MVCAC

mvcac@lists.osenergy.org

1014 discussions

PSC hearing yesterday.
by Duane330＠aol.com 25 Jan '07

25 Jan '07

To: MVCAC Testimony was entered by Duane Nichols, Charles Yuill, and Adam Polinski to the WV Public Service Commission yesterday regarding the environmental impacts of the proposed changes to the Longview power plant. Our attorney, Phillip Gaujot, did an excellent job of presenting our case and of posing questions to the single Longview witness, Chris Colbert. Colbert gave what we consider to be vague and incomplete answers, but the two Commissions present, were not apparently concerned about his lack of specificity and meager amount of information. Mr. Shaw has resigned from the Commission. [The Governor must appoint a Republican lawyer to replace him, since both major parties must be represented and since at least one must be a lawyer....neither Chairman Jon McKinney nor Edward Staats are lawyers.] ............The PSC Staff recommended that the changes be approval, with a list of 10 or 11 stipulations. Our position is that the increased steam plumes are significant and should be the reason for greater evaluation, i.e. a "material" modification. Neither the Staff nor the Commissions are particularly inclined to side with us. In any case, the final decision will not be made until after a Briefing Schedule has transpired: Initial Briefs due Jan. 29th, Reply Briefs due January 31st, and Final Briefs due February 2nd. .......................We are very unhappy with this schedule, because Briefs are to be submitted without the benefit of the Transcript, which will not be ready in time for use during this schedule. ............... Duane Nichols, Convener, MVCAC

1 0

power line thru Virginia..?
by Duane330＠aol.com 22 Jan '07

22 Jan '07

[[note the paragraph that is underlined...........]] Preservationists Resist Proposed Power Line BROAD RUN, VA (AP) - The landowners and preservationists in Virginia’s hunt country have taken on Disney and won, so a battle against the state’s dominant utility over a proposed high-voltage power line leaves them undaunted. The Piedmont Environmental Council, which more than a decade ago famously fought off a proposed Disney theme park in rural Prince William county, is gearing up for battle over some of the same turf - this time a 40-mile section of a proposed multistate power line that cuts through pristine fields and mountains but utilities say is badly needed to meet growing demand and buck up the Northeast region’s electrical grid. The council held a press conference with its brightest star, actor Robert Duvall, to denounce plans to run the line through parts of Fauquier, Loudoun, and Prince William counties that have generally remained preserved despite the Washington, D.C. region’s exploding growth. Duvall, a Fauquier County resident who was also active in the 1990s in opposition to the proposed Disney’s America theme park, said he believes the region ’s residents are even more united against the power line. “ There were people who were for the Disney park back then,” said Duvall, who has consistently supported the region’s preservation efforts but only rarely steps into the spotlight on the issue. “I think everybody is against this. People are up in arms.” The council placed weather balloons 12 stories in the air along the proposed route to simulate the impact the lines would have on the region’s viewshed. In some spots, the balloons dominated a landscape that was largely pristine, dotted by historic sites including Civil War battle sites and the home of former Supreme Court Justice John Marshall. David Botkins, a spokesman for Dominion Virginia Power, said the utility appreciates residents’ concerns and will take them into account as it continues to evaluate the best route for a transmission line. But, he said, it’s wrong to compare Dominion’s proposal to Disney’s efforts. “ Disney’s proposal was about a theme park. This is about providing a lifeblood to hospitals, airports, homeland security facilities, and high-tech businesses, not to mention millions of households,” Botkins said. Northern Virginia could face rolling blackouts as soon as 2011 without additional capacity, Botkins said, and the proposed route is the only way to deliver it. Opponents have questioned whether Dominion is overstating its needs and want the utility to do more to embrace conservation. Opponents are also concerned that a new federal law enacted last year will make it easier for utilities to override residents’ concerns. Passed in response to warnings of gaps in the nation’s electrical network, the law allows the U.S. Energy Department to designate certain transmission corridors as being in the national interest. That would let federal regulators overrule states that would reject a power line with a demonstrated interstate interest. Botkins said Dominion is pursuing approval through traditional means - Virginia’s State Corporation Commission - and has no intention of asking the federal government to override the state. But others - including PJM Interconnection, which operates the region’s electrical grid - could seek a federal override. Power line opponents were sensitive to the perception that a few well-heeled gentlemen farmers concerned about the views from their estates are blocking progress and jeopardizing electricity for the region. “ This is not about a few wealthy landowners’ self-interest,” Duvall said. “ This is about corporate vandalism.” Martha Toomey of Orlean said the power lines would hurt a region that has eschewed residential growth and sought to build an economy based on agriculture and tourism. “ We’re not sitting out here making daisies. This is about business,” Toomey said. The 40-mile section running through Virginia is part of a 240-mile, $850 million line that would start about 20 miles south of Pittsburgh, then head southeast across a corner of western Maryland and West Virginia’s heavily touristed eastern panhandle before crossing into Virginia. The line is a joint project of Dominion and Pennsylvania-based Allegheny Power. JANUARY 2, 2007.

