[image: Moneybox] <http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox.html>
A blog about business and economics.
Feb. 23 2015 12:42 PM
The Solar Business Now Employs More Americans Than Coal Mining
By Jordan Weissmann <http://www.slate.com/authors.jordan_weissmann.html>
[image: 104627690-woker-finishes-installing-solar-panels-funded-by] *You
know what this guy isn't going to get? Black lung.*
My colleague Dan Gross has a great piece
<http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_juice/2015/02/apple_kaiser_perma…>
on
*Slate* about the green energy business' latest coup: Companies like Apple
are now buying mass quantities of solar power, as its production costs have
fallen far enough in some regions to compete economically with fossil
fuels. This, of course, bodes well for the future of renewables; it's one
thing when local governments start purchasing solar- or wind-generated
electricity as a political gesture; it's a whole other when the private
sector jumps on board for the sake of dollars and cents.
Anyway, Dan's article reminded me of a cool tidbit I noticed in last
week's Economic
Report of the President
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/cea_2015_erp.pdf>:
While solar may just be gaining traction with corporate America, by some
measures it already employs more workers than coal mining.
Here's the story in two graphs from the White House. First the decline of
big coal, which according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics directly
employs about 80,000 workers these days.
[image: pres_coal_oil_1]
Economic Report of the President
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/cea_2015_erp.pdf>
And now, the rise of solar. While BLS doesn't break out data for the
industry, the Solar Foundation conducts a censuslike survey of employers to
track employment trends. As of now, it counts almost 174,000 workers
<http://www.thesolarfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Factsheet-Nati…>
.
[image: pres_solar]
You can argue about whether this specific comparison is fair since, as
PolitiFact has reported
<http://www.politifact.com/rhode-island/statements/2014/jul/06/sheldon-white…>,
other organizations have estimated much higher levels of coal industry
employment. A survey by the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration, for
instance, reports that there are more than 123,000 coal workers if you
include contractors at mines. Add in transportation jobs, such as the hands
who move coal on rail or barges, and the National Mining Association says
the industry directly employees some 195,000 Americans.
Which number should we rely on? Its a little tough to say. Contractors at
mines should obviously be counted. Transport workers are a little trickier,
since many of them might still be working if, say, their railroad retooled
in order to ship other kinds of freight. But even if you give the
trade-group figures the benefit of the doubt, and concede that coal
currently supports more jobs than solar, that could change by next year: The
Solar Foundation projects
<http://www.thesolarfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Factsheet-Nati…>
industry employment will grow to 210,000 by the end of 2015.
Whether that's sustainable is an open question. Most solar workers are
hired to do installations. Presumably, as solar's growth rate slows down at
some point in the future, some of those jobs will naturally disappear. And, as
*Grist* notes <http://grist.org/climate-energy/solar-coal-economy-jobs/>,
that day could come sooner rather than later, as an important federal tax
credit for renewables is scheduled to expire in 2017. So, from an
employment perspective, coal may have a built-in advantage—you need workers
to constantly dig more of it out of the ground to burn. Of course, that's
also coal's biggest problem.
http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/02/06/u-s-coal-producers/
U.S. Coal Producers Facing Unprecedented Times
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/02/06/u-s-coal-producers/>*Published
Fri, Feb 6, 2015 * | Tim Maverick
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/author/tim-maverick/>, *Commodities
Correspondent*
[image: Print This Post]
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/02/06/u-s-coal-producers/print/> [image:
Email This Post]
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/02/06/u-s-coal-producers/email/>
[image: U.S. Coal Producers Facing Unprecidented Times]
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/02/06/u-s-coal-producers/>
While oil is grabbing all the headlines lately, another fuel used to
generate heat and light has tumbled even more than the black gold.
Global thermal coal prices have tumbled 52% since 2011 alone. And the rout
shows no signs of abating with global seaborne thermal prices hitting $62
per metric ton (mt) recently.
