientists have greatly underestimated the technological leap that will be required in coming decades to curb dangerous warming. The same day Rogers informed Hansen that he was willing to meet, Roger Pielke Jr., a scientist at the University of Colorado at Boulder<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/University+of+Colorado+at+B…>, co-wrote a commentary piece in the journal Nature<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Nature+Publishing+Group?tid…>that said the U.N.<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/United+Nations?tid=informli…> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Intergovernmental+Panel+on+…>has made assumptions about technological advances that are "optimistic at best and unachievable at worst" when it comes to increasing energy efficiency. While industrialized nations such as the United States and those in Europe<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Europe?tid=informline>have made gains in recent years, developed nations such as China <http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/China?tid=informline>and India <http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/India?tid=informline>have not. As Pielke and his colleagues wrote, "In recent years, global energy intensity and carbon intensity have both increased, reversing the trends of previous decades." Even developed countries are not cutting greenhouse gases as fast as they had anticipated. The European Union<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/European+Union?tid=informli…>released preliminary data last week indicating that emissions from facilities covered by Europe's cap-and-trade system rose 1 percent in 2007, instead of declining. That means it will be harder than expected for companies to meet tighter emissions limits this year. The report sent prices for emissions permits for December 2008 up 4 percent, to $36.60 a ton on the European Climate Exchange in London<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/London?tid=informline>. Hansen, who directs NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said in an interview that the United States and other countries could wean themselves off coal rapidly if they put a greater emphasis on energy efficiency and renewable resources. He recently submitted a paper to the journal Science saying that the world must reduce the current level of carbon dioxide-equivalents in the atmosphere from 385 parts per million to 350 parts per million to avoid dangerous effects of climate change. "We simply cannot burn the coal and put the CO2in the atmosphere and avoid having serious changes in the atmosphere," he said. "The scientists are beginning to realize we have to have a much more dramatic change in direction." Former vice president Al Gore<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Al+Gore?tid=informline>said in an interview last week that he backs Hansen's approach, with one modification: Because carbon capture and storage technology is still not widely available, he said, "I think we ought to have a moratorium on any coal-fired power plant that doesn't have the capacity to capture carbon." But Rogers, who praised Hansen as "an early voice in the wilderness" on climate change, said the scientist's demand reflects a "snap-your-fingers, instant transition of the economy" mind-set. "My requirement is to balance reliability, affordability and clean energy," Rogers said. "He's apparently focused on the clean perspective." In his letter, Hansen took aim at two of Duke's planned power plants, in Cliffside, N.C.<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/North+Carolina?tid=informli…>, and Edwardsport, Ind.<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Indiana?tid=informline>, telling Rogers: "Your suggestion that new, more efficient coal-fired power plants, which do not capture CO2, can be part of a solution ignores the basic facts and urgency of terminating coal emissions." Rogers responded that he will be shutting down 1,000 megawatts of capacity from older power plants as part of the Cliffside project, and that the Edwardsport facility is a commercial coal-gasification plant that "is located in an area with excellent geology" to experiment with technologies for capturing carbon dioxide emissions and storing them underground. Americans are not the only ones puzzling through the transition from a coal-dependent to a low-carbon energy supply. Rachel Crisp, deputy director of Britain<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/United+Kingdom?tid=informli…>'s cleaner fossil fuels unit, said last week that her country had just picked nine candidates for its first carbon capture and storage plant, but that other than Norway<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Norway?tid=informline>, "you don't have other countries lining up and investing serious funding" in this technology. "We're going forward with ours, so we'll see how it turns out," she said. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: Next Coal Activists Call Wednesday, April 9th
by Paul Wilson 06 Apr '08

06 Apr '08

Pls fwd to other Sierra Club members that may have an interest in our Coal work. thanks, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:39:00 -0400 Subject: Next Coal Activists Call Wednesday, April 9th Please join the National Coal Campaign for our next monthly coal activist coal on Wednesday, April 9th at 8:00 p.m. eastern. Please come prepared to talk to us about Earth Day activities, from ideas we have on making coal a big issue to events you have planned in your local communities. We will also welcome two guests to the call who will tell us about an exciting new Coal Film Festival. 866 501 6174 224 0743# Agenda 1. Legal Update: Pat Gallagher & Bruce Nilles 2. Coal Film Festival Announcement: Adrienne Bramhall (Sierra Club Productions) and Nithin Coca (Grassroots Media Organizer) 3. Sharing Earth Day Plans: Verena Owen to lead discussion 4. Open Forum Also, please make sure to check out our Coal Headquarters on Clubhouse for any coal-related needs. http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/Default.aspx Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Blood For Oil
by Regina Hendrix 04 Apr '08

04 Apr '08

Here in one place is the full disclosure of Bush's Blood for Oil Program. Check out Maya Schenwar's "Managing the Econoccuption of Iraq." http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040408J.shtml More oil would lessen the demand for "clean coal" but what a price to pay and one hell of a dilemma for those of us living in the coalfields and those of us on the periphery in the Kanawha Valley choking on the blue haze....... Regina

1 0

Fwd: WV Study unearths higher health risks to coal communities
by Paul Wilson 03 Apr '08

03 Apr '08

Greetings: the following link is to a Pittsburgh Post Gazette article on a WV health study on Coal Communities. I have attached a MS Word version of the same article. best regards, paul w. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <do-not-reply(a)post-gazette.com> Date: Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:42 AM Subject: This news story was sent to you by request To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com Name: Bryan Burgess E-mail: burgessbe(a)allel.net Message: FYI, just incase you missed this article in your papers. Bryan Click here to access the story: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08093/869656-114.stm --- http://www.post-gazette.com -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

SSC Green Fund Petition
by Jonathan Rosenbaum 01 Apr '08

01 Apr '08

Forwarding this on behalf of WVU's Student Sierra Club: As it stands WVU is not taking any serious measures to better their environmental footprint aside from their improvements to energy efficiency and the creation of a campus recycling program. That is why the Sierra Student Coalition is encouraging the university to do better- because we do not want the burden of a polluted, expensive future on our hands. We want to create a green fund that would fund projects on campus, like the creation of on-site renewable energy. It is our overarching goal to reduce emissions 30% by 2015 at WVU To increase solid waste to 50% recycled (up from it's current figure of 22%) To insure that the university invests in sustainability education To construct on site renewable energy, like wind or solar To insure that all new buildings are Silver LEED certified. How does it work? A green fund would take earmarked alumni donations and invest them in a sustainable company, like one that builds solar panels for example. Than, the interest earned would go into creating a green campus project, like on-site renewable energy. We can fund our own windmills! The catch is- we have to convince the administration that this is a great idea and that people are into donating to such a cause. Current and future WVU alumni please sign and leave a comment "You must be the change you want to see in the world." -Ghandi (No immediate contribution to the fund is required.) Thanks! GOAL: 1500 Signatures April 1 Current Signatures: 42 THE PETITION! http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/WVU-Green-Fund Thank you for your time and energy, Christy Christy Hartman West Virginia University Organizer 703-501-2967 chartman(a)mix.wvu.edu

1 0

FW: Fw: home energy fair
by Grubb, Karen 27 Mar '08

27 Mar '08

Does anyone want to have a SC booth at the fair in Elkins? Is the SSC having a booth? ________________________________ From: Denise Poole [mailto:deniseap@earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:42 PM To: Frank Young; lapaix(a)westvirginia.net Cc: jim_scon(a)yahoo.com; Grubb, Karen Subject: Re: Fw: home energy fair Hey all, FYI, and just in case any communication has been dropped - or information still needed on Sierra Club's end .... (I am going through all e-mails again, and reviewing as the final details for the fair). Mountain View Builders have been confirmed for quite some time, pre-E-Day, participating with a sustainable / green building workshop showing what their company is doing in Berkeley County and the region. Ken Auvil is also one of our presenters on the same subject, and all of our workshop slots are full. If the Sierra Club would like a booth however, we are continuing to add those through April 3rd. We do have about 60 booths, and the tables available on campus are spoken for (so please bring your own tables). If you decide to participate, any literature, and Jim's "Home Energy Fair" model showing examples of practical things people can do right now in their homes to save energy could very well be done at your booth. Please let me know if there is any interest in Sierra Club participating with a booth this year, and I'll be happy to add you to our list. I will need to know by April 3rd so we can finalize. Thanks so much, Denise Denise Poole, Co-Director, Sustainable Living for WV deniseap(a)earthlink.net (304) 617-7073 -----Original Message----- From: Frank Young Sent: Feb 28, 2008 6:00 PM To: lapaix(a)westvirginia.net, Denise Poole Cc: jim_scon(a)yahoo.com, Karen Grubb Subject: Re: Fw: home energy fair Thanks, Myra. Also, last Friday at WV E-Council awards we met Mike McKechnie who, along with his brother Pete, own and operate Mountain View Builders at Berkeley Springs. Their specialty is designing and building homes that incorporate renewable energy and sustainable living processes. Mike can be reached at mtviewbuilders(a)verizon.net . Telephone: 304-258-4320 . Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: Bonhage-Hale / Myra <mailto:lapaix@westvirginia.net> To: Myra Bonhage-Hale <mailto:lapaix@westvirginia.net> ; Denise Poole <mailto:deniseap@earthlink.net> ; Frank Young <mailto:fyoung@mountain.net> Cc: jim_scon(a)yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 4:20 PM Subject: Re: Fw: home energy fair Gee, our public relations certainly isn't finding the right people! I thought all you guys knew about the Sustainable Fair in Elkins. Jim, is there any way you could give us some contact information? Perhaps it could fit in with the Sustainable Fair on April 18th, 19th and 20th at Davis & Elkins College sponsored in large part by the WVEC. Let us know - the more the merrier! ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Frank Young" <fyoung(a)mountain.net> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:59:43 -0500 >Would Jim Sconyers idea of a Home Energy Fair (see below) fit in with the Sustainable Fair in Elkins? > >I'm rather certain that Ken Auvil, who is a Green builder in Barbour County, would be a part of this. > >Frank Young > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jim Sconyers [mailto:jim_scon@yahoo.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 4:18 PM >To: Autumn; Sandra Cress; Bill DePaulo; Barbara Fallon; Regina Hendrix; >Jim; Matt Keller; Jim Kotcon; Beth Little; Duane Nichols; Dave Saville; >Kate Stone; Allan Tweddle; Paul Wilson; Mary Wimmer; Karen Grubb; >Jonathan Rosenbaum >Subject: home energy fair > >At my former group, we had a very successful Home >Energy Fair at Earth Day last year. Giveaways, info, >talks, etc. oriented toward practical things to >conserve energy at home. > >I was wondering if this seemed like something we might >want to do, say in Charleston (Capitol?) or >Morgantown. > >I would appreciate your feedback. > >Jim Sconyers >jim_scon(a)yahoo.com >304.789.2542 >603.969.6712 cell > > > ________________________________________________________________ Sent via the WebMail system at mail.westvirginia.net