1 0

Minutes and Notes.
by Duane330＠aol.com 20 Jan '07

20 Jan '07

To: MVCAC participants and friends: NOTE: Longview provided "public notice" in the Dominion Post on January 16th of the Hearing set for the Public Service Commission at 9:30 a.m. in Charleston. The Concerned Citizens, including local residents, CLEAR, Citizens for Responsible Development, and the Citizens for Alternative to Longview Power, will be represented to provide testimony on the inconsistencies and impacts in the Longview filing of November 8, 2006. This latter filing seeks changes which include increasing the power output to 695 MW, increasing the size of the boiler and turbine buildings, and increasing the amount of water usage. Longview has provided only meager information on the equipment design and specifications. See the Notes at the end of the MVCAC Minutes provided below: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minutes of the MVCAC January 8, 2007 The MVCAC met at the St. Paul Lutheran Church with 10 participants in attendance. The meeting began with a report on the application for 501c3 status. The IRS provided some queries to which Paula wrote responses. MVCAC currently has a balance of $391.00 in the checking account. We received a $3000.00 contribution in December. One thousand dollars was sent to Synapse Energy for their costs related to their expert testimony, $1751.00 went to Phil Gaujot for his expenses related to the Longview issues, and $350.00 went for brochures. Paula developed a budget to accompany the 501c3 application. There was some discussion regarding whether we should develop a formal membership process and dues. A sub-committee was formed to further explore this issue. The group then discussed the cover letter that Paula had developed to accompany the brochures that we will mail. A few participants provided some suggestions for revisions. Duane then read Dennis’ report on the appeal of the proposed waste burning (gob) plant at Nemacolin, PA. The appeal was fined by the following Petitioners, namely: Dennis Groce, National Parks Conservation Association, Group Against Smog and Pollution and Phil Coleman. The appeal was turned down, but subsequent action may be feasible. A separate report will be provided shortly. Duane provided an update on Longview. They have received both their siting and transmission line certificates. In November, Longview proposed to increase the output of the plant from 600 to 695 megawatts. They have argued that this increase will have negligible effects. However, the Concerned Citizens have filed documents with the Public Service Commission to protest, because of the effects that this increase will have on the local environment. Longview wants to increase the amount of water necessary (a 12% increase). Also, the main boiler building will be increased from 257 to 270 feet high. So, the larger building and the greater steam plume represent a greater obstacle to the view shed issue. We are also concerned that the cost to build the plant has escalated to $1.8 billion. The Public Service Commission (PSC) will decide whether the increase in output and its effects constitute a significant change to Longview’s plan. If it does constitute a significant change, the consequences could include a new air quality permit. Allegheny Energy has concluded that adding scrubbers to the Ft. Martin power plant will cost more money than they originally anticipated. They have asked the PSC to increase their securitization to cover this additional expense. This will add about $3.50 to each household electric bill, until the scrubber are paid for. Duane asked whether MVCAC should send a letter supporting this increase expense, since we would benefit from scrubbers. It was decided that the board would make the final decision regarding whether to send such a letter. There have been public hearings regarding the proposed power line that will run through West Virginia, PA, MD, and VA. Jim recommended that the MVCAC send a letter to the PSC opposing such a power line and emphasize the problems with the taking of property that would accompany such a power line. Jim has argued that if Allegheny Energy would spend the same amount of $$ on energy conservation as it is proposing to spend on the power line, there would be no need for a power line. Duane spoke to a wire expert with Allegheny Power who stated that if they could upgrade the existing line while it was still being used, there would be no need for a new route. Jim reported on the proposed co-generation power plant for Greenbrier County. Sierra Club and others are protesting the plant based on several issues, such as the fact that the plant will violate EPA’s new particulate standards and that there is not sufficient energy in the gob they are proposing to use. Jim passed around a petition related to the Cool Cities effort. The intent of the petition is to persuade the city of Morgantown to sign on to this effort. This would mean the city would agree to take measures to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, by adopting strategies such as using biofuels, making city buildings more energy efficient, etc. City Council will consider this issue at the next Committee of the Whole meeting on January 30 at 7:00 pm. Please consider attending this meeting to voice your support. Respectfully submitted, Linda Shuster, Secretary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTE: The Public Service Commission has set a “public hearing” for January 24th at 9:30 am in Charleston, to determine whether the proposed changes to the Longview power plant are significant (“material”) or insignificant (“ non-material). The Concerned Citizens as “intervenors” will be present to testify. The public is invited to send comments on whether Longview should be allowed to increase their power output from 600 to 695 megawatts while increasing their water usage by 12% and installing larger buildings on the 160 acre plant site. Based upon past practice, the smoke stack at 554 feet should be redesigned to take into account the other changes including the larger buildings. Longview does not want to consider this redesign. Therefore, Concerned Citizens considers the proposed changes to be “material”, i.e. significant. You can express your opinion and concerns by writing to: Sandra Squire, Executive Secretary, WV Public Service Commission, 201 Brooks Street, Charleston, WV 25323. The letter should contain the following reference: RE: Siting Certificate for Longview Power, LLC.

