Great study our from Than, documenting that Mining reduces fish populations. Water quality is more important than the physical stream structure.
http://www.wvgazette.com/article/20140701/GZ01/140709912
Also, I just heard about a court case in Colorado where the judge ruled that the BLM and USFS had to consider the climate impact from the CO2 released from a mining lease on federal land. That would be a game changer if it holds up.
JBK
To address climate change, nothing substitutes for reducing carbon dioxide
emissions
<http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_environment/~3/MOS…>
Posted: 27 Jun 2014 10:30 AM PDT
The politically expedient way to mitigate climate change is essentially no
way at all, according to a comprehensive new study. Among the climate
pollutants humans put into the atmosphere in significant quantities, the
effects of carbon dioxide are the longest-lived, with effects on climate
that extend thousands of years after emissions cease. But finding the
political consensus to act on reducing carbon dioxide emissions has been
nearly impossible. So there has been a movement to make up for that
inaction by reducing emissions of other, shorter-lived gasses, such as
methane, hydrofluorocarbons, and nitrous oxide, and particulates such as
soot and black carbon, all of which contribute to warming as well.
--
Paul Wilson
Sierra Club
504 Jefferson Ave
Charles Town, WV 25414-1130
Phone: 304-725-4360
Cell: 304-279-1361
"There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha
"In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle