Info
Frack forward Wyoming's fed-bucking approach to environmental policy
News - From the October 01, 2010 issue of High Country
News<http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.17> by
Cally Carswell
Document Actions
<http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.17/frack-forward/image_viewer>
On Sept. 15, Wyoming activated new rules requiring energy companies to
identify the chemicals they inject underground to break up rocks in order to
free trapped oil and gas. Critics suspect that the process -- known …
[View More]as
hydraulic fracturing, or fracking -- can contaminate groundwater. Evidence
has been elusive, though, in part because drilling companies have been
allowed to keep their chemical recipes largely secret.
The new rules -- the nation's strictest -- were a surprisingly easy sell in
Wyoming, where extractive industries almost single-handedly keep state
coffers plump and exercise proportional political clout. At Democratic Gov.
Dave Freudenthal's behest, the state's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
unanimously signed off on them in June. Though Halliburton protested some,
most in the industry seemed unfazed. At the end of this month, the
Associated Press reported that drillers even seemed "eager to comply."
Anticipating similar moves by President Obama's Environmental Protection
Agency, which recently increased its scrutiny of fracking, Wyoming wrote the
rules as a message to the feds: Your help is not needed here. Federal
"meddling" has always irked Wyoming's leaders. But under Freudenthal, the
state has favored a curious strategy for fending off federal regulators:
Beat them to the punch with its own cutting-edge environmental policies.
In 2007, with a lawsuit pending over the U.S. Fish and Wildlife's decision
not to list the greater sage grouse as endangered, Freudenthal ordered state
officials, conservationists and industry reps to map the bird's vital
habitat. Within those "core areas," the state has tightly restricted oil,
gas and wind development, all thought to disrupt grouse breeding -- a
significant improvement over the Bureau of Land Management's style of
developing first and dealing with impacts later.
It's not a perfect plan -- core areas are strategically penciled to exclude
the best gas patches, say critics, making places like the Powder River Basin
sacrifice zones. And Freudenthal has called the grouse "one of the ugliest,
stupidest birds I ever knew." Still, he's willing to defend it to protect
Wyoming's natural gas industry. His office estimates that a listing would
subject 83 percent of gas producers to new regulations. "What we live on in
this state is mineral revenues," said Freudenthal energy advisor Aaron Clark
in 2009, "and we would be subjecting a lot of that to the vagaries of the
Endangered Species Act."
For now, the plan has kept federal regulation at bay. When the Interior
Department this year again declined to protect the grouse, officials
commended Wyoming's efforts. And Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has
encouraged other states with sagebrush habitat to adopt the core-area model.
Wyoming hopes the feds will be similarly seduced by its new fracking law, as
well as pioneering rules developed over the last two years for future carbon
capture and sequestration projects. Shannon Anderson, a lawyer for the
Powder River Basin Resource Council, a local environmental group, calls the
latter "generally good rules." But they're less cautious than similar rules
drafted by the EPA, which aim to protect drinking water by considering only
deep, briny aquifers as potential carbon storage sites. Wyoming's rules
could allow injections in shallow geologic formations, potentially even
those that overlie drinking water sources. "They were designed to beat EPA
and hopefully get them to follow, rather than dictate, Wyoming's approach,"
Anderson says.
It's encouraging to see Wyoming advance environmental regulation instead of
relax it, as the previous governor did to ease coalbed methane development,
and as the Bush-Cheney administration did with fracking. But local
environmentalists caution that the new policies aren't necessarily evidence
that Wyoming's gone green.
"All these rules are baby steps in terms of what we really need to
accomplish to address the impacts we have in the state," Anderson says,
adding that Wyoming is in "an already compromised position." Between 2001
and 2005, sage grouse populations near coalbed methane development in the
Powder River Basin declined by 82 percent. Freudenthal refuses to moderate
Wyoming's anti-wolf stance, jeopardizing the state's chances to manage the
animals. And requiring frackers to disclose their chemicals won't protect
groundwater if drillers remain exempt from the Safe Drinking Water Act. "The
idea is to get these rules in place and stop Congress from passing
(comprehensive legislation), which would actually protect public health and
safety," Anderson says.
Imperfect as it may be, Wyoming's breakaway approach to environmental
regulation is gaining favor among some surprising constituencies. Last
month, Cathy Woollums, an executive of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co., a
coal-reliant utility behemoth, came to the Wyoming Legislature with an
unexpected request: Regulate greenhouse gases. Congressional inaction is
creating too much uncertainty in the utility business, she said. And, in any
case, MidAmerican would rather answer to Wyoming than the EPA.
