September 2007 - EC - lists.bikelover.org

Proposed press release for Oct 12th
by Duane330＠aol.com 29 Sep '07

29 Sep '07

To: WV Sierra Energy Committee From: Duane Nichols, MonValley Clean Air Coalition, etc. RE: Possible press release, to be scheduled for October 12th. 1. We need to get the various diverse groups working on the TrAIL line together in print, as in a press release that we all approve. Each group can then add two paragraphs with their own contact information. 2. This can be released in Charleston and Morgantown simultaneously on Friday, October 12th, in time to be included in the Saturday newspapers. 3. On Saturday, President Bill Clinton will speak in Charleston before the annual state Democratic Party dinner, a huge event. [Clinton is now on record as working with Al Gore on global climate change.] 4. We could picket this event, just for publicity, as one option. {My wife and I have tickets to attend} 5. The connection between the proposed new power line and global warming is this: If TrAIL line is built it will give long-life to old power plants that are a primary source of carbon dioxide, the most important greenhouse gas. 6. Possible groups to be included: Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Council, WV Environmental Council, MonValley Clean Air Coalition, Triune-Halleck Community Association, Ft. Martin Community Association, Laurel Run Community Association, WV Highlands Conservancy, Interfaith Global Climate Change Coalition, .............etc. 7. Please forward this message to all possible groups that might wish to join in so we can make a decision within the next two days......... as to whether to prepare drafts, with a final decision to be made on Tuesday, October 9th, as to which groups are included and which not................ ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

1 0

TRAIL DISCOVERY REQUEST TO SIERRA CLUB INC
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 28 Sep '07

28 Sep '07

I'VE ATTACHED THE CORRECT DISCOVERY REQUEST TO THIS EMAIL. THE SAME BASIC DISCOVERY REQUEST WENT OUT TO ALL INTERVENORS. KINDLY DELETE THE PRIOR REQUEST WHICH RELATED TO A TOTALLY UNRELATED MATTER FROM YOUR COMPUTER -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

TRAIL DISCOVERY REQUEST TO SIERRA CLUB INC
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 28 Sep '07

28 Sep '07

BARBARA AND JIM - PLEASE CALL ME ABOUT THIS - BILL -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

bumper stickers Good News
by Barbara Fallon 28 Sep '07

28 Sep '07

Nate Parr is doing the bumper stickers for us. I sent him the ideas that were sent to me. He is already working on the design and cost for printing. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7

1 0

fundraising letter that went out last week
by Barbara Fallon 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Here is a copy of the fundraising letter that went out.... FYI. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/

1 0

Education campaign
by Barbara Fallon 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Dear Committee, The energy committee recently had a meeting regarding the Allegheny intervention case. While there are many stages that can be considered "next," one stage that needs leadership is the education campaign. This work has come to the foreground because soon the PSC will be announcing the dates for public hearings. We, of course, want to see as many Sierran members at these county meetings as possible. An education campaign will entail a bulk mailing of bulleted information to Sierra Club members. As we all know, citizens do not have to be living along the power line to have a voice against it. The mailing will also include the dates for the hearings. Is someone willing to take this responsibility on? I and others will assist, of course. As for me I need to stay focused on fundraising!!!! ____________________________________________________________________________________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow

1 0

Re: [EC] creativity needed for bumper sticker
by Barbara Fallon 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Apparantly I did not make myself clear!!!! (oh my gosh!!) I do not need creative ideas, but rather I need a person with creative ideas. Who can take on this bumper sticker project???? ----- Original Message ---- From: Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net> To: "William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>; Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)gmail.com>; ec(a)osenergy.org Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:49:54 PM Subject: Re: [EC] creativity needed for bumper sticker In the line of creativity - how about a graphic of a transmission tower with the red circle around and a line through it - the sign for NO. Make it 5 or 6 inches round, and make some of the window decal type that go inside and can be peeled off. -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org]On Behalf Of William V. DePaulo, Esq. Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 11:31 AM To: Paul Wilson Cc: ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: [EC] creativity needed for bumper sticker I THINK WE MIGHT CONSIDER THE NOTION OF COMING UP WITH A BUMPER STICKER OR SLOGAN THAT IS BROAD ENUF TO CAPTURE NOT ONLY THE ALLEGHENY TRAIL PROJECT OF 114 MILES, BUT ALSO THE AEP PROJECT THAT WILL RUN 500+ MILES FROM WINFIELD TO NEW JERSEY. I THINK WE OUGHT TO ALSO SERIOUSLY CONSIDER INTERVENING AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE AEP PROCEEDING AND TRY TO RALLY OPPONENTS FROM THE MUCH MORE SOUTHERN ROUTE IT WILL TAKE, TO JOIN OPPONENTS FROM THE NORTHERN ALLEGHENY PATH. BILL DEPAULO 304-541-1984 On 9/19/07, Paul Wilson <pjgrunt(a)gmail.com> wrote: For the bumper sticker could we use the symbol of an electrical transmission tower as opposed to the word "towers"?? That would make it clear we do not mean wind towers. paul On 9/17/07, Barbara Fallon < brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: We need to get bumper stickers....and we need to decide on our slogan. Who is creative and would be thrilled to take on the bumper sticker project. I would like to have bumper stickers ready to go within the next two weeks.... Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975 _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

1 0

Re: [EC] fundraiser letters
by Barbara Fallon 27 Sep '07

27 Sep '07

Rodger and Sandy, Thank you tremendously for getting this bulk mailing out. I was delighted to receive my letter in the mail on Saturday. You packaged it up perfectly, map and all. Thank you for doing such a good job and for following through asap. Barbara ----- Original Message ---- From: Rodger Dotson <bhaddaka(a)gmail.com> To: Karen Grubb <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:35:58 PM Subject: fundraiser letters The letters are at the post office. Rodger ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC

1 0

Fwd: WVEC Fall Gathering
by James Kotcon 24 Sep '07

24 Sep '07

>>> WVEC - Don Alexander <paradox(a)spectrumz.com> 9/7/2007 2:08 PM >>> If you are reading this text your email program either cannot display html or is configured to display the alternate plain text portion of an html email. You may view the contents of the current WVEC Action Alert online at: http://www.spectrumz.com/wvec/elist/current_aa.htm WVEC's website is at: http://www.wvecouncil.org/ All action alerts are archived at: http://www.wvecouncil.org/take_action/

1 1

Fwd: RE: TRAIL - PSC STATUS HEARING FRIDAY, SEPT 14, 2007
by James Kotcon 24 Sep '07