The reason behind coal’s fall is the same as oil’s – the shale revolution
led to a surplus of thermal coal globally, just as demand from China and
India started weakening.
And like oil, producers around the world are ramping up production, even as
prices fall for the fifth year in a row!
The strategy is similar to OPEC’s – the lowest-cost coal producers around
the world are trying to drive the higher-cost producers out of business.
Black Cloud Engulfing U.S. Coal
Also as with oil, some of the thermal coal producers in the most trouble
are right here in the United States. Thermal or steam coal accounts for
over 90% of all domestic coal output.
The CEO of *Alpha Natural Resources *(ANR
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ANR&ql=0>), Kevin Crutchfield, said the
conditions facing the U.S. industry are “unprecedented.”
In a similar vein, Greg Boyce, CEO of *Peabody Energy *(BTU
<http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BTU&ql=0>), the largest U.S. coal producer,
said conditions were “challenging.”
And these executives are not exaggerating…
U.S. thermal coal prices are at six-year lows, and Appalachian coal
recently hit $45.75 per ton, down from more than $56 a ton a year ago. That
isn’t far from the $42.20 per ton price hit in the depths of the financial
crisis in April 2009.
The downturn in domestic demand for coal has been accelerated by the 44%
drop in natural gas prices since June. This pushed many utilities, looking
to save money, to switch from coal.
Exports, which have been a strength the past few years, are also being
affected by the aforementioned global glut in thermal coal.
Plus, U.S. coal producers are being socked from an unexpected direction
too. You see, financial pressure on Russia is forcing the value of the
ruble done, which has turned Russia into a competitive low-cost coal
producer.
These unprecedented conditions can be clearly seen in the price actions of
the U.S. coal company stocks.
Collapsing Under the Weight
In the past five years, Peabody has lost 87% of its value, Alpha 98%, and *Arch
Coal *(ACI <http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ACI&ql=0>) 96%. And in the last
six months, Peabody is down 59%, while both Alpha and Arch are both down
69%.
The stocks have plunged because the financials aren’t pretty.
For example, Peabody recently reported an after-tax loss of $787 million
for 2014 and slashed its quarterly dividend by 97% to $0.0025 a share. And
its operating cash flow of $337 million was less than its interest payment
of $414 million, according to the *Financial Times*.
Yes, the future for U.S. coal companies looks bleak as conditions continue
to worsen, including regulatory pressure from the Obama administration.
Unfortunately, exports will not be a salvation.
China seems to be serious about cutting pollution coming from coal plants.
In fact, many industry observers think we may soon reach peak coal demand
in China. Imports of foreign coal into China fell by 11% last year to 292
million mt, says *Bloomberg*. And Chinese consumption of seaborne coal is
expected to fall another 9% to 195 million mt this year.
So what is the likely end result for U.S. coal producers?
As Nomura analyst Curt Woodworth told the *Financial Times*, “I think
you’re going to see multiple bankruptcies in U.S. coal over the next 12 to
18 months.”
However, that does not mean all U.S. coal firms are headed for the dust bin
of history.
Peabody has seen some insider buying, and it has more higher-quality assets
around the globe, including in Australia, than its peers. So at least it
looks to be a survivor.
And the chase continues,
Tim Maverick
Tim Maverick boasts decades of experience in the investment world. He spent
20 years at a major brokerage firm - as a trading supervisor and broker
working directly with clients. *Learn More >>
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/author/tim-maverick/>*
<https://www.facebook.com/WallStreetDaily>
<https://twitter.com/TimMaverickWSD>
<https://plus.google.com/104571546762047448905/posts>
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/02/04/sugar-bear-market/>
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/01/13/a-change-to-your-subscription/>
<http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/01/14/copper-prices-deficit/>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"kfc-organizers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to kfc-organizers+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to kfc-organizers(a)googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Energy & Environment
<http://www.nytimes.com/pages/business/energy-environment/index.html>
FEB. 2, 2015
Lower Oil Prices Strike at Heart of Canada’s Oil Sands Production
By IAN AUSTEN
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/a/ian_austen/ind…>
OTTAWA — For as long as 400-ton dump trucks have been rumbling around the
open pit mines of Canada
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/ca…>’s
oil sands
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/o/oil_petroleu…>,
crews from Kal Tire have been on hand to replace and repair their $70,000,
13-foot diameter tires.
