MVCAC

mvcac@lists.osenergy.org

1013 discussions

VIRTUAL TECHNICAL SEMINAR ~ Green Chemical Design & Development
by Duane Nichols 23 Aug '22

23 Aug '22

https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/08/23/virtual-technical-seminar-green-che… VIRTUAL TECHNICAL SEMINAR ~ Green Chemical Design & Development Green & Sustainable Chemicals Needed to Replace Toxic Substances § Boost Green and Sustainable Chemical Development with AI § Presented by Craig Rowlands, Senior Toxicologist and Distinguished Member of the Technical Staff at UL Solutions FROM: Virtual Local Section, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, August 22, 2022 Public concerns about the health and environmental safety of chemicals are driving the development of more sustainable, ‘‘greener’’ chemicals and products. Intrinsic chemical hazards are a function of many factors including physicochemical properties, chemical structure, and sub-structures. Using these properties to predict chemical hazards provides chemical R&D programs with a fast and increasingly reliable technology for new green chemical designs. Artificial Intelligence prediction software is well suited for this purpose and can be applied to all stages of the value chain when developing new green and sustainable chemicals. Dr. Rowlands is a Senior Toxicologist and Distinguished Member of the Technical Staff at UL Solutions providing leadership in the innovation of products and services for chemical safety assessments of consumer products. He has spent over 20 years applying conventional and new toxicology approaches including non-animal and computational predictive toxicology in chemical safety evaluations. His current research is developing approaches to using artificial intelligence models to aid in the development of green and sustainable chemicals. This meeting is free and open to all, not just to Virtual Local Section members. ====================== THREE MEETING OPTIONS ====================== PRIMARY MEETING (LIVE PRESENTATION/LIVE CHAT) 9:00 PM ET Wednesday, August 24, 2022 Register in advance for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUoduquqD0qE9O4BwlDfAWGetzB2vbblo… ALTERNATE 1 (RECORDED PRESENTATION/LIVE CHAT) 7:00 AM ET Thursday, August 25, 2022 Register in advance for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZIpdeCvqDkuG9J2hMp2EO3-JrZgJOITg6… ALTERNATE 2 (RECORDED PRESENTATION/LIVE CHAT) 1:00 PM ET Thursday August 25, 2022 Register in advance for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUtf-2rpz4qGNWEHVt7Pj4ypXKK2kyLvf… After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing instructions for joining the meeting. #######+++++++#######+++++++######## EPA Calls for Nominations for 2023 Green Chemistry Challenge Awards From the EPA Press Office, Washington, DC, August 18, 2022 WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced it is now accepting nominations for the 2023 Green Chemistry Challenge Awards from companies or institutions that have developed a new green chemistry process or product that helps protect human health and the environment. EPA is again including an award category to recognize technology that reduces or eliminates greenhouse gas emissions, in support of the Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to combat the climate crisis. Additionally, EPA is announcing a webinar to be held on Wednesday, September 28, 2022, from 2 p.m.– 3:30 p.m. EDT, to educate stakeholders on the Green Chemistry Challenge Awards and the nomination process. “Green Chemistry Challenge Award winners are leaders in their field and their technologies demonstrate how this revolutionary discipline can be used to prevent pollution at its source,” said EPA Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Deputy Assistant Administrator for Pollution Prevention Jennie Romer. “Green chemistry is also a tool in the fight against climate change, and by encouraging the use of greener products, it can advance environmental justice in underserved and overburdened communities where industrial sites are disproportionately located.” Sent from my iPad

1 0

West Virginia city on list of worst year-round particle pollution | WOWK
by Duane Nichols 22 Aug '22