24 Sep '07

As I feared, Rosen will NOT be able to help us out. JBK >>> "Richard Rosen" <rrosen(a)tellus.org> 9/24/2007 2:55 PM >>> Sorry, later is not much better. I will decline again. -- Rich Rosen -----Original Message----- From: James Kotcon [mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:04 PM To: Richard Rosen Subject: Fwd: [EC] TRAIL - PSC STATUS HEARING FRIDAY, SEPT 14, 2007 Rich: While this schedule is not yet "official", it does appear to be agreed to. We will likely have until Dec. 5 to file our direct testimony, with evidentiary hearings in January. I recognize that your schedule did not permit participation in October/November, and am writing to inquire if this delay would allow you to serve as an expert witness on behalf of the Sierra Club, West Virginia Chapter. I certainly understand if your schedule is already full, but thought it might be worth asking. Thank you for your time. Jim Kotcon >>> "William V. DePaulo, Esq." <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com> 9/18/2007 10:20 AM >>> The parties at the PSC hearing Friday agreed to the following procedural schedule subject to PSC approval, which is expected. Public comment hearings week(s) of October 8 or 15, 2007 Status hearing and Charleston public comment hearing - November 1, 2007 Deadline for Staff and intervenors' testimony, including rebuttal to TrAILCo's testimony - December 5, 2007, 12:00 p.m. Deadline for propounding discovery - December 12, 2007 Deadline for TrAILCo's rebuttal testimony and other parties' cross-rebuttal of each others' testimony - January 7, 2008, 12:00 p.m. Evidentiary hearing, first phase [everyone's case but TrAILCo] - January 9-11, 14-15, 2008* * Evidentiary hearing, second phase [TrAILCo's case, including oral surrebuttal to evidence adduced in first phase; possibly Staff's witnesses unable to attend first phase] - February 12-15, 19-22, 2008. ** Initial briefs and proposed findings/conclusions - March 10, 2008 Reply briefs - March 21, 2008 In general, TrAILCo has agreed to shorten the time for its responses to discovery 1. Requests should be directed via email to each of rpalmer(a)alleghenypower.com, gdeaver(a)alleghenypower.com, hriddle(a)alleghenypower.com, bmill11(a)alleghenypower.com, ccallas(a)jacksonkelly.com, and pmelick(a)jacksonkelly.com, with the requests in an accompanying document published in Microsoft Word. 2. Requests received before 12:00 p.m. on a business day will be deemed served that day. Requests received thereafter will be deemed served on the subsequent business day. 3. TrAILCo will file and serve its objections within seven calendar days, and its responses within 14 calendar days; provided, that if that day is not a business day, then the time is extended to the subsequent business day. TrAILCo has reserved the right to assert that the sheer quantity of requests or other circumstances preclude this accelerated response protocol, as under standard Commission Rule. TrAILCo has already responded to discovery from the Staff and the WVEUG and expect thats TrAILCo, rather than the other parties, will be the principal server of discovery in the week ending December 7, 2007 Obviously, there is a premium on getting discovery out first. In that regard, however, we need to know what, if any, additional information any expert we retain may need. The expert's testimony will need to be filed by December 5. The status hearing set for November 1 is intended, in part, to deal with any pending discovery disputes, again reinforcing the idea of propounding discovery earlier rather than later. I will begin drafting a data request aimed at a range of financial and environmental issues and will forward it for suggestions. Bill William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Fwd: TrAILCo - PSC Case No. 07-0508-E-CN Staff Witness Information
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 21 Sep '07

21 Sep '07

FYI - RE SCHEDULE, FOR SUNDAY NIGHT DISCUSSION ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gregg, Billy Jack <BGregg(a)psc.state.wv.us> Date: Sep 21, 2007 2:30 PM Subject: RE: TrAILCo - PSC Case No. 07-0508-E-CN Staff Witness Information To: "Melick, Phil" <PMELICK(a)jacksonkelly.com>, "Short, Caryn" <CShort(a)psc.state.wv.us> Cc: "Watkins, Joe" <JWATKINS(a)psc.state.wv.us>, "Hitt, Richard" <RHitt(a)psc.state.wv.us>, "Auville, John" <jauville(a)psc.state.wv.us>, "DeHaven, Carrie" <CDeHaven(a)psc.state.wv.us>, "Williamson, Derrick" <DWilliam(a)mwn.com>, "sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com" <sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com>, "rodecker(a)wvdsl.net" <rodecker(a)wvdsl.net>, "bradstephens(a)comptonlawoffices.com" <bradstephens(a)comptonlawoffices.com>, "william.depaulo(a)gmail.com" <william.depaulo(a)gmail.com>, "Palmer, Randall B." <rpalmer(a)alleghenypower.com>, "Deaver, Gerald R." <gdeaver(a)alleghenypower.com>, "Callas, Chris" <CCALLAS(a)jacksonkelly.com> Folks- Even if the January dates work out, I continue to prefer letting the pro se intervenors put on their cases first, followed by TrAILCo and other parties ending with Staff. This will let the pro se intervenors, who may not be able to attend for very many days, put on their cases and get back to their real lives. Billy Jack -----Original Message----- From: Melick, Phil [mailto:PMELICK@jacksonkelly.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2:20 PM To: Short, Caryn Cc: Watkins, Joe; Hitt, Richard; Auville, John; DeHaven, Carrie; Gregg, Billy Jack; Williamson, Derrick; sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com; rodecker(a)wvdsl.net; bradstephens(a)comptonlawoffices.com; william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; Palmer, Randall B.; Deaver, Gerald R.; Callas, Chris Subject: RE: TrAILCo - PSC Case No. 07-0508-E-CN Staff Witness Information Caryn, TrAILCo intends to oppose the Staff motion in Virginia, which will not be fully briefed until October 4. However, if that motion is granted, then TrAILCo would not oppose your suggestion, provided (i) that all other prehearing dates to which we last agreed remain in place and (ii) that the parties agree to move up the dates for briefs. TrAILCo would like to complete the briefing sooner than we last discussed, in the hope of enabling an earlier Commission order. Phil Melick Jackson Kelly PLLC P. O. Box 553 Charleston, WV 25322 (1600 Laidley Tower, Court and Lee Streets, Charleston, WV 25301) pmelick(a)jacksonkelly.com 304.340.1289 (voice) 304.340.1080 (fax) Pursuant to the requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of (i) avoiding Federal tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail message from the law office of Jackson Kelly PLLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, or other dissemination of this e-mail message and/or the information contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ________________________________ From: Short, Caryn [mailto:CShort@psc.state.wv.us] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 01:43 PM To: Melick, Phil; Watkins, Joe; Hitt, Richard Cc: Auville, John; DeHaven, Carrie; Gregg, Billy Jack; 'Williamson, Derrick'; 'sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com'; 'rodecker(a)wvdsl.net'; 'bradstephens(a)comptonlawoffices.com'; 'william.depaulo(a)gmail.com'; 'Palmer, Randall B.'; 'Deaver, Gerald R.'; Callas, Chris Subject: RE: TrAILCo - PSC Case No. 07-0508-E-CN Staff Witness Information Joe and others, Please see the news article below where the Staff in VA has sought a delay of the January 14, 2007 evidentiary hearings. If the Virginia State Corporation Commission grants a continuance to the VA Staff and hearings are not to be held in VA, it seems to me that the dates the WV Staff proposed for hearings in WV in its Motion of September 11, 2007, will be available. Assuming the VA SCC grants the continuance, do any of the parties have an objection to hearings in WV in the January 9-18 timeframe? Please advise. Thanks Caryn Staff Seeks Delay in Hearing on Proposed Power Line By Sandhya Somashekhar Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, September 21, 2007; Page B06 Virginia utility regulators have asked for more time to study whether Dominion Virginia Power should be allowed to build a high-voltage power line through a 65-mile stretch of rural Northern Virginia. The staff of the State Corporation Commission has asked the commission, which approves power lines, to postpone arguments scheduled for Jan. 14 Dominion's application is "voluminous" and "both complex and novel," according to a four-page staff request released Wednesday. The staff asked that the Richmond hearing be delayed until Feb. 25. In addition, staff members said they want additional time to consider whether a high-voltage line proposed for Maryland would affect whether the Virginia power line is needed. Dominion, which contends that the Virginia line is needed to guard against blackouts, is reviewing the commission staff request, a spokeswoman said. If the commission delays the project for more than a year, the company might be allowed to bypass the state and appeal directly to the federal government under a new federal law. The Piedmont Environmental Council, a nonprofit organization that is leading opposition to the line, said it is pleased with the staff's request. They recognize it's not as simple as the scare tactics of, 'Your lights are going to go out if you don't get this line,' " council spokesman Robert W. Lazaro Jr. said. "It is very significant." The 270-mile, 500-kilovolt transmission line, a joint project of Dominion and Pennsylvania-based Allegheny Power, would carry electricity from coal-fired plants in the Midwest to fast-growing Northern Virginia. Dominion would be in charge of the eastern part of the line, which would begin in Frederick, Va., and end in Loudoun County, slicing through parts of Fauquier, Rappahannock, Culpeper, Warren and Prince William counties. The estimated cost of that portion of the line is $243 million The other project the commission staff wants to study is a $1.8 billion, 300-mile high-voltage line proposed by Allegheny and American Electric Power. It would start in West Virginia and end in Frederick County, close to the Montgomery County border. Both proposals have provoked an outcry from preservationists and landowners, who worry that the cables and lofty steel towers will mar the landscape and bring down property values. In addition, the environmental council has argued that Virginia does not need the Dominion line. On Monday, the organization published a report that says Dominion and Allegheny misrepresented the data to prop up the case for the line and that they ignored "less costly and less environmentally damaging solutions." In April, Dominion released a report that warned of "significant problems in the system that will require new transmission facilities by 2011." This week, the utility company announced energy conservation initiatives to help meet the growing demand for electricity in Virginia. A hearing examiner for the State Corporation Commission is to decide this fall whether to delay arguments in the case. If the examiner agrees to a delay, anyone who wants to testify Jan. 14 would be allowed to do so. -----Original Message----- From: Short, Caryn Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:43 AM To: 'Melick, Phil'; Watkins, Joe Cc: Auville, John; DeHaven, Carrie; Gregg, Billy Jack; Williamson, Derrick; sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com; rodecker(a)wvdsl.net; bradstephens(a)comptonlawoffices.com; william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; Palmer, Randall B.; Deaver, Gerald R.; Callas, Chris Subject: RE: TrAILCo - PSC Case No. 07-0508-E-CN Staff Witness Information Joe, In accordance with Commissioner McKinney's directive, at the hearing on Friday, I have confirmed that the Staff witnesses will be available for the February hearing dates. The Staff understands that for the February hearing dates TrAILCo will proceed with the presentation of its witnesses first, any remaining intervenor witnesses next and finally the Staff witnesses, both in-house and Consultant. The Staff is willing to work with TrAILCo and any intervenors that have witnesses remaining to be called at the February hearings in order to accommodate the calling of out of town witnesses in an efficient manner. Further it may be appropriate to group the presentation of witnesses by their area of expertise. Please provide this information to the Commission and let me know if they require anything further. Caryn Caryn Watson Short Supervising Attorney WV PSC P.O. Box 812 201 Brooks Street Charleston, WV 25323 Ph. (304)-340-0338 Fax: (304) 340-0372 -----Original Message----- From: Melick, Phil [mailto:PMELICK@jacksonkelly.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:47 AM To: Watkins, Joe Cc: Short, Caryn; Auville, John; DeHaven, Carrie; Gregg, Billy Jack; Williamson, Derrick; sriggs(a)spilmanlaw.com; rodecker(a)wvdsl.net; bradstephens(a)comptonlawoffices.com; william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; Palmer, Randall B.; Deaver, Gerald R.; Callas, Chris Subject: TrAILCo - PSC Case No. 07-0508-E-CN Joe, As you requested on Friday, here is what the attending lawyers agreed to with respect to a procedural schedule, in the event that the Commission determines not to proceed as per the previous Staff memoranda. Public comment hearings week(s) of October 8 or 15, 2007 Status hearing and Charleston public comment hearing - November 1, 2007 Deadline for Staff and intervenors' testimony, including rebuttal to TrAILCo's testimony - December 5, 2007, 12:00 p.m. Deadline for propoundment of discovery - December 12, 2007 Deadline for TrAILCo's rebuttal testimony and other parties' cross-rebuttal of each others' testimony - January 7, 2008, 12:00 p.m. Evidentiary hearing, first phase [everyone's case but TrAILCo] - January 9-11, 14-15, 2008 TrAILCo will pay for expedited transcription of proceedings Evidentiary hearing, second phase [TrAILCo's case, including oral surrebuttal to evidence adduced in first phase; possibly Staff's witnesses unable to attend first phase] - February 12-15, 19-22, 2008. TrAILCo will pay for overnight transcription of proceedings Initial briefs and proposed findings/conclusions - March 10, 2008 Reply briefs - March 21, 2008 The Commission might also wish to reflect in an order TrAILCo's stipulation as to how it would expedite discovery. With the understanding that it will not be asked to do anything more expeditiously, TrAILCo has committed to accelerating its responses to discovery as set forth below. (As stated on Friday, discovery outside this protocol will be addressed pursuant to Commission Rule.) 1. Requests should be directed via email to each of rpalmer(a)alleghenypower.com, gdeaver(a)alleghenypower.com, hriddle(a)alleghenypower.com, bmill11(a)alleghenypower.com, ccallas(a)jacksonkelly.com, and pmelick(a)jacksonkelly.com, with the requests in an accompanying document published in Microsoft Word. 2. Requests received before 12:00 p.m. on a business day will be deemed served that day. Requests received thereafter will be deemed served on the subsequent business day. 3. TrAILCo will file and serve its objections within seven calendar days, and its responses within 14 calendar days; provided, that if that day is not a business day, then the time is extended to the subsequent business day. TrAILCo must reserve the right to take the position that sheer quantity of requests or other circumstances preclude this accelerated response protocol, just as might be the case under standard Commission Rule. By copy of this correspondence to the lawyers who attended our hearing on Friday, we respectfully reiterate our request that parties propound discovery as soon as they are able. In that regard, TrAILCo's case in chief has been of public record since March 30, and TrAILCo has already responded to discovery from the Staff and the WVEUG. We would expect that TrAILCo, and not the other parties, will be the principal server of discovery in the week ending December 7, 2007 (if the Commission adopts the stipulated schedule above). Joe, please let us know if the you or the Commission have any questions or concerns. Phil Melick Jackson Kelly PLLC P. O. Box 553 Charleston, WV 25322 (1600 Laidley Tower, Court and Lee Streets, Charleston, WV 25301) pmelick(a)jacksonkelly.com 304.340.1289 (voice) 304.340.1080 (fax) Pursuant to the requirements related to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of (i) avoiding Federal tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail message from the law office of Jackson Kelly PLLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient or recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, or other dissemination of this e-mail message and/or the information contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