But the relationship, going back over a decade, didn’t spare the company
when oil
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/oil-petroleu…>
prices began plummeting.
Dan Allan, the senior vice president of Kal’s mining tire unit, said that
customers immediately began looking for price concessions. Others asked Kal
to withdraw personnel from some sites or swiftly canceled plans to add more
maintenance crews.
“We’re sort of caught at the sharp end of the spear,” said Mr. Allan, who
is now looking to relocate some employees. “It’s really difficult.”
Canada’s oil sands
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/o/oil_petroleu…>
— and the 167 billion barrels of reserves — prompted an unprecedented
expansion over the last decade. But the roughly $155 billion spending spree
left the industry with unusually high production costs.
Now, oil sands operators are scrambling to limit the damage, as crude
prices hover near seven-year lows
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/13/business/energy-environment/oil-prices.ht…>
.
Photo
An oil sands operation near Fort McMurray, Alberta, last September.
Production costs are high in the oil sands, and low oil prices are a threat
to profitability. Credit Todd Korol/Reuters
Suncor, the largest oil sands operator, announced plans to eliminate about
1,000 contract jobs. Shell Canada said it would cut its oil sands work
force by about 10 percent. Cenovus Energy said that it would reduce
investment spending by 27 percent, and set aside plans for two oil sands
project expansions.
A camp for workers in Northern Alberta, the heart of the oil sands, was
permanently closed and another was temporarily shut. Several proposed oil
sands projects and expansions are under review or have been deferred.
The cuts, though, won’t necessarily translate into lower production. Oil
sands production is expected to increase by 25 percent, to 4.8 million
barrels a day, according to January estimates by the Canadian Association
of Petroleum Producers, partly because of new projects moving into
production.
The enormous projects are just too difficult to switch off, and the
companies must keep pumping crude to cover the sizable debt on their
multibillion-dollar investments. They also don’t want to cede market share
to producers in other countries.
Imperial Oil, which is controlled by Exxon Mobil, said on Monday that
fourth-quarter earnings dropped by 36 percent. Even so, the company plans
to start production at two new oil sands projects this year.
“It really makes no economic sense to bring down production at this point
because most of the costs are sunk,” said Stewart Glickman, an energy
equity analyst with S&P Capital IQ Equity.
While production may keep humming along, the big question is whether oil
sands producers can break even at current prices.
An oil sands project takes five to 10 years to design and build, and they
have a life span of 25 to 50 years. Fort Hills, a project now under
construction in a partnership led by Suncor, has a budget of 13.5 billion
Canadian dollars (about $10.7 billion).
Once such projects are up and running, the expenses are significant, given
the process needed to get the oil
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/oil-petroleu…>-laden
bitumen from the ground. It must either be dug up or blasted from under the
ground using steam. Two energy-hungry steps are then needed to separate the
bitumen from the sand and to turn it into usable oil known as synthetic
crude.
A frequently cited study
<http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/221135.pdf>
prepared for the United States State Department’s review of the Keystone XL
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/k/keystone_pip…>
pipeline estimated that many oil sands projects become unprofitable at
prices of $65 to $75 a barrel. Prices are now below $50.
But the State Department review, which was released in January 2014,
doesn’t necessarily account for the changing environment.
Andrew Leach, an economist and professor of energy policy at the University
of Alberta, said that the American figure inflated the break-even point by
including a 12 percent profit margin for oil producers. The drop in the
Canadian dollar has also provided an added cushion for domestic oil
companies that are paid for their products in the now more valuable
American currency.