22 Aug '22

https://www.wowktv.com/news/west-virginia/west-virginia-city-on-list-of-wor… West Virginia city on list of worst year-round particle pollution by: Alix Martichoux, Nexstar Media Wire Posted: Apr 10, 2022 Updated: Apr 10, 2022 (NEXSTAR) – The World Health Organization announced this week that 99% of the world’s population breathes poor-quality air, that when inhaled over time can cause cardiovascular and respiratory disease. While cities in the developing world have the worst air quality, according to the WHO, pollution is still a problem in American cities. There are chronic sources of air pollution, like vehicle traffic on busy highways, as well as seasonal issues, like smoke from wildfires. The American Lung Association tracks air pollution in U.S. cities. Its annual report uses data from the Environmental Protection Agency on the presence of two types of pollutants: ozone (or smog) and particulate matter. Particulate matter has many sources, such as transportation, power plants, agriculture, fires and industry – as well as from natural sources like desert dust. Using the EPA data, the report ranks the most and least polluted metro areas. The cities with the highest amount of ozone pollution (or smog) are: Los Angeles-Long Beach, California Bakersfield, California Visalia, California Fresno-Madera-Hanford, California Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona Sacramento-Roseville, California San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, California Denver-Aurora, Colorado Salt Lake City-Provo-Orem, Utah San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, California The cities with the worst year-round particle pollution are: Bakersfield, California Fresno-Madera-Hanford, California Visalia, California Los Angeles-Long Beach, California Medford-Grants Pass, Oregon Fairbanks, Alaska San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, California Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona Pittsburgh-New Castle-Weirton, Pennsylvania/Ohio/West Virginia El Centro, California “Particulate matter, especially PM2.5, is capable of penetrating deep into the lungs and entering the bloodstream, causing cardiovascular, cerebrovascular (stroke) and respiratory impacts,” WHO said. “There is emerging evidence that particulate matter impacts other organs and causes other diseases as well.” The American Lung Association also keeps track of which cities have the least air pollution. The ten cities with the cleanest air, free of particle pollution are: Urban Honolulu, Hawaii Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, Hawaii Cheyenne, Wyoming Wilmington, North Carolina Casper, Wyoming St. George, Utah Bellingham, Washington Elmira-Corning, New York Sioux Falls, South Dakota Duluth, Minnesota/Wisconsin There are many cities that also scored well for smog-free air, but because they all had similar readings, the ALA did not rank them. You can see the full list of clean air cities in the American Lung Association’s report.

1 0

Children Living Close to Fracking Sites Have Two to Three Times Higher Risk of Leukemia - DeSmog
by Duane Nichols 19 Aug '22

19 Aug '22

https://www.desmog.com/2022/08/17/children-fracking-sites-higher-risk-cance… Children Living Close to Fracking Sites Have Two to Three Times Higher Risk of Leukemia From an Article by Nick Cunningham, DeSmog Blog, August 17, 2022 Children living close to fracking sites in Pennsylvania are two to three times more likely to be diagnosed with leukemia, and contamination of drinking water is suspected as an avenue of exposure, according to a new study. “Unconventional oil and gas development can both use and release chemicals that have been linked to cancer, so the potential for children living near UOG to be exposed to these chemical carcinogens is a major public health concern,” the study’s senior author, Nicole Deziel, associate professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, said in a statement. Unconventional oil and gas development, more commonly referred to as fracking, exploded over the past two decades, with a particularly frenzied period of drilling in Pennsylvania in the early 2010s. Fracking results in a range of toxic chemicals and pollutants being discharged into the air and waterways, including heavy metals, radioactive material, particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds. For example, benzene, a known carcinogen, is routinely emitted into air and water during the drilling and fracking process. Published on August 17 in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, the study looked at almost 2,500 children in Pennsylvania, including 405 who have been diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a type of blood cancer. The researchers compared children 2 to 7 years old living within close proximity of fracking sites since birth against others living further away, while controlling for a variety of confounding factors, including other environmental exposures. “Our results indicate that exposure to [unconventional oil and gas] may be an important risk factor for [acute lymphoblastic leukemia], particularly for children exposed in utero,” Cassandra Clark, one of the study’s authors and a postdoctoral associate at the Yale Cancer Center, told DeSmog in an email. The researchers looked at oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania that fell within the same watershed as the children in the study, and used an exposure metric that takes into account topography, hydrology, and proximity to gas wells. They found that children living within two kilometers (roughly 1.2 miles) of a drill site were two to three times more likely to develop acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common form of childhood cancer. The results suggest drinking water may be impacted by fracking operations nearby. Other studies have shown that oil and gas drilling uses or emits 55 chemicals that are known or probable human carcinogens. This new study adds more evidence that not only does proximity to fracking contribute to heightened risk of childhood leukemia, but also that water contamination could be one of the sources. The study adds to the enormous body of research that shows negative health impacts for people living close to oil and gas operations. DeSmog has reported on some earlier findings, including the health risks of people living in close proximity to flaring, and the increased risk for pregnant women who live close to drilling developing gestational hypertension and eclampsia. But there is a dearth of research on the links with childhood cancer, and the Yale study adds stronger evidence of the dangers for children living close to fracking operations. “While there have been around 50 epidemiologic studies of [unconventional oil and gas] exposure and a variety of health outcomes to date, only two studies focused on childhood cancer,” Clark said. “This is the largest study of unconventional oil and gas development and childhood cancer to date, and the first to incorporate an exposure metric that focuses on the drinking water pathway.” “This new study connects a lot of dots,” biologist Sandra Steingraber, co-founder Concerned Health Professionals of New York, who was not involved in the study, told DeSmog. “As such, this study is a kind of terrifying voila,” Steingraber said, adding that the methodology in the study is “really robust.” For years, the Concerned Health Professionals of New York has compiled and published a compendium of scientific and medical findings of the human health impacts from fracking. Steingraber noted that the latest study also builds on other research demonstrating the harms of fracking in Pennsylvania. One study linked higher numbers of gas wells with higher rates of pediatric asthma hospitalizations. Another found benzene in the bodies of people living near fracking. A third found links between fracking and the risk of heart attack. “These findings from this case-control study both corroborate and extend a rapidly growing body of evidence — now documented in more than 100 studies — showing that fracking is a public health crisis,” Steingraber said. “All together, these studies, new and old, show us that fracking in Pennsylvania is not safe for Pennsylvanians — even those living a mile or more away. In fact, it’s a moral obscenity.” Southwest Pennsylvania has also seen a cluster of Ewing’s sarcoma in teens, a rare form of bone cancer, and many residents suspect fracking as the culprit. The state has approved millions of dollars in funding to study the possible links. One consistent takeaway from so many health studies related to fracking is that proximity is key. In many states, there are no federal setback requirements and drillers are allowed to encroach on local populations, setting up rigs within a few hundred feet of homes and businesses. “The allowable setback in Pennsylvania, where our study was conducted, is 500 feet,” Clark said. “Our findings of increased risk of [acute lymphoblastic leukemia] at distances of two kilometers (about 6560 ft) or more from [drilling] operations, in conjunction with evidence from numerous other studies, suggest that existing setback distances are insufficiently protective of children’s health.”

1 0

Action Alert! Mountain Valley Pipeline Requests FERC Extension - Act by July 14
by Duane Nichols 15 Jul '22

15 Jul '22

Action Alert! Mountain Valley Pipeline Requests FERC Extension - Act by July 29 https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/mvpferc2022_copy1?wvpId=1484761a-9d09-4d6b-9…

1 0

Mountain Valley Pipeline asks for another four years to complete the project | Local News | roanoke.com
by Duane Nichols 07 Jul '22

07 Jul '22

https://roanoke.com/news/local/mountain-valley-pipeline-asks-for-another-fo… Mountain Valley Pipeline asks for another four years to complete the project Article by Laurence Hammack, Roanoke Times, June 24, 2022 Unused sections of the Mountain Valley Pipeline lay on Brush Mountain land in Montgomery County in February. Construction of the 303-mile natural gas delivery project has been delayed while environmental permits have been challenged in court. MATT GENTRY, The Roanoke Times Having already spent $5.5 billion and more than four years building a natural gas pipeline through Southwest Virginia, the developers are now asking for another four years to finish the job. In a letter Friday to federal regulators, Mountain Valley Pipeline requested that it be given until Oct. 13, 2026, to complete a 303-mile pipeline that has encountered fierce opposition at every turn since it was first proposed in 2014. Court rulings striking down government-issued permits for the pipeline, prompted by lawsuits from environmentalists, made it clear that construction would not be completed by this Oct. 13, a deadline set two years ago by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. “Due to the ongoing litigation,” Mountain Valley wrote in a letter to FERC, it is requesting an extension to allow it to “work cooperatively with all affected stakeholders and permit agencies to complete construction and achieve final restoration.” “Despite a continual barrage of attacks from Project opponents, Mountain Valley remains committed to completing this critical infrastructure project,” Matthew Eggerding, assistant general counsel for the company, wrote in the letter to FERC secretary Kimberly Bose. Although Mountain Valley is seeking another four years, spokeswomen Natalie Cox said that the joint venture of five energy companies still hopes the pipeline will be in service by late next year. Opponents say time has already run out on a flawed concept. Construction of the buried 42-inch diameter pipe has marred scenic landscapes and clogged pristine streams with muddy runoff, they say, and its environmental footprint will only deepen when it begins to deliver natural gas that will help fuel a climate change crisis. “This project is a dinosaur and should go extinct in 2022,” said David Sligh, conservation director of Wild Virginia. When plans were first announced for the pipeline — which will run from northern West Virginia through the New River and Roanoke valleys to connect with an existing pipeline near the North Carolina line — the goal was to have it completed by the winter of 2018, at a cost of $3.7 billon. The projected cost has now grown to $6.6 billon, and the expected completion date has been pushed back more than a half-dozen times. With key permits thrown out by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, construction is currently stalled, with the exception of erosion control and stabilization of the pipeline’s 125-foot wide right of way. Mountain Valley is in the process of seeking renewed authorizations from several government agencies. Despite the mounting problems, Mountain Valley indicated in its letter to FERC that it still has the support of its partners and investors. A deadline extension from FERC would “provide necessary clarity and certainty to stakeholders” and benefit “the landowners, the environment, project shippers and end-users of natural gas,” the letter stated. “In addition, the project remains fully subscribed under binding long-term agreements.” FERC first approved the pipeline in 2017, finding there was a public need for the 2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas that it would transport at high pressure. Mountain Valley was given a three-year certificate, which expired Oct. 13, 2020. After lawsuits began to slow construction, the company was given another two years, which runs out in October. It asked FERC to rule on its second request to extend the deadline another four years by Aug 8. Similar delays have been approved for other natural gas projects, it said. “Mountain Valley stands ready to complete the remaining construction as soon as practicable,” it said in the letter. The company says construction is 94% complete, although opponents dispute that figure and contend that an overly optimistic picture is being painted for regulators and investors. “Mountain Valley Pipeline does not deserve another pass to harm the communities and water resources of Appalachia,” said Jessica Sims, Virginia field coordinator for Appalachian Voices, which has joined Wild Virginia and other groups in legal challenges. “MVP’s request for a 4-year certificate extension runs counter to May 2022 statements from a major equity holder in the project, Equitrans, which touted project completion in 2023,” Sims said in a statement. “No matter how much time MVP asks for, it does not change the likelihood that the project can be built legally or safely, so FERC should deny this extension request.” Mountain Valley counters that geo-political forces such as the war in Ukraine have only increased an existing demand for natural gas. “As our nation transitions to a lower-carbon future, natural gas infrastructure will continue to play a critical role in transporting our abundant supply of domestically produced energy, supporting our current energy needs, and helping to solidify America’s energy independence,” Cox wrote in an email. ###

1 0

Tell the EPA to Write the Strongest Methane Rule Possible
by Duane Nichols 27 Jun '22

27 Jun '22

To All Citizens Concerned About Air Pollution And Climate Change And The Public Health From: Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition, June 27, 2022 Later this year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will be proposing the full version of its much anticipated rule limiting climate-changing methane, asthma-causing volatile organic compounds (VOC), and the known carcinogen benzene from new and existing oil and gas facilities. We need the EPA to propose the strongest rule possible in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Methane pollution has 87 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide over a 20-year time period. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has predicted an “above average” hurricane season for the 7th consecutive year. Please click here to tell the EPA to propose the strongest methane standard for oil and gas facilities possible. https://cleanaircouncil.salsalabs.org/gasdrilling_copy1_copy1_copy1_copy1_c…

1 0

PSC To Hold 4 Public Hearings On Appalachian Power's Rate Request | WVPB
by Duane Nichols 18 Jun '22

18 Jun '22

https://www.wvpublic.org/energy-environment/2022-06-06/psc-to-hold-4-public… See also .... FrackCheckWV.net

1 0

NOW MORE THAN EVER ~ Economic Development REALLY SHOULD Account for Environmental Impacts
by Duane Nichols 22 May '22

22 May '22

https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/05/22/now-more-than-ever-economic-develop… NOW MORE THAN EVER ~ Economic Development REALLY SHOULD Account for Environmental Impacts Scientists, engineers, economists and political leaders have a responsibility ... When will ‘economic growth’ account for environmental costs? From the Article by David Shearman, The Hill ~ Energy & Environment, May 12, 2022 Human health and the natural environment are indivisible. A recent article in the journal The Lancet reminds us that “economic decisions on the environment have major impacts on human health, and health and wellness depend on a flourishing environment.” Those living in vast cities may find this statement difficult to grasp and many economists certainly do, for the words “natural environment” have now to be changed to “natural capital” for their understanding. We live in a world where economic thinking rules our lives, whereas many believe it should be our servant in delivering an equitable and secure future. When leaders of most Western nations continue to puff out their chests to announce their latest increase in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), or rate of growth, they expose their impotence to manage a nation’s future by failing to recognize environmental costs. Or as written more politely by Stephen Posner and Lydia Olander, in The Hill, “While congressional leaders debate trillions of dollars of federal spending, they have a critical blind spot” for they are “not informed by a complete accounting of the nation’s assets, leaving out many critical services that nature provides.” After nearly 70 years of GDP in economic ideology and practice, the World Bank is having second thoughts about GDP as a measure of “growth” for it takes no account of natural and human capital used to achieve it. Indeed the bank’s “The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021 Managing Assets for the Future” report now seriously questions the use of GDP in its present form and may at long last provide a glimmer of hope for the world to have a sustainable future. On “natural capital,” the report states “mismanagement of nature and failure to consider the longer-term impacts of our actions can carry severe consequences, even if they might not be immediately evident. We therefore need an expanded economic toolkit, including broader measures of economic progress, to secure our collective prosperity and even sustain our existence as a species.” The report notes that “in countries where today’s GDP is achieved by consuming or degrading assets over time, for example by overfishing or soil degradation, total wealth is declining. This can happen even as GDP rises, but it undermines future prosperity.” In Australia with an election due on May 21, the government has proudly announced a current GDP of 4 percent, yet it may well be minus 4 percent if the loss on natural capital is accounted for, due to prodigious land clearing, urban expansion and extensive environmental damage from mining. This may also be the case in the U.S. but there has been little attempt to measure it. The issue is of pressing importance because world food supply is threatened by war, harvest failures from climate change extreme events and by supply problems. This is a threat to one of our life support systems, the living soil, the ecology of which together with the surrounding services from biodiversity provide our food. The research of many scientists defining these threats should galvanize action. The World Bank 2021 report may have been influenced by the report “The Economics of Biodiversity,” by eminent economist Professor Partha Dasgupta, which was cited in a previous article in The Hill. Dasgupta pointed out that GDP does not include “depreciation of assets” as such as the degradation of the biosphere. Economic progress has been based on the extraction of resources from nature and the dumping of waste back into it. When extraction and dumping exceed nature’s capacity to repair itself, natural capital shrinks as do biodiversity and the essential environmental services they provide. A basic tenet of any policy or practice is that it should be able to measure its effect accurately so it is now vital to establish environmental accounting to place a value on natural capital as explained in an article from the Harvard Kennedy School. Indeed, one has to ask why the U.S. has been tardy to adopt the UN System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) which commenced in 2012, when about 90 countries have already done so. The answer may be that the U.S. favors of a free-market system that embodies deregulation and is the leading instrument in disregard for the consumption of natural capital. Indeed, even recent articles from eminent business schools fail to mention the environment as it related to the U.S. economy. It is also important to reflect that for too long we have failed to acknowledge and use the inherent knowledge of many indigenous peoples on land management. The free-market system has moved Western civilizations far from such understanding. Reform must be initiated by a fundamental change in the thinking of economists and by politicians of both persuasions. Bipartisan reforms will become all the more necessary when climate-driven conflict emerge, and reforms could offer security, especially to rural constituencies who understand food production. Given the unprecedented impact we’ve had on land, the recent sobering UN land report is essential reading for all members of Congress as they consider economic policies — not just climate action. A vital step in developing the World Bank’s “expanded economic toolkit” should be to educate the public and business on reform of GDP to put a value on nature so providing an incentive for government to protect it. Currently, “Real GDP” denotes GDP adjusted for inflation. Let us have “true GDP,” which encompasses environmental loss. But we must realize that reform of GDP is only one piece of a thousand others needed to complete this jigsaw puzzle in the next few decades, if the planet is to remain viable for human life. The other pieces — including climate change, pollutions, toxic chemicals, water security, sea and land ecology, population growth, consumption, conflict — must all fit together as they are interrelated. Only in fitting together the puzzle can we ensure out survival. >>> David Shearman (AM, Ph.D., FRACP, FRCPE) is a professor of medicine at the University of Adelaide, South Australia and co-founder of Doctors for the Environment Australia. He is co-author of “The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy” (2007) commissioned by the Pell Centre for International Relations and Public Policy. #######+++++++#######+++++++####### See Also: Americans Largely Favor U.S. Taking Steps To Become Carbon Neutral by 2050, Alec Tyson, et al., March 1, 2022 Majorities of Americans say the United States should prioritize the development of renewable energy sources and take steps toward the country becoming carbon neutral by the year 2050. But just 31% want to phase out fossil fuels completely, and many foresee unexpected problems in a major transition to renewable energy. Tagged as: economics, excess deaths, fossil fuels, GHG, impacts, NEPA, waste disposal, World Bank Sent from my iPad

