EC

ec@lists.wvsierraclub.org

2254 discussions

This uranium enrichment plant produces a larger carbon footprint than .........
by Frank Young 02 Feb '13

02 Feb '13

<http://www.facebook.com/n/?groups%2F199849692677%2Fpermalink%2F101516811641 72678%2F&mid=7775ee2G3ecf0b71G401277aG96&bcode=1.1359831477.AblQPLpU6mX7n6Sp &n_m=fyoung%40mountain.net> Michael Leonardi posted in Green Party of Ohio <http://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=790837421&mid=7775ee2G3ecf0b71G40 1277aG96&bcode=1.1359831477.AblQPLpU6mX7n6Sp&n_m=fyoung%40mountain.net> This uranium enrichment plant produces a... <http://www.facebook.com/n/?profile.php&id=790837421&mid=7775ee2G3ecf0b71G40 1277aG96&bcode=1.1359831477.AblQPLpU6mX7n6Sp&n_m=fyoung%40mountain.net> Michael Leonardi 1:57pm Feb 2 This uranium enrichment plant produces a larger carbon footprint than the output from the largest Nuclear Plant in North America. Yet some people out there still think that nuclear power is CARBON FREE! Wake Up Y'all! The gaseous diffusion plant covers 750 acres (300 ha) of a 3,425 acres (1,386 ha) site. The four process buildings cover 74 acres (30 ha), and consume a peak electrical demand of 3,040 megawatts. How's that for a carbon footprint??? <http://www.facebook.com/l/9AQH9wBezAQENqOOQY4aCK2LNRXAbTL6swyHdNbZ_1hrpLQ/e n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paducah_Gaseous_Diffusion_Plant> <http://www.facebook.com/l/QAQFztZL2AQGAypyF9VOvAB-svNZhSOns-SW4bkPou_4w_Q/e n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paducah_Gaseous_Diffusion_Plant> Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia <http://www.facebook.com/l/QAQFztZL2AQGAypyF9VOvAB-svNZhSOns-SW4bkPou_4w_Q/e n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paducah_Gaseous_Diffusion_Plant> en.wikipedia.org The Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant is a facility located in McCracken County, Kentucky, near Paducah... <https://www.facebook.com/email_open_log_pic.php?mid=7775ee2G3ecf0b71G401277 aG96> <http://www.facebook.com/n/?groups%2F199849692677%2Fpermalink%2F101516811641 72678%2F&mid=7775ee2G3ecf0b71G401277aG96&bcode=1.1359831477.AblQPLpU6mX7n6Sp &n_m=fyoung%40mountain.net> View Post on Facebook . <http://www.facebook.com/n/?settings&tab=notifications&section=group_notific ation&mid=7775ee2G3ecf0b71G401277aG96&bcode=1.1359831477.AblQPLpU6mX7n6Sp&n_ m=fyoung%40mountain.net> Edit Email Settings . Reply to this email to add a comment.

1 0

Fwd: Mississippi power plant poll
by James Kotcon 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

The line below caught my attention: "75 percent of respondents say cost overruns should be paid by utility shareholders." This is exactly the issue with the First Energy and AEP transfers. Stockholders want to preserve their profits by dumping uncompetitive power plants on ratepayers. Would it make sense to commission a similar poll in WV? JBK ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Caitlin Pixley <caitlin.pixley(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:52 PM Subject: Fwd: Test To: CONS-FRED(a)lists.sierraclub.org --------------------------- cc:Mail Users----------------------------- ** Remember to DELETE the 'Sender: ...' lines above before REPLYing ** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MS: Poll shows customer opposition to rate hikes via Kemper coal plant (Sierra Club) ( http://msbusiness.com/magnoliamarketplace/2013/01/30/sierra-club-poll-subst… ) The Sierra Club was supposed to release last Thursday the results of a poll meant to gauge Mississippi Power Co. ratepayers’ attitudes toward the Kemper County coal plant. The environmental group delayed the results because of a hearing in which the Mississippi Public Service Commission reached a rate case settlement with the utility. The delay ended Wednesday morning. The poll, conducted by Fondren Strategies, surveyed by landline and mobile telephone 400 respondents that a press release says were certified to be Mississippi Power customers. The results say 65 percent of those polled said the possibility of their electricity rates going up approximately 33 percent once the plant is finished erodes their support of the project. About 75 percent of respondents say cost overruns should be paid by utility shareholders. Mississippi Power has already filed to recover $172 million in financing costs associated with the project. The filing came one day after last week’s settlement, which lowered the maximum cost recoverable via PSC ratemaking proceedings from $2.88 billion to $2.4 billion. If the PSC grants the $172 million recovery request, Mississippi Power says rates will go up an average of 21 percent, starting in April and lasting through 2013, for customers who use an average of 1,000 kWh per month. The project’s overall rate impact, the company said on an analyst call Friday, will hover around 25 percent. The Sierra Club has opposed the plant since its inception in 2009, calling it an expensive and unnecessary environmental hazard. The club has called for the plant to be converted to a natural gas-fired facility, which it says is cleaner than the lignite coal the plant will eventually use. The project is on time for a May 2014 completion, Mississippi Power said recently. Sierra Club’s own press release can be found here ( http://content.sierraclub.org/press-releases/2013/01/new-poll-shows-ms-powe… ). Fondren Strategies interviewed 400 voters in MS from Jan. 14 – 17; MoE is +/- 4.9% points at the 95% CI -- Caitlin Pixley Conservation Associate Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter 353 Hamilton Street Albany, NY 12210 (518)426-9144 ( tel:%28518%29426-9144 ) caitlin.pixley(a)sierraclub.org Like us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/SierraClubAtlanticChapter - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the CONS-FRED list, send any message to: CONS-FRED-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp

1 0

Farewell, Don Gasper
by Frank Young 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

Don Gasper's personal warmth and his spirit of boundless pressure, applied endlessly, toward the goal of sane environmental stewardship policies will always be with us. Frank _____ From: wvec-board(a)yahoogroups.com [mailto:wvec-board@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of dsgjr(a)aol.com Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:56 AM To: wvec-board(a)yahoogroups.com Subject: [wvec-board] Farewell, Don Gasper My good friend and fishing buddy, Donald C. Gasper, died late last night, February 1st, at his home. He will be cremated and his ashes spread over at least one West Virginia stream that he loved so much. He told his family that he did not want a funeral or memorial service of any kind. But there may be a small private gathering of just family members. Rest in peace, my friend. Don Garvin __._,_.___ <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvec-board/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJxYmJmbm9uBF9TAzk3 MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTg0MDQxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTM2NTM5MgRtc2dJZAMzMTYxBHNlYwNm dHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTM1OTcyNjkzNQ--?act=reply&messageNum=3161> Reply via web post <mailto:DSGJr@aol.com?subject=Re%3A%20Farewell%2C%20Don%20Gasper> Reply to sender <mailto:wvec-board@yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Farewell%2C%20Don%20Gaspe r> Reply to group <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvec-board/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmNmNmbmRlBF9TAzk3 MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTg0MDQxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTM2NTM5MgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBj BHN0aW1lAzEzNTk3MjY5MzU-> Start a New Topic <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvec-board/message/3161;_ylc=X3oDMTM1bmo4anRh BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIxNTg0MDQxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTM2NTM5MgRtc2dJZAMzMTYx BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTM1OTcyNjkzNQR0cGNJZAMzMTYx> Messages in this topic (1) Recent Activity: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvec-board;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOWg5bmZjBF9TAzk3MzU5N zE0BGdycElkAzIxNTg0MDQxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTM2NTM5MgRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0a W1lAzEzNTk3MjY5MzU-> Visit Your Group <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlOXByZWhhBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIxN Tg0MDQxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTM2NTM5MgRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM1OTcyNjkzN Q--> Yahoo! Groups Switch to: <mailto:wvec-board-traditional@yahoogroups.com?subject=Change%20Delivery%20F ormat:%20Traditional> Text-Only, <mailto:wvec-board-digest@yahoogroups.com?subject=Email%20Delivery:%20Digest > Daily Digest . <mailto:wvec-board-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> Unsubscribe . <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Use . <mailto:ygroupsnotifications@yahoogroups.com?subject=Feedback%20on%20the%20r edesigned%20individual%20mail%20v1> Send us Feedback . <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=21584041/grpspId=1705365392/msgI d=3161/stime=1359726935/nc1=5898816/nc2=3848621/nc3=4025373> __,_._,___

1 0

Thursday - Thomas E. Lovejoy discusses Climate Change at WVU
by Jonathan Rosenbaum 30 Jan '13