US Climate Change Science Program
by duane330＠aol.com 21 Sep '07

21 Sep '07

US CLIMATE CHANGE SCIENCE PROGRAM PANEL GIVES U.S. PROGRAM MIXED GRADES. The National Research Council is pleased that the Bush Administration has advanced the science of climate change, but?has serious concerns about the management, funding, and emphasis of the? $1.7 billion a year Climate Change Science Program.? ? http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11934 ? http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11934 ? http://www.gcrio.org/ipcc/ar4/wg1/faq/index.htm ? Chapter from which Questions have been taken [PDF files] Questions [PDF files] Multiple chapters All Questions in Single File? [7Mb] 1. Historical Overview of Climate Change Science 1.1. What Factors Determine Earth's Climate? [392Kb] 1.2. What is the Relationship between Climate Change and Weather? [514Kb] 1.3. What is the Greenhouse Effect? [2.7Mb] 2.Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing 2.1. How do Human Activities Contribute to Climate Change and How do They Compare with Natural Influences? [298Kb] 3.Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change 3.1. How are Temperatures on Earth Changing? [3.7Mb] 3.2. How is Precipitation Changing? [296Kb] 3.3. Has there been a Change in Extreme Events like Heat Waves, Droughts, Floods and Hurricanes? [412Kb] 4.Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground 4.1. Is the Amount of Snow and Ice on the Earth Decreasing? [254Kb] 5. Observations: Oceanic Climate Change and Sea Level 5.1. Is Sea Level Rising? [139Kb] 6. Palaeoclimate 6.1. What Caused the Ice Ages and Other Important Climate Changes Before the Industrial Era? [549Kb] 6.2. Is the Current Climate Change Unusual Compared to Earlier Changes in Earth's History? [79Kb] 7.Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System?and Biogeochemistry 7.1. Are the Increases in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases During the Industrial Era Caused by Human Activities? [701Kb] 8.Climate Models and their Evaluation 8.1. How Reliable Are the Models Used to Make Projections of Future Climate Change? [183Kb] 9.?Understanding and Attributing Climate Change 9.1. Can Individual Extreme Events be Explained by Greenhouse Warming? [129Kb] 9.2. Can the Warming of the 20th Century be Explained by Natural Variability? [601Kb] 10.?Global Climate Projections 10.1. Are Extreme Events, Like Heat Waves, Droughts or Floods, Expected to Change as the Earth's Climate Changes? [79Kb] 10.2. How Likely are Major or Abrupt Climate Changes, such as Loss of Ice Sheets or Changes in Global Ocean Circulation? [100Kb] 10.3. If Emissions of Greenhouse Gases are Reduced, How Quickly do Their Concentrations in the Atmosphere Decrease? [211Kb] 11. Regional Climate Projections 11.1. Do Projected Changes in Climate Vary from Region to Region? [1.2 Mb] U.S. Global Change Research Information Office, Suite 250, 1717 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: +1 202 223 6262. Fax: +1 202 223 3065. Email: information(a)gcrio.org. Web: www.gcrio.org. Webmaster: webmaster(a)gcrio.org. ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com