1 0

Cleanbrier press release
by Beth Little 21 Mar '08

21 Mar '08

Here's what we decided at the meeting Thurs. See attached. Beth Little HC 64 Box 281 Hillsboro, WV 24946 304-653-4277 Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1328 - Release Date: 3/13/2008 11:31 AM

1 0

Fwd: The nonturbine wind alternative - Alternative Energy dot Com
by James Kotcon 21 Mar '08

21 Mar '08

>>> Nathan Askins <nate.askins(a)gmail.com> 3/20/2008 6:41 PM >>> http://alternativeenergy.com/video/video/show?id=1066929%3AVideo%3A21951

2 1

Fwd: Sic Semper Transmission?
by Duane330＠aol.com 19 Mar '08

19 Mar '08

From: pecnews(a)pecva.org Sent: 3/19/2008 7:44:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Sic Semper Transmission? (http://www.pecva.org/) Three Weeks, Two Nervous Utilities & One Website to Hear it All Dear Duane, After three witness packed weeks, the Virginia transmission line hearings have come to a close. Since I last wrote we have heard from expert witnesses for PEC, Virginia's Commitment, Fauquier County, Prince William County, the Powerline Landowners Alliance, Oakwood et al, VDOT and the SCC staff. The cumulative expertise provided by these groups is unparalleled. _Listen to the Testimony on the SCC Website_ (http://citizen-networks.org/ct/vdswh5F1LqRY/) Sic Semper Transmission? There was more testimony than I can possibly summarize in email format, so I'd like to touch on some of the major takeaways. 1. Dominion and TrAILCo's entire case is based on assumptions that are woefully inadequate and unrealistic. There was a lot, I mean a lot of testimony regarding the planning assumptions dictated by PJM Interconnection, the regional grid operator. PJM and Dominion ask you to accept that all of their models are reasonable and accurate. You must next assume that the growth of the past few years will continue unabated, energy conservation will never be more than it has been in the past and that efficiency is always outpaced by greater usage. You must also assume that planned generation projects that contribute to the identified problem should be modeled, while those that contribute to the solution should not be modeled. And finally, you must assume that business-as-usual should be continued while the world around us changes. 2. There is a very real negative impact to building this line. This line will cost over a billion dollars to construct, make the east coast more dependent on distant (and largely coal-fired) generation, make it less cost-effective to build clean generation on the east coast, require clear-cutting of forests, increased use of herbicides, ruin public viewsheds in three states and impact property values along the entire 240-mile long route. 3. There is a better way. It was very clear from the testimony that neither PJM, Dominion or TrAILCo analyzed viable alternatives to building this line. Together, the witnesses from various groups showed that a combination of demand side reduction, clean and appropriately placed distributed generation and realistic planning will allow essential services to remain cost-effective and reliable. To use the words of Virginia's Commitment attorney Michael Gerrard, PJM and Dominion "put all of their eggs in one basket and never came up with a Plan B". Time to Write the Best Brief Ever Our legal briefs will be due in early May. The brief is an argument of law referencing the record that has developed over the course of the proceeding. The Hearing Examiner will review briefs, as well as the public testimony, pre-filed testimony of expert witnesses and transcripts from the hearings. He will then come up with a recommendation for the SCC Commissioners regarding whether to approve or deny the transmission line applications. A final decision by the Commissioners is expected some time this Summer or Fall. TrAILCo heads to Pittsburgh for the beginning of their case in Pennsylvania on March 24. And we are all awaiting the West Virginia Public Service Commission ruling. They are scheduled to make their final decision on May 2. Needless to say, May 2 is going to be a big day for all of us. Thank You for Making this Case Possible I would once again like to thank all of you who have supported us (or any of the Respondents) and stayed vigilant throughout this long process. A utility has never faced opposition like this before. If you are able to listen to only one day of the hearing, I would encourage you to listen to PEC's engineering witness Dr. Hyde Merrill, his testimony can be _found here_ (http://citizen-networks.org/ct/v1swh5F1LqRR/) and begins at minute 16:15 of the audio file. Best, Bri West Piedmont Environmental Council _pecnews(a)pecva.org_ (mailto:pecnews@pecva.org) ps: None of this happens without you. _We need your continued support to keep this up_ (https://secure.citizen-networks.org/08/energytransmission/np7swh5F1DIJW?) . ____________________________________ This message was personalized for you. Please spread the word and safely forward this message using: (http://citizen-networks.org/campaign/sb525/forward/8b7nsdufok88i38?) _Tell-a-friend!_ (http://citizen-networks.org/campaign/sb525/forward/8b7nsdufok88i38?) This message was sent to duane330(a)aol.com. Visit your _subscription management page_ (http://citizen-networks.org/pec/smp.tcl?nkey=8b7nsdufok88i38&) to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop receiving Power Line Alerts, click to _unsubscribe_ (http://citizen-networks.org/pec/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=subscription&n…) . To stop ALL email from The Piedmont Environmental Council, click to _remove_ (http://citizen-networks.org/pec/remove-domain-direct.tcl?ctx=center&nkey=8b…) yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line). (http:///) **************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home. (http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom0…)

1 0

FW: Architecture 2030: BYOBlue
by Grubb, Karen 19 Mar '08

19 Mar '08

This person gave a talk at the Good Jobs Green Jobs conference in Pittsburgh. ________________________________ From: Peter Chapman [mailto:pandrewchapman@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:59 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: Architecture 2030: BYOBlue Hello Karen, Thank you for your interest in helping Architecture 2030 to spread the work about BYOBlue. Our goal is to reach as many people as possible with this clear message: wear BLUE for Earth Day 2008 as a vote for NO COAL! BYOBlue / Earth Day 2008 April 19-22 Want to stop global warming? Wear BLUE for Earth Day 2008! Join millions of people around the world who will be wearing BLUE to signify their vote for NO COAL. ***** Earth Day 2008 is going to be historic! Architecture 2030, along with numerous other groups around the nation, is calling on everyone to wear BLUE during Earth Day 2008 to signify their vote for No Coal. Events will be happening around the world from April 19th through April 22nd, so... If you're attending the Earth Day event on the National Mall in Washington, DC on April 20th, wear BLUE. If you're attending another Earth Day event, wear BLUE. No matter what you're doing for Earth Day 2008, wear BLUE. A BLUE shirt, top, sweater or jacket...whatever. Just wear BLUE. Then, on April 22, as a culminating action, pick up the phone, call Congress at 202-224-3121 and ask for an immediate 'Moratorium on Coal' - a halt to the construction of any new coal-fired power plants. Through this Call for Climate event, Earth Day hopes to generate over a million phone calls to Congress. Visit Earth Day's website to learn more about this critical event. Your BLUE vote will count. Fifty-nine coal plants were canceled in 2007. That's over a third of the 151 planned. That happened before millions of people joined together to say No Coal. BYOBlue for Earth Day 2008. Be the vote that tips the balance. ***** Architecture 2030 is asking the global community to help get the message out: - send this message to everyone on your email list. - download <http://www.byoblue.org/downloads/BYOBlue_web.zip> the banner ads and display them prominently on your website, Facebook, MySpace etc. - link to www.byoblue.org <http://www.byoblue.org/> or create your own BYOB web page. - attend an Earth Day event wearing BLUE and - on April 22nd, wear BLUE all day - to work, lunch and dinner - and make the call to Congress at 202-224-3121, asking for an immediate 'Moratorium on Coal'. -- Peter Chapman Marketing Coordinator 2030, Inc. / Architecture 2030 505-988-5309 x17 chapman(a)architecture2030.org www.architecture2030.org

1 0

Fwd: 132 coal plants vanish - POOF!
by James Kotcon 15 Mar '08

15 Mar '08

This is pretty significant news. The data may seem boring, but I suspect that it would be quite relevant to our case on TrAILCo. These data do not assume a carbon cap and trade program, but even with just the recently passed H.R.6, “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” signed by President Bush in December 2007, the reduction in the electric demand growth rate is tremendous. I recommend clicking on the link and spend some time with the numbers. JBK >>> "dave saville" <daves(a)labyrinth.net> 3/15/2008 3:30 AM >>> No New Coal Plants! (nonewcoalplants(a)energyjustice.net) On March 4, without fanfare, a bureaucrat named Guy Caruso caused 132 coal plants to disappear with a wave of his magic wand. Actually, he used a spreadsheet, but the effect was the same. Caruso is the head of the Energy Information Administration, the division of the U.S. Department of Energy that, well, comes up with information on energy. Sort of like the CIA, but less glamorous. A year ago, the EIA projected that electricity use would grow at the rate of 1.5 percent per year through 2030. But on March 4, Caroso told Congress that the EIA had revised its projected growth rate downward to 1.1 percent. As we all learned in algebra, a small change in a percentage rate can make a big difference over time. Applied to coal, the new growth rate caused projected electricity generation from coal in 2030 to drop from 3191 Billion kilowatt hours (Bkwh) to 2756 Bkwh, a decrease of 435 Bkwh. What does 435 Bkwh equate to in terms of coal plants? Assuming a 75% capacity factor (the percentage of hours in an average year that a plant is running full-bore), that's the output of 66,200 Megawatts of generating capacity, or 132 new coal plants (500 MW each) that won't have to be built afterall between now and 2030. Of course, a lot of people already knew this was going on, including Wall Street. For years, the Energy Information Administration, which should be leading the way in guiding decision makers, has been out of step with reality. It tends to play the role of cheerleader for an industry that has always wanted to build, build, build. But at some point reality intrudes -- the cheerleader turns around and actually looks at the game. And that's why 1.5% just became 1.1%, and 132 coal plants suddenly went poof. Here is Caruso's March 4th testimony to the U.S. Senate: <http://www.nreca.org/Documents/PublicPolicy/caruso030408.pdf>http://www.nre ca.org/Documents/PublicPolicy/caruso030408.pdf Here is last year's projection -- see Table A8 <http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo07/pdf/appendixes.pdf>http://www.eia .doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo07/pdf/appendixes.pdf Here is the latest projection -- again, see Table A8 <http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/pdf/appa.pdf>http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ae o/pdf/appa.pdf