--
Paul Wilson
Sierra Club
504 Jefferson Ave
Charles Town, WV 25414-1130
Phone: 304-725-4360
Cell: 304-279-1361
"There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha
"In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle
[View Less]
West Virginia ranks 43rd in energy efficiency among the states, dropping from 35th place in the first scorecard in 2006. Lossing points for building codes was one contributor.
JBK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To get off this list, send email to: LISTSERV(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
Make the message text (not the Subject): SIGNOFF CONS-FRED
The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) has released
<http://www.aceee.org/sector/state-…
[View More]policy/scorecard> a new report ranking
states by the strength of their energy efficiency policies. Has your
chapter won substantial victories to improve energy efficiency in your
state? If so, be sure to let us know by filling out our victory reporting
form <http://tinyurl.com/y8fn9an> . In the meantime, if you're looking for
some good news, check out these recent victories won by Sierra Club
activists throughout the country:
Scott Elkins, Director for Chapter Coordination
Sierra Club
612-659-9124
[View Less]
SC and the Wetzel folks are trying to drag EPA in on the air pollution aspect of
Marcellus.
Jim Sconyers
jim_scon(a)yahoo.com
304.698.9628
Remember: Mother Nature bats last.
________________________________
From: Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net>
To: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>; ec(a)osenergy.org
Sent: Sat, October 30, 2010 7:32:35 PM
Subject: Re: [EC] Fwd: [GW-ACT-LEADERS] Environmental Regs Cause Nat Gas to
Replace Coal for Electric Generation
I've really been …
[View More]wrestling with this, because I want to see ALL coal phased
out, and I don't want the amount of gas drilling it would take to replace
it. I also don't want any stupid developments like coal to liquid,
windmills on every forested ridge in WV, biomass plants burning up all the
trees, power lines through WV taking (supposed) renewable energy from the
midwest to the east coast. So what's left. My answer is efficiency, but I
don't see it happening, because of the influence of the fossil fuel industry
on our government (both legislators and regulators), the influence of the
fossil fuel industry on voters through misleading advertising and public
relations, and the natural resistance of people to change, especially giving
up their wasteful habits.
What I'm left with is working like hell for regulations to minimize impacts
and suing whenever possible to slow the destruction down. Maybe we can slow
it down enough to cause some blackouts. That's probably the only thing that
will bring any real change.
If EPA regulations are going to be the reason for retiring lots of coal,
maybe that is the place to go for regulating gas drilling.
________________________________
From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of
James Kotcon
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 6:36 PM
To: ec(a)osenergy.org
Subject: [EC] Fwd: [GW-ACT-LEADERS] Environmental Regs Cause Nat Gas to
Replace Coal for Electric Generation
This investment newsletter predicts phasing out 20-25 % of coal capacity by
2020, due solely to mercury, NOx and SO2 regulations. Natural gas (and some
renewables) will be taking up the slack.
How do we get ready for this?
JBK
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3228 - Release Date: 10/30/10
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC(a)osenergy.org
http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec
[View Less]
This investment newsletter predicts phasing out 20-25 % of coal capacity by 2020, due solely to mercury, NOx and SO2 regulations. Natural gas (and some renewables) will be taking up the slack.
How do we get ready for this?
JBK
The hearing before the WV Air Quality Board over our appeal of the air permit for the TransGas Coal-To-Liquids plant was held Wed & Thursday. I just got off a conference call with some folks over the results.
The comment below reflect my understanding of what happened, so someone please correct me if I get it wrong.
Basically, the AQB listened carefully to our arguments, and appeared to grasp some key points made by our wonderful attorney, Elena Saxonhouse.
One of our major issues is …
[View More]the claim by DEP & TransGas that the facility is a "Minor Source" rather than a "Major Source". Major Sources have significantly more stringent requirements for an air permit, including requirements that the facility model pollutant dispersion, and that they determine the "Best Available Control Technology" (BACT). TransGas did not include certain emissions in their application, which kept them under the threshold for Major Source. DEP approved the permit as submitted by TransGas, arguing that any emissions not included in the permit would be violations of the permit. Our concern is that, once the plant is built, these emissions could be added to the permit as a minor modification and they would continue operating as a major source without meeting the intent of the Clean Air Act.
One major source of emissions is a "flare" used to burn off waste gases. Unfortunately, flares are inherently hard to monitor, and DEP simply assumed that the emissions would be small and therefore the facility as a whole would meet the Minor Source limit. The Air Quality Board seemed receptive to our argument that, to be adequately protective, the air permit had to either measure the emissions to show they were under the limit, or they would have to assume that they could be larger than DEP assumed.