1 0

Fwd: Coal: Cheap, Abundant, Cheap
by Paul Wilson 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

good for a few laughs. pass it around. best,paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org <Alice.McKeown(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Sep 18, 2007 12:39 PM Subject: Coal: Cheap, Abundant, Cheap To: bruce_nilles(a)prodigy.net, Baumling(a)aol.com, pjgrunt(a)gmail.com, Pat.Gallagher(a)sierraclub.org This video parody of coal is hilarious: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71kckb8hhOQ ________________________________ Alice McKeown Sierra Club Clean Air & Coal Campaigns tel: 202.675.6271 fax: 202.547.6009 -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

creativity needed for bumper sticker
by Barbara Fallon 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

We need to get bumper stickers....and we need to decide on our slogan. Who is creative and would be thrilled to take on the bumper sticker project. I would like to have bumper stickers ready to go within the next two weeks.... ____________________________________________________________________________________ Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html

4 4

[Fwd: [forestcouncil] [hw-issues] Dominion subpoenaed on plants Richmond Times Dispatch 9/19/07]
by Regina Hendrix 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

I wanted to be sure Energy Committee members saw this one. Regina

1 0

Draft Resolutions for Presentation at CCL Meeting
by Regina Hendrix 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

I will be leaving for the 2007 CCL meeting on Saturday and am interested in having input and comment from the energy committee membership, esp. on the one about the Environmental Protection Act. I would appreciate it if you would take a quick look and feed me your comments either today or Friday. Regina

1 0

TrAIL power point presentation
by duane330＠aol.com 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

Attached is the power point presentation of John Balasko, as presented at the last meeting of the Monongahela Chaper of the WV? Sierra Club. Be sure to provide proper attribution to John Balasko? if you use these slides. From:? Jonathan and Duane ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com

3 2

Bill Clinton in Charleston on Oct. 13th
by Duane330＠aol.com 20 Sep '07

20 Sep '07

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Nick Casey August 29, 2007 (304) 345-2000; (304) 610-4941 PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON TO KEYNOTE ANNUAL DEMOCRATIC DINNER -Record-breaking crowd expected for Jefferson-Jackson Dinner- CHARLESTON, WV – West Virginia State Democratic Party Chairman Nick Casey today announced that President Bill Clinton will be this year’s keynote speaker for the Jefferson-Jackson Dinner, which will be held on Saturday, Oct. 13 at the Charleston Civic Center. President Bill Clinton officially accepted Gov. Joe Manchin’s personal invitation earlier this week. “I am truly honored that President Clinton has accepted my invitation to be our guest speaker this year,” Gov. Joe Manchin said. “Anytime we can get a former president, who still enjoys such high popularity, in our state, it is a positive thing. I join my fellow Democrats in welcoming President Clinton and look forward to his visit.” The Jefferson-Jackson Dinner is an annual fundraising event that is spo nsored by the Democratic Party every fall in Charleston. The Party is expecting to shatter any previous crowd records and pack more than 2,000 Democrats into the Civic Center this year. “The Party has tried for several years to get President Clinton to keynote our annual dinner,” Chairman Casey added. “We feel very fortunate that he has accepted the invitation this year, and we are confident that we will have a great crowd. Democrats won’t want to miss this event.” Tickets are $125 for floor seating and $75 for first-level seating and will go on sale Tuesday, Sept. 4, at 9:00 a.m. Individuals may purchase tickets by calling the Democratic Party headquarters at 304.342.8121. ### ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

2 1

The "No-TrAIL March on Charleston"
by Duane330＠aol.com 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

In a message dated 9/19/2007 1:08:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, william.depaulo(a)gmail.com writes: WHAT IS THE BIGGEST NUMBER OF PEOPLE YOU THINK WOULD BE WILLING TO COME TO CHARLESTON IN EFFECT TO MARCH AGAINST THE PROPOSED TRAIL LINE. 100, 1,000, 10,000, MORE" We will need some active coordination work to get 1,000. As you know, plenty of property owners have written letters to the PSC. A few hundreds have signed petitions; but, to get them together for a long trip will require a plum at the end of the rainbow, i.e. there needs to be a real payoff at the end.......... We would need a celebrity to make a speech, or do a concert........ The Commissioners of the PSC are not going to be standing on the steps at the Capitol, waiving cheers to the crowd. The Governor will not likely be serving apple cider or handing out picket signs. A tootsie-roll from Bill dePaulo will not draw people from Preston County. If we can attract a nationally known leader...........Wow, that could be huge. Duane ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

1 0

REAL HEALTH ISSUES from TrAIL
by duane330＠aol.com 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

See the attachment for some real health issues from TrAIL. ................. Duane ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com

1 0

intervention meeting number 2
by Grubb, Karen 19 Sep '07

19 Sep '07

Barbara has graciously offered her home for a second meeting on the PSC Intervention at 4:00 Sunday, September 23. We will be discussing the plan and expert witnesses. Bring your snack and/or beverage of choice. Can someone please tell me where to find the document that Paul had which gave the outline for making a campaign plan. He said it is on the clubhouse, but I don't know where to look. Barbara and I signed the fundraising letter today and it will be mailed as soon as it is copied and stuffed. Great work everyone! Karen

2 1

TRAIL - PSC STATUS HEARING FRIDAY, SEPT 14, 2007
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 18 Sep '07

18 Sep '07

The parties at the PSC hearing Friday agreed to the following procedural schedule subject to PSC approval, which is expected. Public comment hearings week(s) of October 8 or 15, 2007 Status hearing and Charleston public comment hearing - November 1, 2007 Deadline for Staff and intervenors' testimony, including rebuttal to TrAILCo's testimony - December 5, 2007, 12:00 p.m. Deadline for propounding discovery - December 12, 2007 Deadline for TrAILCo's rebuttal testimony and other parties' cross-rebuttal of each others' testimony - January 7, 2008, 12:00 p.m. Evidentiary hearing, first phase [everyone's case but TrAILCo] - January 9-11, 14-15, 2008* * Evidentiary hearing, second phase [TrAILCo's case, including oral surrebuttal to evidence adduced in first phase; possibly Staff's witnesses unable to attend first phase] - February 12-15, 19-22, 2008. ** Initial briefs and proposed findings/conclusions - March 10, 2008 Reply briefs - March 21, 2008 In general, TrAILCo has agreed to shorten the time for its responses to discovery 1. Requests should be directed via email to each of rpalmer(a)alleghenypower.com, gdeaver(a)alleghenypower.com, hriddle(a)alleghenypower.com, bmill11(a)alleghenypower.com, ccallas(a)jacksonkelly.com, and pmelick(a)jacksonkelly.com, with the requests in an accompanying document published in Microsoft Word. 2. Requests received before 12:00 p.m. on a business day will be deemed served that day. Requests received thereafter will be deemed served on the subsequent business day. 3. TrAILCo will file and serve its objections within seven calendar days, and its responses within 14 calendar days; provided, that if that day is not a business day, then the time is extended to the subsequent business day. TrAILCo has reserved the right to assert that the sheer quantity of requests or other circumstances preclude this accelerated response protocol, as under standard Commission Rule. TrAILCo has already responded to discovery from the Staff and the WVEUG and expect thats TrAILCo, rather than the other parties, will be the principal server of discovery in the week ending December 7, 2007 Obviously, there is a premium on getting discovery out first. In that regard, however, we need to know what, if any, additional information any expert we retain may need. The expert's testimony will need to be filed by December 5. The status hearing set for November 1 is intended, in part, to deal with any pending discovery disputes, again reinforcing the idea of propounding discovery earlier rather than later. I will begin drafting a data request aimed at a range of financial and environmental issues and will forward it for suggestions. Bill William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

