July 2007 - EC - lists.bikelover.org

The Climate Game is Over..(y, n, really.?)
by Duane330＠aol.com 29 Jul '07

29 Jul '07

Editorial Climate: Game Over Donald Kennedy, editor, Science (AAAS) With respect to climate change, we have abruptly passed the tipping point in what until recently has been a tense political controversy. Why? Industry leaders, nongovernmental organizations, Al Gore, and public attention have all played a role. At the core, however, it's about the relentless progress of science. As data accumulate, denialists retreat to the safety of the Wall Street Journal op-ed page or seek social relaxation with old pals from the tobacco lobby from whom they first learned to "teach the controversy." Meanwhile, political judgments are in, and the game is over. Indeed, on this page last week, a member of Parliament described how the European Union and his British colleagues are moving toward setting hard targets for greenhouse gas reductions. Science, 27 July 2007 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "City welcomes TrAIL blazers", Fairmont Times West Virginian, front page headlines Regional office for the power line will be in Vets' Plaza. Kenny Construction Co. President John Kenny, Jr, Allegheny Power President Dave Filtman and state Sen. Brooks McCabe announce the construction company will open an office in Fairmont to build AE's new transmission line. The TrAIL project will create an estimated 700 construction jobs for the next five years. Fairmont Mayor Scott Sears officially welcomed Kenny Construction to the "family of Fairmont" and declared the city is "open for business". Kenny Construction is a Chicago-based construction company that has its focus on honesty, integrity and safety, according to its President. Friday, July 27, 2007. ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

1 0

Re: [EC] Fwd: Fw: July 25 FutureCoalFuels.org Update
by Grubb, Karen 26 Jul '07

26 Jul '07

This is a possibly as the ExCom will have a meeting August 11 in Lewisburg. I could possibly stay over at my brother's in Renick. Karen -----Original Message----- From: ec-bounces(a)osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of James Kotcon Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 9:06 AM To: ec(a)osenergy.org; Glen Besa Subject: [EC] Fwd: Fw: July 25 FutureCoalFuels.org Update Anybody want to go to Beckley to picket this event? With the right preparation, we might get a lot of press to help nip this industry in the bud. At a minimum, they should know that there is opposition, even in West Virginia. JBK >>> "Donald Strimbeck" <dcsoinks(a)comcast.net> 7/25/2007 11:05 AM >>> Untitled Donald C. Strimbeck, Secretary Upper Monongahela River Association Incorporated 109 Broad Street, P.O. Box 519 Granville, WV 26534-0519 304-599-7585 (Fax:4131) Email: dcsoinks(a)comcast.net http://www.uppermon.org http://www.monriversummit.org ----- Original Message ----- From: info futurecoalfuels To: dcsoinks(a)comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:15 AM Subject: July 25 FutureCoalFuels.org Update FutureCoalFuels.org Update July 25, 2007 In this update: Coal-to-Liquids Coalition to host major CTL conference in West Virginia Rep. Barton emphasizes need for domestic CTL fuels in House energy bill DOE highlights need for domestic CTL fuels in Sacramento Bee House approves bill funding Ohio CTL studies Peabody Energy considering CTL plant in western Kentucky Become a CTL grassroots supporter ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Coal-to-Liquids Coalition to host major CTL conference in West Virginia The Coal-to-Liquids Coalition will host a major conference Aug. 14-15 in Beckley, W.Va., that will highlight the significant energy security, economic and environmental benefits America stands to gain by jumpstarting production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels. The conference will feature the latest information on the outlook for domestically produced CTL fuels by U.S. House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman John Murtha (D-Pa.) U.S. Air Force Undersecretary Dr. Ronald M. Sega, Assistant Air Force Secretary William Anderson, as well as presentations from leading industry, financial and labor experts. Among the speakers scheduled to participate in the conference are United Mine Workers of America President Cecil Roberts, Pat Esposito, energy advisor to West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin (D) and Peabody Energy Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Fred Palmer. The conference will also include a luncheon presentation by Lt. Col. Daniel Millman, who conducted B-52 testing of Fischer-Tropsch fuels for the Air Force in 2006. Col. Millman will detail his experience flying aircraft powered by fuels made using the same process that will be used to produce domestic CTL fuels. "The Coal-to-Liquids Coalition is proud to host this conference that will spotlight how CTL fuels can play a vital role in creating a new energy future for America," said National Mining Association President and CEO Kraig R. Naasz. "On behalf of the coalition, I urge those interested in learning how CTL fuels can put America on a path to energy independence to attend and learn more from leading military, industry, labor and government representatives on the many benefits offered by domestic CTL fuels." To register and learn more about the conference, please visit: www.ctlconference2007.org or contact Corey Henry at chenry(a)futurecoalfuels.org. Rep. Barton emphasizes need for domestic CTL fuels in House energy bill House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Joe Barton (R-Texas) recently expressed dismay that the House of Representatives may soon consider energy legislation that does not contain incentives meant to jumpstart the production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels. Speaking at an energy forum hosted by Congressional Quarterly, Barton stressed that coal is "our most abundant natural resource.and we ought to use it." Barton lamented that energy legislation the House could consider in the next two weeks as currently drafted is an "energy bill that has no energy in it." Barton said that the abundance of coal in the U.S. is what makes CTL fuels "so attractive," saying "politically [CTL] has to be in the mix" if the House stands any chance of advancing comprehensive energy legislation. John Ward, vice president of marketing and government affairs for Headwaters Inc., participated in a panel discussion with representatives from leading energy producing and using organizations and detailed how congressional support for CTL fuels is needed to begin reducing America's growing reliance on oil imported from unstable parts of the world. Headwaters Inc. is a member of the Coal-to-Liquids Coalition (CTLC) and is actively engaged in efforts to construct the first fleet of CTL facilities in the United States. Ward also noted that the construction and operation of domestic CTL facilities will create thousands of new, high-paying jobs across the nation. He stressed that domestically made CTL fuels will help reduce the flow of billions of dollars American consumers send to hostile and unstable nations. In addition, Ward stressed that federal studies have demonstrated that in comparison to the fuels they will replace, CTL fuels will be as clean, or cleaner, in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, while substantially reducing emissions of harmful pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and particulate matter "On behalf of the CTLC, I want to thank John Ward and Rep. Barton for so clearly making the case for federal support of incentives that would accelerate domestic CTL production and help put America on the road to energy independence," said National Mining Association President and CEO Kraig R. Naasz. "America's future economic prosperity and national security hinge on allowing domestic CTL fuels to lead the way toward breaking our addiction to foreign oil." DOE highlights need for domestic CTL fuels in Sacramento Bee A senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) official earlier this month emphasized the urgent need to begin production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels, citing the energy security and environmental gains America can realize through production and use of domestic CTL fuels. "Energy security means having reliable, affordable and environmentally sound sources of energy available largely from domestic sources," wrote Lowell Miller, director of DOE's Office of Sequestration, Hydrogen and Clean Coal Fuels in a July 13 Sacramento Bee opinion piece. "Coal fits the bill." As crude oil prices appear likely to remain in the $50-60 range for the foreseeable future, "coal-derived fuels can provide a highly competitive and clean supplement to oil-derived fuels, substantially reducing the need for imported oil and thereby increasing energy security," said Miller. "The chemical-industrial process for extracting ultra-clean diesel fuel, jet fuel and other products from coal has been around for decades, but only in recent years have advances in technology and the steep increase in the price of oil combined to make "coal-to-liquids" an attractive part of the solution to our pressing energy security and environmental concerns," wrote Miller. Miller noted that a recent report from the National Coal Council estimates that America's coal supply could produce 2.6 million barrels per day of coal-derived fuels and highlighted that the Air Force has already "successfully tested blends of coal-derived jet fuel in its planes." Miller emphasized that technological innovations are helping to make coal use increasingly clean. "Carbon sequestration and other emissions-reduction technologies can be applied to coal-to-liquids plants, and the primary product, ultra-clean diesel fuel, is far cleaner than any diesel fuel or gasoline in use today," Miller wrote. As various legislative proposals have been and will continue to be considered on Capitol Hill, Miller said efforts are under across the country to begin constructing the first fleet of CTL plants. "While the legislative wheels grind, developers are working on coal-to-liquids plans with the governors and governments of Alaska, Montana, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and Louisiana." Miller also noted that America's economic competitors are racing ahead with plans to produce CTL fuels. "China.expects to be producing 20,000 barrels of fuel daily from its first coal-to-liquids plant before the year is out," said Miller. "When planned expansion is complete, the plant will produce 200,000 barrels of fuel a day. This is only the first shot in a massive, $127 billion coal liquefaction campaign by the Chinese." Miller also pointed to CTL production plans in Australia, Indonesia and New Zealand and noted that India's government is actively studying CTL fuel production. A complete copy of Miller's opinion piece is available here. House approves bill funding Ohio CTL studies The U.S. House of Representatives last week approved a fiscal year 2008 appropriations bill that contains $2.25 million to study the technologies that could be used by a CTL plant Baard Energy plans on constructing in southeast Ohio. A total of $1 million has been set aside to support a carbon sequestration scoping study meant to identify major geologic sites in Ohio suitable for underground carbon dioxide storage, while another $250,000 would be used to study the carbon life cycle of coal-based transportation fuel. The remaining $1 million would finance a northeastern Ohio pipeline study. Construction of the Baard facility is expected to result in 4,000 jobs over the four years of expected construction and generate $31 million in income southeast Ohio. Peabody Energy considering CTL plant in western Kentucky Platts Coal Trader reported on July 6 that a CTL project under consideration by Peabody Energy for construction in Union County, Ky., is in the "very preliminary" stages, with its future likely to be decided by the results of a soon-to-be completed feasibility study. Platts reported that the $3 billion plant would produce about 30,000 barrels of transportation fuels daily, with operations beginning in 2012 or 2013. Kevin Sheilley, president and CEO of Northwest Kentucky Forward, told Platts that the office of Kentucky Governor Ernie Fletcher has given Peabody $400,000 for the feasibility study, with Peabody expected to contribute another $1 million. For now, no completion date for the study has been set. The Peabody CTL plant is one of seven clean-coal projects proposed for the region, according to Sheilley, most of which would produce transportation fuels or synthetic natural gas. Become a CTL grassroots supporter The Coal-to-Liquids Coalition is working to build a strong network of grassroots supporters willing to contact federal and state lawmakers to voice their support for measures meant to spur the domestic production of affordable, clean-burning CTL fuels. CTL grassroots supporters can include company employees, union members, retirees, their families, friends and others spread across the country who share a personal stake in the successful launch of a domestic CTL industry. The coming months are likely to see continued congressional CTL activity; a time in which a robust CTL grassroots network can be an invaluable tool in helping to increase the bipartisan support for legislation designed to jumpstart the production of ultra-clean CTL fuels. To become a grassroots supporter visit: http://www.capitolconnect.com/futurecoalfuels/. As CTL fuel developments transpire in 2007, be sure to regularly visit FutureCoalFuels.org for the latest news and information and learn how you can help strengthen America's energy future. If you wish to unsubscribe from the CTL update e-mail service, please click here. _______________________________________________ EC mailing list EC(a)osenergy.org http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec

3 2

Re: [EC] two emails from National concerning Intervention
by Grubb, Karen 26 Jul '07

26 Jul '07

Let's have a phone conference Friday, July 27 at 7:00 p.m. to start the plan for intervention. If you cannot make this time please let me know beforehand. Karen 1 (866) 501-6174 Conference Code: 1005700 ________________________________ From: Stephen M. Walker [mailto:stephenwalkeresq@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 11:02 PM To: Grubb, Karen Cc: James Kotcon; Barbara Fallon; Jonathan Rosenbaum Subject: Re: two emails from National concerning Intervention I'm available pretty much any time this week. Steve On 7/23/07, Grubb, Karen <kgrubb(a)fairmontstate.edu > wrote: I am leaving this weekend and will be gone for a week. Who wants to have a phone conference this week to get started on the plan? I spoke with David Herring last Friday and just sent that form, too. Below are the two emails from Erin Chalmers. Karen ----------------------------------------------------- From: Erin.Chalmers(a)sierraclub.org [mailto: Erin.Chalmers(a)sierraclub.org <mailto:Erin.Chalmers@sierraclub.org> ] Sent: Wed 6/27/2007 8:09 PM To: william.depaulo(a)gmail.com; pjgrunt(a)gmail.com; Grubb, Karen; jkotcon(a)wvu.edu Subject: Allegheny Transmission Line intervention Hi Bill and all, On behalf of the national Sierra Club, the WV chapter has authorization to intervene in the PSC hearing in the Allegheny transmission line case. It looks like a great issue and I'm glad the chapter is taking it on! I think this case presents many opportunities and also some difficult issues. You all are obviously already working with other chapters and groups on the larger issue, but to the extent I can be of assistance in getting resources, please let me know. For instance, I may be able to find testimony from other PSC hearings that addresses the true costs of coal or potential rate savings from efficiency. In terms of issues, my concern on this case is mostly financial - as you well know, the chapter will have to decide how much it can put into the case and plan accordingly. Bill has generously offered to carry out this case on a reduced fee basis. My understanding from talking with Bill today is that he expects the chapter to make good faith efforts to raise funds to pay for part of his time but that there is no specific fee cap or arrangement. Because you are a chapter member, Bill, I'm sure you'll work closely with Karen and others to make sure they understand how much time you are putting in and how much payment you expect. I bring this up just because I have seen similarly lax fee arrangements go awry in other cases, and I don't want any surprises for the chapter or for Bill down the road. So I strongly encourage Karen and the chapter to work very closely with Bill and to make sure he is comfortable with what the chapter is raising for funds for him. The new matter form I received noted that $5000 would be allotted to legal expenses - I don't believe this was expected to be a fee cap of any sort, but rather just an estimate of possible and reasonable costs that the chapter would fund as needed. Again, I expect that Karen and Bill, and others, will work out their expectations as to paying for Bill's time. An little work now in terms of figuring out your funding expectations is worth it to avoid big headaches later. I have seen big fights in chapters over fee issues and just want to make sure that doesn't happen here. As another reminder, any settlement (which doesn't seem likely at this point) would require separate national authorization. Also, please keep me informed of any major developments in the case and feel free to ask if you have any questions I might be able to help with. Best of luck and thanks for your hard work on this issue! thanks, Erin Erin Chalmers Environmental Law Fellow Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second St., 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 977-5765 phone (415) 977-5793 fax ----------------------------------------------------- From: James Kotcon [mailto: jkotcon(a)wvu.edu <mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu> ] Sent: Tue 6/26/2007 10:00 AM To: Grubb, Karen; Erin.Chalmers(a)sierraclub.org Cc: Fallon, Barbara; Paul Wilson; 'Dave Muhly'; Glen Besa; Peter.Martin(a)sierraclub.org; 'James Kotcon' Subject: RE: Allegheny Transmission line deadline - WVPSC Intervention Thanks for the leads. We (I) have already contacted Synapse, as they worked with us on the Longview case. Unfortunately, they have already been retained by other state parties, and due to the potential conflict of interest, are unable to assist us. I will follow up with the other leads. JBK >>> <Erin.Chalmers(a)sierraclub.org> 6/25/2007 8:49 PM >>> Hi Jim, Karen and all, Thanks for the detailed new matter form that Paul just sent. I wanted to get back to you with some potential financial and expert resources for this case. First, it looks like the national law program is interested in contributing up to about $3000 toward the case. This case fits well with our ongoing energy work, so we'd love to support it. Also, you may have already tried, but if not, it might be worth your while to ask the Club's national Global Warming and Smart Energy Committee - Joan Saxe is chair. I have no idea if they have money, but they might have either money or interest in helping in other ways (finding other resources, helping with media, etc). Ditto with the Sustainable Planet Strategy Team. I'll also alert our media dept that this is happening, and they might be able to offer some assistance as well in the form of advising, writing press releases or looking over ones you have. Second, I have a couple potential leads for expert witness/analysis help. 1) Synapse Energy Consultants. We have used them before in other cases, including in Florida. We have worked with David Schlissel (tell him Kristin Henry referred you) before, who was very good. Their website is: http://www.synapse-energy.com/aboutus/ 2) ACEEE: http://www.aceee.org/ We don't have a specific contact there, but they may be able to help 3) HP Energy Associates, in Massachusetts - Hale Powell is the contact, who we have worked with before. hpenergy(a)aol.com 978-392-8442 Folks in our office also recommended that you might be able to get more bang for your buck if you were able to partner with a local university who could then work with one or more of the experts. The hired expert could do some big picture research and could potentially assign some discrete tasks to university researchers, thus stretching your money as well as getting more local buy-in and support. Lastly, I attached a memo one of our interns recently compiled - it lists existing research and papers addressing costs and other issues of demand-side management and energy efficiency. Some of those reports could be helpful. thanks, and I'll work with Jim DePaulo to get national authorization in time for him to file on the chapter's behalf, Erin (this is a report mentioned in the other attachment that can't be easily found online) Erin Chalmers Environmental Law Fellow Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second St., 2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 977-5765 phone (415) 977-5793 fax

2 1

Fwd: wind power siting
by James Kotcon 26 Jul '07

26 Jul '07

You may find the attached interesting. I did a quick scan of the siting standards, and they appear to be useful, but are still pretty vague, and they have almost no wildlife (bird or bat) impact requirements, which is one of our major issues in WV. I am not sure they will resolve the controversy, and I would like some more specifics in the standards, as these seem more oriented toward a "process' for siting, rather than specific technical requirements that need to be met. Still it is a step forward and a useful tool if we get into other wind farm debates. JBK >>> Paula Carrell <Paula.Carrell(a)sierraclub.org> 7/19/2007 3:43 PM >>> 2. Wind Power Siting The Kansas Eneryg Council in April 2005 established guidelines for county use in siting wind power generators. The Sierra Club Kansas Chapter's Energy Chair, Bill Griffith, says, "Overall the standards avoid politics and stick with science and with those values a particular community holds dear. We have reviewed the Kansas guidelines and support them as a fairly decent siting handbook." The Kansas guidelines can be accessed at http://www.kansasenergy.org/KEC/documents/wind_siting_handbook.pdf If any other state has adopted wind siting guidance that you would recommend, please let Paula know.

1 0

Fwd: Fw: July 25 FutureCoalFuels.org Update
by James Kotcon 26 Jul '07

26 Jul '07

Anybody want to go to Beckley to picket this event? With the right preparation, we might get a lot of press to help nip this industry in the bud. At a minimum, they should know that there is opposition, even in West Virginia. JBK >>> "Donald Strimbeck" <dcsoinks(a)comcast.net> 7/25/2007 11:05 AM >>> Untitled Donald C. Strimbeck, Secretary Upper Monongahela River Association Incorporated 109 Broad Street, P.O. Box 519 Granville, WV 26534-0519 304-599-7585 (Fax:4131) Email: dcsoinks(a)comcast.net http://www.uppermon.org http://www.monriversummit.org ----- Original Message ----- From: info futurecoalfuels To: dcsoinks(a)comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:15 AM Subject: July 25 FutureCoalFuels.org Update FutureCoalFuels.org Update July 25, 2007 In this update: Coal-to-Liquids Coalition to host major CTL conference in West Virginia Rep. Barton emphasizes need for domestic CTL fuels in House energy bill DOE highlights need for domestic CTL fuels in Sacramento Bee House approves bill funding Ohio CTL studies Peabody Energy considering CTL plant in western Kentucky Become a CTL grassroots supporter -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coal-to-Liquids Coalition to host major CTL conference in West Virginia The Coal-to-Liquids Coalition will host a major conference Aug. 14-15 in Beckley, W.Va., that will highlight the significant energy security, economic and environmental benefits America stands to gain by jumpstarting production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels. The conference will feature the latest information on the outlook for domestically produced CTL fuels by U.S. House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman John Murtha (D-Pa.) U.S. Air Force Undersecretary Dr. Ronald M. Sega, Assistant Air Force Secretary William Anderson, as well as presentations from leading industry, financial and labor experts. Among the speakers scheduled to participate in the conference are United Mine Workers of America President Cecil Roberts, Pat Esposito, energy advisor to West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin (D) and Peabody Energy Senior Vice President of Government Affairs Fred Palmer. The conference will also include a luncheon presentation by Lt. Col. Daniel Millman, who conducted B-52 testing of Fischer-Tropsch fuels for the Air Force in 2006. Col. Millman will detail his experience flying aircraft powered by fuels made using the same process that will be used to produce domestic CTL fuels. "The Coal-to-Liquids Coalition is proud to host this conference that will spotlight how CTL fuels can play a vital role in creating a new energy future for America," said National Mining Association President and CEO Kraig R. Naasz. "On behalf of the coalition, I urge those interested in learning how CTL fuels can put America on a path to energy independence to attend and learn more from leading military, industry, labor and government representatives on the many benefits offered by domestic CTL fuels." To register and learn more about the conference, please visit: www.ctlconference2007.org or contact Corey Henry at chenry(a)futurecoalfuels.org. Rep. Barton emphasizes need for domestic CTL fuels in House energy bill House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Joe Barton (R-Texas) recently expressed dismay that the House of Representatives may soon consider energy legislation that does not contain incentives meant to jumpstart the production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels. Speaking at an energy forum hosted by Congressional Quarterly, Barton stressed that coal is "our most abundant natural resource.and we ought to use it." Barton lamented that energy legislation the House could consider in the next two weeks as currently drafted is an "energy bill that has no energy in it." Barton said that the abundance of coal in the U.S. is what makes CTL fuels "so attractive," saying "politically [CTL] has to be in the mix" if the House stands any chance of advancing comprehensive energy legislation. John Ward, vice president of marketing and government affairs for Headwaters Inc., participated in a panel discussion with representatives from leading energy producing and using organizations and detailed how congressional support for CTL fuels is needed to begin reducing America's growing reliance on oil imported from unstable parts of the world. Headwaters Inc. is a member of the Coal-to-Liquids Coalition (CTLC) and is actively engaged in efforts to construct the first fleet of CTL facilities in the United States. Ward also noted that the construction and operation of domestic CTL facilities will create thousands of new, high-paying jobs across the nation. He stressed that domestically made CTL fuels will help reduce the flow of billions of dollars American consumers send to hostile and unstable nations. In addition, Ward stressed that federal studies have demonstrated that in comparison to the fuels they will replace, CTL fuels will be as clean, or cleaner, in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, while substantially reducing emissions of harmful pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and particulate matter "On behalf of the CTLC, I want to thank John Ward and Rep. Barton for so clearly making the case for federal support of incentives that would accelerate domestic CTL production and help put America on the road to energy independence," said National Mining Association President and CEO Kraig R. Naasz. "America's future economic prosperity and national security hinge on allowing domestic CTL fuels to lead the way toward breaking our addiction to foreign oil." DOE highlights need for domestic CTL fuels in Sacramento Bee A senior U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) official earlier this month emphasized the urgent need to begin production of clean, domestic coal-to-liquid (CTL) transportation fuels, citing the energy security and environmental gains America can realize through production and use of domestic CTL fuels. "Energy security means having reliable, affordable and environmentally sound sources of energy available largely from domestic sources," wrote Lowell Miller, director of DOE's Office of Sequestration, Hydrogen and Clean Coal Fuels in a July 13 Sacramento Bee opinion piece. "Coal fits the bill." As crude oil prices appear likely to remain in the $50-60 range for the foreseeable future, "coal-derived fuels can provide a highly competitive and clean supplement to oil-derived fuels, substantially reducing the need for imported oil and thereby increasing energy security," said Miller. "The chemical-industrial process for extracting ultra-clean diesel fuel, jet fuel and other products from coal has been around for decades, but only in recent years have advances in technology and the steep increase in the price of oil combined to make "coal-to-liquids" an attractive part of the solution to our pressing energy security and environmental concerns," wrote Miller. Miller noted that a recent report from the National Coal Council estimates that America's coal supply could produce 2.6 million barrels per day of coal-derived fuels and highlighted that the Air Force has already "successfully tested blends of coal-derived jet fuel in its planes." Miller emphasized that technological innovations are helping to make coal use increasingly clean. "Carbon sequestration and other emissions-reduction technologies can be applied to coal-to-liquids plants, and the primary product, ultra-clean diesel fuel, is far cleaner than any diesel fuel or gasoline in use today," Miller wrote. As various legislative proposals have been and will continue to be considered on Capitol Hill, Miller said efforts are under across the country to begin constructing the first fleet of CTL plants. "While the legislative wheels grind, developers are working on coal-to-liquids plans with the governors and governments of Alaska, Montana, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and Louisiana." Miller also noted that America's economic competitors are racing ahead with plans to produce CTL fuels. "China.expects to be producing 20,000 barrels of fuel daily from its first coal-to-liquids plant before the year is out," said Miller. "When planned expansion is complete, the plant will produce 200,000 barrels of fuel a day. This is only the first shot in a massive, $127 billion coal liquefaction campaign by the Chinese." Miller also pointed to CTL production plans in Australia, Indonesia and New Zealand and noted that India's government is actively studying CTL fuel production. A complete copy of Miller's opinion piece is available here. House approves bill funding Ohio CTL studies The U.S. House of Representatives last week approved a fiscal year 2008 appropriations bill that contains $2.25 million to study the technologies that could be used by a CTL plant Baard Energy plans on constructing in southeast Ohio. A total of $1 million has been set aside to support a carbon sequestration scoping study meant to identify major geologic sites in Ohio suitable for underground carbon dioxide storage, while another $250,000 would be used to study the carbon life cycle of coal-based transportation fuel. The remaining $1 million would finance a northeastern Ohio pipeline study. Construction of the Baard facility is expected to result in 4,000 jobs over the four years of expected construction and generate $31 million in income southeast Ohio. Peabody Energy considering CTL plant in western Kentucky Platts Coal Trader reported on July 6 that a CTL project under consideration by Peabody Energy for construction in Union County, Ky., is in the "very preliminary" stages, with its future likely to be decided by the results of a soon-to-be completed feasibility study. Platts reported that the $3 billion plant would produce about 30,000 barrels of transportation fuels daily, with operations beginning in 2012 or 2013. Kevin Sheilley, president and CEO of Northwest Kentucky Forward, told Platts that the office of Kentucky Governor Ernie Fletcher has given Peabody $400,000 for the feasibility study, with Peabody expected to contribute another $1 million. For now, no completion date for the study has been set. The Peabody CTL plant is one of seven clean-coal projects proposed for the region, according to Sheilley, most of which would produce transportation fuels or synthetic natural gas. Become a CTL grassroots supporter The Coal-to-Liquids Coalition is working to build a strong network of grassroots supporters willing to contact federal and state lawmakers to voice their support for measures meant to spur the domestic production of affordable, clean-burning CTL fuels. CTL grassroots supporters can include company employees, union members, retirees, their families, friends and others spread across the country who share a personal stake in the successful launch of a domestic CTL industry. The coming months are likely to see continued congressional CTL activity; a time in which a robust CTL grassroots network can be an invaluable tool in helping to increase the bipartisan support for legislation designed to jumpstart the production of ultra-clean CTL fuels. To become a grassroots supporter visit: http://www.capitolconnect.com/futurecoalfuels/. As CTL fuel developments transpire in 2007, be sure to regularly visit FutureCoalFuels.org for the latest news and information and learn how you can help strengthen America's energy future. If you wish to unsubscribe from the CTL update e-mail service, please click here.

1 0

AUTOMATIC FORWARDING OF PLEADINGS IN TRAIL CASE AT W VA PSC
by William V. DePaulo, Esq. 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

I HAVE PUT A FILTER ON MY EMAIL TO AUTOMATE THE FORWARDING TO ec(a)osenergy.org OF ALL EMAIL UPDATES I RECEIVE FROM THE PSC BY VIRTUE OF BEING ON THE SERVICE LIST FOR THE TRAIL PROCEEDING. AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS LIKELY TO GENERATE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF EMAIL. THERE WERE 16 MESSAGES IN MY EMAIL BOX AT THE TIME I CREATED THE FILTER. I DON'T KNOW IF ALL OF YOU WILL WANT TO RECEIVE THE UPDATES, OR NOT. IF YOU DON'T PLEASE LET ME KNOW AND I WILL TAKE SOME STEPS TO CREATE A NEW LIST. THE LIST AT ec(a)osenergy.org IS THE DISTRIBUTION ON THIS FORWARDING. ALSO COULD SOMEBODY PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHO ALL IS ON THE LIST AT ec(a)osenergy.org ? THANKS. BILL -- William V. DePaulo, Esq. 179 Summers Street, Suite 232 Charleston, WV 25301-2163 Tel: 304-342-5588 Fax: 304-342-5505 william.depaulo(a)gmail.com www.passeggiata.com

3 3

[PSC Docket] Activity on PSC Case 07-0508-E-CN(Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company)
by WV Public Service Commission 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

1 0

[PSC Docket] Activity on PSC Case 07-0508-E-CN(Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company)
by WV Public Service Commission 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

1 0

[PSC Docket] Activity on PSC Case 07-0508-E-CN(Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company)
by WV Public Service Commission 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

1 0

[PSC Docket] Activity on PSC Case 07-0508-E-CN(Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company)
by WV Public Service Commission 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

1 0

[PSC Docket] Activity on PSC Case 07-0508-E-CN(Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company)
by WV Public Service Commission 24 Jul '07

24 Jul '07

1 0

Fwd: [WPST-WILD] Rahall energy bill
by Paul Wilson 18 Jul '07

18 Jul '07

here's something on the Rahall Energy bill, which the Club is supporting. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Athan Manuel <Athan.Manuel(a)sierraclub.org> Date: Jul 18, 2007 10:56 AM Subject: [WPST-WILD] Rahall energy bill To: CONS-WPST-WILD-FORUM(a)lists.sierraclub.org Folks - I want to give you a quick update on the Rahall energy, which will probably come up for a vote on the House floor next week. This is the bill that we discussed on Wildlands (and other calls) last month regarding making sure the wind energy folks comply with existing laws such as the ESA, Migratory Bird Treaty and other conservation laws. Anyway, as you know we settled that and like the bill, which has some very good language on western lands oil drilling and protecting species and habitat. As part of our effort to pass the Rahall bill we have signed on to the attached community letter. And we are also organizing a community lobby day on Thursday - targeting Blue Dogs and moderate Rs - to protected the western lands drilling language. Apparently the Blue Dogs don't like the language Rahall has in the bill, and may offer an amendment to strip that part out. We're fairly confident that Rahall will hold the caucus together, but as usual we are not taking anything for granted. I'll let you know how the lobby day goes, but if you're from a Blue Dog district call your member of Congress and urge them to support the Rahall bill and oppose any weakening amendments. If you have any questions, etc. please contact me or Myke Bybee. Thanks. - Athan ********************************************************* Athan Manuel Director of Lands Protection Sierra Club 408 C St. NE Washington, DC 20002 202-548-4580 / fax 547-6009 cell: 202-716-0006 athan.manuel(a)sierraclub.org -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club Wildlife & Endangered Species Comm. 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Fwd: WVNS story for July 17, 2007. WV Mayor: Proposed Mine Threatens Only Source of W
by Paul Wilson 18 Jul '07

18 Jul '07

This is why you cannot give carte blanche on all deep well mines. The Mayor is a retired coal miner, BTW. best, paul ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Public News Service <wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org> Date: Jul 17, 2007 9:52 AM Subject: WVNS story for July 17, 2007. WV Mayor: Proposed Mine Threatens Only Source of W To: pjgrunt(a)gmail.com West Virginia News Service A statewide news service for West Virginia 5312 MacCorkle Avenue, SW, #315, South Charleston, WV 25309 Phone: 800.317.6705 Fax: 540-301-0801 E-mail: wvns(a)publicnewsservice.org July 17, 2007 WV Mayor: Proposed Mine Threatens Only Source of Water Bayard, WV - A proposed coal mine would cut through the watershed that supplies all the drinking water for two Grant County towns. The mining company says the water won't be affected - but Bayard (BAIRD) mayor Steven Durst says he wants an independent survey before the mining starts, to make sure the town's drinking water will stay clean. Suggested Script: A West Virginia mayor is sending out an S-O-S for his town's only supply of drinking water. A proposed coal mine in Grant County would dig into a watershed that supplies two towns in the area. The Wolf Run Mining Company has said it can get the coal without hurting the water. Steven Durst is mayor of Bayard and a retired coal miner - he says he and most area residents aren't taking the company's word that their drinking water is safe. Actuality Cut 30777 (:07) "The problem is that if they're wrong about what they say, they're going to destroy a water system for nine hundred families." Suggested Tag: He's calling for an independent geological survey before mining starts - he'd like that to come from a third party, not affiliated with mining interests or with the state's Department of Environmental Protection. The mine is waiting for a permit from Environmental Protection; they're expected to rule in the next two months. **** Second Cut: Durst says when it comes to small towns like his that don't have a lot of political clout, the state government tends to put business interests ahead of protecting the quality of life of local citizens. Actuality Cut 31777 (:10) "Our concerns, of course, are that the Department of Environmental Protection will not protect us, they're not gonna be concerned as to whether or not our water system is endangered." (ends) OPTIONAL REPORTER WRAP - uses first soundbite: LEAD: A West Virginia mayor is sending out an S-O-S for his town's only supply of drinking water. Rob Ferrett has more. Actuality Cut 32 777 TRT: 35 Q...in the next two months. Editor's Note: Durst is at 304 693 7300. Still available: scripts and sound on the web page, or call toll-free # and use the cut # listed below followed by the 3-digits in the web ID above. Cuts 45-47: Few Treatment Options in WV for "Signature Wound" of Iraq War - Comments from Hilda Heady, associate vice president for rural health at West Virginia University. --- To be removed from this list please send an e-mail to remove(a)publicnewsservice.org and put the word "remove" in the subject line. -- Paul Wilson Sierra Club Wildlife & Endangered Species Comm. 504 Jefferson Ave Charles Town, WV 25414-1130 Phone: 304-725-4360 Cell: 304-279-6975

1 0

Global Warming and Energy conference calls
by Grubb, Karen 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

________________________________ From: Glen Besa [mailto:glen.besa@sierraclub.org] Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 4:01 PM Cc: Allison.Forbes(a)sierraclub.org Subject: FW: [energy activists] Activist resources for House action Folks, Many of you were on our Appalachian Regional call last Thursday to discuss congressional actions related to energy. Allison Forbes with our National Energy Team, who gave us an update on the Congress, hosts calls each Tuesday evening at 8:30 PM and she maintains an energy activist list to which she send updates like the one below with attachments. Note that there will be no call this Tuesday because of Congressional recess over the July 4 holiday. Allison has attached a number word documents for you. Sample LTEs, Electronic alerts you can forward and lists of the bills co-sponsors. Many other documents including fact sheets on bills are posted on the web in two locations: 1. The public website: http://www.sierraclub.org/energy/grassroots/ 2. On Clubhouse at: http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/go/committees/energyhq/grassroots/ which is password protected Additionally, on the call we discussed accessing the text of the bills and their status which can be viewed on www.thomas.gov <http://www.thomas.gov/> Glen Besa, Regional Director Sierra Club Appalachian Region (DC, DE, GA, MD, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV) 422 East Franklin Street, Suite 302 Richmond, VA 23219 O-804-225-9113 x 104 F-804-225-9114 C-804-387-6001 glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org ________________________________ From: Allison.Forbes(a)sierraclub.org [mailto:Allison.Forbes@sierraclub.org] Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 12:45 PM To: Allison.Forbes(a)sierraclub.org Subject: [energy activists] Activist resources for House action Before the House energy bill hits the floor, we need to show that renewable energy and clean car legislation has broad support from our Representatives. The Sierra Club is working hard to ensure that a Renewable Energy Standard (RES) and an increase in fuel economy (CAFE) standards will be included in the energy package Speaker Pelosi brings to the floor in July. Please find activist materials for constituent calls, emails and media work below. Next Call We will resume regular weekly calls on Tuesday, July 10. Join the Global Warming and Energy team to discuss the challenges ahead. Tuesday, July 10, 8:30pm Eastern 1-866-501-6174 2239223# House Update Attached is a House energy update from Debbie Sease. On Thursday, Representatives Baron Hill and Lee Terry introduced a bad CAFE bill (H.R. 2927) with John Barrow, Henry Brown, Mike Ross, Paul Ryan and Edolphus Towns as co-sponsors. According to a United Auto Workers union action alert supporting the bill, it sets a target of 32 mpg by 2022 (and might prohibit NHTSA from going above 35 mpg in that year), while maintaining the light truck loophole in current law. This bill lets automakers off the hook and will not secure the oil savings and greenhouse gas reductions we need to reduce our oil dependence and curb global warming. Activists: Is your Representative a co-sponsor of the Markey-Platts fuel economy bill (H.R. 1506) and Udall-Platts RES bill (H.R. 969)? Check out www.thomas.gov for the latest updates. If they are, send your thanks! If your Rep is not already a co-sponsor, please schedule an in-district meeting with the member (or staff) this week and distribute the following materials to fellow activists in your district: 1) A sample call script 2) A sample email alert that you can forward to your local lists 3) Sample Letters to the Editor (LTEs) to generate media buzz around the House energy bill More materials, factsheets and background information are available at clubhouse.sierraclub.org/energy/grassroots Activist Materials - Please forward! Scientists tell us we need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050, or an average of two percent a year. We believe that in order to reach this goal we must begin by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from our vehicles and electric utilities. Raising miles-per-gallon standards for cars and light trucks is the biggest single step we can take to curb global warming pollution, reduce our dependence on oil and save consumers money at the pump. Requiring electric utilities to invest in renewable energy resources will slash greenhouse gas emissions while creating thousands of new jobs across the U.S. and boosting our clean energy economy. Ask your Representative to cosponsor legislation that establishes a Renewable Energy Standard (RES) of at least 20 percent by 2020 (Udall-Platts bill H.R. 969) and legislation that mandates a four percent annual increase in fuel economy (CAFE) standards (Markey-Platts bill H.R. 1506). Call Your Representative today! E-mail alert for local lists - please distribute! Sample Letters to the Editor: LTEs printed in local and state newspapers help generate media buzz are raise the profile of our issues. Send your own today. Allison Forbes National Conservation Organizer Sierra Club Global Warming and Energy Program (202) 548-6583