When those factors are combined, Mr. Leach said, “you’re looking at a
reduction of the growth rate at current prices, a stall.” He estimates that
the production cost for synthetic crude from the major open pit mine
projects is $31 to $39 a barrel, at current exchange rates. He added,
though, that a few projects with production problems had much higher costs.
The industry thinking, he said, is, “I’m willing to burn through cash on
this project because in the long term it will be worth it.”
As a result, most oil sands operators are reviewing future projects rather
than considering production cuts or stopping projects already under
construction. They are also looking to cut costs as swiftly as possible.
“Nobody in the oil industry feels very secure,” said Ken Smith, president
of the Unifor union local that represents about 3,600 Suncor employees who
operate the giant dump trucks and excavators. “We’re kind of at the mercy
of these big players like the Saudis and Russia.”
Mr. Smith said he believed that none of Suncor’s 1,000 layoffs would
involve his members. Sneh Seetal, a spokeswoman for Suncor, said the
company had yet to determine the specifics, but noted that it would involve
a mix of contract positions and employees spread across the company’s
domestic operations, which include refining and gasoline retailing.
Companies in supporting roles — such as suppliers for safety boots and
cleaning services — are feeling the most immediate squeeze.
Photo
A Suncor oil sands mining operation near Fort McMurray, Alberta. Such
enormous projects are difficult to switch off. Credit Todd Korol/Reuters
The Fort McMurray branch of Finning International, a Caterpillar dealer
that sold many of the $5 million to $6 million heavy-haul dump trucks,
recently laid off about 60 workers. At the end of December, Civeo
<http://www.civeo.com>, which is based in Houston, said it was mothballing
an oil sands work housing complex with 2,005 rooms and was permanently
closing another with 510.
Trevor Haynes, the president and chief executive of the Black Diamond Group
<http://www.blackdiamondlimited.com/main/index>, another supplier of work
housing based in Calgary, Alberta, said he was not yet being pressured to
cut rates by oil companies and did not expect to have to close any of the
housing in the oil sands. But that does not mean that he is sanguine.
“It comes down to one word, which is ‘uncertainty,’ ” Mr. Haynes said.
“Those of us who have been around awhile have seen these periods before, so
it feels familiar, if vaguely disconcerting.”
Continue reading the main story
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/business/energy-environment/lower-oil-pri…>
Continue
reading the main story
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/business/energy-environment/lower-oil-pri…>
Continue reading the main story
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/03/business/energy-environment/lower-oil-pri…>
His main concern is that new construction projects may be indefinitely
postponed. If so, he plans to fill the void by supplying housing to
proposed liquefied natural gas
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/natural-gas/…>
plants in British Columbia as well as that province’s recently announced
plan to build a major hydroelectric
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/h/hydroelectri…>
dam.
Not everyone is upset or worried about the slowdown in the oil sands.
Melissa Blake, the mayor of the regional municipality of Wood Buffalo,
which includes Fort McMurray and most of the major oil sands sites, said
she welcomed it. After trying to keep up with a population increase of more
than 125 percent since 2000, Ms. Blake said, Fort McMurray needs a break.
“The past few years have been just been catching up with the growth we’ve
had,” the mayor said. “There’s a bit of an advantage from having a less
robust industry.”
A break, Ms. Blake, said should allow the community’s infrastructure to
finally catch up with its growth.
Ms. Blake said she had seen no obvious signs of a slowdown around town,
like emptier stores and restaurants. But that, she said, is probably
because most of the 79,000 full-time residents of Fort McMurray are in less
vulnerable jobs. That’s probably not the case, she acknowledged, for about
39,000 people who fly in to work on oil sands projects but make their homes
elsewhere, often on the other side of Canada.
But Ms. Blake acknowledged that if the slump in prices proved to be
sustained, few would escape its effects.
“There’s going to have to be a real battening down of the hatches,” she
said.