Jim Sconyers
jim_scon(a)yahoo.com
304.698.9628
Remember: Mother Nature bats last.
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: F.J. Morris <frankmorris(a)ECOLOGICINVESTOR.COM>
To: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 3:35:03 PM
Subject: Southern Calif Edison Buys 20 Years of Solar Power for Less than
Natural Gas
Ed M,
Good stuff…Like Ned Ford keeps saying, efficiency with distributed renewables,
are competitive now. Good stuff.
Get efficient, build distributed renewables, and bankrupt fossil. Money’s like
calories, and so are Killowatts. Control the money, control the kws, and
control the polluting industries. Frank Morris
________________________________
From:Chp & Grp Global Warming Energy Chairs
[mailto:CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG] On Behalf Of Edward
Mainland
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 3:05 PM
To: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
Subject: [GW-ACT-LEADERS] SCE Buys 20 Years of Solar Power for Less than Natural
Gas
Solar panel prices have decreased by about 40% in just the past couple years, a
trend that is continuing. Doesn't this call into question outdated assumptions
about natural gas being the Club's go-to "transition" or "bridge" fuel? Can NG
be a "bridge" to anywhere once it becomes ever more costly (levelized) than
renewables? And note how small renewable projects in many cases can now come on
stream faster than large central-station, environmentally impactful desert
projects. That these small solar projects in California have now broken through
the discriminatory (in favor of natural gas) "market price referent" barrier
under a "renewable standard contract" is highly significant. -- Ed M.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SCE Buys 20 Years of Solar Power for Less than Natural Gas
1 comment
February 1, 2011 in Solar Energy
Southern California Edison has selected 250 MW worth of solar bids from
companies able to produce solar electricity for 20 years for less money annually
than the 20 year levelized cost of energy of a combined-cycle natural gas
turbine power plant.
SCE’s bidding process for smaller renewable projects is smart. These small
projects do not face the multi-year bureaucratic delays for extensive reviews,
like most utility-scale solar, so each small unit can be built as quickly as
normal commercial rooftop solar projects. They are made up of multiple
distributed solar installations of under 20 MW, which in combination total a
power plant-sized 250 MW.
The utility already gets more than 19% of its electricity from renewable
sources, placing it in the lead between California’s three big utilities to
reach the Renewable Energy Standard requirement to get 20% of its electricity
from renewables (which excludes large hydro and nuclear) by 2013.
This year SCE had put out a request for bids to get 250 MW of just solar power,
made up of multiple smaller rooftop arrays. Fremont-based Solyndra was one of
the early bidders to be accepted. Solyndra will supply 20 years of power , with
its unique cylindrical solar panels, to be installed by its subsidiary, Photon
Solar.
With a bidding process, SCE can save money by making renewable energy companies
compete to offer the lowest price for supplying the utility some of its
electricity through its Renewable Standard Contract
The requirement is that the renewable energy has to be priced to cost no more
than the Market Price Referent (MPR) – which is an annual calculation of the 20
year levelized cost of energy of a combined cycle gas turbine.
This year, the solar bids are below the MPR, meaning that they cost less than
the annual cost of getting the same amount of electricity from natural gas over
the same time period.
Even more interesting, SCE says that they received over 2.5 GW – 2,500 MW – of
offers from solar companies eager and apparently able to supply solar power for
less than the cost of gas. I was not able to locate that price in their
detailed filing with the California Public Utilites Comission (PDF), a hefty
tome. but the MPR for 2010 appears to be in the 11 cent range.
According to Adam Browning at Vote Solar, “prices are kept confidential for
something like 3 years. All we know is whether it is above or below MPR—and the
advice letter says it is below”.
Susan Kraemer @Twitter- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - To unsubscribe from the CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS list, send any message
to: CONS-SPST-GLOBALWARM-CHAIRS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out
our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms &
Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
-----Original Message-----
From: National Hydrofracking Team [mailto:ACTNET-FRAC-NEWS@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG] On Behalf Of Oliver Bernstein
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:30 AM
To: ACTNET-FRAC-NEWS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
Subject: [ACTNET-FRAC-NEWS] Fwd: Call with Michael Brune on Protecting Public Health and Building a Clean Energy Economy Tuesday Feb 1
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Subject: Call with Michael Brune on Protecting Public Health and
Building a Clean Energy Economy
Friends,
Please join us for an activist call with Executive Director Michael
Brune on Protecting Public Health and Building a Clean Energy Economy.
This call is open to all Sierra Club volunteers.