1 0

Fwd: H.R. 809
by James Kotcon 15 Jul '07

15 Jul '07

All, Letty is from Preston County and is opposing the TrAILCo line. I have been hearing similar rumors from other sources. So if Mollohan starts telling us that he voted against the appropriations amendment, but is co-sponsoring this bill, we need to make it clear that people in Mon County think that is not good enough and he has some more "splaining" to do. JBK >>> Letty Butcher <multiflora123(a)yahoo.com> 7/10/2007 10:33 PM >>> I guess you heard that the bill is as dead as a door nail. Even Hinchey, Wolf and Murtha won't take the lead. --------------------------------- Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.

1 0

[FW]Fwd: Wind generation dropped in heat wave
by Paul Wilson 13 Jul '07

13 Jul '07

1 0

Meeting scheduled with Mollohan office
by Grubb, Karen 10 Jul '07

10 Jul '07

We are scheduled to meet in Mollohan's Morgantown office with Anna Rittenhouse Thursday July 12 at 4:00. Her office is in the PO Building on High Street, 2nd floor. She wants information on your group's letterhead to fax to Mollohan. We should try to gather by 3:30 (I may be late as I have a doctor's appointment in Morgantown before that) to arrange who will say what. I am planning to give her the Markey-Platts and Udall-Platts fact sheets I attached, but it would be good to have something on coal to liquids and AP Trail also, perhaps a revision of the TrAILCO fact sheets. Thanks, Karen

2 2

CLEANBRIER REMINDER - Hearing Thursday
by Beth Little 10 Jul '07

10 Jul '07

Thursday, July 12, 6:00 - 9:00pm at the Western Greenbrier Middle School in Crawley Please come. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/893 - Release Date: 7/9/2007 5:22 PM

1 0

Fwd: ACT: Set Up a meeting with your Congress member on Energy and Global Warming
by James Kotcon 10 Jul '07

10 Jul '07

Josh, Karen, Barbara, et al.: Paul Wilson and I were on a conference call last week to talk about the Energy bills in Congress. As you may recall, the Senate passed an increase in the CAFE standard, and action now turns to the House. The Club is making an all out effort to pass the bill there, with the strongest possible CAFE standard and a renewable energy portfolio standard. In addition, we must oppose coal-to-liquid subsidies in any form, as America must not start down that path if we are to avoid a dramatic surge in greenhouse gas emissions. Over the next couple weeks, we will be targeting Molohan and Rahall to ask their support. This will be more difficult than it seems, as both have sponsored coal-to-liquids bills, and both have raised objections to wind farms in their districts. Nevertheless, an increase in CAFE standards has been a Club goal for many years, and the Senate bill is a good start. We are unlikely to see a better bill in this Congress, so we must do our part to get them on board. We should discuss at least three efforts, 1) getting calls to the Congressmen; 2) letters to the editor (guest op/ed pieces would be even better); and 3) setting up a meeting with Mollohan, preferably while he is on the July 4th recess during the next two weeks. (Suvch a meeting might also be a good time to talk about Allegheny's TrAILCo powerline). JBK >>> "Glen Besa" <glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org> 6/30/2007 5:21 PM >>> ACT: Please call your Congress member's office to set up a meeting in the district before July 16. See details below: Folks, One of the most important actions you can take is to set up a meeting with your Congress member or his staff in their district. If you can set up a meeting in the next two weeks, before July 16 when we anticipate the House to take action that would be outstanding TIPS: 1) please check in with staff to coordinate setting up in-district meetings so we don't have multiple asks. Here are your staff contacts: DE - Ezra Temko EzraJT(a)gmail.com GA -- Anna Cherry anna.cherry(a)sierraclub.org MD -- Glen Besa glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org NC - Chatham Olive chatham.olive(a)sierraclub.org SC - Dave Muhly vafw(a)naxs.net TN -- Dave Muhly vafw(a)naxs.net VA - Glen Besa glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org WV - Dave Muhly vafw(a)naxs.net 2) coordinate with other Sierra Club volunteers in the district in setting up the meeting date and time. 3) Invite other groups to accompany you. Make sure they support our position. Other groups might be reps from the faith community, other enviro groups, Trout Unlimited, etc. 4) You'll probably meet a staffer rather than your congress member -ask them to relay your position to the Congress member. 5) Be courteous! Be Prepared! Use the fact sheets as talking points. If there are several of you, assign roles and rehearse what you want to say. See goals below: 6) Report the outcome of your meeting on the attached form above and return it to your staff contacts. GOAL OF IN-DISTRICT MEETINGS: To secure action by Congress that addresses global warming and oil dependence, we will ask Representatives in the House to support legislation to accomplish the following three goals: 1) Establish a national Renewable Energy Standard (RES) of at least 20% by 2020; See Udall-Platts Factsheet 2) Mandate a 4% annual improvement in fuel economy (CAFE) standards; See Markey-Platts Factsheet 3) Prevent environmental damage from motor fuels with a particular focus on blocking any provisions that would jumpstart a new liquid coal industry. See Coal Energy Bill factsheet. Our Priority Targets: State House DE AL (Castle) GA GA8 (Marshall); GA12 (Barrow); GA13 (Scott) MD MD2 (Ruppersberger); MD5 (Hoyer); MD6 (Bartlett); MD7 (Cummings) NC NC1 (Butterfield); NC2 (Etheridge); NC4 (Price); NC7 (McIntyre); NC11 (Shuler); NC12 (Watt); NC13 (Miller) SC SC4 (Inglis); SC5 (Spratt); SC6 (Clyburn) TN TN4 (Davis); TN5 (Cooper); TN6 (Gordon) VA VA3 (Scott); VA10 (Wolf); VA11 (Davis) WV WV1 (Mollohan); WV3 (Rahall) RESOURCES: Many other documents including fact sheets on bills are posted on the web in two locations: 1. The public website: http://www.sierraclub.org/energy/grassroots/ 2. On Clubhouse at: http://clubhouse.sierraclub.org/go/committees/energyhq/grassroots/ which is password protected Additionally, you can access the text of the bills and their status on www.thomas.gov <http://www.thomas.gov/> Glen Besa, Regional Director Sierra Club Appalachian Region (DC, DE, GA, MD, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV) 422 East Franklin Street, Suite 302 Richmond, VA 23219 O-804-225-9113 x 104 F-804-225-9114 C-804-387-6001 glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org

4 4

FW: Vacancy on the Greenbrier County Planning Commission
by Beth Little 09 Jul '07

09 Jul '07

Any takers? -----Original Message----- From: William Deegans [mailto:deegans@mac.com] Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 9:31 AM To: Beth Little Subject: Vacancy on the Greenbrier County Planning Commission Hi Beth: The Greenbrier County Commission is soliciting applications for a 3-year position on the County Planning Commission. I think it would be a good opportunity to push someone from the Cleanbrier Group if you want to spread the word. At one time in the past, Florian Schleiff indicated he would be interested, and I have encouraged him to consider it (not sure if you have to be a USA citizen). The deadline is MONDAY, JULY 9 at 4:30. Thanks, Skip No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/891 - Release Date: 7/8/2007 6:32 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/891 - Release Date: 7/8/2007 6:32 PM

