This is likely to be the key to our strategy for the IRP, the CPP and
energy policy in WV generally. While renewables are cost competitive for
new generation, they do not yet compete with old plants that have been
mostly paid off. To close these existing facilities, we need to reduce
overall demand quickly, and that is what the big utilities are afraid of.
Read the report, Click on the webinar. This is the stuff we need to know.
Jim Kotcon
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ned Ford <Ned.Ford(a)fuse.net>
Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:14 PM
Subject: [GW-ACT-LEADERS] Fwd: The Next Quantum Leap in Energy Efficiency
To: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS(a)lists.sierraclub.org
This report by some old friends (The Quantum Leap) addresses how to raise
efficiency standards above 2% per year. This goal is an essential
component of a strategy which can still, at this date, eliminate fossil
fuel generation by about 2030.
Without the efficiency savings, the cost of renewables is a high barrier,
since what we want is not just renewables at parity with fossil generation
(we already have that) but new capital investment to replace existing fully
amortized coal, gas and nuclear plants at a rate which hasn't existed in
this country since the 1960's. And on a much larger scale than the coal
rush in the 1940-1970 era.
This report may be useful in regulatory work, but it is certainly a great
place to start a conversation about how we cut carbon as fast as possible.
- Ned
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: The Next Quantum Leap in Energy Efficiency
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:26:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Regulatory Assistance Project <info(a)raponline.org>
<info(a)raponline.org>
Reply-To: info(a)raponline.org
To: ned.ford(a)fuse.net
Can't read or see images? View this email in a browser
<http://zc1.campaign-view.com/ua/viewinbrowser?od=11287eca45b58a&rd=18d88732…>
[image: RAP Newsletter Heading]
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
*Energy Solutions for a Changing World*
*The Next Quantum Leap in*
*Energy Efficiency - Game On*
*-David Farnsworth*
Ten years ago, the most aggressive electric efficiency efforts in the
country were achieving first-year electric savings of about 1.0 percent of
annual sales.
Today, at least five different states have—or plan to—double those levels
of savings, achieving between 2.0 and 2.5 percent first-year savings
annually. Since 2006, nationwide customer efficiency spending has nearly
quadrupled, from $1.6 to $5.9 billion, and substantial additional savings
have been realized through federal equipment efficiency standards, building
codes, and other regulatory mechanisms.
By many measures, we have made solid progress on energy efficiency over the
last decade. But there continues to be room for more of this low-cost,
high-benefit resource.
“It looks like many states are getting the message,” says Rich Sedano, RAP
principal and US program director. “Every state may want to take a fresh
look at the possibilities for upping their game on energy efficiency—there
continues to be considerable space to grow.”
We at RAP think that the efficiency bar could be raised substantially. In
our recent paper, *The Next Quantum Leap in Efficiency: 30 Percent Electric
Savings in 10 Years*
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>,
we examine whether it would be possible to meet 30 percent of electricity
system needs in ten years with efficiency.
Continue Reading
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
------------------------------
*Webinar: The Energy Efficiency Quantum Leap *
A recent RAP webinar explores the next quantum leap in efficiency savings.
Chris Neme of Energy Futures Group (EFG) shared the findings of a study
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
(mentioned above) he co-wrote with Jim Grevatt for RAP demonstrating how
states can achieve persistent savings of 30 percent of load over ten years.
This quantum leap in efficiency cannot be brought about without major
policy changes, including increasing ratepayer funding of energy
efficiency, making efficiency more profitable for utilities, aligning
efficiency goals with long-term objectives, and creating new models for
acquiring efficiency.
View Webinar
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
------------------------------
*Recognizing Early Action Under The Clean Power Plan*
*-Ken Colburn*
Data suggest that the electric power sector’s long march toward
decarbonization
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
was already well underway before the EPA’s Clean Power Plan (CPP)
rulemaking, let alone the final rule’s compliance period, which doesn’t
begin until 2022. If so, then the emissions reduction obligations imposed
by the CPP might be characterized as consistent with the dramatic changes
already underway within the power sector as much as they are a driver of
those changes. This is an encouraging characterization, because it suggests
that compliance with the CPP is likely to be accomplished without departing
greatly from the utility resource planning and state policy pathways
already in motion. Some are concerned, however, that the CPP could
temporarily slow the adoption of cleaner, more renewable energy sources and
more efficient end-use of energy.
Continue Reading
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
------------------------------
*Webinars*
------------------------------
*Teaching the Duck to Fly - Second Edition *
March 3, 2016
1 p.m. EST
Join us for a webinar
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
where Jim Lazar shares new insights on opportunities that have arisen and
technologies that have evolved since his 2014 paper *Teaching the Duck to
Fly
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>.
*Drawing
from the soon-to-be-released *Teaching the Duck to Fly - Second Edition*,
Mr. Lazar will discuss each of the strategies, how they can be deployed and
managed, and how each affects the load shape that remains, thus
demonstrating that the amount of flexibility they can provide has
increased. Together, these measures enable utilities to adapt to a supply
portfolio containing a high level of variable renewable energy resources
and still provide adequate, reliable, and economical service to consumers.