1 0

Re: [EC] ...no new towers .........
by Barbara Fallon 17 Sep '07

17 Sep '07

Yes, I had considered this point (windpower). How about "WV is Ours,, STOP Allegheny Towers." ----- Original Message ---- From: Beth Little <blittle(a)citynet.net> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; "Grubb, Karen" <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu>; EC(a)osenergy.org Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 6:47:24 PM Subject: RE: [EC] ...no new towers ......... Folks in my area would probably think it was referring to wind towers. -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org]On Behalf Of Barbara Fallon Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:58 PM To: Grubb, Karen; EC(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: [EC] ...no new towers ......... I think we need to keep it simple "WV is Ours, No new towers." In fact I think we need to get bumper stickers made with this slogan and send it out to those who respond to our fundraising letter. B ----- Original Message ---- From: "Grubb, Karen" <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> To: EC(a)osenergy.org Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:31:47 PM Subject: Re: [EC] ...no new towers ......... I prefer keeping “WV is ours, no new towers at the end”, but the beginning can be altered to clarify its meaning, such as “Stop Alleheny’s TrAIL from gouging the ratepayers” or “Stop Allegheny Power from gouging the ratepayers.” We could use the rhyme between power, towers and ours somehow. From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org ] On Behalf Of duane330(a)aol.com Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:49 AM To: ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] ...no new towers ......... "Stop Allegheny from Gouging the Ratepayers. WV is Ours, No New Towers" This is good. However, since there are a number of companies with Allegheny in the title, including Allegheny Wood Products with whom we are now working, so could we use the word TrAIL instead of Allegheny................ Might we consider the following modification.... "No New TrAIL Towers , WV Is Ours, Stop Ratepayer Gouging" Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658

1 0

FW: More Information on PATH
by Grubb, Karen 17 Sep '07

17 Sep '07

________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:22 AM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: More Information on PATH Karen, Here is some additional information. Michael http://caponvalleycoalition.com/2007/08/23/path-the-other-trail-ep-and-a llegheny-formalize-joint-venture-to-build-transmission-line/ ________________________________ Michael, Yes PATH is the other southern line I was referring to. But since, as the attached email says, this line will go to New Jersey, it could go through Jefferson County. I believe the electric lines are up to the PSC, although if the local commission and your representatives in Charleston come out against it, that could carry some weight with PSC. Unfortunately, our governor mostly seems to favor the lines since that means WV will sell more coal. If NIETC if approved by Congress, what the states say may not matter, as the federal government would have the power of eminent domain. NIETC includes the whole top half of WV, and states north and east of it. This federal designation is what has given Allegheny and American Electric the impetus to propose these power lines. Karen: I think you are correct, the Allegheny TrAIL project was at first proposed as indicated, but has since been changed to the current more southern route. The other project to watch is the joint AE-AEP 765-kv line (PATH) from the John Amos plant near Charleston to somewhere in New Jersey. If TrAIL is approved, I suspect that PATH will be next. Furthermore, if the NIETC is approved, Jefferson County could easily be in the route for this or other lines. Hence, stopping TrAIL is important, even if this particular line is not in your back yard. JBK ________________________________ Dear Karen, I had first thought so myself, but now think that there must be two separate lines, TRAIL and PATH, so I googled Bedington, which is the electric substation near us mentioned in the 2006 Allegheny Power letter and found the following, http://www.alleghenyenergy.com/Newsroom/NewsReleases/2007/PJM_Bd_Approva l_0607.pdf, I am going to try and follow up this week to see where this stands with the local county planning commission. Do they have any jurisdiction over this, to your knowledge, or would it all be up to the WV Public Service Commission? You mentioned an NIETC. Do you know if this includes Jefferson and Berkeley Counties, I assume it does, and whether it includes anything that Allegheny wants to do anywhere in it? Thank you! Michael Lippe In a message dated 9/16/2007 7:25:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu writes: Dear Mr. Lippe, In looking at your attachment, I see it is dated March 6, 2006. I believe that the proposed route has been changed to the more southern route and no longer is planned to go through part of Maryland and Jefferson County. I have also heard that Allegheny Power is avoiding all federal lands along the route. http://www.marstellerclientarea.com/Trail_Map/TRAIL_Map_animation.html I will consult with our Energy Committee to see if they have more information I can give you. The actual eastern NIETC covers at least 2/3 of WV (Mid-Atlantic Area National Corridor includes counties in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, Virginia, and all of New Jersey, Delaware, and the District of Columbia.). The Allegheny TrAIL is the actual proposed route of one transmission line, with another being proposed much farther south in WV by American Electric Power. http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/4.26.07_National_Corridors.pd f The WV Sierra Club is fighting all additional power lines, regardless of where they are placed. We welcome your help and involvement. We are currently conducting a funding drive to collect money to pay for expert witness testimony for our intervention against Allegheny Power with the WV Public Service Commission. Karen Grubb WV Sierra Conservation Chair ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 10:02 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Ms. Grubb, There was a recent article in the Shepherdstown Chronicle about an Allegheny Power request for designation of a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor to go through the Eastern Panhandle and Jefferson County, apparently quite near to where we live. Looking at the rough map on the proposal, which I downloaded at http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/allegheny.pdf, it appears that the corridor might go through the nearby National Conservation Training Center (where there is a pair of nesting bald eagles) and then cross the Potomac very near if not through Antietem National Battlefield Park. When I started to look this up, I quickly came to your site and the battle concerning the transmission lines being planned, apparently along another route, further to the South. I am assuming that the two corridors are not related, at least geographically, but am not sure and am wondering whether the Sierra Club has looked into the issues concerning the Eastern Panhandle corridor. Thank you for any light you can shed on this and any assistance you can provide in directing me in the right direction to try and find out more about all of this. Perhaps needless to say, we are quite worried about the implications of this proposal. Best regards, Michael Lippe

1 0

FW: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines
by Grubb, Karen 17 Sep '07

17 Sep '07

Intervention Subcommittee, Please let me know if my reply to Michael Lippe below was correct, or if you know of any additional information I can send him. Thanks, Karen ________________________________ From: Grubb, Karen Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 7:25 PM To: 'MJLippe(a)aol.com' Subject: Re: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Mr. Lippe, In looking at your attachment, I see it is dated March 6, 2006. I believe that the proposed route has been changed to the more southern route and no longer is planned to go through part of Maryland and Jefferson County. I have also heard that Allegheny Power is avoiding all federal lands along the route. http://www.marstellerclientarea.com/Trail_Map/TRAIL_Map_animation.html I will consult with our Energy Committee to see if they have more information I can give you. The actual eastern NIETC covers at least 2/3 of WV (Mid-Atlantic Area National Corridor includes counties in Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, Virginia, and all of New Jersey, Delaware, and the District of Columbia.). The Allegheny TrAIL is the actual proposed route of one transmission line, with another being proposed much farther south in WV by American Electric Power http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/4.26.07_National_Corridors.pd f The WV Sierra Club is fighting all additional power lines, regardless of where they are placed. We welcome your help and involvement. We are currently conducting a funding drive to collect money to pay for expert witness testimony for our intervention against Allegheny Power with the WV Public Service Commission. Karen Grubb WV Sierra Conservation Chair ________________________________ From: MJLippe(a)aol.com [mailto:MJLippe@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 10:02 PM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: Allegheny Power Transmission Lines Dear Ms. Grubb, There was a recent article in the Shepherdstown Chronicle about an Allegheny Power request for designation of a National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor to go through the Eastern Panhandle and Jefferson County, apparently quite near to where we live. Looking at the rough map on the proposal, which I downloaded at http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/allegheny.pdf, it appears that the corridor might go through the nearby National Conservation Training Center (where there is a pair of nesting bald eagles) and then cross the Potomac very near if not through Antietem National Battlefield Park. When I started to look this up, I quickly came to your site and the battle concerning the transmission lines being planned, apparently along another route, further to the South. I am assuming that the two corridors are not related, at least geographically, but am not sure and am wondering whether the Sierra Club has looked into the issues concerning the Eastern Panhandle corridor. Thank you for any light you can shed on this and any assistance you can provide in directing me in the right direction to try and find out more about all of this. Perhaps needless to say, we are quite worried about the implications of this proposal. Best regards, Michael Lippe

2 1

Re: [EC] ...no new towers .........
by Barbara Fallon 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