Another major source is that Transgas never included emissions from a wastewater treatment plant. They argued that the plant has not been designed yet, and that they may ship the water off site to another facility, and therefore the emissions should not be included in their air permit. We argued that simply omitting the emissions from a required step in the process was not permitted under the Clean Air Act, as it would allow any major source to avoid major source requirements simply by segmenting the facility into tiny little parts, when the whole facility was still a major source.
While the Air Quality Board listened carefully to two full days of testimony, and we have good legal arguments, we should not assume that the AQB is a friendly body. Closing briefs will be filed over the next few weeks, so we do not expect a decision for a couple months.
On a related note, I hope you all saw the announcement this week by Gov. Manchin that TransGas had settled on an "engineering and procurement contractor". In addition, they had reached an agreement with the Affiliated Construction Trades union to assure that the plant would be built by union labor.
We remain very skeptical that this plant would ever get financing, and it was not clear that the EPC contractor or anyone else has actually committed to building anything. The facility's air permit is under challenge (by us), none of the other needed permit applications have even been submitted, and many key features still do not have a final design (e.g., waste water treatment). So even if the air permit were approved, they are still a long way from ever getting anything built.
We should not assume we have already lost, but neither should we take for granted that such a crazy idea will be easily rejected.
Endless pressure, endlessly applied!
Jim Kotcon
304-2903-8822 (office)
304-594-3322 (home)
[View Less]
fyi, paul
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: DAVID E ORTMAN <deortman(a)msn.com>
Date: Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:16 AM
Subject: RE: WV Governor, TransGas Development Systems Announce Coal to
Gasoline Project
To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com, coal-campaign-alerts(a)lists.sierraclub.org
FR: David E. Ortman, Seattle, WA
Regarding coal to gasoline, Scientific American was not impressed in 2007.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=worse-than-gasoline
Apparently some are …
[View More]proposing to use nuclear energy to power the damn
conversion process!
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:59:37 -0400
From: pjgrunt(a)GMAIL.COM
Subject: Fwd: WV Governor, TransGas Development Systems Announce Coal to
Gasoline Project
To: COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG
fyi, paul
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Frank Young* <fyoung(a)mountain.net>
Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:21 PM
Subject: [EC] Fw: Governor, TransGas Development Systems Announce Coal to
Gasoline Project
To: ec(a)osenergy.org, wvec-board(a)yahoogroups.com, WVHCBOARD(a)yahoogroups.com
In Mingo County, coal to liquids- long awaited announcement
....................
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: **<governor(a)wv.gov>
Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Subject: Governor, TransGas Development Systems Announce Coal to Gasoline
Project
To: trouserdude(a)gmail.com
Oct. 28, 2010
*GOVERNOR, TRANSGAS DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS ANNOUNCE COAL TO GASOLINE PROJECT
**TransGas president says that coal to gasoline project will be first in the
nation and a model for the country to regain its energy independence and put
Americans to work*
Contact: Melvin Smith, 304-558-2000 or Adam Victor, 917-816-3700 or
adamvictor(a)transgasdevelopment.com
CHARLESTON, W.Va. – After four years of continuous effort, Gov. Joe Manchin
and TransGas Development Systems President Adam Victor, along with several
state and local representatives, today announced that the company has
selected its Engineering Procurement Contractor (EPC) and technology
provider for its coal to gasoline facility that will be built in Mingo
County, West Virginia. This facility will be the nation’s first and
largest of its kind in the world. Representatives from the state Building
and Construction Trades Council, along with representatives from the EPC
contractor and the project technology provider were also present for today’s
announcement. The project will be built by SK Engineering & Construction
and will utilize the technology of Uhde GmbH, one of the world’s largest
construction companies, using premier coal gasification technology.
The governor commended the efforts of TransGas Development Systems, SK
Engineering and Uhde GmbH for their partnership with the state of West
Virginia. “This project indicates how serious we are about matching our
abundant coal resources with the technology available to produce clean
energy. West Virginia is fully committed to being a leader in energy
self-sufficiency and this development shows that we are dedicated to using
our coal resources as prudently as possible. This project’s success will
truly be far-reaching for the coal industry,” said the governor.
During today’s meeting, Victor reminded officials that four years ago, he
was on the verge of relocating his operations overseas after facing years of
challenges while trying to convince officials across the Northeast to make
the tough decision to support necessary energy infrastructure development.
Only after Mr. Victor met Governor Manchin did he realize that West Virginia
could be a place where energy infrastructure could be built and supported by
state and local officials.
“Four years ago, TransGas found, in Governor Joe Manchin, a leader who
understood the importance of coal as the primary asset to developing
America’s future energy independence. Moreover, he understood the need to
forcefully address the many fallacies that have arisen surrounding the
environmental effects of mining and using coal.