WHAT: Call to Action: Protecting Public Health and Building a Clean
Energy Economy
WHEN: Tuesday, February 1st at 8:30pm ET/5:30pm PT
HOW: Dial (866) 501-6174; when prompted enter access code 223 9223 #
AGENDA:
1.) Vision: Protecting Public Health and Building a Clean Energy Economy
- Michael Brune, Sierra Club Executive Director
2.) Health Campaign Overview
- Mary Anne Hitt, National Beyond Coal Campaign Director
3.) Defending the Clean Air Act
- Melinda Pierce, Deputy Director of National Campaigns
4.) Questions and Answers
5.) Your Charge: Translating this Work to the Local Level
6.) Questions and Answers
Please submit questions that you have for Michael Brune to
energy.intern(a)sierraclub.org by 5:00pm ET on Tuesday with the subject
line: "Question for Michael Brune."
Hope you can make it.
--
Oliver Bernstein
Senior Communications Strategist
Sierra Club
Phone: 512.477.2152
Cell: 512.289.8618
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To unsubscribe from the ACTNET-FRAC-NEWS list, send any message to:
ACTNET-FRAC-NEWS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp
To subscribe to the ACTNET-FRAC-NEWS list, or one of the
Sierra Club's other lists, visit us at http://lists.sierraclub.org
in case you missed this.... paul w
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Oliver Bernstein <oliver.bernstein(a)sierraclub.org>
Date: Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:36 PM
Subject: SNL Energy News interview with Deb Nardone
To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)lists.sierraclub.org
FYI
http://www.snl.com/InteractiveX/article.aspx?CDID=A-12249018-12850&KPLT=2
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:06 PM ET
Sierra Club's natural gas reform campaign to focus on industry
accountability
By Bryan Schutt
The newly appointed director of the Sierra Club's natural gas reform
campaign said that the group will be focused on safeguarding communities
from the potential hazards associated with shale gas development and that
the campaign will strive to hold industry accountable for its actions.
The campaign supports natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil
but advocates strong federal and state oversight of hydraulic fracturing to
ensure that extraction of the fossil fuel does not come at the expense of
land, water and community health. Deborah Nardone, whose appointment as
director was announced on Jan. 25, said her role will be to advance that
mission.
"The overall goal is to protect our communities, our land, our air and our
water," she said. "The strength of the Sierra Club is our members. They are
well-informed, incredibly organized, and they are pushing to hold the
industry accountable to higher standards."
To increase accountability, the campaign will push a myriad of measures.
First and foremost, Nardone said, the industry should be held to the same
environmental laws all other industries are required to adhere to. "It's
pretty unacceptable that they're exempt from [multiple] federal
regulations," she said.
Nardone said it will also be vital for adequate resources to be appropriated
at all levels of government to provide for more thorough oversight and
enforcement. Speaking of oversight, she noted that drilling should never be
considered appropriate in certain areas, a point many in New York City have
been adamant about.
"Our more sensitive wild lands, our drinking water source watersheds ... and
other significant natural resources should be left off limits to drilling,"
she said.
The Sierra Club's overall mission of increasing energy efficiency and
reliance on renewable energy will play a large part of the campaign, too.
"As natural gas is being pushed to play a larger role on the scene, we're
seeing that reliance on renewables and efficiency is starting to decline,"
Nardone said. "We should also be looking at pushing renewable energy
sources."
Nardone's comments about clean energy were echoed by President Barack Obama
during his State of the Union address Jan. 25. Some in the fossil fuels
industry pounced on the president's remarks, saying a focus on clean energy
should not compromise the economic engine of the exploration and production
industry.
While the oil and gas industry is able to tout the economic benefits and
jobs created by drilling, Nardone said, that boom cannot be used as an
excuse to ignore environmental stewardship.
"If we can't protect our communities and we can't protect our natural
resources, than we shouldn't drill for gas," she said. "The argument of jobs
versus the environment, they're not opposite each other. If you don't have a
healthy community ... then you can't have jobs."
Nardone joins the Sierra Club after working with the Pennsylvania Council of
Trout Unlimited. With Trout Unlimited, Nardone served as a coldwater
resource specialist developing conservation plans to protect the headwaters
of streams. She has also worked on watershed protection for the Chesapeake
Bay Foundation and the Allegheny Ridge Heritage Area.
Sierra Club Director of Conservation Sarah Hodgdon hailed the announcement.
"Deb has been a leader in protecting watersheds throughout Pennsylvania from
unsound development," she said in a statement. "We look forward to her
bringing her wealth of experience and successful campaigns to this huge
challenge on the national stage."