I think we need to keep it simple "WV is Ours, No new towers." In fact I think we need to get bumper stickers made with this slogan and send it out to those who respond to our fundraising letter. B ----- Original Message ---- From: "Grubb, Karen" <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> To: EC(a)osenergy.org Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:31:47 PM Subject: Re: [EC] ...no new towers ......... I prefer keeping “WV is ours, no new towers at the end”, but the beginning can be altered to clarify its meaning, such as “Stop Alleheny’s TrAIL from gouging the ratepayers” or “Stop Allegheny Power from gouging the ratepayers.” We could use the rhyme between power, towers and ours somehow. From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org ] On Behalf Of duane330(a)aol.com Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:49 AM To: ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] ...no new towers ......... "Stop Allegheny from Gouging the Ratepayers. WV is Ours, No New Towers" This is good. However, since there are a number of companies with Allegheny in the title, including Allegheny Wood Products with whom we are now working, so could we use the word TrAIL instead of Allegheny................ Might we consider the following modification.... "No New TrAIL Towers , WV Is Ours, Stop Ratepayer Gouging" ____________________________________________________________________________________ Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting

5 4

Fw: Governor Rendell: Enhancing National Security through Energy Independence
by Allan Tweddle 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

Jeff I presume that you get the Governor of Pennsylvania's regular newsletter. It is interesting to note that as a coal mining State, his emphasis is on jobs from renewable energy...and no mention of CTL. He claims to have developed 1500 jobs already and anticipates 35,000 jobs in renewable energy industries. And his emphasis is on Energy Independence. There is also a bit of a sleeper out there in the shale oil of Utah, Colorado and other sites. There are those stating that the real stealth energy strategy of the US Government, as expressed in the current energy bill before Congress and the one passed in 2005, is empowering companies to begin serious drilling to extract oil from these Western oil shale deposits. The sites are almost all public lands. The estimates are that the reserves there are the largest deposits of crude in the world...and while there has been a hold placed upon these deposits since the late 30's, they are now being developed rather quietly by the Bush Administration as a hedge against energy security threats. The current estimates is that the oil there can be recovered for anywhere from $25 to $45 per barrel. I am sure that you would agree that we must take this into consideration as we develop our energy plan. Allan ----- Original Message ----- From: PA Governor's Newsletter<mailto:ra-govnews@state.pa.us> To: allantweddle(a)msn.com<mailto:allantweddle@msn.com> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:54 PM Subject: Governor Rendell: Enhancing National Security through Energy Independence September 7, 2007 Governor's Homepage<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=KkvT…> | Contact the Governor<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=vij5…> In The News: More than $1 Million given to protect, enhance PA's Coastal Zones, Shorelines <http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=64sO…> PCCD Awards Grant to Assess Needs of Latino Juveniles in 7 Counties<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=Ur3X…> Health Department Survey shows impact of Income, Gender, other Factors on Health and Access to Health Care <http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=xBfO…> Email to a Friend Would you like to send this email to a friend? Enter their email address here: Click here for a large text version of this newsletter<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=51Nf…>. Enhancing National Security Through Energy Independence After five years at war in Iraq, most experts are asking if our national interests can be protected given the level of our nation's dependence on oil from the Persian Gulf. In fact, last week, former CIA Director James Woolsey said America’s growing dependence on foreign oil is one of the greatest threats to the nation’s security and economy. His views are echoed by many of our nation's most trusted former military and political leaders. To say that the oil producing nations have us “over a barrel” is an understatement. To get out of this precarious situation, federal and state governments must pass legislation and appropriate resources to accelerate the production of domestic sources of renewable energy and fuels. To this end, I’ve called a special session of the General Assembly on energy independence, which begins Sept. 17th. This special session will address my Energy Independence Strategy<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=L/gY…> as well as debate other proposals that achieve similar ends. My strategy will reduce the nation's dependence on foreign fuels and save consumers $10 billion in energy costs over the next decade by dramatically increasing Pennsylvania’s alternative and renewable energy production capacity. Instead of Pennsylvanians sending $30 billion each year to the Persian Gulf to buy oil, we can invest that money in Pennsylvania by paying our farmers for the crops that produce ethanol and biodiesel. My PennSecurity Fuels program will require 1 billion gallons of biofuels to be produced and consumed within Pennsylvania by 2017. This proposal puts Pennsylvanians to work and makes our nation safer. In addition to decreasing our reliance on foreign fuels, our state's energy infrastructure needs to become more efficient and diversify in order to ensure that electricity is affordable for our residents and our industries. Already, some Pennsylvanians have suffered the sticker shock caused by the expiration of caps on electricity rates. Over the next three years more Pennsylvanians will see their rates increase as these caps expire. My strategy can soften the impact of the cap expiration by investing $850 million in solar and wind energy production as well as in conservation improvements in the electricity distribution systems. My proposal rewards consumers who purchase energy-efficient appliances and those who decrease energy usage in their homes. My Energy Independence Fund will attract new companies to Pennsylvania and help grow those already here in the alternative energy sector in our state. And, it will mean our consumers save money on their electricity bills. I believe it is urgent that the members of the General Assembly debate and pass a sound energy package that: (1) increases our national security by addressing our reliance on foreign oil; (2) invests funds to ensure Pennsylvania has the best alternative energy and conservation companies; and (3) rewards consumers who conserve energy. By adopting a strategic approach, Pennsylvania can declare its energy independence in a way that creates new economic opportunity for our state while also strengthening national security. Sincerely, To find out where the Governor is going to be next, check his Public Schedule<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=eMvd…>! Governor Rendell's Office, 225 Main Capitol Building, Harrisburg, PA, 17120 Photos courtesy of Commonwealth Media Services. If you are having problems viewing this message, click below http://t.lt05.net/html.asp?email=allantweddle%40msn.com&msgID=795758<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=xGYx…> Was this message forwarded to you? Sign up<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remote.html?ltk=5mcG…> if you received this email from a friend and would like to add yourself to Governor Rendell's mailing list. Unsubscribe You have received this email because you subscribed to Governor Rendell's Newsletter. If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please unsubscribe<http://www.virtualtours.state.pa.us/newsletter/listrak/remotehtml?ltk=G0RbH…>. TM & © 2007 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.

1 0

Re: [EC] Please read over one more time..
by Grubb, Karen 14 Sep '07

14 Sep '07

The Times WV reported yesterday that an alternate route has been proposed: The alternate path, called the Grafton Area Route, follows the proposed route to the southern part of Monongalia County and parallels the existing transline that goes to a substation in Pruntytown, he said. It runs through Marion, Taylor and Preston counties and then continues on the proposed route. "I'm against that power line and the destruction of so much of our pristine countryside," Marion County Commissioner Randy Elliot said. "The new plan needs to go into (review) to have less of a negative impact. West Virginia will not benefit from the power from these lines. http://www.timeswv.com/archivesearch/local_story_255230907.html Is it worth changing the letter and sending it to the additional counties? ________________________________ From: Barbara Fallon [mailto:brbr_fallon@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:40 PM To: Grubb, Karen; William DePaulo Esq Subject: Please read over one more time.. Karen, I need your signature today.. Bill, I hope all has gone well at the PSC today...