“Governor Joe Manchin also understood that a fleet of coal to liquid plants
would form the cornerstone of a resurgence of American industrial might –
built by skilled American unionized construction tradesmen, working in close
concert with project owners. Simply put, if not for the governor, we would
not have invested the time, nor effort into this project and this project
would not exist today,” said TransGas president, Adam Victor.
Victor praised the governor for bringing the construction trades union
together with his chosen contractor and technology provider to ensure that
this project will be built by skilled West Virginia workers, on time and
under budget.
This project will convert regional coal into 756,000 gallons of premium
grade ultraclean gasoline a day. Put in proper perspective, less than fifty
of these Coal to Gasoline facilities nationwide would eliminate 100 percent
of America’s need to import foreign gasoline; create nearly 150,000 jobs and
make the United States a net exporter of gasoline.
SK E&C (www.skec.com) is an arm of SK group (www.sk.com), Korea's third
largest corporation and one of the leading business organizations in the
world. SK is made up of 40 companies including seven that are listed on the
Korea Stock Exchange. SK has a presence on six continents and 25,000
employees. SK E&C is one of the world’s most qualified engineering,
procurement, construction, and maintenance services organizations. Their
experience includes Korea’s largest oil refinery, the Cadereyta and Madero
Refinery upgrades in Mexico, full-scale refinery projects in Kuwait, Brazil
and Ghana.
Udhe GmbH is one of Germany's ThyssenKrupp AG's 670 companies who employ
almost 200,000 employees worldwide. In addition to a 50-year history of
developing gasification technologies, Udhe is one of the world's leading
engineering groups specializing in the design of chemical, refining and
other industrial plants in all four corners of the globe with more than
2,000 plants to its credit.
More information on TransGas Development Systems LLC is available at
http://www.transgasdevelopment.com/ . Contact: Adam Victor, 917-816-3700 or
adamvictor(a)transgasdevelopment.com
# # #
Cheers,
Daniel Chiotos
Keeper of the Mountains Foundation
Operations Director
http://www.mountainkeeper.org
179 Summers St, Suite 234
Charleston, WV, 25301
(304)886-3389 - cell
(304)205-0920 - office* <http://appalachiarising.org/>
"WE ARE THE KEEPERS OF THE MOUNTAINS, LOVE THEM OR LEAVE THEM, JUST DON'T
DESTROY THEM. IF YOU CARE TO BE ONE TOO, CALL 304-542-1134 OR
304-205-0920."* - Larry Gibson
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC(a)osenergy.org
http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec
--
Paul Wilson
Sierra Club
504 Jefferson Ave
Charles Town, WV 25414-1130
Phone: 304-725-4360
Cell: 304-279-1361
"There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha
"In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To
unsubscribe from the COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS list, send any message to:
COAL-CAMPAIGN-ALERTS-signoff-request(a)LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Check out our
Listserv Lists support site for more information:
http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp Sign up to receive Sierra Club
Insider, the flagship e-newsletter. Sent out twice a month, it features the
Club's latest news and activities. Subscribe and view recent editions at
http://www.sierraclub.org/insider/
--
Paul Wilson
Sierra Club
504 Jefferson Ave
Charles Town, WV 25414-1130
Phone: 304-725-4360
Cell: 304-279-1361
"There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha
"In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle
[View Less]
In Mingo County, coal to liquids- long awaited announcement ....................
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <governor(a)wv.gov>
Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Subject: Governor, TransGas Development Systems Announce Coal to Gasoline Project
To: trouserdude(a)gmail.com
Oct. 28, 2010
GOVERNOR, TRANSGAS DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS ANNOUNCE COAL TO GASOLINE PROJECT
TransGas president says that coal to gasoline project will be first in the nation and a model for the …
[View More]country to regain its energy independence and put Americans to work
Contact: Melvin Smith, 304-558-2000 or Adam Victor, 917-816-3700 or adamvictor(a)transgasdevelopment.com
CHARLESTON, W.Va. – After four years of continuous effort, Gov. Joe Manchin and TransGas Development Systems President Adam Victor, along with several state and local representatives, today announced that the company has selected its Engineering Procurement Contractor (EPC) and technology provider for its coal to gasoline facility that will be built in Mingo County, West Virginia. This facility will be the nation’s first and largest of its kind in the world. Representatives from the state Building and Construction Trades Council, along with representatives from the EPC contractor and the project technology provider were also present for today’s announcement. The project will be built by SK Engineering & Construction and will utilize the technology of Uhde GmbH, one of the world’s largest construction companies, using premier coal gasification technology.