1 0

Fwd: FW: Global warming expert from Alaska to be in WV
by James Kotcon 15 Mar '08

15 Mar '08

I got a call from these folks. They have funding to do a speaking tour in WV April 10-15, and would appreciate some help with local arrangements. I suspect we could easily host them in Huntington, Charleston, Fairmont, Morgantown, and perhaps at Shepherdstown or somewhere in the Eastern Panhandle. They would also like to do editorial board visits, meet with local congressional staff, etc. We have often done quite well with talks on Alaska, so perhaps this might be an easy way to promote a global warming agenda with popular programs. Would anyone else be interested in serving as a local arrangements person? JBK P.S. I already gave away some of your names and e-mail addresses, so look forward to hearing from them. _____ From: Margaret Manousoff [mailto:margaret@alaskaconservationsolutions.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:18 PM To: 'cjkotcon(a)wvu.edu' Subject: Global warming expert to be in WV Dear Jim: I am writing to alert you to a FREE educational speaking tour (funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation) being conducted in West Virginia from April 10th-15th by Deborah Williams, President of Alaska Conservation Solutions. Ms. Williams is Alaska's foremost spokesperson on global warming. (Her bio is below.) She would be honored to give a free presentation on the topic to West Virginia University Students, the Sierra Club, and interested guests. Her talk addresses the alarming consequences already evident in Alaska and the commonalities between our state and yours (i.e. impacts on wildlife, water quality, recreation, tourism, etc.) She offers practical carbon-reducing strategies that not only reduce emissions but also protect human health, save money and increase America's energy independence. Deborah is a highly intelligent and articulate speaker, and I believe that a meeting between your group and her would be mutually educational and inspiring. For further information about Alaska Conservation Solutions and Ms. Williams, please visit our website at <http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com/> www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com . Because Ms. Williams' speaking calendar fills up quickly, I would appreciate a response as to the feasibility of a presentation to your group at your earliest convenience. Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you soon. Kind regards, Margaret Margaret Manousoff Outreach and Advocacy Coordinator Alaska Conservation Solutions 308 G St., Suite 219 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: (907) 929-9370 Fax: (907) 929-1562 <http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com> http://www.alaskaconservationsolutions.com Deborah L. Williams, President Ms. Williams has been actively involved in conservation and sustainable community for over 35 years, and is now focusing on global warming. She received her B.A. from Pomona College, summa cum laude, with a concentration in Biology and Economics. Subsequently she was graduated from Harvard Law School, with honors, and was the principal founder of and co-editor-in-chief of the Harvard Environmental Law Review <http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/elr/> <http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/elr/> . After serving in the Department of Interior's Solicitors Honors Program in Washington D.C., Ms. Williams represented the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Alaska. Between 1981 and 1994, Ms. Williams was the Executive Director of the Alaska Consumer Advocacy Program and of the Alaska Lung Association, while serving on many boards and commissions, including Trustees for Alaska (president of the board) and the Municipal Health Commission (chair of the Environmental Health Committee.) In 1994, Ms. Williams received a Presidential appointment and became the Special Assistant to the Secretary of Interior for Alaska, in which position she advised the Secretary about managing over 220 million acres of national lands in Alaska and working with Alaska tribes and others associated with the Department's broad natural and cultural resource jurisdiction. She also was a Trustee on the Exxon Valdez Trustee Council and other boards. For over six years, Ms. Williams served as the Executive Director of the Alaska Conservation Foundation, winning many awards in that role. Currently Ms. Williams is President of Alaska Conservation Solutions, an organization devoted primarily to addressing global warming. Ms. Williams has published numerous law review and other articles, has been featured repeatedly in the media (including 60 Minutes, the New York Times and the BBC), and has taught graduate-level courses at both the University of Alaska and Alaska Pacific University. Deborah greatly enjoys backpacking, skiing, gardening, traveling, and serving on boards and in service organizations such as Rotary and the American Land Conservancy.

3 2

[Fwd: [fom] Coal companies seek deals with state DEP]
by Regina Hendrix 14 Mar '08

14 Mar '08

FYI

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] DEP chief to quit]
by Regina Hendrix 14 Mar '08

14 Mar '08

FYI

1 0

ALASKA GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT PRESENTATIONS
by Allan Tweddle 13 Mar '08

13 Mar '08

Deborah cc: Margaret Manousoff Please also mail to ; margaret(a)alaskaconservationsolutions.com<mailto:margaret@alaskaconservationsolutions.com> Thanks you for the time and stimulating conversation last evening. I look forward to meeting with you when you are here in West Virginia. It is certainly a small world when we can connect with mutual friends like Judge Holland. I was always very proud to have been a close friend in Ann Arbor in our undergraduate days, and ever since, and then to read as he dealt with the EXXON Valdez oil spill case. We had a spill here in West Virginia of toxic coal sludge that was reported to be 22 times the volume of the Valdez spill. It is quite a story of how the power of coal interests have successfully diverted any real consequences to the company, and in fact led to the termination of a very senior and dedicated environmental engineer on the MSHA staff because he told the truth about the mismanagement that led to the spill. I look forward to sharing my other experiences in trips to Alaska...both in winter and summer...Hope, Kenai Peninsula, the crab dinners on the tip of the Spit in Homer...WOW...lots of memories for me. In particular, I appreciate your suggestion that we could combine forces to bring the real impacts of global warming in Alaska to the realities and opportunities for West Virginia. I have giving my tailored version of the Gore Presentation about 20 times since last April's training in Nashville. I try to tailor to the audience and to add my own 40 years of experience solving air pollution problems as an engineer in my native Canada, including 30 years in Southern California. And in the last 20 years I have been involved in addressing environmental policy and regulations in California as a consultant to industry and the regulators, addressing how clean technology solutions can in fact be good economics. We are constantly being reminded daily that coal brings 50% of all electricity in the US, 95% in West Virginia, and that to suggest any alternative form of energy is speaking against the flag, motherhood, apple pie, jobs and all mankind...well, at least West Virginia's families. The Oxymoron "Clean Coal Technology" is being pounded into the citizens everywhere, while the truth of how dirty coal really is, is off limits for public discussion. And any speaker who speaks out about the dirty truth about coal is pillared as an enemy of the good working folks of the State. So your planned tour is quite timely and appropriate. I would have as an objective to give you as much exposure as time will allow, and achieve a reality check for the few open minds of West Virginia, and some of the skeptics, to see why we cannot continue to use coal without achieving zero emissions. Now as to the tour itself. There is not much time to plan this. And I am concentrating on Charleston, the State Capitol, as I do not have the same number and level of contacts in the other cities But we do have many of us who have received Margaret's e-mail able to work on a schedule. I have a few questions: 1.. Are all details in place, and/or are there local folks working on this already? 2.. Do you have specific sites , halls, venues in mind or already arranged? 3.. How many presentations would be appropriate in this time period. 4.. Would you entertain TV and radio talk show interviews? 5.. As a member of the West Virginia Public Energy Authority, I could call for a special meeting just to receive your presentation. But as we, who are labeled global warming "alarmists", do not have a majority, that request may be denied. 6.. I see that you are a member of Rotary. Have you spoken to Rotary before? I am not a member, however, one of our very successful, but now retired corporate CEO's is in Rotary, so I could explore with him and see of the Friday that you are here would work. They may already have a speaker for that date. 7.. The memo from Margaret says that the tour is sponsored. Does that include any provision for fees or rent at any venues? You are scheduled from the 10th to the 15th. That is over a weekend. What if any other plans do you have in those available days? My wife and I would certainly be interested in spending some quiet time to get to know you better. In fact, if you would like, you would be welcome ion our home while you are here in Charleston. By the way, I have tried to e-mail Margaret, and I cannot get anything I write to go once I press the send button. One "computer guru" here suggested that it was because her e-mail address is too long. I think that I can speak for all of us that we look forward to meeting you and doing what we can to make your tour here very successful. Allan Allan Tweddle Quidvis recte factum quamvis humile praeclarum Sir Henry Royce, 1924

1 0

Fwd: Stop the Towers Update
by Duane330＠aol.com 12 Mar '08

12 Mar '08

____________________________________ From: website(a)stopthetowers.org Sent: 3/11/2008 3:49:58 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: Stop the Towers Update March 9, 2008 Dear Friends and Neighbors, Here is latest update on the Stop the Towers efforts and related issues. You can always find the latest at the website and on the ECCO Hotline at 724-267-3040. Please stay involved and work to keep all your friends and neighbors informed. Buses Are Filling Up The PUC Evidentiary Hearings in Pittsburgh are just two weeks away and the buses are filling up! Beginning at 10:00 am on March 24th at the State Office Building, the Public Utility Commission will begin hearings on the proposed AP TrAIL. To assist the residents in Washington and Greene Counties, Stop the Towers is organizing buses to take you up and back for the hearings. For less than the cost of gas and parking, not to mention you won’t have to worry about fighting the traffic, you can ride a bus with other Stop the Towers supporters and be dropped off in front of the State Office Building. Please contact Rebecca Foley (_rfoley1(a)windstream.net_ (mailto:rfoley1@windstream.net) ) as soon as possible to reserve your seat. Departure and return times will be available from Rebecca. TrAIL Co Sends Insulting Letter to ALJ’s We believe it is important to have YOU attend the Evidentiary Hearings. Apparently, TrAIL Co does not! Earlier this week, TrAIL Co sent a letter to the Administrative Law Judges asking them to issue an order about proper decorum in the courtroom. They caution the ALJ’s by asking for “observers in the hearing room is (be) closely monitored for everyone's safety, and to permit sufficient room for all the parties, counsel, witnesses and staff before making space available for observers.” TrAIL Co is worried that we won’t properly behave and would disrupt the proceedings. They point to the Public Input Hearings and said that the supporters of TrAIL were “concerned about their personal safety in returning to their vehicles”. First of all, isn’t that ironic that the same company that has been sending land agents onto our properties, harassing and intimidating people in their own homes, is now worried about that same kind of behavior. Secondly, never has Stop the Towers encouraged nor supported such behavior and we certainly are not now! We simply believe that it is important to continue to put faces to the rural Americans whose lives will be destroyed or at the very least severely disrupted should this unnecessary, greed-driven proposal be approved!! So what are you going to do? Contact Rebecca and reserve your seat now!!! DOE does it Again! Once again, the Department of Energy has ignored everyone, except the utility companies that will profit greatly, by denying all requests for Re-Hearings on the NIETC designations. Even with a number of environmental groups filing lawsuit against the designations, the DOE continues to support a flawed energy policy that will encourage long-distant transmission lines coming from the highly polluting, coal-fired generation plants rather than cleaner, safer alternatives. Better alternatives which include demand-side management programs, conservation, upgrading existing infrastructure and the most reasonable solution, building the generation plants near the demand. Utility companies benefit greatly from section 1221 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 as they will be granted profits of up to 14% or more, passing ALL costs on to the rate payers and all the while taking property and destroying the lives of rural Americans. This is exactly what is happening here in southwestern Pennsylvania with the proposed AP TrAIL! Fortunately, most environmental groups and at least some of our Congressman see the flaws in this policy. We must be thankful for people like Senator Casey and the others that recently requested Senate hearings on section 1221. (You can see the letter on the Stop the Towers website)Please continue to encourage Senator Casey and others to push for the complete repeal of Section 1221 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Specifically here in Pennsylvania, please contact Senator Specter (contact info below) and encourage him to support a complete repeal of the above Act. Senator Specter did sign Senator Casey’s letter asking for the hearings and he is listening. But we must contact him and tell him our concerns because you can be sure the utility industry lobbyists are talking with him every chance they get. If he is not hearing from us, how is he to know what we are going experiencing? Please email the Senator now. We need him on our side! Senator Arlen Specter - United States Senator Pittsburgh Office: Washington Office: Regl. Entrprs. Twr. 711 Hart Building 425 6th Ave- Suite 1450 Washington, D.C. 20510 Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Phone: (202) 224-4254 Phone: (412) 644-3400 Fax: (412) 644-4871 Website: specter.senate.gov Pittsburgh Office Staff Members _Marybeth_McGowan(a)specter.senate.gov_ (mailto:Marybeth_McGowan@specter.senate.gov) _stan_caldwell(a)specter.senate.gov_ (mailto:stan_caldwell@specter.senate.gov) _adam_pope(a)specter.senate.gov_ (mailto:adam_pope@specter.senate.gov) Stop the Towers! For more information, go to _http://www.stopthetowers.org/_ (http://www.stopthetowers.org/) . If you feel you have received this email in error or no longer wish to receive messages from Stop the Towers, a grassroots organization dedicated to stopping the AP TrAIL, please reply to this email with REMOVE in the subject line. **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)

1 0

Fwd: Senate to weigh DOE's power to overrule states; Law allows agency to dictate placement of power
by James Kotcon 11 Mar '08

11 Mar '08

I think it may be important to send more letters to the Senators on this committee (see below). It should also be important to find out if the Manchin Administration will offer testimony in opposition to NIETC. JBK >>> "Vivian Stockman" <vivian(a)ohvec.org> 3/10/2008 10:32 AM >>> Senate to weigh DOE's power to overrule states Law allows agency to dictate placement of power lines http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08069/863024-58.stm Sunday, March 09, 2008 By Janice Crompton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Opponents of a high-voltage power line project in Washington and Greene counties have received encouraging news. Last week, the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee said it would hold hearings to review how the U.S. Department of Energy is implementing its controversial transmission corridor program. The program allows the federal government to overrule state decisions about placement of electric transmission lines. It allows property to be taken for the lines using eminent domain, and has faced harsh criticism in recent months. Also new on the power line front, the state Public Utility Commission will begin evidentiary hearings March 24 on the application of Greensburg-based Allegheny Power to build the Pennsylvania portion of a proposed 240-mile, 500-kilovolt transmission line. The line would extend from Washington and Greene counties in Pennsylvania to existing substations in West Virginia and end in northern Virginia. Allegheny's 210-mile portion of the line would cost $820 million to build, with the total project estimated at more than $1 billion. The smaller portion of the line would be constructed and paid for by Dominion Virginia Power, which serves customers in Virginia. Allegheny Power, calling the project the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Project, or TrAIL, has already provided the PUC with testimony from 19 witnesses, while a local opposition group, the Energy Conservation Council of Pennsylvania, has responded with three experts. The company is facing challenges from more than just local groups, though. Company testimony regarding the need for the power line so far has been rebutted by two witnesses for the Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate, and from a supervisor from the PUC Office of Trial Staff, who called the application "premature at best." PUC Supervisor Gary Yocca questioned Allegheny Power's application after analysis, testifying that the company had not yet done enough to merit approval of the application. Mr. Yocca said that while the company says the new power line is needed to address anticipated local system failures and brownouts within the next several years, he questioned whether there could be less costly and intrusive methods. He said the company failed to follow through on an assessment of the environmental impact of the project and apparently no federal or state agency examined the project. Mr. Yocca said there are questions about the effects on farmland, forest land, plants and wildlife, and the significance for historic and archaeological sites. Other consequences loom And, while he took note of local residents' objections to the scenic dilemma presented by high-voltage transmission towers, Mr. Yocca warned of far more serious consequences. In his testimony, Mr. Yocca reminded PUC board members of the longwall coal mining operations peppering Washington and Greene counties and of the susceptible limestone ground structure. He said the 125-foot to 150-foot transmission towers could be affected by future mining operations or mine subsidence. "If subsidence occurs under a [high voltage transmission line] tower, the results could be catastrophic," he said. Allegheny Energy spokesman David Neurohr said the company will address rebuttal testimony from the PUC and other sources during the evidentiary hearings. "That will be the process," he said. "That is what they are for." Will Burns, a lawyer with the Energy Conservation Council of Pennsylvania, said his group is gearing up for the fight against the power company and said he appreciates the work by Pennsylvania's state and national legislative delegations. He said the decision by the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee to hold hearings "was indicative of how important Pennsylvania legislators think this is." A team of 38 Democratic state legislators, led by state House Majority Leader Bill DeWeese, recently urged the Senate committee to investigate the implementation of a provision in the Energy Act of 2005 that gives the federal government jurisdiction over what has traditionally been state land-use decisions. Mr. DeWeese's letter to the committee came on the heels of one sent by U.S. Sen. Bob Casey earlier last month. Energy law at issue Pennsylvania, along with a number of states, has objected to the Department of Energy designating a large swath of the Northeast and parts of the Southwest as a national interest electric transmission corridor -- or NIETC. The Mid-Atlantic designation in the Northeast, which encompasses eight states, the District of Columbia, and 50 of Pennsylvania's 67 counties, means the federal government will have the right to overrule state decisions involving the location of electric transmission lines and to take private property through eminent domain for such projects. If a state denies a construction permit to a power company, makes no decision within a year, or places too many restrictions on the company, it would have the right to seek a permit from the federal government if the project is within a NIETC. Already, Southern California Edison has asked federal regulators to approve the siting of a 500-kilovolt electric transmission line through Arizona after that state denied approval last year, saying it didn't want to be an "extension cord for California." Late last month, a vice president for Dominion Virginia Power testified that the company would not rule out seeking federal intervention if state approval is denied. Mr. Casey has become the national voice against the large regional corridors, which critics say defy the intent of the law -- to address electric reliability and congestion after the 2003 blackout in the northeast U.S. Senators, governors and others have proposed that the corridors be of reasonable size and include critically congested areas in need of transmission and new generation. Local groups have expressed concern that Western Pennsylvania's relatively cheap coal-fired electricity will be shipped to the power-starved East Coast. Senate to air concerns Mr. Casey and other legislators have tried obstructing and amending the law to no avail. Mr. Casey even threatened to delay the renomination of Joseph Kelliher, Federal Energy Regulatory Committee chairman, to block implementation of the NIETC. The most serious concerns raised by officials include the failure by the DOE to consult with states before the final NIETC designation and to assess transmission needs and alternatives. Another major concern was the lack of alterations to the draft NIETC proposals last year. After more than 2,000 comments from the public, along with state and local officials, the DOE published the final designation with only token changes. Last month, Mr. Casey sent a letter signed by 14 other senators to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, urging Chairman Jeff Bingaman, D-New Mexico, ranking member Pete Domenici, R-New Mexico, to delve further into how the transmission corridor program is being administered. Last week, Leon Lowery, a member of the professional staff for the committee, said there would be a hearing on the NIETC issues. "There will be a number of hearings on electricity issues," he said. "Among those things are the corridor issues." Mr. Lowery said there has been no schedule set yet for the hearings, but that the transmission corridors would likely not receive a separate hearing. Janice Crompton can be reached at jcrompton(a)post-gazette.com or 724-223-0156. First published on March 9, 2008 at 12:00 am

2 1

Fwd: REMINDER: National Coal Campaign Activist Call Wednesday, March 12
by Paul Wilson 11 Mar '08

11 Mar '08

I will be traveling up to the Blue-Green Conf. in Pittsburgh tomorrow, so if there is some other folks that could sit in on this call that would be helpful. The section on Mercury would be esp. useful to us I believe. thanks, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM Subject: REMINDER: National Coal Campaign Activist Call Wednesday, March 12 To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org *NOTE: Please make sure to check out our Clubhouse Coal Headquarters http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/conservation/energy/coal/Default.aspx * Our next national coal campaign activist call will be Wednesday, March 12th at 8:00 p.m. eastern/ 5:00 p.m. pacific. Please join us for an update on the campaign, a discussion on how the mercury court ruling may affect your local plant, and an open forum for your questions. Dial: 866-501-6174 Code: 224.0743# Agenda 1. Welcome and campaign updates including recent news and victories (15 minutes) 2. Mercury: What the recent ruling means for activism, legal strategy, and stopping new plants (15 minutes) 3. Open forum Many thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

livebetter magazine - Newburg WV
by Jonathan Rosenbaum 10 Mar '08

10 Mar '08

I picked up a new magazine (started Jan 2008) in Office Depot yesterday called livebetter: http://www.centerforabetterlife.com/eng/magazine/ Here is how they describe their "sustainability" purpose: http://www.centerforabetterlife.com/eng/about/ They have some interesting partners, and they are located in Newburg, WV. Perhaps we should get on their list. Does anyone know anything about them? -Jonathan

4 3

FW: DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations
by Grubb, Karen 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

-----Original Message----- From: nietcwebmaster(a)anl.gov [mailto:nietcwebmaster@anl.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 7:24 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations ************************************************************ National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors ************************************************************ DOE Affirms National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designations The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today denied requests for rehearing of the Mid-Atlantic and the Southwest Area National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors) designated by DOE in October 2007 as areas of significant electricity congestion and constraint. The designation of national corridors was made in accordance with the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). In affirming the National Corridor designations today, DOE dismissed as being without merit challenges raised by the applicants for rehearing, citing extensive data analysis conducted in its 2006 National Interest Electric Transmission study, ample opportunity for public review and comment, and several other key reasons. The order and a related press release are available on the "Order Denying Rehearing" page on the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors and Congestion Study Web site at http://nietc.anl.gov/index.cfm For More Information ******************** For more information about the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors and Congestion Study, visit the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors and Congestion Study Web site at (http://nietc.anl.gov/index.cfm), or contact us at: nietcwebmaster(a)anl.gov Forward This Message ******************** Please forward this message to any party you feel may be interested in the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors and Congestion Study. _________________CONTACTS/SUBSCRIPTIONS_____________________ FEEDBACK -------- To submit feedback, contact the webmaster at nietcwebmaster(a)anl.gov PRIVACY POLICY -------------- Our online privacy policy is at: http://www.energy.gov/privacy.htm SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE --------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe to the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors and Congestion Study e-mail service, visit: http://nietc.anl.gov/email/index.cfm If the above URL is not enabled as a link, please copy it into your browser window to access our E-Mail Services Page. ************************************************************ You are currently subscribed as: kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu ************************************************************

1 0

CLEANBRIER - please please please write a letter
by Beth Little 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

The WGC plant proponents are mounting a petition campaign to convince Senator Byrd to help them raise another $25 million, despite the fact that they are way over budget, out of money and have defaulted on their loans, which were guaranteed by the WV Development Office. The $25 million is so they can borrow $300 million with municipal bonds through Citigroup and get a grant from the US DOE for over $100 million. This use of taxpayers funds for a bad idea must stop. Letters are better than petitions. Please write a letter to Senator Byrd (and you can send copies to Rahall and Manchin). AND SEND A COPY TO ME SO WE WILL KNOW HOW OUR LETTER CAMPAIGN IS GOING. AND FORWARD THIS TO ANYONE YOU CAN THINK OF. Attached is the text from our fact sheet. If you can't open it, or want more details, just let me know. Byrd's address in Charleston (works better than DC; email and fax work too): Senator Robert C. Byrd 300 Virginia St, #2630 Charleston, WV 25301 fax: 304-343-7144 email: from his website - http://byrd.senate.gov/ Rahall's address: Representative Nick Rahall 301 Prince St. Beckley, WV 25801 fax: 202-225-9061 email: nrahall(a)mail.house.gov Manchin's address: Governor Joe Manchin 1900 Kanawha Boulevard E Charleston, WV 25305 Email: Governor(a)WVGov.org Beth Little HC 64 Box 281 Hillsboro, WV 24946 304-653-4277 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.5/1314 - Release Date: 3/5/2008 6:38 PM

1 0

CLEANBRIER - report on public meeting Tues night
by Beth Little 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Report is attached. If you have trouble accessing it, let me know and I'll send it in the message. It occurred to me to mount a counter petition, but on second thought, I think we should just have a letter writing campaign. They are much more effective than petitions, and it's about time we let Byrd know what we think about this boondoggle. As my roomate said when I told her the WGC guys want Byrd to bail them out, she said, "I don't want any more of my tax dollars spent on a coal fired power plant. I want health care, out of Iraq, my roads fixed, education cleaned up." So read at least the first part of this report and be thinking about what you want to say to Senator Byrd. I'll send another message with those talking points about the cogen plant and Byrd's address. Also, I'm working on setting up a meeting next week to plan a response and to distribute green bags. Beth Little HC 64 Box 281 Hillsboro, WV 24946 304-653-4277 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.4/1313 - Release Date: 3/5/2008 9:50 AM

1 0

Fwd: Stop the Towers in Penna
by Duane330＠aol.com 23 Feb '08

23 Feb '08

Stop The Towers Update.........for PA> **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-du… 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)

1 0

Re: [EC] A Washington Post story on TRAIL powerline
by Paul Wilson 22 Feb '08

22 Feb '08

Greetings: this article is from the Feb. 3rd Washington Post. Sorry it was not sent sooner. There is much on the Piedmont Environmental Council website too, including testimony from their 9 expert witnesses that will be at a hearing this weekend in Richmond. This article is a good explanation of all the proposed Powerlines and related issues. best, paul -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: NBC Nightly News on NV coal plants & "clean coal" backers
by Paul Wilson 22 Feb '08

22 Feb '08

Please look at this NBC report. It is 3 minutes long. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice McKeown <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:14 AM Subject: NBC Nightly News on NV coal plants & "clean coal" backers To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org Please click the link below to watch a three minute news story from NBC on the proposed new coal plants in Ely, NV. The piece also takes a closer look at the coal front group Americans for Balanced Energy Choices and their nationwide media blitz promoting new coal power. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/#23279992 Thanks, Alice ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club National Coal Campaign tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubsribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Proposed PATH transmission line
by duane330＠aol.com 19 Feb '08

19 Feb '08

AEP transmission venture with Allegheny files to establish FERC rate for PATH transmission project COLUMBUS, Ohio, Dec. 28, 2007 – American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP) today announced that Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline LLC, AEP’s transmission joint venture with Allegheny Energy (NYSE: AYE), has filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to establish a transmission rate to recover costs for the approximately 290-mile, extra-high voltage transmission line that the companies propose to build from West Virginia into Maryland. The companies are seeking a transmission cost-of-service formula rate, effective March 1, 2008, that will provide for annual updates to the amounts that PJM Interconnection (PJM), an independent regional transmission operator, will charge utilities to recover the costs of the project. The proposed rate includes recovery of a return on construction work in progress (CWIP) for the project and a return on equity of 14.3 percent, which includes an incentive award, consistent with federal policy to encourage significant transmission infrastructure and technology improvements. AEP and Allegheny each separately received FERC approval for incentive rate treatments for individually proposed transmission projects that ultimately became the joint Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) project. The PATH project includes approximately 244 miles of 765-kilovolt (kV) extra-high voltage transmission from AEP’s Amos substation near St. Albans, W.Va., to Allegheny’s Bedington substation, northeast of Martinsburg, W.Va. Another 46 miles of twin-circuit 500-kV transmission will be constructed from Bedington to a new substation to be built near Kemptown, southeast of Frederick, Md. The total project is estimated to cost approximately $1.8 billion. PJM identified June 2012 as the date by which the PATH project needs to be operational. “The PATH project addresses significant reliability concerns in the region, including overloads that will occur on more than thirteen existing transmission lines in Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia and Pennsylvania, as soon as 2012 if PATH is not built,” said Michael G. Morris, AEP chairman, president and chief executive officer. “Establishing FERC rates for the project will provide the timely cost recovery necessary to obtain financing and allow us to move forward and bring the project on line in time to help prevent overloads on these lines.” Once approved by FERC, the costs of the PATH project will be allocated to all electric utilities who serve retail customers in the PJM region. AEP and Allegheny plan to begin work on the routing study and environmental assessment for the PATH project in January 2008. The companies anticipate seeking regulatory approvals for the project from the utility commissions in both West Virginia and Maryland in the fourth quarter of 2008, following the completion of the routing study. AEP and Allegheny are committed to working with landowners, neighboring residents, business owners, affected communities and regulators to minimize the environmental and land use impacts of the project. http://www.aep.com/newsroom/newsreleases/default.asp?dbcommand=displayrelea… ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com

1 0

TrAIL in the public press
by duane330＠aol.com 19 Feb '08

19 Feb '08

TrAIL?Multistate Power Line Proposal Stirs W.Va. Controversy Posted on: Tuesday, 19 February 2008.? Charleston Gazette. Plans for a $1.3 billion power line across northern West Virginia continue to stir controversy, and more such projects are likely on the way. The state Public Service Commission is scheduled to issue a ruling by May 2 on Allegheny Energy's proposed Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line, or TrAIL. The 240-mile transmission line would carry electricity from western Pennsylvania across West Virginia and into Virginia. Allegheny wants the PSC to approve the 114 miles of the line that run through West Virginia. TrAIL would enter the state north of Morgantown, and run south and east through Monongalia, Preston and Tucker counties to Mount Storm in Grant County. Then, it would turn east through Hardy and Hampshire counties before entering Virginia. Allegheny officials say the line is needed to provide cheap and reliable power to big Eastern cities and their growing suburbs. Aging infrastructure, combined with increasing demand, could cause ?rolling blackouts by 2011 that would extend into eastern West Virginia, power company officials say. ? Commissioners Jon McKinney and Ed Staats are hearing the case. PSC Chairman Michael Albert, appointed last year by Gov. Joe Manchin, recused himself. Albert said he did some work on the project for Allegheny Energy before leaving the Jackson Kelly law firm for the PSC post. The project has drawn intense opposition from hundreds of West Virginians, who fear it will mar scenic views, lower their property values and otherwise damage rural communities. Project opponents are especially upset that Allegheny could get PSC approval to use the power of eminent domain to force residents to give the company rights of way for the power line. They are also worried that if the PSC doesn't approve the project, or waits too long to decide, the federal government might take over the permitting process under a 2005 law meant to encourage new power lines. The PSC staff and the agency's consumer advocate have also objected to parts of the power line proposal. In early January, the consumer advocate agreed to drop part of its objections in exchange for Allegheny promising to provide free electricity to residents along the power line path. The company also agreed to limit clearcutting and not use aerial herbicide spraying to maintain its right of way. PSC consultants have argued the Allegheny proposal is not "the most economical or cost-effective means" to cure potential northeast power outages, and a PSC staff engineer concluded the company did not choose the best and least environmentally damaging route. Developers of two natural gas-fired power plants proposed for Virginia and Maryland are also fighting the TrAIL proposal. Competitive Power Ventures Inc. argues its plants would eliminate the need for the 500-kilovolt transmission line. Reports from CPV Warren experts, filed with the PSC, conclude the gas-fired plants are a better solution to electrical reliability problems identified by PJM Interconnections, a private organization that maintains the regional power grid. "If the generation resource cap is in the East, build generation resources, such as CPV Warren, in the East, not a massive transmission line such as the one proposed here to support the delivery of power and energy from existing and proposed generation in the West," George C. Loehr, a consultant for CPV Warren, said in a prepared statement filed with the PSC. To contact staff writer Ken Ward Jr., use e-mail or call 348- 1702. (c) 2008 Sunday Gazette - Mail; Charleston, W.V.. ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com