30 Jan '13

Thomas E. Lovejoy will be lecturing at 11 a.m., Thursday, January 31, 2013 at the Marlyn E. Lugar Courtroom, WVU Law Center about Climate Change. There will be a live webcast at http://lawmediasite.wvu.edu/Mediasite/Catalog/catalogs/default . http://law.wvu.edu/lovejoy Along with Michael Brune, Thomas is one of the Climate Cabinet leaders for the Sierra Club's Climate Recovery Partnership: http://www.sierraclub.org/crp/leadership/cabinet.aspx Here is the press release: http://wvutoday.wvu.edu/n/2013/01/22/renowned-biologist-to-discuss-climate-… -Jonathan

1 0

Fracking rules in NC, and DEPs lawyers. (was: DAILY UPDATE 29 January 2013. News of interest to Mon river watershed denizens.
by James Kotcon 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

Two stories out today. Note the tracers in NC. I am not sure we will be ready for legislation this year, but this should remain a priority. JBK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mall, Amy" <amall(a)nrdc.org> To: "cog" <cog(a)lists.earthworksaction.org> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 9:34 AM Subject: [COG] North Carolina: Fracking board set to propose nation's toughest rules Fracking board set to propose nation's toughest rules By John Murawski - jmurawski(a)newsobserver.com<mailto:jmurawski@newsobserver.com ( mailto:jmurawski@newsobserver.com%3Cmailto:jmurawski@newsobserver.com )> Published in: Business North Carolina’s fracking board is considering what its members say would be among the nation’s strictest rules governing shale gas exploration as the panel delves into the arcana of updating the state’s 1940s-era energy regulations. The N.C. Mining & Energy Commission completed two days of meetings Friday and expects to continue discussions in March about requirements for chemical disclosures, water testing and wastewater disposal by exploration and drilling companies. Those have been some of the most contentious issues related to fracking in other states, where the practice has been blamed for drinking water contamination, chemical spills and other problems. Commissioner George Howard said the board could vote as early as March 8 on the first of the proposed rules, but other members said they’re not that optimistic they will be ready. “We’re trying to come up with the toughest reasonable laws,” Howard said. “We’re cherry-picking the best laws out there.” The commission, formed last summer by the state legislature, is still getting its sea legs on the issue. During Friday’s public meeting, several members spent more than a half-hour in a meandering discussion about the uneven quality of media coverage of their work and about whether they should hire a press secretary. Several voiced frustration about uninformed, emotional comments from the public at previous workshops. No members of the public made comments Friday. Fracking is an industry term for hydraulic fracturing of shale rock with high pressure water and chemicals to release natural gas trapped inside the prehistoric formations. The technology remains controversial and won’t be legal in this state until the commission writes about 100 regulations to govern the practice, and the state legislature signs off on the regulatory program. The commission has a deadline of October 2014 to complete its task. It will develop rules on well casings and property owners’ rights, among a host of legal and environmental issues. A similar process in New York state took about three years. That state currently has a moratorium on fracking. The board has begun discussing what its members say would be the most stringent standard in the nation for well water testing before drilling and fracking could get under way. It is proposing that a drilling company, at its own expense, test every water source within 5,000 feet of a natural gas wellhead. Other states generally require testing within 1,000 or 2,000 feet, said Hannah Wiseman, a law professor at Florida State University who tracks fracking laws and rules. North Carolina’s testing standard, if approved, would require drillers to test about a dozen wells, based on well density averages in northwestern Lee County, which is believed to be the epicenter of the state’s shale gas reserves. A thorough laboratory water content analysis could cost more than $2,000 per well, said Melinda Chapman, a hydrologist with the U.S. Geological Survey’s Raleigh office. The agency tested 56 local private wells last year and had to use eight different labs to analyze the water samples. Commissioner Amy Pickle said the 5,000-foot testing distance is just one of several factors. Another important issue the commission will have to decide is what constituents it will require testing for. Commissioner Howard said the board also will discuss injecting tracers into fracked gas wells to help determine whether the wells are leaking chemicals and methane gas. He said the commission is guided by the state law passed last summer that holds drillers responsible for any water contamination within 5,000 feet of a wellhead unless they can prove otherwise. “The beauty of a presumptive liability law is that it protects companies from paying for bad water they didn’t cause,” Duke University environmental scientist Robert Jackson said. “It protects homeowners in case their water quality changes.” Duke University also has tested about 55 private wells in Lee County to establish baseline quality measures. Duke’s testing analyzes the presence of such metals as boron and arsenic, salts and methane gas, such chemicals as benzene and toluene, as well as radioactive elements. These are elements that are either injected into wells during fracking, or elements agitated underground during the process and liable to flush out of the well over time. Energy law firm picks up DEP’s senior counsel Posted: Jan 28, 2013 10:07 AM EST Updated: Jan 28, 2013 10:16 AM EST By Taylor Kuykendall, Reporter The senior counsel for the Department of Environmental Protection has been hired by business law firm Lewis Glasser Casey & Rollins PLLC. According to a news release from the law firm, Joseph Jenkins, as senior counsel at the DEP, has successfully defended a challenge to state notice, comment and appeal procedures for oil and gas well permits and was actively involved in defending challenges to surface mining and pollution discharge permits issued by the agency. "As one of the premier energy law firms in the Appalachian Basin, we wanted to enhance Lewis Glasser's full-service capabilities with Joe's unique environmental law and regulatory knowledge," said Nick Casey, managing member. "Joe's background in regulatory matters, litigation and legislative rule-making will serve our clients well." Jenkins also served as counsel to the West Virginia Senate Committees on Energy, Industry and Mining and Transportation and Infrastructure during the 2011 Legislative Session. The law firm said it is expanding its energy practice, particularly in the natural gas sector. "Joseph has joined the firm as an associate, and his practice focuses mainly on energy and natural resources law, environmental law, legislation, rule-making and litigation with an emphasis in oil and natural gas, mining and quarrying, including SMCRA, Clean Water Act and state and federal environmental permitting, compliance and enforcement," the news release stated. The firm also "maintains an active government relations practice" through LGCR Government Solutions LLC. The firm has offices in Charleston, Morgantown and Ohio.