--
Oliver Bernstein
Senior Communications Strategist
Sierra Club
Phone: 512.477.2152
Cell: 512.289.8618
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To
unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to:
COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our
Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms &
Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp
--
Paul Wilson
Sierra Club
504 Jefferson Ave
Charles Town, WV 25414-1130
Phone: 304-725-4360
Cell: 304-279-1361
"There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha
"In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle
Jim Sconyers
jim_scon(a)yahoo.com
304.698.9628
Remember: Mother Nature bats last.
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Denise Binion <dbinion(a)gmail.com>
To: WVFirstCongressionalOFA <WVFirstCongressionalOFA(a)groups.barackobama.com>
Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 9:53:03 AM
Subject: [WVFirstCongressionalOFA] Fwd: HB2025 Energy Efficiency
>From our friend Mike Harman.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike Harman <mph1946(a)gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:42 AM
Subject: Fwd: HB2025 Energy Efficiency
To:
Dear friends,
Now is the time to take action in support of HB 2025, the Energy Efficiency bill
introduced in the House of Delegates and referred to the Government Organization
Committee. Sponsors are Mike Manypenny and Barbara Fleischauer.
This bill establishes specific energy savings targets to be met by utilities
over the next 15 years, with incentives as well as penalties, and an option for
large industrial customers to achieve comparable savings under their own plans
(a "self-direct" provision).
Attached is everything you need to help get started.
Feel free to spread the word by sharing this email!
The attached "Fact Sheet" describes HB2025 and how it will help. Be sure your
legislator gets a copy of it, along with a request to support the bill.
The "Talking Points" is an outline of points for advocates to use in
conversation with legislators. On the reverse is a roster of the Gov Org
committee. We did not include email addresses in the roster, but you can easily
obtain them by going to http://www.legis.state.wv.us/
The Government Organization Committee must take up the bill and vote to send it
out to the floor for a vote. This is our top concern for now. We need for at
least half the members to support the bill.
If you have a representative on this committee, it is urgent that you connect
with them ASAP. Note that home telephone numbers are included for most members.
We have found that calls to their homes on the weekend are usually more
productive than trying to reach them at the Capitol. Keep in mind that
legislators are paid for 60 consecutive days! Most will welcome hearing from
concerned citizens. Democracy only works when we all participate.
Try to get specific feedback from your representative!
Ask if they will support this bill. Will they vote to report it out?
If not, then what specifically are their concerns? What information do they need
about the bill?
We need to have your feedback from your contacts. Please send any feedback,
questions or concerns to John Christensen, WV Environmental Council, at
410-499-4873, email jbc329(a)earthlink.net.
Many thanks to John for his help at the Capitol, and to Cathy Kunkel who has
written our materials.
Mike Harman
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to 17 members of WVFirstCongressionalOFA
This email was sent from Denise Binion dbinion(a)gmail.com
Listserv email address: WVFirstCongressionalOFA(a)groups.barackobama.com
Your reply will be sent to: WVFirstCongressionalOFA(a)groups.barackobama.com
Unsubscribe or change your email settings:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/WVFirstCongressionalOFA/listserv-unsub
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gas Drilling Technique Is Labeled Violation By TOM ZELLER
Jr.<http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/z/tom_jr_zell…>
Published:
January 31, 2011
Oil and gas service companies injected tens of millions of gallons of diesel
fuel into onshore wells in more than a dozen states from 2005 to 2009,
Congressional investigators have charged. Those injections appear to have
violated the Safe Water Drinking Act, the investigators said in a letter to
the Environmental Protection
Agency<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/environ…>on
Monday.
The diesel fuel was used by drillers as part of a contentious process known
as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, which involves the high-pressure
injection of a mixture of water, sand and chemical additives — including
diesel fuel — into rock formations deep underground. The process, which has
opened up vast new deposits of natural
gas<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/natural-gas/…>to
drilling, creates and props open fissures in the rock to ease the
release
of oil<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/oil-petroleu…>and
gas.
But concerns have been growing over the potential for fracking chemicals —
particularly those found in diesel fuel — to contaminate underground sources
of drinking water.
“We learned that no oil and gas service companies have sought — and no state
and federal regulators have issued — permits for diesel fuel use in
hydraulic fracturing,” said Representative Henry A.
Waxman<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/henry_a_waxman…>of
California and two other Democratic members of the House Committee on
Energy and Commerce, in the
letter<http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?q=news/waxman-markey-an…>.
“This appears to be a violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act.”