1 0

Fwd: ACT: Please do a 30 second call for clean energy on February 20th
by Paul Wilson 19 Feb '08

19 Feb '08

We are trying to get 2000 calls into Dynegy *tomorrow* so please forward to others that may be interested in Coal and other Energy issues. thanks, paul w. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <mkresowiksc(a)earthlink.net> Date: Feb 19, 2008 3:24 PM Subject: ACT: 30 second call for clean energy To: No New Coal List <CONS-EQST-AIR-MW-COAL-COMM(a)lists.sierraclub.org>, No New Coal Plants <NoNewCoalPlants(a)energyjustice.net>, LS Power Coalition < new-king-coal-coalition(a)googlegroups.com> Join us to "Clean Up Dynegy" and put an end to the worst new global warming polluter in the country! Tomorrow people across the country will be taking just 30 seconds to put an end to six new coal plants (totaling more than 44 million tons of global warming pollution) proposed in six different states. Please take the time to help the volunteers working in Nevada, Arkansas, Texas, Georgia, Michigan, and Iowa by placing a call to Dynegy headquarters (877-396-3499), forward this message to your friends and colleagues, and then let us know how many calls you placed together by emailing mark.kresowik(a)sierraclub.org. Starting at noon tomorrow our website will go live - check out http://www.cleanupdynegy.org to get involved. Call for clean energy! Join us for a nationwide call-in day of action urging the worst new global warming polluter in the country Dynegy/LS Power to shift investments away from six proposed coal plants to cleaner energy solutions. As the largest developer of coal-fired power plants in the country, Dynegy has an opportunity to really shape our energy future. A decision by Dynegy to provide cleaner, healthier more economical energy could give a real boost to our clean energy economy. It's time for Dynegy to follow the lead of other companies across the U.S. who have found that switching to cleaner, greener energy can only be good for the environment, but also for the company's bottom line. WHAT: Nationwide call-in day of action targeting Dynegy Headquarters in Houston, TX WHEN: Wednesday, February 20th, 2008 CALL NUMBER: 877-396-3499 See the attached call script for talking points, a call-tracking sheet, and other call-in information. Still have questions? Email mark.kresowik(a)sierraclub.org Mark Kresowik Organizer, National Coal Campaign Sierra Club mark.kresowik(a)sierraclub.org 319-621-7393 (cell) 3839 Merle Hay Road Suite 282 Des Moines, IA 50310 -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Amos plant emitting more than reported; 'Blue haze' inquiry uncovers discrepancies]
by Regina Hendrix 18 Feb '08

18 Feb '08

FYI

1 0

Sierra Club at E-Day
by Grubb, Karen 16 Feb '08

16 Feb '08

Are any of you, not counting Regina, going to be at E-Day for tabling, lobbying, and the dinner afterwards? If you are coming from Morgantown area, do you want to car pool? I am thinking of going down Thursday night and coming back Saturday. Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: Denise Poole <mailto:deniseap@earthlink.net> To: Bill Price <mailto:bill.price@seirraclub.org> ; Vivian Stockman <mailto:vivian@ohvec.org> ; Danny Chiotos <mailto:danny@seac.org> ; Dana Kuhnline <mailto:dana.kuhnline@gmail.com> ; Chris Higgins <mailto:plantandgnome@verizon.net> ; Julie Archer <mailto:julie@wvcag.org> ; Gary Zuckett <mailto:garyz@wvcag.org> ; Coal River Mountain Watch <mailto:coalriver@crmw.net> ; James Kotcon <mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu> ; Danny Chiotos <mailto:trouserdude@gmail.com> ; Plateau Network <mailto:pan_wv@earthlink.net> ; Matt Noerpel <mailto:matt@crmw.net> ; Matt Keller <mailto:matt.keller@wvwild.org> ; Mountain View Builders <mailto:mtviewbuilders@verizon.net> ; Hugh Rogers <mailto:rogers@wvhighlands.org> ; Janet Keating <mailto:ohvec@ohvec.org> ; Jason Keeling <mailto:jason.keeling@wvwild.org> ; Julian Martin <mailto:imaginemew@aol.com> ; Adam Webster <mailto:awebster@wvrivers.org> ; Mike Costello <mailto:michael.costello@wvwild.org> ; Frank Young <mailto:frankly@mtparty.org> ; John Christensen <mailto:jbc329@earthlink.net> ; Dave Saville <mailto:dave.saville@wvwild.org> ; Janice Nease <mailto:janice@crmw.net> ; Janice Nease <mailto:Sranease@aol.com> ; Gary Zuckett <mailto:garyz@mtparty.org> ; Hugh Rogers <mailto:Hugh.rogers@gmail.com> ; Carol Warren <mailto:peacelovemom@gmail.com> ; Kay Basham <mailto:kaymoondreamer@hotmail.com> ; dbady(a)marshall.edu ; patricia(a)sludgesafety.org ; outreach(a)saveblackwatercanyon.org Cc: dsgr <mailto:dsgr@aol.com> ; wyro(a)appalight.com Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:24 PM Subject: E-Day just around the corner! Hi everyone, Just a reminder that WVEC's E-Day is just around the corner - Friday, February 22nd. If you are receiving this e-mail, you are listed as a participant for the E-Day at the Capitol. If there are any errors, please e-mail back to me. Attached find the E-Day Booth form once again with the details of when and where to set up. When you arrive, volunteers will be on hand to help guide you to your table(s). Each table will also have your group or businesses name on them. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at the WVEC office, (304) 414-0143 or e-mail me at deniseap(a)earthlink.net. Please stay and join us in the evening for the Benefit Reception Dinner/2008 Award Presentations. Women's Club of Charleston, corner of Elizabeth & Virginia Street East. From 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. More details are in this weeks Legislative Update. Here are the booth participants to date: WVEC Information WVEC Lobby table WV Highlands Conservancy OVEC Coal River Mountain Watch WVU Sierra Club Student Coalition WV Chapter, Trout Unlimited WV Sierra Club Central Appalachian Environmental Justice WV Citizen Action Group Clean Elections Coalition Medicine Song Crafts Mountain View Builders, LLC - Mountain View Solar Friends of the Mountains Student Environmental Action Coalition Charleston Area Youth Environmental Network WV Wilderness Coalition Friends of Blackwater Canyon Plant & Gnome Nursery Sludge Safety Project WV Rivers Coalition

1 0

[CLEANBRIER] meager update
by Beth Little 14 Feb '08

14 Feb '08

Hello fellow lovers of clean air and water, No news is good news? I'm not ready to relax completely and assume the Western Greenbrier CoGen plant is dead, but there have been no vehicles at the site for months now, except Wayne Brown's a couple of times. Neely, the young gung ho employee, is gone, is selling his home and word is he is going back to his old job. Even if it is dead, it rankles that the taxpayers footed the bill for several years of fat salaries and pie-in-the-sky visions. It sure would be nice if the press would do their job and expose this boondoggle for what it is/was. The next problem is that there has been a permit issued for a mountaintop removal project in western Greenbrier Co. We are finally getting the low-rate green bags for people to use and will need to distribute them. We will have a meeting in March to pass out the bags, share news and decide what to do next. IF ANYONE FINDS OUT ANYTHING FROM RAINELLE, RUPERT OR QUINWOOD TOWN COUNCILS, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE FORWARD THE INFORMATION. Beth Little HC 64 Box 281 Hillsboro, WV 24946 304-653-4277 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.2/1272 - Release Date: 2/11/2008 5:28 PM

2 1

Re: [EC] would we support this bill that would amend the Zoning code?
by Paul Wilson 13 Feb '08

13 Feb '08

This was entered to stop some unappropriate land uses in residential areas eg. a Shale mine in Gerrardstown in Berkeley Cty (E. Panhandle). I want to put an article in the NL and ask folks to contact the committee chairs. thanks, paul * Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:* That §8A-7-10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended and reenacted to read as follows: *ARTICLE 7. ZONING ORDINANCE. **§8A-7-10. Effect of enacted zoning ordinance.* (a) After enactment of a zoning ordinance by a municipality or county, all subsequent land development must be done in accordance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance. (b) All zoning ordinances, and all amendments, supplements and changes thereto, legally adopted under any prior enabling acts, and all actions taken under the authority of any such ordinances, are hereby validated and continued in effect until amended or repealed by action of the governing body of the municipality or the county taken under authority of this article. These ordinances shall have the same effect as though previously adopted as a comprehensive plan of land use or parts thereof. (c) Land, buildings or structures in use when a zoning ordinance is enacted can continue the same use and such use cannot be prohibited by the zoning ordinance so long as the use of the land, buildings or structures is maintained, and no zoning ordinance may prohibit alterations or additions to or replacement of buildings or structures owned by any farm, industry or manufacturer, or the use of land presently owned by any farm, industry or manufacturer but not used for agricultural, industrial or manufacturing purposes, or the use or acquisition of additional land which may be required for the protection, continuing development or expansion of any agricultural, industrial or manufacturing operation of any present or future satellite agricultural, industrial or manufacturing use. A zoning ordinance may provide for the enlargement or extension of a nonconforming use, or the change from one nonconforming use to another. (d) If a use of a property that does not conform to the zoning ordinance has ceased and the property has been vacant for one year, abandonment will be presumed unless the owner of the property can show that the property has not been abandoned: *Provided,* That neither the absence of natural resources extraction or harvesting nor the absence of any particular agricultural, industrial or manufacturing process may be construed as abandonment of the use. If the property is shown to be abandoned, then any future use of the land, buildings or structures must conform with the provisions of the zoning ordinance regulating the use where the land, buildings or structures are located, unless the property is a duly designated historic landmark, historic site or historic district. (e) Nothing in this chapter authorizes an ordinance, rule or regulation preventing, outside of urban areas, the complete use of natural resources by the owner. *(f) Any county which has enacted county-wide zoning and which has been designated as a "growth county" as defined in section three, article twenty, chapter seven of this code may: (1) Limit the use of land presently owned or subsequently acquired by any farm, industry or manufacturer and not presently or subsequently used for energy related industrial or manufacturing purposes, to those uses permitted by the applicable zoning ordinance, notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsection (c) of this section; (2) Limit the use of abandoned property to the provisions of the zoning ordinance where such property is not being used for energy related natural resources extraction or harvesting or where there is no particular agricultural, energy related industrial or manufacturing process on the land, and where such property has been (d) of this section; and (3) Limit or prohibit the complete use of nonenergy related natural resources by an owner of property, if such use of the property does not conform to the provisions of the applicable zoning ordinance.* NOTE: The purpose of this bill is to limit the use of some lands for nonenergy related purposes in "growth counties." Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from the present law, and underscoring indicates new language that would be added. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

3 3

[Fwd: Re: [fom] Breaking News: 50 Ohio students confront corporate and governement targets on proposed coal plant]
by Regina Hendrix 13 Feb '08

13 Feb '08

I wanted to be sure you saw this. Regina

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Montana op-ed on Wall Street/coal plants]
by Regina Hendrix 13 Feb '08

13 Feb '08

I wanted to be sure you saw this.

1 0

Governor announcing big energy recycling project
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 10 Feb '08

10 Feb '08

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENT AND A STRONG ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF PRAGMATIC ALTERNATIVES TO THE INCREASED TRANSPORTATION OF COAL FIRED ENERGY OFFERED BY TRAIL AND PATH. HERE IS A LINK TO THE RECYCLED ENERGY DEVELOPMENT <http://www.recycled-energy.com/index.html> WEB PAGE. LINK BELOW TO DAILY MAIL ARTICLE ON PROJECT AT ALLOY PLANT IN FAYETTE COUNTY. TO GENERATE 44 MW FOR A COST OF 45 MILLION, SIGNIFICANTLY LESS FINANCIALLY, AND INFINITELY LESS DAMAGING ENVIRONMENTALLY. ----- Tuesday February 5, 2008 *Governor announcing big energy recycling project<http://www.dailymail.com/News/200802050159> * by George Hohmann<http://%5C%22contact/ohfvarff+qnvylznvy+pbz+return=/News/200802050159%5C%22> Daily Mail Business Editor New facility would take plant exhaust and use it to power factory <http://www.dailymail.com/News/200802050159> -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

2 1

Re: [EC] NY times on Clean Power or Dirty Coal
by Paul Wilson 10 Feb '08

10 Feb '08

February 10, 2008 New York Times Editorial Clean Power or Dirty Coal? Opposition to new coal-fired power plants built without new technology — that is, without the capacity to capture greenhouse gas emissions — is rising on both Wall Street and Main Street. Citizen opposition has led companies to cancel some high-profile projects, including a proposed plant near the Florida Everglades. Pressure from environmental organizations has persuaded major banks to begin weighing the risks of global warming when deciding whether to finance new plants. This is good news. Coal-fired power plants are big contributors to global warming. In the United States alone, they generate half the country's electricity and nearly a third of its emissions. Meanwhile, scientists have left no doubt that the world has just a few years to make deep cuts in emissions or begin to suffer the worst consequences of rising temperatures. This means that scientists will have to figure out a way to capture carbon dioxide from coal plants, or coal will have to be replaced with cleaner fuels. Given that task, the failure — by both the Bush administration and Congress — to encourage alternative sources of power is distressing. Bowing to veto threats from the White House, Congress stripped from an otherwise admirable energy bill two important provisions on alternative fuels. One would have required states to generate an increasing share of their power from renewable sources like wind and solar energy. The other would have rolled back about $12 billion in wholly unnecessary tax breaks for the oil industry and used the proceeds to develop cleaner fuels and new energy technologies. There is a way that Congress can quickly begin to make amends. That is to extend important tax breaks for alternative energy sources that are set to expire at the end of this year. These incentives have been critically important to the development of wind and solar power; wind power has become increasingly cost-competitive with natural gas, although not yet with coal. Investors are unlikely to pump much new money into clean power unless they are sure the credits will be available next year. The American Wind Energy Association has already detected a drop in new capital spending. As we have said before, the surest and probably the only way to encourage meaningful and swift commercial development of cleaner fuels and energy sources is to put a stiff price on carbon emissions. That, in turn, would inspire — indeed require — industry to invest heavily in energy efficiency and low-carbon fuels. But until Congress sets such a price, through a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade program — and it is a long way from doing so — every effort should be made to encourage the development of alternative energy sources. The first step is to extend the tax credits for alternative sources like wind and solar power. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: [wman] RAN News Release: Proposed Coal Plants Losing Steam
by Paul Wilson 06 Feb '08

06 Feb '08

fyi, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Ananda Tan" <ananda(a)ran.org> To: "WMAN list" <wman(a)lists.onenw.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:51:27 -0800 Subject: [wman] RAN News Release: Proposed Coal Plants Losing Steam Please forward, especially to allies fighting coal. Ananda Lee Tan Global Finance Campaign Rainforest Action Network 221 Pine Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 USA Phone: + 1 415 659 0550 Cell: + 1 415 374 0615 Fax: + 1 415 398 2732 Email: ananda(a)ran.org RAN Website: www.ran.org Campaign Site: www.dirtymoney.org Proposed Coal Plants Losing Steam *59 Coal Plants Cancelled or Shelved in 2007* * * SAN FRANCISCO—Fifty-nine proposed coal-fired power plants were cancelled or shelved during 2007, according to research compiled by Coal Moratorium NOW<http://cmnow.org/>! and Rainforest Action Network. <http://www.dirtymoney.org/> Both groups are calling for a moratorium on the construction of new coal-fired power plants. The list, including documentation, is posted online at "Coal Plants Cancelled in 2007."<http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Coal_plants_cancelled_in_2007>It includes data supplied by Sierra Club <http://www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/coal/plantlist.asp>, coalSwarm <http://www.coalswarm.org/>, the U.S. Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Lab<http://cmnow.org/NETL%20New%20Coal%205.2007.pdf>, and utility industry sources. "Coal-fired power plants are the wrong investment for our climate, our health, and our economy," said Becky Tarbotton, director of Rainforest Action Network's Global Finance Campaign. "Utilities, regulators, and investors are realizing that the path ahead is energy efficiency and renewable energy. It's time to stop financing and building coal and to start funding the future." Ted Nace, founder of Coal Moratorium NOW! said, "Although we knew that many plants were being nixed, we were stunned by the total number. It spells real hope for the movement seeking to blunt the coal rush." Because coal is the largest contributor to the human-made increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, coal plants are at the top of the list of global warming threats cited by climate scientists. Dr. James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Space Center, the world's largest climate research agency, told Congress on April 26, 2007, that a moratorium on new coal plants is "the most critical action for saving the planet at this time." Among the study's conclusions: * * · *Climate concerns played a role in at least 15 plant cancellations.*These included five plants in Florida, where Gov. Charlie Crist has made global warming a top issue; a three-unit plant in Kansas opposed by Gov. Kathleen Sibelius; and several plants affected by strict new carbon regulations in western states. * * · *Coal plants disappeared entirely from some utilities' long-range plans:* Increasingly, coal plants were cancelled before they could even be named, due to increasing regulatory scrutiny of long-range integrated resource plans by states such as Oregon and California. * * · *Renewables began elbowing out coal: *Regulators in several states favored utility-scale renewables over coal. In Delaware, regulators cancelled a coal power plant proposed by NRG Energy in favor of an alternative proposal that combined wind and natural gas. In California, the combination of a strict carbon emissions standard and a renewable portfolio standard prompted utilities to enter into contracts for large thermal solar projects sponsored by Ausra, BrightSource, and Solel. ** * * · *Grassroots opposition mounted, financial markets cooled to coal: *After a spate of enthusiasm in 2006, coal plant financiers in 2007 recoiled from escalating construction costs; litigation by environmental groups; and public opposition to coal expressed through rallies, sit-ins, petitions, and local referenda in Texas, Maine, Montana, Utah, Iowa, Minnesota, Virginia, and elsewhere. As sponsors ran into difficulty raising funds, numerous projects were quietly abandoned.** * * · *More plants were abandoned than rejected:* Of the 59 cancelled or sidetracked projects, only 15 were rejected outright by regulators, courts, or local authorities. In the remaining 44 cases, the decision was made by the sponsors themselves. Besides climate concerns, leading reasons for abandoning plants include (1) rapidly rising construction costs, (2) insufficient financing or failure to receive hoped-for government subsidies, and (3) lowered estimates of demand. · *Heavy spending but poor results for "clean coal":* Despite a multi-million dollar advertising campaign by the coal industry in support of its "clean coal" message, the public was unconvinced. An October poll by Opinion Research Corporation<http://www.cleanenergyaction.net/101807_CLEAN_survey_report.pdf>showed that 75 percent of American adults would support a five-year moratorium on new coal plants if funding for renewable alternatives was increased and efficiency standards were tightened. *Background on the Coal Boom* After mainly building natural gas turbines during the 1980s and 1990s, utilities returned to coal when natural gas prices jumped in 2000. In May 2007, the Department of Energy's "Tracking New Coal-Fired Power Plants" (5/07) <http://cmnow.org/NETL%20New%20Coal%205.2007.pdf> study counted 151 proposed coal plants. Five months later, "Tracking New Coal-Fired Power Plants" (10/07) <http://www.netl.doe.gov/coal/refshelf/ncp.pdf> counted 121 proposed plants. According to a survey completed in the first week of January 2008 by Coal Moratorium NOW! and Rainforest Action Network, the number of proposed plants (including those under construction or recently completed) now stands at 113. Details on the study may be seen at the following links: · "Coal Plants Cancelled in 2007<http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Coal_plants_cancelled_in_2007#Li…>" · Proposed Coal Plants: state-by-state descriptions<http://cmnow.org/Proposed%20Coal%20Plants.pdf> · Proposed Coal Plants: spreadsheet<http://cmnow.org/Proposed%20Coal%20Spreadsheet.pdf> · Table of Proposed Coal Plants by Expected Year of Completion<http://cmnow.org/Plants%20by%20Year%20Table.pdf> · Table of Proposed Coal Plants by Type of Utility <http://cmnow.org/Plants%20by%20Type%20of%20Utility%20Table.pdf> · Table of Proposed Coal Plants by Region <http://cmnow.org/Plants%20by%20Region%20Table.pdf> *###* *Coal Moratorium NOW! <http://cmnow.org/> (http://cmNOW.org<http://cmnow.org/>) tracks the coal boom and advocates for a moratorium on new coal plants. Together with the Center for Media and Democracy, Coal Moratorium NOW! also co-sponsors www.coalSwarm.org <http://www.coalswarm.org/>, a coal-oriented wiki. Contact: info(a)cmNOW.org or Ted Nace at 510-331-8743. * * * *Rainforest Action Network <http://www.dirtymoney.org/> ( http://www.dirtymoney.org) runs hard-hitting campaigns to break America's oil addiction, reduce our reliance on coal, protect endangered forests and indigenous rights, and stop destructive investments around the world through education, grassroots organizing, and non-violent direct action.* -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Re: [EC] ctl
by Allan Tweddle 05 Feb '08