2 1

Sierra meeting tonight
by Barbara Fallon 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

I am going to be at the Sierra Club meeting tonight by 6:30. If anyone wants to join me for energy discussions I will be there. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7

2 1

Re: [EC] Status Hearing on Friday, Sept 14
by Grubb, Karen 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

I agree with you. Many people may not immediately know what grid greed is. -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 8:28 AM To: Duane330(a)aol.com; ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: Re: [EC] Status Hearing on Friday, Sept 14 I second Duane's motion. The initial impetus for this delay in scheduling was the letter from people in the Halleck Road group, and it appears to be independently supported by others. The extension for reply briefs is also warranted, as it takes time to read through the arguments from each side. I also offer a new "sound bite" for our message. We had originally agreed upon the slogan "Stop Grid Greed. WV is Ours, No New Towers" I propose to make the opening line more blunt. "Grid Greed" is cute, but it is not as clear as it could be, and it sounds like name calling, and therefore is easy to dismiss. I think our message should emphasize the phrase "Gouging the Ratepayers". The Dominion Post editorialized on this yesterday, and it is clear that the rules established by Congress in the 2005 Energy Policy Act were a blatant handout to the electric companies by locking in guaranteed profits at the expense of the ratepayers. It is an argument for which Allegheny has no defense, and it squarely confronts the issue to be faced by the PSC. Protecting the ratepayers may be the only argument that can successfully challenge the "reliability" issue. I want the Commissioners, Legislators, and the Governor to think "Gouging the Ratepayers" every time they hear Allegheny speak Hence I propose to modify the slogan to read: "Stop Allegheny from Gouging the Ratepayers. WV is Ours, No New Towers" Whaddya Tink? JBK >>> <duane330(a)aol.com> 9/12/2007 2:55 PM >>> To:? Energy Committee. I have just reviewed the proposed Schedule of the Staff of the PSC, dated September 11th.? This is to be reviewed and acted upon this Friday. Two major comments, that I put into a motion for our Energy Committee, to be acted upon by Bill DePaulo: 1.? We support the addition of 35 days to the original proposed schedule, to provide that the Evidentiary Hearings in Charleston take place after the holiday months of November and December of 2008, the new dates becoming January 9th thru January 18th. 2.? We take exception to the proposal that Reply Briefs be due on February 26, 2008, just 11 days after the due date of February 15th for the Initial Briefs.? We believe that an additional 6 days is appropriate for the due date of the Reply Briefs, as this is an extremely complex and extensive case, and because for the most part the intervenors are relying upon volunteer or part-time assistance in their legal preparations.? This would still leave 60 days for the PSC to render their decision. Respectfully submitted,?? Duane Nichols

2 1

Re: [EC] ...no new towers .........
by Grubb, Karen 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

I prefer keeping "WV is ours, no new towers at the end", but the beginning can be altered to clarify its meaning, such as "Stop Alleheny's TrAIL from gouging the ratepayers" or "Stop Allegheny Power from gouging the ratepayers." We could use the rhyme between power, towers and ours somehow. ________________________________ From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of duane330(a)aol.com Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:49 AM To: ec(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] ...no new towers ......... "Stop Allegheny from Gouging the Ratepayers. WV is Ours, No New Towers" This is good. However, since there are a number of companies with Allegheny in the title, including Allegheny Wood Products with whom we are now working, so could we use the word TrAIL instead of Allegheny................ Might we consider the following modification.... "No New TrAIL Towers, WV Is Ours, Stop Ratepayer Gouging"

1 0

Status Hearing on Friday, Sept 14
by duane330＠aol.com 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

To:? Energy Committee. I have just reviewed the proposed Schedule of the Staff of the PSC, dated September 11th.? This is to be reviewed and acted upon this Friday. Two major comments, that I put into a motion for our Energy Committee, to be acted upon by Bill DePaulo: 1.? We support the addition of 35 days to the original proposed schedule, to provide that the Evidentiary Hearings in Charleston take place after the holiday months of November and December of 2008, the new dates becoming January 9th thru January 18th. 2.? We take exception to the proposal that Reply Briefs be due on February 26, 2008, just 11 days after the due date of February 15th for the Initial Briefs.? We believe that an additional 6 days is appropriate for the due date of the Reply Briefs, as this is an extremely complex and extensive case, and because for the most part the intervenors are relying upon volunteer or part-time assistance in their legal preparations.? This would still leave 60 days for the PSC to render their decision. Respectfully submitted,?? Duane Nichols ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com

3 2

...no new towers .........
by duane330＠aol.com 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

"Stop Allegheny from Gouging the Ratepayers.? WV is Ours, No New Towers" This is good.? However, since there are a number of companies with Allegheny in the title,? including Allegheny Wood Products with whom we are now working, so could we use the word TrAIL instead of Allegheny................ Might we consider the?following modification.... "No New TrAIL Towers, WV Is Ours,?Stop Ratepayer Gouging" ________________________________________________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - http://mail.aol.com

1 0

Fwd: RE: PEC Position statement
by James Kotcon 13 Sep '07

13 Sep '07

Attached is the Piedmont Environmental Council Position Paper mentioned yesterday. It is loaded with good stuff that helps overcome the reliability arguments. It is 24 pages, but I recommend that everyone on the Energy Committee read it. JBK >>> "Bri West" <bwest(a)pecva.org> 9/12/2007 1:28 PM >>> Here it is! -----Original Message----- From: James Kotcon [mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:31 AM To: bwest(a)pecva.org Subject: PEC Position statement Brie I did not get a copy of the Position Statement you mentioned last night. Could you send me an electronic copy? JBK

1 0

article on NY power line
by Grubb, Karen 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

New York Regional Interconnect has sued NY state legislators for passing a law that prevents energy companies such as NYRI from using eminent domain to seize private property. http://www.pressconnects.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070911/NEWS01/ 709110330/1006 Cuomo wants NYRI lawsuit dismissed By Nancy Dooling Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is seeking dismissal of a lawsuit filed against state Assemblywoman Donna A. Lupardo, D-Endwell, and others by an energy company that wants to develop a power line through upstate New York. New York Regional Interconnect filed suit earlier this year against Lupardo as the author of a new state law that prevents energy companies such as NYRI from using eminent domain to seize private property. The lawsuit also names state Sen. John Bonacic, R-Mt. Hope, who sponsored the legislation in the state Senate. State lawmakers have fought NYRI by enacting legislation. Lupado cited the potential environmental and economic damage the project would do to the upstate counties through which the proposed power line would be constructed. The project would supply power only to the New York City area. NYRI is claiming it has been harmed by the state law sponsored by Lupardo and Bonacic. Cuomo is expected to argue that NYRI has not been harmed because its application is still pending before a federal agency. Also named in the NYRI lawsuit is Gov. Eliot Spitzer, former Gov. George E. Pataki, several state officials, and other upstate elected officials including state Sen. Thomas W. Libous, R-Binghamton. Lupardo said a court hearing on the matter has been scheduled for Nov. 11 in Albany's federal court before Senior U.S. District Court Judge Thomas J. McAvoy. Sens. Charles E. Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton, both D-NY, are also seeking to restrict the exercise of eminent domain by energy companies, Lupardo said. Earlier this month, a similar amendment sponsored by Rep. Michael Arcuri, D-Utica, and Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey, D-Hurley, died in the House of Representatives.

1 0

Re: [EC] Status Hearing on Friday, Sept 14
by Grubb, Karen 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

I vote yes. ________________________________ From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of duane330(a)aol.com Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:55 PM To: ec(a)osenergy.org Cc: Duane330(a)aol.com Subject: [EC] Status Hearing on Friday, Sept 14 To: Energy Committee. I have just reviewed the proposed Schedule of the Staff of the PSC, dated September 11th. This is to be reviewed and acted upon this Friday. Two major comments, that I put into a motion for our Energy Committee, to be acted upon by Bill DePaulo: 1. We support the addition of 35 days to the original proposed schedule, to provide that the Evidentiary Hearings in Charleston take place after the holiday months of November and December of 2008, the new dates becoming January 9th thru January 18th. 2. We take exception to the proposal that Reply Briefs be due on February 26, 2008, just 11 days after the due date of February 15th for the Initial Briefs. We believe that an additional 6 days is appropriate for the due date of the Reply Briefs, as this is an extremely complex and extensive case, and because for the most part the intervenors are relying upon volunteer or part-time assistance in their legal preparations. This would still leave 60 days for the PSC to render their decision. Respectfully submitted, Duane Nichols ________________________________

2 1

Re: [EC] How high
by Barbara Fallon 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

Thanks Will. I got info from JBK on this. He said 142' -150' towers. These are the numbers i will use. Thanks for getting back with me.. ----- Original Message ---- From: Will Reilly <wjreilly99(a)yahoo.com> To: Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com>; ec(a)osenergy.org Cc: Will Reilly <wjreilly99(a)yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:51:28 AM Subject: Re: [EC] How high Barbara: This is a direct quote from a TRailCo FAQ Q: Rather than placing a 500kV transmission line on 125-foot towers, wouldn't it be better just to bury it underground where nobody sees it? So it's probably at least 125 foot if this is a hypothetical question. Will The link is TrAILCo http://www.aptrailinfo.com/index.php Includes maps of route, as well as links to the WV, PA and VA applications. Barbara Fallon <brbr_fallon(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Does anyone know how high the proposed Allegheny towers will be? Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids._______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433