The governor commended the efforts of TransGas Development Systems, SK Engineering and Uhde GmbH for their partnership with the state of West Virginia. “This project indicates how serious we are about matching our abundant coal resources with the technology available to produce clean energy. West Virginia is fully committed to being a leader in energy self-sufficiency and this development shows that we are dedicated to using our coal resources as prudently as possible. This project’s success will truly be far-reaching for the coal industry,” said the governor.
During today’s meeting, Victor reminded officials that four years ago, he was on the verge of relocating his operations overseas after facing years of challenges while trying to convince officials across the Northeast to make the tough decision to support necessary energy infrastructure development. Only after Mr. Victor met Governor Manchin did he realize that West Virginia could be a place where energy infrastructure could be built and supported by state and local officials.
“Four years ago, TransGas found, in Governor Joe Manchin, a leader who understood the importance of coal as the primary asset to developing America’s future energy independence. Moreover, he understood the need to forcefully address the many fallacies that have arisen surrounding the environmental effects of mining and using coal.
“Governor Joe Manchin also understood that a fleet of coal to liquid plants would form the cornerstone of a resurgence of American industrial might – built by skilled American unionized construction tradesmen, working in close concert with project owners. Simply put, if not for the governor, we would not have invested the time, nor effort into this project and this project would not exist today,” said TransGas president, Adam Victor.
Victor praised the governor for bringing the construction trades union together with his chosen contractor and technology provider to ensure that this project will be built by skilled West Virginia workers, on time and under budget.
This project will convert regional coal into 756,000 gallons of premium grade ultraclean gasoline a day. Put in proper perspective, less than fifty of these Coal to Gasoline facilities nationwide would eliminate 100 percent of America’s need to import foreign gasoline; create nearly 150,000 jobs and make the United States a net exporter of gasoline.
SK E&C (www.skec.com) is an arm of SK group (www.sk.com), Korea's third largest corporation and one of the leading business organizations in the world. SK is made up of 40 companies including seven that are listed on the Korea Stock Exchange. SK has a presence on six continents and 25,000 employees. SK E&C is one of the world’s most qualified engineering, procurement, construction, and maintenance services organizations. Their experience includes Korea’s largest oil refinery, the Cadereyta and Madero Refinery upgrades in Mexico, full-scale refinery projects in Kuwait, Brazil and Ghana.
Udhe GmbH is one of Germany's ThyssenKrupp AG's 670 companies who employ almost 200,000 employees worldwide. In addition to a 50-year history of developing gasification technologies, Udhe is one of the world's leading engineering groups specializing in the design of chemical, refining and other industrial plants in all four corners of the globe with more than 2,000 plants to its credit.
More information on TransGas Development Systems LLC is available at http://www.transgasdevelopment.com/ . Contact: Adam Victor, 917-816-3700 or adamvictor(a)transgasdevelopment.com
# # #
Cheers,
Daniel Chiotos
Keeper of the Mountains Foundation
Operations Director
http://www.mountainkeeper.org
179 Summers St, Suite 234
Charleston, WV, 25301
(304)886-3389 - cell
(304)205-0920 - office
"WE ARE THE KEEPERS OF THE MOUNTAINS, LOVE THEM OR LEAVE THEM, JUST DON'T DESTROY THEM. IF YOU CARE TO BE ONE TOO, CALL 304-542-1134 OR 304-205-0920." - Larry Gibson
[View Less]
Climate Change and the Future of Coal: A Legal Perspective presented at WVU College of LawMichaelB. Gerrard the Andrew Sabin Professor of Professional Practice atColumbia Law School, will present "Climate Change and the Future ofCoal, " at 11 a.m., Monday, Nov. 1 in the Marlyn E. Lugar Courtroom atthe WVU Law Center. For full release, see: http://wvutoday.wvu.edu/n/2010/10/26/climate-change-and-the-future-of-coal-…
RESEARCH
Can't make money mining coal in WV - who'd a thunk it! And our recent hammering
them on selenium will ramp up the cost of mining considerably.
Jim Sconyers
jim_scon(a)yahoo.com
304.698.9628
Remember: Mother Nature bats last.
________________________________
From: James Kotcon <jkotcon(a)wvu.edu>
To: ehansen(a)downstreamstrategies.com; pbjmwood(a)gmail.com; jim_scon(a)yahoo.com
Sent: Mon, October 25, 2010 10:03:05 AM
Subject: Fwd: Article - Patriot Coal reports $46M third-…
[View More]quarter loss
Note: Forwarded message is attached.
The attached news article may suggest why Patriot is a little desperate.
JBK
[View Less]