05 Feb '08

Vivian It's a good discussion none the less Nice to see you quoted and chosen as source of concern for the global environmental community. The author should have used the quote, (I believe one that you distributed), by the Minister of the Environment for the South African Government when he stated that the Segunda Plant of Salsol is the largest single source of greenhouse gasses on the globe! I am going to try and work this into my talks this week at Shepherd University tomorrow afternoon...two science classes and...then an all campus all student and faculty debate with a nay-slayer (that's not a typo) on Thursday evening. Wish me luck...wish you could be there to ask some key questions. Allan ----- Original Message ----- From: Vivian Stockman<mailto:vivian@ohvec.org> To: Allan Tweddle<mailto:allantweddle@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:38 AM Subject: ctl http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/02/04/221273/environment-special-…<http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/02/04/221273/environment-special-…> Allan--my quote should read "mountaintop removal coal mining" not "mountaintop removal, coal mining"

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] 'Blue haze' inquiry narrows to John Amos]
by Regina Hendrix 03 Feb '08

03 Feb '08

I wanted to be sure you saw this. Not only are we sacrificing our mountains, even more important, we are sacrificing our health. We're sucking this stuff up every day. Mostly it dissipates faster, but the small daily doses are still poisonous. We generate the electricity because the Eastern Seaboard states don't want the expense of shipping coal and they'd rather not have the pollution from generation either. Now they want new transmission lines running thru some of our acreage which has been unspoiled so far. They want us to figure out a way to stop the acid rain from heading north and east. And they want WV ratepayers to pay for the transmission lines too. Meanwhile the WV taxpayer pays to repair our roads after 120,000 lb. plus coal trucks tear them up and we pay big bucks to treat our streams subject to acid mine drainage. This in a state where taxpayers making as little as $10K pay state income tax and the out-of-state landholding companies pay pennies per acre property tax on their resource-rich holdings. Gosh this does sound like a diatribe and I know I'm preaching to the choir.......... Regina

1 0

[Fwd: [fom] Fwd: Did Bush kill coal, boost nukes?]
by Regina Hendrix 03 Feb '08

03 Feb '08

Wanted to be sure you saw this one. Regina

1 0

Save OVEC & WV mountains
by duane330＠aol.com 02 Feb '08

02 Feb '08

>From the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy www.wvhighlands.org ? ? ????The WV Coal Association's Friends of Coal has denounced the Ohio Valley Environmental Council? (OVEC) as an extremist organization. They are boycotting Kroger for including OVEC in their gift card program. If you would like to show your support for the wonderful work OVEC is doing in their fight against mountain top removal strip ?mining you are?encouraged to purchase a Kroger gift card and write and /or email?Kroger and?encourage them to continue including?OVEC?in their gift card program.? ????Here is the process for buying an OVEC Kroger gift card-- Go to the OVEC website www.ohvec.org?and just down from the top of the homepage,in the center,is a link with full explanation and a printable pdf application to mail in. You the Kroger shopper buys a Kroger gift card from OVEC for $20, it is preloaded with $20; then as you shop at Kroger, pay for your purchase with the gift card,making sure you have it sufficiently recharged at the customer service desk before you check out. You can load the Kroger card with any amount up to $500 and spend it over time,?& OVEC get's 5% of whatever?you spend. If you normally pay for groceries with a credit card,you can just recharge your gift card with the same credit card, continuing to earn frequent-flier miles,bonus points,cash back,or whatever. ????Kroger has held up well and so far continues to include OVEC in the gift card program. ????You can email Kroger on line at http://services.kroger.com/comments/comments.aspx ????To write to Kroger and thank them for including OVEC use the address below. Please cc martinjul(a)aol.com? so we know how many have responded. ? Mr. Carl York Public Relations Manager Kroger P.O. Box 14002 Roanoke, VA? 24038? ? "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, things aren't going to get better, they're not!" From The Lorax by Dr. Suess For The Mountains Julian Martin Vice-President for State Affairs West Virginia Highlands Conservancy www.wvhighlands.org 1525 Hampton Road, Charleston, WV 25314 Contact me(martinjul(a)aol.com) for a trip to Kayford Mountain to see active and so-called reclaimed mountain top removal. Go to www.wvhighlands.org for I Love Mountains t-shirts, hats, I Heart Mountains and Friends Of The Mountains bumper stickers and for speakers, information and exhibits on environmental issues in West Virginia. ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com

1 0

FW: NIETC Call to Action
by Beth Little 01 Feb '08

01 Feb '08

This is hot! Liese called me and explained how even if we win our legal action against TrAIL, federal eminent domain could be used to build it anyway. See below and try to make calls/emails in the next week. -----Original Message----- From: Liese Dart [mailto:ldart@pecva.org] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 4:45 PM To: jkotcon(a)wvu.edu; ohvec(a)ohvec.org; crmw(a)crmv.net; samsva(a)gmail.com; multiflora123(a)yahoo.com; mjmb(a)westco.net; billgolemon(a)frontiernet.net; jkotcon(a)wvu.edu; wojtowicz(a)metsci.com; philipy(a)zoominternet.net; blittle(a)citynet.net; Johnmcferrin(a)aol.com; hugh.rogers(a)gmail.com; buffrodman(a)hotmail.com; marilyn.shoenfeld(a)gmail.com; martinjul(a)aol.com; JohnMcFerrin(a)aol.com; woodhavenwv(a)netscape.net; fyoung(a)wvhighlands.org; larryvthomas(a)aol.com; foutsberg(a)citlink.net; larryvthomas(a)aol.com; foutsberg(a)citlink.net; scz3667(a)aol.com; mayorbobhenrybaber(a)yahoo.com; rdf(a)citynet.net; photonzx(a)ntelos.net; mcclainw(a)davisandelkins.edu; wpmcneel(a)gmail.com; PShoenfeld(a)gmail.com; gbrbat(a)ntelos.net; jeanrodman(a)verizon.net; ellis_6511(a)msn.com; sliderf(a)ovis.net; DSGJR(a)aol.com; cmains(a)wvu.edu; woodhavenwv(a)netscape.net; imaginemew(a)aol.com; woodhavenwva(a)netscape.net; johnmcferrin(a)aol.com; rogers(a)wvhighlands.org; imaginemew(a)aol.com; wvhcweb(a)wvhighlands.org; pshoenfeld(a)gmail.com; 'Heather Wicke' Subject: NIETC Call to Action ****National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Call to Action**** Please call Senator Rockefeller and Senator Byrd next week and ask them to sign onto a letter requesting oversight hearings on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designation (the letter is attached). The Department of Energy has designated 42 of 55 counties in West Virginia as part of the Mid-Atlantic NIETC. Within this area, an interstate transmission line applicant has access to federal eminent domain to site the line. NIETC could be used to site the TrAILCo/Dominion transmission line in West Virginia. Please ask your Senators to join Senators Casey, Whitehouse and Biden in asking the Energy & Natural Resources Committee to hold hearings on this flawed policy. Senator Rockefeller’s DC office: (202)224-6472 Senator Byrd’s DC office: (202)224-3954 For more information, please contact Liese Dart at (202)857-6982 or by email at ldart(a)pecva.org. What is NIETC Designation? Sec. 1221 of the 2005 Energy Policy Act provided the Department of Energy the discretion to designate National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETC) in areas of the United States that are found to be electrically congested. If a project lies within an NIETC, a utility may appeal an unfavorable state decision to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for use of federal eminent domain to site the project. Despite receiving over 2,000 comments against the designations, the Department of Energy designated two corridors on October 5, 2007. The first NIETC’s encompass portions of 10 states, 220 counties and impact more than 72 million people. The Department of Energy failed to conduct an alternatives analysis or to consult with the affected states prior to these designations, both requirements of Sec. 1221. Although this policy could be used to provide long distance transmission access to our nation’s developing wind and solar facilities, the Department of Energy has not designated areas of the country that are identified as having significant renewable resources. The Mid-Atlantic NIETC designation will increase transmission infrastructure to coal-fired generation built prior to the 1972 Clean Air Act, facilities that lie outside of the EPA’s non-attainment area for air quality. These investments in unnecessary interstate transmission will make cleaner alternatives such as efficiency and demand response technologies less economically viable. Eight of the ten states in the first NIETC designations have filed Petitions for Rehearing against the Department of Energy’s final decision. Liese Dart Special Projects Assistant Piedmont Environmental Council Phone: (202)857-7982 Cell: (202)431-8606 Fax: (540)349-9003 ldart(a)pecva.org www.pecva.org Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.6/1231 - Release Date: 1/18/2008 11:55 AM

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

EC