Oil and gas companies acknowledged using diesel fuel in their fracking
fluids, but they rejected the House Democrats’ assertion that it was
illegal. They said that the E.P.A. had never properly developed rules and
procedures to regulate the use of diesel in fracking, despite a clear grant
of authority from Congress over the issue.
“Everyone understands that E.P.A. is at least interested in regulating
fracking,” said Matt Armstrong, a lawyer with the Washington firm Bracewell
& Giuliani, which represents several oil and gas companies. “Whether the
E.P.A. has the chutzpah to try to impose retroactive liability for use of
diesel in fracking, well, everyone is in a wait-and-see mode. I suspect it
will have a significant fight on its hands if it tried it do that.”
Regardless of the legal outcome, the Waxman findings are certain to
intensify an already contentious debate among legislators, natural gas
companies and environmentalists over the safety of oil and gas development
in general, and fracking in particular.
Oil services companies had traditionally used diesel fuel as part of their
fracturing cocktails because it helped to dissolve and disperse other
chemicals suspended in the fluid. But some of the chemical components of
diesel fuel, including toluene, xylene and benzene, a carcinogen, have
alarmed both regulators and environmental groups. They argue that some of
those chemicals could find their way out of a well bore — either because of
migration through layers of rock or spills and sloppy handling — and into
nearby sources of drinking water.
An E.P.A. investigation in 2004 failed to find any threat to drinking water
from fracking — a conclusion that was widely dismissed by critics as
politically motivated. The agency has taken up the issue again in a new
investigation started last year, although the results are not expected until
2012 at the earliest.
The House committee began its own investigation in February last year, when
Democrats were in the majority. In Monday’s letter, Mr. Waxman, along with
Representatives Edward J.
Markey<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/edward_j_marke…>of
Massachusetts and Diana DeGette of Colorado, said that they were so
far
“unable to draw definitive conclusions about the potential impact of these
injections on public health or the environment.”
Still, the investigators said that three of the largest oil and gas services
companies — Halliburton<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/halliburton_company/i…>,
Schlumberger<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/schlumberger_ltd/inde…>and
BJ Services — signed an agreement with the E.P.A. in 2003 intended to
curtail the use of diesel in fracking in certain shallow formations.
Two years later, when Congress amended the Safe Water Drinking Act to
exclude regulation of hydraulic fracturing, it made an express exception
that allowed regulation of diesel fuel used in fracking.
The Congressional investigators sent letters to 14 companies requesting
details on the type and volume of fracking chemicals they used. Although
many companies said they had eliminated or were cutting back on use of
diesel, 12 companies reported having used 32.2 million gallons of diesel
fuel, or fluids containing diesel fuel, in their fracking processes from
2005 to 2009.
The diesel-laced fluids were used in a total of 19 states. Approximately
half the total volume was deployed in Texas, but at least a million gallons
of diesel-containing fluids were also used in Oklahoma (3.3 million
gallons); North Dakota (3.1 million); Louisiana (2.9 million); Wyoming (2.9
million); and Colorado (1.3 million).
Where this leaves the companies in relation to federal law is unclear.
Mr. Waxman and his colleagues say that the Safe Drinking Water Act left
diesel-based hydraulic fracturing under the auspices of E.P.A.’s
“underground injection control program,” which requires companies to obtain
permits, either from state or federal regulators, for a variety of
activities that involve putting fluids underground.
No permits for diesel-based fracking have been sought or granted since the
Safe Drinking Water Act was amended in 2005.
Lee Fuller, a vice president for government relations with the Independent
Petroleum Association of America, said that was because the E.P.A. had never
followed up by creating rules and procedures for obtaining such permits and
submitting them for public comment.
The agency did quietly update its Web site last summer with language
suggesting that fracking with diesel was, indeed, covered as part of the
underground injection program, which would suggest that permits should have
been obtained. But Mr. Fuller’s organization, along with the U.S. Oil and
Gas Association, has gone to court to challenge the Web posting, arguing
that it amounted to new rule-making that circumvented administrative
requirements for notice and public commentary.
The E.P.A. said Monday that it was reviewing the accusations from the three
House Democrats that the companies named were in violation of the Safe
Drinking Water Act.
“Our goal is to put in place a clear framework for permitting so that
fracturing operations using diesel receive the review required by law,”
Betsaida Alcantara, an E.P.A. spokeswoman, said in an e-mail message. “We
will provide further information about our plans as they develop.”
--
William V. DePaulo, Esq.
179 Summers Street, Suite 232
Charleston, WV 25301-2163
Tel 304-342-5588
Fax 304-342-5505
william.depaulo(a)gmail.com
www.passeggiata.com