1 0

From the National Stop Crypto Group on 5/19/22
by Duane Nichols 20 May '22

20 May '22

FROM the National Stop Crypto Group on 5/19/22 > > Here are links to share: > NBC News clip explains crypto mining https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yMsDUEnOw8c > Articles on Cherokee County NC crypto mining: > Washington Post article by Kevin Williams https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/03/18/bitcoin-mining-noise-pol… > Daily Beast article by Simon Spichak https://www.thedailybeast.com/a-crypto-mine-is-making-life-a-daily-hell-for… > CitizenTimes (USA Today) article by Brian Gordon https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/2021/12/13/nc-cryptocurrency-minin… > Sierra Club of WNC > Crypto mining talking points (attached pdf) > Blog post https://www.sierraclub.org/north-carolina/blog/2022/04/cryptocurrency-comes… > Cherokee County Citizens Against Crypto Mining (CCCACM) petition https://www.change.org/CryptoMiningPetition

1 0

FYI ~ Health Department Seeks Comment on Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan
by Duane Nichols 10 May '22

10 May '22

Note ~ Air Toxics Ambient Monitoring | US EPA https://www.epa.gov › amtic › air-toxics-ambient-monit... The goal of ambient air toxics monitoring is to support the reduction of public exposure to air toxics, also known as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). Air toxics, also known as toxic air pollutants or hazardous air pollutants, are those pollutants that cause or may cause cancer or other serious health effects, such as reproductive effects or birth defects, or adverse environmental and ecological effects. This is really a broad category and could hardly be comprehensive, rather would be limited by definitions. From: Allegheny News <AlleghenyNEWS(a)alleghenycounty.us> > Date: May 10, 2022 at 2:08:31 PM EDT > Subject: Health Department Seeks Comment on Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan > > > > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > May 10, 2022 > Contact: > Neil Ruhland > Public Health Information Officer > 412-578-8312 (office) > 412-339-7995 (cell) > Neil.Ruhland(a)AlleghenyCounty.us > > > Health Department Seeks Comment on Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan > > PITTSBURGH – The Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) is requesting written public comment on its draft 2023 Air Monitoring Network Plan, an annual report which provides a detailed description of how and where air pollution is monitored in Allegheny County. > > Air Monitoring Network Plans are required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The plan provides the specific location of each monitoring station, siting criteria, monitoring methods and objectives, frequency of sampling, pollutants measured at each station and aerial photographs showing their physical location. > > The 2023 plan is substantially similar to the 2022 Air Monitoring Network Plan except for the proposed move to the air monitoring station from the Clack Campus to Fulton Street. A summary of all proposed changes may be found in the Executive Summary of the draft plan, beginning on page six. > > The county’s air monitoring network includes nine locations within the county: Avalon, Clairton, Flag Plaza, Glassport, Harrison, Lawrenceville, Liberty, North Braddock, Parkway East (Wilkinsburg) and South Fayette. One or more of the following pollutants is measured at each site: sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, total reactive nitrogen, ozone, PM10, PM2.5, and air toxics. > > Comments will be accepted until 4:30 p.m. on June 9, 2022, and may be submitted via e-mail to david.good(a)alleghenycounty.us or by mail to: > > Allegheny County Health Department > Attention: David D. Good > Air Quality Program > 301 39th Street > Pittsburgh, PA 15201 > > All correspondence must include first and last name and a complete mailing address. > > For more information regarding the department’s air quality efforts, visit the Air Quality page of the Health Department website. > > # # # > > Debra L. Bogen, MD, Director > Allegheny County Health Department – Public Information Office > 542 Fourth Avenue │ Pittsburgh, PA 15219 > Phone: 412-687-ACHD (2243) │ Fax: 412-578-8325 > www.alleghenycounty.us/healthdepartment >

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
102
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

MVCAC