1 0

Tue at 7 pm
by Duane330＠aol.com 08 Jan '07

08 Jan '07

IMPORTANT MEETING OF THE MON VALLEY CLEAN AIR COALITION, TUESDAY, JANUARY 9TH, 7 PM. Location: St. Paul's Lutheran Church, Basement Meeting Area. We will review recent activities. We have a new budget to present. Come and enjoy seeing your old friends, and prepare for a new year of activities. We can focus and be efficient!!! Duane Nichols, Convenor. That's Tuesday, January 9th at 7 pm.......................................... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< For Immediate Release: For More Information, contact Jan. 6, 2007 James Kotcon 304-594-3322 (home) 304-293-8822 (office) _jkotcon(a)wvu.edu_ (mailto:jkotcon@wvu.edu) Energy Options and Solutions for Global Warming Changes in energy use to address global warming are increasingly likely. But what kind and how much change is still debated. Three approaches to new energy policies for America will be presented at the next meeting of the Monongahela Group of Sierra Club on Thursday, Jan. 11. A panel of speakers will review changes in energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Ken Markel, an expert on fossil energy will present technical information on energy options. Paul Brown will review the need for dramatic reductions in carbon emissions. A major new policy proposal from the Sierra Club will be presented by Jim Kotcon. The “Smart Energy Solutions” initiative presents a comprehensive, but realistic approach to protecting the planet from dangerous climate changes. The meeting will be held at 7 PM in the Blackwater Room of the WVU MountainLair. The public is invited and a discussion will follow the presentations. For details, call 594-3322. -End-