Register Now
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
------------------------------
*RAP in Action*
------------------------------
Ken Colburn discusses energy efficiency and state planning requirements
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
during a panel about the Clean Power Plan at the Association of Energy
Services Professionals' National Conference and Expo
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
in Phoenix.
RAP staff will be attending the 2016 Winter Committee Meetings of the
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
in Washington, DC, later this month. Find us in the halls, and be sure to
stop by our table and pick up copies of our publications, including two
hot-off-the-press reports, *The Next Quantum Leap in Efficiency: 30 Percent
Electric Savings in 10 Years*
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>,
and *Teaching the Duck to Fly – Second Edition*. Hope to see you there!
In early March, Chris James will highlight the role of markets for clean
energy
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
under
the Clean Power Plan at the Climate Leadership Conference in Seattle
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
.
------------------------------
*Global Highlights*
------------------------------
Demand response is important for Europe to meet clean energy targets
reliably and efficiently
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>,
according to a new RAP policy brief.
------------------------------
Manage your Subscription
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/click.zc?od=11287eca45b58a&repDgs=18d88732ee…>
This email was sent by info(a)raponline.org to ned.ford(a)fuse.net
Not interested? Unsubscribe
<http://zc1.maillist-manage.com/ua/optout?od=11287eca45b58a&rd=18d88732ee12d…>
Regulatory Assistance Project | 50 State Street, Suite 3 | Montpelier VT
05602
<http://www.raponline.org>www.raponline.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To
unsubscribe from the CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS list, send any message to:
CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out
our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq
Wow, I knew they were big. But this is bigger than I thought.
JBK
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Glen Besa <glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org>
Date: Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:53 PM
Subject: FYI If your chapter is fighting gas pipelines, ...
To: CONS-FRED(a)lists.sierraclub.org
Find report here: Report on climate impacts of pipelines
<http://sierraclub.org/sites/www.sierraclub.org/files/sce/virginia-chapter/d…>
For Immediate Release
January 28, 2016
CONTACT: Glen Besa 804-387-6001
*Climate Disrupting Pollution from Atlantic Coast and *
*Mountain Valley Pipelines nearly twice that of Virginia power plants and
other stationary sources*
A new report by the Sierra Club finds that greenhouse gas pollution from
the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines would be almost twice the
total climate-changing emissions from existing power plants and other
stationary sources in Virginia.
The report, prepared by Richard Ball, PhD., a retired US EPA and DOE
scientist who served as a lead author on the First and Second
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessments and is the Energy
Chair for the Sierra Club Virginia Chapter, estimates total carbon dioxide
gas equivalent from each of the two pipelines over the natural gas fuel
cycle, including fugitive emissions of methane from fracking in the gas
fields, leakage during transmission and storage, and combustion of the
delivered gas. It also shows the estimated planetary heating from all four
proposed pipelines for Virginia.
Last week, the US EPA urged the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
to require applicants for new pipelines to assess a project’s indirect
impacts, including potential increases in gas production and greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions[1]. “Our report provides an assessment of the greenhouse
gas emissions of the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley Pipelines as the
EPA suggests,” said Dr. Ball. “We urge FERC to consider this report and to
require the pipeline developers to address climate concerns in a
programmatic environmental impact statement that takes a comprehensive look
at impacts from all proposed new or expanded pipelines.”
“Statements made by gas industry executives and public officials, including
Governor McAuliffe, that natural gas is a clean fuel ignore the significant
climate impact of increased reliance on gas,” said Kirk Bowers, an
organizer for the Sierra Club working with communities opposing the new
natural gas pipelines in Virginia and West Virginia.
The report’s emission estimates from production and processing operations,
including fracking, are based on a 2013 published analysis by Laurenzi and
Jersey, researchers with ExxonMobil. Total pipeline emission estimates in
the report include production and processing as well transmission and
storage, and combustion of the delivered gas.
In addition to emitting large amounts of CO2 when burned, natural gas is a
major contributor to climate change in the extraction and transmission
stages, where significant amounts of methane escape from wells and pipeline
leaks. Methane is a much more powerful greenhouse gas than CO2, and these
“fugitive emissions” of methane have emerged as an area of serious concern
that undercuts the case for natural gas as a cleaner substitute for coal.
“Natural gas only seems like a cheap and easy fix for climate change,” said
Glen Besa, Director of the Sierra Club Virginia Chapter, “In reality,
methane pollution is a serious problem that makes natural gas a dead-end
solution. We have to stop kidding ourselves. Virginia should be investing
in wind and solar and energy efficiency, not expanding infrastructure for
more fossil fuel burning.”