1 0

URGENT - NIETC Comment Period over tommorrow
by Jonathan Rosenbaum 05 Jul '07

05 Jul '07

Tomorrow, July 6th is the last day to leave comments with the DOE concerning NIETC at http://nietc.anl.gov/involve/comments/index.cfm . How important is this? If the National Interest Electric Transmission Congestion Corridors becomes a reality, then even if WVPSC rejects TrAIL we will still have to contend with the fact that FERC may implement TrAIL. TrAIL won't be the last transmission line we end up fighting due to the fact that every large power utility in the United States has signed up for an early inclusion in Section 1221(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. How can you comment?: Many feel the comment period should have been extended, so at the very least send in a comment saying NO to the question " Would designation of one or more National Corridors in these areas be appropriate and in the public interest?," and request that the comment period be extended for the public. I used these guidelines provided by DOE in their Congestion Study document to provide comments to questions they have for the public: 1. Would designation of one or more National Corridors in these areas be appropriate and in the public interest? A. Does a major transmission congestion problem exist? B. Are key transmission constraints creating the transmission congestion? C. What is the magnitude of the problem? D. What are the relevant transmission or non-transmission solutions? 2. How and where should DOE establish the geographic boundaries for a National Corridor? 3. How would the costs of a proposed transmission facility be allocated? It's a lot of fun answering these questions, but I must admit I haven't had enough time to perform adequate research, however I'm giving it my best try. Keep in mind that the deregulation of the electricity market in 1996 is a key factor in today's congestion, due to shoddy practices by Power Utilities like Enron. It's not clear to me as a Citizen of the United States of America that we actually have a congestion problem, but what we do have are businesses very interested in making money under the guise that the National Security of America is under threat. In that case, the DOE should be interested in creating a decentralized electricity solution, and should recognize that Global Warming is a much greater threat to National Security than the energy economics of congestion. Here's how I answered 1(C). C. What is the magnitude of the problem? It's an insignificant problem compared to Global Warming. This is a perfect time for the DOE to become a significant part of the Global Warming solution. In the process of applying practices that reduce Global Warming, the transmission congestion problem will dissipate and eventually disappear. Jonathan

1 0

Re: [EC] Meeting with your Mollohan on Energy and Global Warming
by Duane330＠aol.com 05 Jul '07

05 Jul '07

Karen, josh and the committee. I'm on vacation is Delaware until Sunday, April 22nd. I'll join in the meeting with Mollohan, if after the 22nd, but, please move forward as quickly as you can. Thanks, Duane ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

1 0

[FW]Take Action: Urge Congress to Vote for Clean Energy Jobs
by Paul Wilson 05 Jul '07

05 Jul '07

1 0

Re: [EC] An Energy Independence Day op-ed
by James Kotcon 03 Jul '07

03 Jul '07

Jim and Karen, Glen, et al. Thanks for the assistance. JBK >>> Below is the link to the op ed in today's Gazette. Thanks. http://www.wvgazette.com/section/Opinion/Op-Ed+Commentaries/200707028 Bill Price Sierra Club Central Appalachia Environmental Justice Program 922 Quarrier Street, Suite 304 Charleston, WV 25311 Phone 304-342-3182 Fax 304-342-3183 Cell 304-389-8822 >>> "Glen Besa" <glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org> 6/30/2007 5:35 PM >>> Folks, With the 4th of July Holiday approaching, consider submitting a letter to the editor about energy independence. Better yet call the editor of your local paper about submitting the OpEd below that you will need to localize. Thanks, Glen Besa From: Odette.Mucha(a)sierraclub.org [mailto:Odette.Mucha@sierraclub.org] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 5:58 PM To: glen.besa(a)sierraclub.org; chris.carney(a)sierraclub.org; jessica.hodge(a)sierraclub.org; bob.bingaman(a)sierraclub.org; leigh.fifelski(a)sierraclub.org; joshua.low(a)sierraclub.org; allison.forbes(a)sierraclub.org; dave.hamilton(a)sierraclub.org Cc: chris.wilhite(a)sierraclub.org Subject: Energy Independence Day op-ed see below and attached. To be localized. thanks, odette i'll be in DC through July 6th. please email or call me on my cell 607-279-6338. :) Two Percent for Energy Independence As the Fourth of July approaches and we gather to watch fireworks and celebrate our country?s political independence, it is time to struggle for a new kind of independence: energy independence from what has become a tyranny of fossil fuels. World scientists agree that global warming is here and that it is happening at an alarming rate, largely due to the world?s reliance on the carbon emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels Fortunately, however, scientists also tell us that we can curb global warming if we take bold, comprehensive steps to cut global warming pollution by 80% by the year 2050. Though this may seem daunting, it equates to a doable two percent every year for the next forty years! Change needs to start now. America is an energy importer, relying on foreign fuels both for the gasoline we use in our cars and for much of the coal and natural gas that we burn for our electricity. Not only do these dirty energy sources contribute to global warming and asthma-causing smog, they also cost American citizens billions of dollars every year in money sent overseas and intrinsically link our economy and way of life to foreign powers. There is, however, a better way. [Insert state] has already started along a new, cleaner path. For [insert state] energy Independence means investing in renewable energy, like [insert best renewable energy practice] as well as in money saving solutions that reduce the amount of energy we use and therefore the need to import. By becoming more energy efficient, like using the super-efficient LED lights in buildings and for traffic lighting, [insert state citizen name] can significantly cut their energy use. As solutions that use less dirty, imported energy sources keep more and more [insert state] dollars at home, we can begin investing more and more of that money in creating our own clean energy alternatives right here at home. [Insert paragraph about effort?s already taken by your state]. Efforts like these are to be applauded, but they must continue to grow and expand. Government can do a lot to protect the environment. The fight against global warming, however, can start right at home. To reach our goal, to build a cleaner, smarter and safer energy future and stronger economy, to meet and overcome the most urgent problem facing us, to protect our children and theirs, we must all be part of the 2 percent solution. Change a light-bulb. Turn the air-conditioning down. Carpool. Write to your elected officials asking them to fight for our energy independence. Citizens, businesses and governments all have a role to play and we must begin to act now. That?s why, this Fourth of July, before I watch the fireworks from [insert location], I?ll honor the legacy of American independence and replace a few light-bulbs with energy-saving fluorescents! Odette Mucha Field Media Coordinator Sierra Club San Francisco, CA 415-977-5761 cell: 607-279-6338

3 2

[CLEANBRIER] This is it!
by Beth Little 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