1 0

Immediate reply necessary
by Duane330＠aol.com 04 Jan '07

04 Jan '07

To: Participants of the MVCAC From: Duane Nichols, Convenor RE: Adoption of Six (6) Amendments to Articles of Organization ACTION: Please vote immediately: Yes-- for approval, No-- for objection. NOTE: Contributions to the MVCAC will be exempt of IRS taxes if the MVCAC meets the requirements of Section 501-c-3 of the IRS code. We have been informed by the IRS that six amendments are needed to our Articles of Organization. These required amendments are herewith proposed by Paula Hunt for adoption by email vote of the Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition. Decision is by consensus, so if there are any objections, said objections will need to be resolved at our upcoming meeting on Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 7 pm in the Basement Meeting Area of St. Paul's Lutheran Church, Patterson Drive, Morgantown, WV. MON VALLEY CLEAN AIR COALITION Articles of Organization Adopted: January 23, 2006 In consideration of health concerns relating to high levels of air pollutants in the Monongahela River valley and surrounding areas, the Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition, a nonprofit organization whose participants serve on a voluntary basis, has been founded to promote public education and advocacy relating to air quality issues and to enhance capabilities for monitoring air quality in the region. Activities may include 1) partnering with the local school systems to provide educational materials regarding energy awareness and genesis of air pollutants such as ozone, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds and particulates, 2) financially assisting in the acquisition of air monitoring equipment to be used in conjunction with the school programs, 3) exploring avenues for performing independent air monitoring either through direct equipment acquisition and operation by volunteers or via contractual agreement with a third party, 4) development of presentations and pamphlets to be used in adult public outreach, 5) participation in health fairs and other public opportunities for adult education, 6) the submission of data and other relevant information to local, state, and federal agencies regarding the development of rules for regulatory functions and environmental quality permits, 7) the writing of letters and testifying at public hearings on environmental issues and proposed permits for pollution control, as well as 8) the legal appeal of permits or regulations within the statutory time periods set aside in the permitting process. Each of these activities is intended only to the extent permitted under the Internal Revenue Service 501-c-3 rules. The Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition functions under the leadership of a Convenor, Secretary, and Treasurer. These officers are chosen by consensus, serving short indefinite terms of less than one year under typical circumstances. A Board of Directors is made up of the current and former Convenors and serves to facilitate decision-making, when necessary, between regular monthly meetings. The Treasurer maintains a bank account for the deposit of receipts and the payment of expenses, consistent with an annual Budget and approval of the officers and/or participants. A list of participants is to be maintained by the Secretary; and, an email list exists and is used as the primary means of communication among the officers and the participants. There is no membership fee or regular assessment. Voluntary contributions are welcomed from anyone who shares an interest in the objectives and mission of the Coalition, as it is stated above. Current funding categories for expenditures are 1) public education to include newsletters and brochures plus expenses for seminars and other public speaking functions, 2) the air monitoring project for data collection, training, and public awareness, 3) fees for consultants and experts, secretarial fees, and legal expenses (lawyers and court costs), and 4) other miscellaneous organization expenses. Monthly meetings involve a systematic discussion of all the relevant topics at that time. Decisions are made by consensus of those present, and minutes of each monthly meeting are distributed promptly to the participants. Committee meetings are held on an as-needed basis. The Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition is incorporated in the State of West Virginia as a not-for-profit Voluntary Association, Control Number 77545, July 11, 2005. The West Virginia Taxpayer Identification Number is WV-041-2704-001. The Employer Identification Number that as been assigned by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service is EIN 75-3199088. In the case of the dissolution of the Coalition, its monetary assets are to be donated to the American Lung Association and any equipment or supplies are to be donated to the Monongalia County Board of Education, Morgantown, WV. The formal address of the Coalition is as follows: Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition P. O. Box 4679 Morgantown, WV 26504 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amendments to Articles of Organization (Prepared: January 2, 2007) 1. The MVCAC is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, including for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (or the corresponding section of any future Federal tax code). 1. No part of the net earnings of the MVCAC shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to its members, trustees, directors, officers or other private persons, except that the MVCAC shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and to make payments and distributions in furtherance of Section 501(c)(3) purposes. 1. No substantial part of the activities of the MVCC shall be the carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, and the MVCAC shall not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution of statements) any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office. 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of these articles, the MVCAC shall not carry on any other activities not permitted to be carried on (a) by a corporation or organization exempt from Federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (or corresponding section of any future Federal tax code) or (b) by a corporation or organization, contributions to which are deductible under Section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (or corresponding section of any future Federal tax code). 1. Upon the dissolution of the MVCAC, assets shall be distributed for one or more exempt purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or corresponding section of any future Federal tax code, or shall be distributed to the Federal government, or to a state or local government, for public purpose. 1. However, if the named recipient is not then in existence or no longer a qualified distributee, or unwilling or unable to accept the distribution, then the assets of the MVCAC shall be distributed to a fund, foundation, or corporation organized exclusively for the purposes specified in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (or corresponding section of any future Federal tax code). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

1 0

Meet Jan 9th. St. Paul's Lutheran
by Duane330＠aol.com 27 Dec '06

27 Dec '06

To: MVCAC participants and friends RE: General Meeting, Tuesday, January 9th Time & Location: 7 pm, St. Paul's Lutheran Church (Basement), Patterson Drive, Morgantown, WV. Agenda to include the following: 1. The Longview "siting certificate" case has been reopened at the Public Service Commission, since Longview wants to increase the power output, the size of buildings, and the amount of water usage. 2. The Allegheny Energy scrubbers for the Ft. Martin power plant have an updated financing plan, due to cost inflation. 3. The Allegheny Power transmission line plan is to be filed at the PSC. 4. Status of Green County coal refuse power plant. 5. MVCAC plans for 2007, including local educational and local monitoring activities. 6. MVCAC plans for 2007, including fund raising and grant applications.

1 0

General Meeting 1-9-07
by Duane330＠aol.com 17 Dec '06

17 Dec '06

To: MVCAC participants and friends. We are planning a general meeting, to include a number of important topics, for Tuesday, January 9th, at 7 pm. I hope that you can attend. Please add this date and time to your calendar now and plan to come out. Let's start the New Year with a bang, an emissions free bang! Duane

1 0

Electricity and Climate Change in Tuesday's News
by paula - pj- hunt 13 Dec '06

13 Dec '06

In addition to the Allegheny Transmission line public meeting south of Morgantown (thanks for your comments Jim K), yesterday was a big news day for electricity and global climate change (at least on public radio). Here are some links in case you missed them: Jim referred to a story on coal-fired power plants, how some are being thwarted, and what Congress may do (or not) about capping carbon emissions: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6612925 WalMart, the store many love to hate, is switching some of its lights to LEDs (at least refrigerated case lights in its new stores). The company spends about $1Billion on electricity every year (I think that is what the guy said in this story), so they say a 1% savings is a lot of money: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6612916 The program Justice Talking had an entire show on greenhouse gases and global climate change. You can listen to/ download an mp3 of the entire show here http://www.justicetalking.org/viewprogram.asp?progID=578 - paula hunt