The lowest estimates of greenhouse gas emissions for Atlantic Coast
Pipeline at 40.7 million metric tons per year (MMT/yr) are more than 5
times the annual carbon pollution from Dominion’s Chesterfield Power
Station (7.2 MMT/yr), the largest coal fired plant in Virginia, and equal
to more than 80% of the total carbon pollution (49.4 MMT) from all 177
stationary sources in the EPA’s 2014 inventory of GHG emissions in Virginia
[2]. The larger capacity Mountain Valley Pipeline’s total emissions of
54.3 MMT/yr would be 7.5 times the emissions of Dominion’s Chesterfield
Power Station and actually exceed the total 2014 emissions from all of
Virginia’s stationary sources as estimated in the EPA’s 2014 inventory.
*If both the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines were to be built,
their combined climate disrupting pollution would total 192%, of the
emissions from Virginia’s existing power plants and other stationary
sources.* Emissions from the other two proposed pipelines, the WB Xpress
and the Appalachian Connector, would nearly double the total emissions from
the ACP and MVP for a total of 185 MMT CO2eq at a GWP of 25 in the base
case, the ExxonMobil rates, or 3.7 times the EPA GHGRP (stationary source
inventory) total for Virginia. These comparisons illustrate the magnitude
of the pollution these pipelines would generate; however, actual pollution
from these pipelines would also occur in West Virginia where the natural
gas is produced by fracking and in North Carolina as well as Virginia where
the gas would be burned.
“There are more immediate and familiar concerns with these pipelines
including property rights and water pollution,” said Besa, “but climate
change impacts should be considered by FERC particularly in light of the
recent Paris agreement committing the United States to reducing our total
emissions of greenhouse gas pollution.”
XXX
*Richard Ball has a Ph.D. in physics and worked on scientific research on
the planet Earth and on energy issues for 10 years at the Rand Corp. He
has 27 years’ experience working on energy policy and technology analysis,
atmospheric science of acid precipitation, and climate science at the
U.S.EPA and the U.S. Dept. of Energy, including serving as a lead author on
the First and Second IPCC assessments of climate change. Now retired, Dr.
Ball serves as volunteer Chair of the Sierra Club Virginia Chapter's Energy
Committee.*
------------------------------
[1] FERC Should Review Indirect Impacts, GHG Emissions From NatGas
Projects, EPA Says, NGI’s Shale Daily, Jan 21, 2016;
http://www.naturalgasintel.com/articles/105081-ferc-should-review-indirect-…
[2] EPA’s “Flight database” from its Greenhouse Gas Reporting system.
http://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do
Glen Besa, Director
Sierra Club-Virginia Chapter
422 E. Franklin St, Suite 302
Richmond, VA 23219
glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org
P-804-387-6001
F-804-225-9114
Web: sierraclub.org/virginia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To
unsubscribe from the CONS-FRED list, send any message to:
CONS-FRED-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our Listserv Lists
support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq To
view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see:
http://www.sierraclub.org/terms
Pretty good into to coal bankruptcies. This will be the emerging coal
issue of 2016, so we will want to know something about it.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/01/28/1476412/-Coal-Bankruptcy-101-Compa…
JBK
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Heather Moyer <heather.moyer(a)sierraclub.org>
Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM
Subject: [Coal Volunteers List] Mary Anne Hitt's latest: Coal bankruptcies
leaving workers, communities behind
To: #Coal <coal-list(a)sierraclub.org>, #Coal-Volunteers <
coal-volunteers-list(a)sierraclub.org>, #Media <media-list(a)sierraclub.org>
Hi friends-
Beyond Coal director Mary Anne Hitt's latest column is now live. It's a
great piece penned with attorney Peter Morgan about how coal companies that
are going bankrupt are leaving many in the lurch, esp as company execs gets
millions in bonuses.
*Retweet:*
https://twitter.com/sierraclub/status/692805692202336257
*Possible Tweets:*
Coal Bankruptcy 101: Companies Are Leaving Workers & Communities In the
Lurch bit.ly/23wnflZ <https://t.co/1xiVMqxngw>
Coal bankruptcy 101: Give execs millions in bonuses, leave workers &
communities in the lurch bit.ly/23wnflZ <https://t.co/1xiVMqxngw>
*LINKS*
*Compass:* bit.ly/23wnflZ <https://t.co/1xiVMqxngw>
*Daily Kos: *
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/01/28/1476412/-Coal-Bankruptcy-101-Compa…
*Huffington Post:*
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-anne-hitt/coal-bankruptcy-101-compa_b_91…
--------
*Social media question or request? Please email social-list(a)sierraclub.org
<social-list(a)sierraclub.org>*
*Heather Moyer*
Senior Content Producer
202-675-6276
Sierra Club
50 F Street, 8th Floor
Washington, DC 20001
--
To access the Beyond Coal Campaign Resource Portal, go to:
https://sites.google.com/a/sierraclub.org/beyond-coal-resource-portal/
To sign up for this list, email neha.mathew(a)sierraclub.org with the subject
and message "SUBSCRIBE #coal-volunteer"
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"#Coal-Volunteers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to coal-volunteers-list+unsubscribe(a)sierraclub.org.
To post to this group, send email to coal-volunteers-list(a)sierraclub.org.