1 0

How high
by Barbara Fallon 12 Sep '07

12 Sep '07

Does anyone know how high the proposed Allegheny towers will be? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&…

2 1

Fwd: RE: Allegheny transmission line
by James Kotcon 10 Sep '07

10 Sep '07

Bad news! Who will address the costs of greenhouse gases? JBK >>> "Richard Rosen" <rrosen(a)tellus.org> 9/10/2007 1:10 PM >>> Jim, Sorry that I have not gotten back to you with a proposal since we spoke. But this delay illustrates my problem. I am really too busy to take on your case...I think I would be irresponsible to do so. So, upon further thought, I have to decline being a consultant to the Sierra Club. Sincerely, Rich Rosen -----Original Message----- From: James Kotcon [mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:02 PM To: Richard Rosen Subject: Allegheny transmission line A "status hearing" is scheduled on Sept. 14, at which time we expect some sort of definitive schedule for filing direct testimony, rebuttal testimony, and finally an evidentiary hearing. I agree that the primary issues we would like addressed would include "reliability" (have they made their case, and even if they have, is the line the most reasonable approach) and the issue of the effect of future carbon costs on electric rates and the demand for transmission of electricity from Allegheny versus sources with lower carbon emissions.I believe that the primary driver for this line is Allegheny's desire to sell their "low-cost" electricity to eastern markets, but if their electricity is no longer "low cost" will the line be "used and useful" Thank you again for your call, and we look forward to receiving your letter outlining services and costs. Feel free to contact me if I can provide more information Jim Kotcon 304-293-8822 (office) 304-594-3322 (home)

1 0

NIETC issues.
by Duane330＠aol.com 09 Sep '07

09 Sep '07

To: Energy Committee. It occurs to me that the NIETC components of the US Energy Policy Act of 2005 may be unconstitutional given that this act provides powers to the federal government that are in the domain of "state's rights". Consider that the federal government has apparently backed off of requiring the State of Nevada to accept the long-term storage of radioactive wastes from the nuclear power plants. Does anyone know whether the Sierra Club or others are intending to challenge this part or other parts of the Energy Policy Act of 2005? p.s. Now that Allegheny Energy is intending to use federal authority to charge back costs for planning the TrAIL line, we have a much larger set of issues to face, and more outrage on the part of the general public. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

1 0

Testimony on Reliability
by Duane330＠aol.com 09 Sep '07

09 Sep '07

To: Energy Committee. I met with Ron Klein, retired WVU professor of electrical engineering, this past Friday afternoon. We discussed the preparation of testimony regarding the proposed TrAIL line. We decided to focus on the areas of reliability and congestion. We had an extensive discussion. I printed off some documents from the PSC web pages for him and gave him some example materials from the Longview case. We are both currently reading and preparing for a working session this coming week. It is important for us to do a substantial amount of study to feel comfortable about the case, so as to permit the preparation of an outline or draft of possible expert testimony. This is the current priority. My approach is to get his participation at little or no cost. I'll get a better reading on this during the coming week. So, Jonothan and I can hopefully meet with him a couple of times this coming week. Duane p.s. I came home from Pennsylvania with a few additional ideas about testimony for the TrAIL case and am working to put a summary together. An MD presented references on health effects and a landowner presented some compelling information on security risks, as in "homeland" security. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

1 0

FW: Transmission line blurb for WVHC
by Grubb, Karen 06 Sep '07

06 Sep '07

________________________________ From: Frank Young [mailto:fyoung@mountain.net] Sent: Thu 9/6/2007 11:51 AM To: Grubb, Karen Subject: Re: [EC] Transmission line blurb for chapter web page Thanks Karen. The deadline for the September Highlands Voice was last Friday- the day we met at Barbara's. And I was away from computer until Monday. We will have a good article, including with bullet points for letters and info. on how to contribute $$$, etc. in the October issue. If there is anything else, more specific or more urgent or whatever that comes up, and which the Highlands Voice can help with, send it to me. Or you can send stuff directly to Editor John McFerrin at johnmcferrin(a)aol.com . Understand though, John edits and prioritizes submissions by others. But his policy is to use, without editing and without question, anything submitted by a WVHC board member, . So if it's really important, get it to me and it will be in the Voice. Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: Grubb, Karen <mailto:kgrubb@fairmontstate.edu> To: Frank Young <mailto:fyoung@mountain.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 5:50 PM Subject: FW: [EC] Transmission line blurb for chapter web page Use as you see fit. You were a big help at the meeting. Thanks for coming. -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 2:37 PM To: EC(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] Transmission line blurb for chapter web page Attached is a modified and updated fact sheet for the web page, or for general use. I have included a sample letter to political leaders, as well as an announcement of public hearings on the last page. JBK

1 0

Re: [EC] consultants -Barbara
by Barbara Fallon 05 Sep '07

05 Sep '07

I will look into this. As you will recall Jim, the Energy Foundation is the source we discussed on a recent phone call with Pat Gallagher and Beth Soholt. I think this foundation only funds to the mid-west. You know I will look into it though. ... ----- Original Message ---- From: "Grubb, Karen" <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu> To: EC(a)osenergy.org Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 2:12:56 PM Subject: Re: [EC] consultants -Barbara http://www.ef.org/home.cfm Barbara, what do you think? -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:04 PM To: EC(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] consultants I have made another contact with Rosen at the Tellus Institute, and asked him to send us a letter outlining his services and costs. He suggested we contact "The Energy Foundation" as a potential funding source, as they often fund work such as this. I seem to recall that name mentioned earlier, so perhaps we should follow up expeditiously, or at least find out who they are. JBK _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase. http://farechase.yahoo.com/

2 1

Re: [EC] Aptrail Campaign Webpage is now up on the Chapter website.
by Paul Wilson 05 Sep '07

05 Sep '07

Please review ASAP and let me know of any changes you wish to see either in the LINK on the left side of the Chapter homepage OR on the Campaign webpage. thanks, paul -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

2 1

Re: [EC] consultants -Barbara
by Grubb, Karen 04 Sep '07

04 Sep '07

http://www.ef.org/home.cfm Barbara, what do you think? -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:04 PM To: EC(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] consultants I have made another contact with Rosen at the Tellus Institute, and asked him to send us a letter outlining his services and costs. He suggested we contact "The Energy Foundation" as a potential funding source, as they often fund work such as this. I seem to recall that name mentioned earlier, so perhaps we should follow up expeditiously, or at least find out who they are. JBK _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

1 0

consultants
by James Kotcon 04 Sep '07

04 Sep '07

I have made another contact with Rosen at the Tellus Institute, and asked him to send us a letter outlining his services and costs. He suggested we contact "The Energy Foundation" as a potential funding source, as they often fund work sch as this. I seem to recall that name mentioned earlier, so perhaps we should follow up expeditiously, or at least find out who they are. JBK

1 0

backpack
by Barbara Fallon 04 Sep '07

04 Sep '07

Someone left their backpack at my house after the meeting Friday night....Lots of eco stuff in it, but no name. Barbara ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433

1 0

minutes
by Sally Wilts 03 Sep '07

03 Sep '07

These are the draft minutes. Please send any corrections to me and I'll compile them and send out the corrected minutes. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469

1 0

Re: [EC] Transmission line blurb for chapter web page
by Grubb, Karen 02 Sep '07

02 Sep '07

Thanks, Jim. This is great! Is it okay if I forward all or part of this to Frank Young for him to use on the WVHC website and/or newsletter? -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 2:37 PM To: EC(a)osenergy.org Subject: [EC] Transmission line blurb for chapter web page Attached is a modified and updated fact sheet for the web page., or for general use. I have included a sample letter to political leaders, as well as an announcement of public hearings on the last page. JBK

1 0

Transmission line blurb for chapter web page
by James Kotcon 01 Sep '07

01 Sep '07

Attached is a modified and updated fact sheet for the web page., or for general use. I have included a sample letter to political leaders, as well as an announcement of public hearings on the last page. JBK

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

EC September 2007