2 1

"power line"--Tue. Dec 12, 5 - 8 pm
by Duane330＠aol.com 12 Dec '06

12 Dec '06

NOTE: Allegheny Energy is planning a new 500 kilovolt transmission line crossing portions of western Pennsylvania, northern West Virginia, western Maryland and northern Virginia. In this regard, there will be a public meeting Tuesday evening from 5 pm to 8 pm at the Clinton District Fire Hall, on Grafton Road, US 119 South. [A similar meeting will be held in Waynesburg on Wednesday and in Washington, PA on Thursday.] See the following web site: _http://www.aptrailinfo.com/_ (http://www.aptrailinfo.com/) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Landowners Fear Ruin From Power Line Route By _Sandhya Somashekhar_ (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/sandhya+somashekhar/) Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, December 11, 2006; Page B01 The 15-story towers and crackling cables that are planned to cut across the Northern Virginia countryside are just red lines on a map, a paper illustration of what could come. But for Cameron Eaton, who learned shortly after Thanksgiving that one of the proposed routes for a new high-voltage power line slices across her Fauquier County property, they have already brought the specter of financial ruin. She bought her 100-acre Delaplane farm last year, when it was an overgrown slice of land anchored by a rundown old farmhouse just off Interstate 66. She plowed all her savings into it. To pay down her $1 million mortgage and build up her horse business, she planned to sell a five-acre chunk within a couple of years. Then came what her neighbors have come to regard as "the black cloud." "I'm probably sunk by this," said Eaton, 45, seated by the wood stove she uses to heat the farmhouse. "No one will buy that land if some ugly power line could run right over their house. I'm broken off at the knees." Across parts of Loudoun, Prince William and Fauquier counties, property owners who possess some of the most valuable land in Virginia are struggling with the sudden shock of learning that Dominion Virginia Power, which supplies electricity to most of the state, plans to erect 40 miles of power line through their back yards. Of particular concern is that plans call for the 500,000-volt cables to be carried by a series of steel lattice towers planted along a 150-foot-wide ribbon of land stripped of trees and buildings. The area's picturesque countryside, with its emerald farms dotted by Civil War-era barns, is arguably its most valuable quality, area real estate agents say. The mere suggestion that it could be marred by this line has sent land values plummeting, said Matt Sheedy, a land developer and president of Virginians for Sensible Energy Policy, a group opposed to the power line. "We've talked to a number of brokers, and we're being told that the real estate market is just frozen," Sheedy said. "People are backing out of contracts, and no one is prepared to buy with this hanging over them." Sheedy's group was formed primarily to raise awareness of the line's impact on property values and to fight any effort by Dominion to confiscate private property through eminent domain. The group estimates that land directly in the cross hairs could diminish in value by as much as 75 percent. Dominion officials have not selected a specific route for its portion of the 240-mile electric transmission line, a $1.3 billion project planned jointly by Dominion and Pennsylvania-based Allegheny Power. Last week, the company released a map of several possible routes for its section, all of which roughly track I-66 between Winchester and a substation just across the Prince William border in Loudoun. Although Dominion can use eminent domain to take private property to build a power line across it, the company usually tries first to negotiate a settlement with a landowner in accordance with state law, said John D. Smatlak, Dominion's vice president for electric transmission (javascript:void(popitup('http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/postphotos/orb/metro/2006-12-11/… /10/PH2006121001043.html',650,850))) _Buy This Photo_ (http://pictopia.com/perl/ptp?provider_id=25&ptp_photo_id=xt-mt-25-title_706…) (javascript:void(popitup('http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/postphotos/orb/metro/2006-12-11/… /10/PH2006121001043.html',650,850))) Cameron Eaton fears that a power line will drastically devalue her Fauquier County property. (By Gerald Martineau -- The Washington Post) Graphic (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/12/08/GR200612080…) _Potential Routes for New Line_ (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/12/08/GR200612080…) Dominion successfully negotiates with property holders about 97 percent of the time, Smatlak said, although critics argue that landowners often simply acquiesce to avoid going to court. The company does not expect to take anyone's home for the project, Smatlak said, and in some cases Dominion will offer landowners damages to compensate for other impacts to property values. But it is rare that landowners are happy with such settlements, said John Foote, a Virginia land-use lawyer. "It's an emotional process for most people," said Foote, "because here you have a [big company] coming in and saying, 'We are going to take your property, and there is nothing you can do about it.' " It will be especially unwelcome on the western edge of Northern Virginia, where vistas will be diminished by unsightly industrial towers, Sheedy said. "When you're out in the country and you're selling property, what you're selling is the open space and the bucolic views and the history," Sheedy said. "Running power lines through an area like this is just devastating." Dominion says it has no choice but to put up the lines. Officials say that the company's power grid is growing dangerously congested and that demand will outstrip capacity by 2011. The only way to avoid the possibility of rolling blackouts is to add more lines and bring more power from the Midwest, they say. And the most efficient route, they say, is through parts of Northern Virginia. That is little consolation for Gene and Deborah Bedell, who invested in their 223-acre Markham farm as their retirement plan. They pulled their house off the market last week after learning that one of the proposed routes slices through their back yard. No one, their real estate agent told them, would buy it if they knew that it could have a power line looming over it. "Not along it, not around it, but directly through our property," said Deborah Bedell, 54. "It's like finding out your 401(k) is in Enron stock." They will have to put off their plans to retire to a warmer climate until the process plays out, which could be years, they said. Opposition to the project is fierce. The Piedmont Environmental Council, a vociferous opponent of the power line, plans to hold a news conference today during which U.S. Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.) and actor Robert Duvall, who lives in Fauquier, are expected to speak. Eaton, a horse trainer and riding teacher, says she won't be able to afford her mortgage payments without selling part of her land, and she believes she will go bankrupt as a result. The farm had been her dream, Eaton said. She had looked for years for a property where she could care for her clients' horses, give riding lessons and invite drug-addicted and mentally ill women to enjoy the therapeutic effects of being near horses through a local equine-assisted psychotherapy program. She could help pay off the debt from the property and invest in her business, she calculated, by selling three subdivided plots for about $300,000 apiece. Then she learned from a friend that the properties she planned to sell were in one of the proposed paths for the line. "She said, 'Cammie, it's a direct hit,' " Eaton said. "I couldn't deal with it. I couldn't even ask questions. I had planned it all so well. My business plan was rock-solid."