We asked for a public hearing on Water Quality Certification and we are getting it - Thursday, July 12, 6:00 - 9:00pm at the Western Greenbrier Middle School in Crawley (same place as the public hearing on the Draft EIS). It is vital that we have a good attendance and let the WV DEP know how much we care about water quality. I cannot stress how important turnout is, so mark your calendars and bring friends and neighbors. Below are talking points for what to say, but if you aren't good at public speaking and your voice shakes as much as your knees, just say (after introducing your self and where you live), "I came because I want the Department of Environmental Protection to protect the Meadow River." Or, if you live in or near Rainelle, "I came because I want the Department of Environmental Protection to protect my supply of drinking water." If you fish, raft, kayak, swim, or otherwise enjoy the Meadow River, mention that. Keep watch for more information about this between now and the hearing. Talking points: The Legislative Rules for the Department of Environmental Protection Office of Water Resources states, "It is declared to be the public policy of the State of West Virginia to maintain reasonable standards of purity and quality of the water of the State consistent with (1) public health and public enjoyment thereof; (2) the propagation and protection of animal, bird, fish, and other aquatic and plant life; and (3) the expansion of employment opportunities, maintenance and expansion of agriculture and the provision of a permanent foundation for healthy industrial development." Under Antidegradation Policy, the Legislative Rules make it clear that existing uses shall be maintained and protected. The quality of the water of the Meadow River would suffer if the flow is significantly reduced, so the DEP should not grant 401 Water Quality Certification without conclusive scientific data that the Meadow River will be okay. So far, to date, there has been no official information assuring that there will be enough water for the WGC plant. At the public hearing on the Draft EIS, DOE representatives admitted that studies were ongoing. We have not heard any results from those studies. The Draft EIS did not specify a final plan for where the water would come from, just that they need 1200 gallons/min, that 500 gallons/min would come from the Rainelle Sewage Treatment Plant, and the rest would come from the Meadow River and/or local wells or maybe some additional source. The problem is that both the Meadow River and the aquifer are at their lowest levels at the same time of the year. Furthermore, the effluent from the Rainelle Sewage Treatment Plant that used to go back into the river will now be completely subtracted from the Meadow River. The information about the Meadow River was based on old data about flow with no studies about impacts on recreation or fish or other biota in the river. The pump tests on the aquifer were so inconclusive that the consultant hired to evaluate groundwater pumping recommended further longer tests and stated that these further tests might indicate that long term pumping is not sustainable. Following are the comments I filed about the water supply on the Draft EIS. If you would like to see the comments from the Appalachian Center, let me know and I will forward them. The incompleteness of the Draft EIS regarding sufficient water supply is admitted on page 2 - 39, where it is stated, "Additional and ongoing groundwater studies are planned to better characterize the local aquifer and the effects of long-term pumping. These studies were not completed in time to be incorporated into the Draft EIS, but they are expected to be available for incorporation into the Final EIS." Conversations with Mark McKoy, geologist with DOE, at the January 4, 2007 public hearing confirmed that studies are ongoing and a sufficient water supply has not been confirmed. Mr. McKoy attempted to characterize this as an insignificant factor by saying that they did not feel they needed to be 100% certain of the water supply, but I submit that the following information demonstrates that they are a long way from 100%. * Page 2 - 37, 2.4.6 Water Supply, states that water supply requirements range from 900 to 1200 gallons per minute depending on seasonal fluctuations (with peak demand in the summer months). (Emphasis added) * Then on page 2 - 38, Figure 2.4-5 illustrates that it is during the summer months of peak demand that the primary water source, the RSTP, is lowest. * Page 2 - 39 goes on to admit, "Because there is some uncertainty regarding whether sufficient water would be available from either the Meadow River or groundwater sources under extended low recharge conditions, WGC has considered two options for supplemental process water supply for the power plant." These options are to use both the Meadow River and the groundwater aquifer; the options differ in which is to be the secondary and which the tertiary source. The problem is that both the Meadow River and the aquifer are at their lowest levels at the same time of the year. * In fact, on page 4.4-12, Figure 4.4-5 illustrates that for over two months in August, September and October the Meadow River flow is below both 60% of the annual average flow and 60% of the average seasonal flow, yielding the sole conclusion that no water at all could be drawn from the river during this time. * In addition, in Appendix D, Groundwater Pump Test, the last statement on page 6, Model Predictions, is that 12 feet could be considered the additional drawdown to reflect short-term drought conditions. Since short-term drought conditions occur during August, September and October, it is when no water can be drawn from the Meadow River, and the aquifer may already be down 12 feet from the summer drought, that the most water (at least 800 gallons per minute in addition to the RSTP) will be required to operate the plant. The first paragraph on page 4.4-14 says it all, "Because of limited hydrologic data on the relationship between the aquifer and the Meadow River, there is an ongoing study on the local aquifer that would provide more insight on the aquifer's characteristics and to a better judge its availability and impacts during use. Also, a gage would be located on Meadow River near the intake structure (under either water supply option) as part of a daily check to monitor and record stream levels. Ongoing collection of river data would allow for a better understanding of the Meadow River's characteristics and along with the ongoing aquifer study, provide WGC more data for better water use decisions. Furthermore, the state would review the issues and provide recommendations to WGC. The forthcoming results from the aquifer tests, continuous monitoring of the river's behavior and correspondence with state agencies would help WGC decide on the best approach to supplying water for the project and minimize adverse impacts to water sources." The actions listed in this paragraph should be completed before a Draft EIS is published for comment. Several other factors further enforce my conclusion that the Draft EIS is incomplete and inadequate: * All these figures are averages and/or estimates, so the reality at a given time could be even worse. * The data regarding Meadow River flow is from 25 years ago. * The choice is left open as to whether the Meadow River will be maintained at 60% of its annual average or 60% of its seasonal average flow. * In most instances where the 60% threshold for reducing the Meadow River flow is mentioned there is an added clause, "or another comparable withdrawal limitation measure determined in consultation with the state." This is an open-ended factor meaning the actual drawdown of the Meadow River may be an unidentified amount. * There is no resolution of the WGC alternatives identifying which source of water supply is to be secondary and which tertiary. The absurdity of the water supply situation is illustrated on page 2 - 39, where it is stated that, "WGC is also investigating alternate groundwater sources outside the drawdown area for the WGC production wells for use as a potential third source of water." Here we have another potential area of environmental impacts that is not identified, not studied, and for which the public will have no opportunity to comment. Incidentally, since the Meadow River is one of three sources of water, the statement should have read "a potential fourth source of water." Additional questions that should be answered by a Draft EIS follow. Why were the following issues raised on page 1 - 7, Table 1 - 1 Issues Identified for Consideration in the EIS, not addressed? * Impacts from elevated stream temperatures from disposal of waste heat. * Impacts from acid rain and mercury deposition in streams. * Impacts from disturbance of the Anjean gob pile (at that time, the only gob pile identified as part of the project). Appendix F, Stream Studies, contains Aquatic Biota Habitat Surveys of Two Streams in Rainelle, WV. Why was no such study conducted on the Meadow River? How is the 60% threshold of the Meadow River flow justified? The Draft EIS refers to the Tennant Method, but this is a technique, not a study. The pertinent statement in the Draft EIS is, "A general rule of thumb is that serious degradation of habitat occurs beyond 30 percent of the annual average." Figure 4.4-4 on page 4.4-11 demonstrates that the monthly variability of flow in the Meadow River makes a "general rule of thumb" invalid in determining how much can be withdrawn from the river without affecting river health; and as noted above regarding Appendix F, no study was conducted of aquatic biota in the Meadow River. Since the unsubstantiated 60% drawdown of the Meadow River is further qualified by the open-ended statement, "or another comparable withdrawal limitation measure determined in consultation with the state," how is the public to make substantive comments on the environmental impacts of an unknown amount? There was scant mention of the monitoring needed to ascertain that the flow of the Meadow River is sufficient (supposing a sufficient flow is determined). Who will perform this monitoring? Who will have access to the monitoring data? What will be the procedure for alerting WGC plant operators when the Meadow River is below the required level of flow? In conclusion, this Draft EIS should be withdrawn and redone, or a supplemental EIS should be issued when the above studies have been completed and the alternatives selected. Barring this, the no action alternative should be selected on the basis that no additional negative environmental impacts will occur. Regarding the existing drainage from the Anjean and other gob piles, there are other alternatives for dealing with those impacts that, by its own admission, are beyond the scope of this document. Besides, the gob piles are currently being treated; and the environmental impacts of disturbing the gob piles and then having the project halted because it becomes financially unfeasible, lacks a sufficient water supply, or other result of the incomplete planning that characterizes the project so far, would be much worse than the no action alternative. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.10/876 - Release Date: 6/28/2007 10:56 AM

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

EC July 2007