2 1

Re: [EC] Fwd: Gen Transfer Case --- Power Plant Visits
by James Kotcon 28 Jan '13

28 Jan '13

Anyone interested? This is a great opportunity for a new volunteer to learn about these plants, just wander along and listen to PSC Staff and FE people ask and answer questions. No time is listed, but I suspect it would be mid-day-ish, and you would want to contact Gary Jack (below) to confirm time and directions. Jim Kotcon >>> Mark Kresowik <mark.kresowik(a)sierraclub.org> 1/25/2013 4:25 PM >>> I think it'd be a good idea to have someone there.On Jan 25, 2013 4:23 PM, "Zachary Fabish" <zachary.fabish(a)sierraclub.org> wrote: See below. Anybody interested in visiting the plants? -Zack ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <gjack(a)firstenergycorp.com> Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:16 PM Subject: Gen Transfer Case --- Power Plant Visits To: jauville(a)psc.state.wv.us, william.depaulo(a)gmail.com, jroberts(a)cad.state.wv.us, sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com, pmaroney(a)mwwplaw.com, scott.j.rubin(a)gmail.com, zachary.fabish(a)sierraclub.org, mbecher(a)appalmad.org, dhanna(a)hannalawpllc.com, dwilliamson(a)spilmanlaw.com Cc: ccallas(a)jacksonkelly.com, gblanke(a)firstenergycorp.com All: PSC Staff engineers have requested we arrange power plant visits for them at Pleasants and Harrison. We have arranged to have power plant tours for Pleasants on Wednesday, January 30th and for Harrison on Monday February 4. Anyone else is welcome to attend. If you plan to attend, please let me know. Thanks. Gary A. Jack Senior Corporate Counsel FirstEnergy 5001 NASA Blvd. Fairmont, WV 26554 Phone: 304-534-7409 ( tel:304-534-7409 ) Internal: 333-7409 ----------------------------------------- The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message. -- Zachary M. Fabish Staff Attorney 50 F Street, NW - 8th Floor Washington, DC 20001 (202) 675-7917 (202) 547-6009 (fax) zachary.fabish(a)sierraclub.org CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION/WORK PRODUCT This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential attorney-client communications and/or confidential attorney work product. If you receive this e-mail inadvertently, please notify me and delete all versions on your system. Thank you.

4 4

Chapter Energy Committee Update
by James Kotcon 25 Jan '13

25 Jan '13

To the Energy Committee Please pardon any duplicate messages. We currently have this address for you as part of our Energy committee list, but it is a new year and time to update our Committee roster. If you are interested in continuing to be active on the Chapter Energy Committee, please respond affirmatively. We also would like contact info and a phone number for more urgent actions. If you can not commit to an active role tight now, please let us know that too. The Chapter is launching a major campaign on energy efficiency, and we will be calling on active members to write letters, make phone calls, and meet with public officials to encourage more energy efficiency in west Virginia. Right now, we have a target of opportunity with state utilities who have filed petitions with the WV Public Service Commission to acquire some used coal-fired power plants from Ohio affiliates (total cost ~$2.5 billion). We will be urging people to ask that the PSC require the utilities invest in energy efficiency instead of more coal-fired power plants. So West Virginia is facing a choice in the next couple months between continued intensification of our reliance on coal versus shifting toward a clean, energy efficient future. An Energy Committee conference call will be held next Thursday, Jan. 31, at 7 PM and we would like to get all active members of the committee to join in to help plan and execute this campaign. Jim Kotcon Chapter Conservation Chair 304-293-8822 (office) 304-594-3322 (home)