4 3

Response to Longview @ PSC
by Duane330＠aol.com 07 Dec '06

07 Dec '06

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Longview Power, LLC And Longview Power, LLC Case No. 03-1860-E-CS-CN Case No. 05-1467-E-CN RESPONSE AND OBJECTIONS OF BARBARA BORN, ET AL. TO THE PETITION OF LONGVIEW POWER, LLC FOR WAIVER OF MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT REQUIREMENT FOR SITING CERTIFICATE TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF POWER PRODUCED I. INTRODUCTION On June 26, 2006, the Public Service Commission (PSC) granted certificates to Longview Power to construct at 600 MW coal-fired electric generation station and associated transmission line in the Cass District of Monongalia County, WV. On November 8, 2006, Longview Power submitted a Petition to the PSC to increase the power output of this plant to 695 MW with an increase in water usage but no increase in coal input. Barbara Born, et al. (Concerned Citizens) now responds and raises significant objections to the proposed plant. The resolution of these issues is of importance to the State and its citizens, particularly those residing in Monongalia County. Now, herewith, Concerned Citizens submits this Response and Objections to the Petition of Longview of November 8th, and requests a full hearing so that said objections can be considered, and related issues as stated herein can receive proper resolution. II. ARGUMENT The power output is to increase from 600 to 695 MW at constant maximum design heat input of 6,114 MM Btu per hour. And, the cooling water usage is to increase by about 12% to approximately 5,000 gallons per minute. This raises a number of issues and concerns for the Concerned Citizens and for the PSC, as follow: 1. The increased power generation level means an increase in the overall thermal efficiency of the plant, yet the increase in the cooling water rate means a decrease in the overall thermal efficiency of the plant. These conditions are at odds with each other, and a full explanation is necessary. A variety of impacts to the local environment will be precipitated by these changes, as indicated below. 2. An increased cooling water usage will require more or larger cooling towers, which will result in additional environmental impacts. The steam plume quantities in the local environment will be greater with attendant increased local rainout of pollutants and other impacts. The noise from cooling fans will be greater and, the view shed profiles will be increased. These problems are examined further below. 3. It is stated by Longview that “No modification of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit issued by DEP to Longview is necessary due to the increased water usage by the facility.” This is a premature statement since no evidence of such a determination by WV-DEP is given, and because the existing permit is under appeal before the WV-Environmental Quality Board. 4. It is stated by Longview that the boiler building will increase from 257 feet high to 270 feet high, and the steam turbine building will increase from 100 feet high to 120 feet high. It is these heights that determine the plant primary stack height, currently at 557 feet. Good engineering practice will necessitate that the stack height be recalculated, to become a larger number, i.e. a higher stack will be required. Further, the air pollution modeling for the plant was based upon the previous values for the building and stack heights as well as previous values for the boiler exit temperature and the temperature profile in the stack. The air modeling needs now to be repeated to determine the impacts of pollutant dispersion on the local environment. Further, the stack height currently exceeds federal guidelines for obstacles in the vicinity of public airports; so the changes will require a re-examination of the stack height. 5. The issues raised in Argument 4 above will necessitate that the Air Quality Permit granted to Longview by the WV-DEP Division of Air Quality be reconsidered. Among the issues in need of consideration are (a) the new stack height determined from best engineering practice, (b) the number and quantity of cooling towers and the quantity and quality of the evaporated cooling water, (c) atmospheric dispersion modeling for the new stack and cooling towers given the new boiler building and steam turbine building, and other possible considerations some of which are mentioned below. 