2 1

from Center for Media and Democracy: Fracking Industry Goes After Promised Land Film
by Paul Wilson 24 Jan '13

24 Jan '13

Fracking Industry Goes After Promised Land Film [image: Image of Promised Land poster]Before Gus Van Sant's latest film Promised Land even premiered, the energy industry was up in arms, gearing up to counter the film's apparent anti-fracking stance with a barrage of "community" responses (read: thinly veiled corporate PR). James Schamus, chief executive of Focus Features the distributor of the film, expressed shock about the attacks on Promised Land: "We've been surprised at the emergence of what looks like a concerted campaign targeting the film even before anyone's seen it." With blogs, astroturf websites, Facebook pages, internet ads, and theater ad buys in advance of the movie, the industry is working hard to spin the conversation in a more fracking-friendly direction. Read more<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=nUCyXR%2FfF%2BEo45Pb…> -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

2 1

from ScienceDaily e-newsletter: Analysis of fracking wastewater yields some surprises
by Paul Wilson 23 Jan '13

23 Jan '13

Analysis of fracking wastewater yields some surprises<http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_environment/~3/U96…> Posted: 22 Jan 2013 07:21 AM PST Hydraulically fractured natural gas wells are producing less wastewater per unit of gas recovered than conventional wells would. But the scale of fracking operations in the Marcellus shale region is so vast that the wastewater it produces threatens to overwhelm the region's wastewater disposal capacity, according to new analysis. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-1361 "There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha "In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle

1 0

Fwd: Take Action: Tell Dept. of Energy to take a time out on LNG exports!
by James Kotcon 22 Jan '13

22 Jan '13

In addition to the LNG export sign-on letter, i urge each of you to comment individually. Click below. Jim Kotcon >>> Deb Nardone <deb.nardone(a)sierraclub.org> 1/17/2013 3:15 PM >>> Team WV, An extremely important deadline is approaching. With the Dept. of Energy (DOE) considering exporting up to 40% of current US gas production through 19 different LNG export terminals, your voice couldn't be more important than now. Exporting even a fraction of that gas will have significant negative impact on our communities, the environment, and our climate. Yet, DOE has failed to seriously analyze these impacts. With the most recent economic study being completed, DOE is now accepting comment on this seriously flawed report, which fails to consider the lasting impacts exports will cause. Please consider taking action, then help spread the word! We have until January 24th to flood the Dept. of Energy with comments. Thank you for all you do! Deb TAKE ACTION LINK Dear Friend, Tell DOE Secretary Chu to go back to the drawing board and look at how exporting fracked gas could hurt our communities. Would you hire a consulting firm with strong fossil fuel industry ties to study whether or not exporting fracked gas is a good idea? The Department of Energy (DOE) did just that, and you probably won't be surprised by the industry-friendly results. This report has more holes than a block of swiss cheese, focusing on how the natural gas industry and the wealthiest people in our country will profit. The costs to our communities -- air and water pollution, environmental destruction, lost jobs, climate disruption and even increased energy costs -- are completely ignored or dismissed as unimportant to big business. Will you help get 10,000 letters by Friday to DOE Secretary Steven Chu telling him he needs to look at the full effects on our communities before any decision can be made? Send your letter today. Tell Secretary Chu not to make any decisions about the future of exporting fracked gas without looking at the whole picture. If Secretary Chu plans to consider exporting natural gas, then we deserve a study with the real numbers, the real costs, and all of the real facts. Allowing the natural gas industry to frack even more and export this fossil fuel without considering the harm to our communities is unacceptable. Tell Secretary Chu you want the real story about how more fracking and exporting natural gas will impact you and your community. Thanks for all you do to protect the environment, Deb Nardone Director, Beyond Natural Gas Campaign Sierra Club P.S. Please share this email with friends and family, and help get 10,000 letters to Sec. Chu by Friday! -- Deborah J. Nardone, Director Beyond Natural Gas Campaign Sierra Club O: 814-308-9767 C: 814-932-6668 -- Deborah J. Nardone, Director Beyond Natural Gas Campaign Sierra Club O: 814-308-9767 C: 814-932-6668

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

EC