6. Longview reports that the view shed problems due to the boiler building and steam turbine building will increase from 2.08 square miles to 2.176 square miles. “The increase in building height causes a 0.6 percent increase in the area that can see the buildings.” However, the view shed problems are not well represented by these numbers or by this analysis technique. The residents of Ft. Martin, Bakers Ridge and Stewartstown will see a substantial increase in the size of the plant profile on the horizon as well as the extremely large steam plume that will dominate the day and night sky continuously. The views of the plant and its plumes from important observation sites at Coopers Rock, Dorsey’s Knob, and from the Evansdale and Medical Center campuses of West Virginia University will be significantly increased. 7. The cost of the proposed 600 MW power plant has gone from $940 million to $1.8 billion. Whether these are realistic estimates is not known to the Concerned Citizens; but clearly, it is important that the PSC know and understand the estimates for the capital and operating cost for the proposed plant. [Estimates for two coal-fired power plants proposed by Duke Energy to the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) were brought into question this past September; and, in late October Duke Energy notified the NCUC that the cost of these plants had gone up by 50% to $3.0 billion. The NCUC has now reopened the record and additional hearings will be held in January.] The cost issue is relevant to the financial viability of the proposed Longview power plant as well as to whether the public interest is served by the “payment in lieu of taxes” (PILOT) and other agreements pertaining to the proposed plant. 8. The decision of whether to build a conventional power plant such as a pulverized coal boiler unit or an advanced power plant such as an integrated gasification combined cycle system (IGCC) should involve environmental impacts and costs. Clearly, “best available control technology” (BACT) takes some account of the costs to achieve low environmental impacts. Given the high costs for a conventional power plant, as recently presented by Longview, it is now time to understand why the State of West Virginia cannot or should not benefit from advanced technology as represented by the IGCC option. Other BACT options may also be feasible given the new cost domain associated with the proposed plant. If Longview is to benefit from advances in boiler design, in achieving an increase from 600 to 695 MW with the same coal input, then the public should benefit from advances in environmental control at the same coal input level. III. RELIEF For these reasons, including other possible questions of financial viability, cooling tower performance and noise control that are still under study, it is appropriate that a full hearing on the various proposed changes be held. Only after the complete extent of the proposed changes have been determined and examined can a proper judgment be made as to the appropriate course for the future. It is the Public Service Commission that has the responsibility to gather the relevant information, hold hearings as appropriate to gain a complete understanding of the issues and information involved, and to render decisions in the public interest. The Public Service Commission must place the burden of proof upon Longview to establish that the public is protected. The primary purpose of the Commission is to serve the interests of the public. WHEREFORE, the Concerned Citizens respectfully request that the Petition of Longview Power of November 8, 2006, be denied subject to a full hearing for examination of all the details of anticipated impacts from the proposed changes. Barbara Born et al. (Concerned Citizens) By Counsel ________________________ Phillip D. Gaujot, Esquire (WVSB # 1355) 445 Lakeview Drive Morgantown, WV 216505 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON Longview Power, LLC And Longview Power, LLC Case No. 03-1860-E-CS-CN Case No. 05-1467-E-CN As counsel for Barbara Born, et al. (Concerned Citizens), I do hereby certify that on this 7th day of December 2006, copies of the foregoing “Response and Objections of Barbara Born, et al., to the Petition of Longview Power, LLC for Waiver of Modification or Amendment Requirement for Siting Certificate to Increase the Amount of Power Produced” were served upon the parties and/or counsel of record in this proceeding, and addressed as follows: Leslie J. Anderson, Staff Attorney Vincent Trivelli, Esquire Public Service Commission The Calwell Practice 201 Brooks Street 178 Chancery Row Charleston, WV 25301 Morgantown, WV 26505 Leonard Knee, Esquire Kathryn L. Patton, Esquire Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love LLP Allegheny Power 600 Quarrier Street 800 Cabin Hill Drive Charleston, WV 25301 Greensburg, PA 15601-1689 ______________________ Phillip D. Gaujot, Esquire WV Bar # 1355 445 Lakeview Drive Morgantown, WV 216505

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

MVCAC