I am reminded of an article last year which suggested that the free market has a name for a company that does not provide what their customers want, it is called "bankrupt". Only with a monopoly would utilities be able to survive by forcing onto customers a product that they would not choose. Smart utilities have already recognized this and are finding market mechanisms to make a profit by serving customers with what the clean energy that customers want. Fossil fuel-based utilities may win some battles over net metering by using their considerable political clout, but the very fact that they are even fighting their most progressive customers means they have already lost the war.
But these utilities can do a lot of damage on the way down, so please keep up the good work.
Jim Kotcon
Frank is spot-on with this analysis. His is the correct paradigm for analyzing this "problem".
The real issue is that utilities know that net-metering will continue to grow, and they see their market share declining.
JBK
From: ec-bounces@osenergy.org <ec-bounces@osenergy.org> on behalf of frank young <fyoung@mountain.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 1:06 PM
To: wvec-board@yahoogroups.com; WVHCBOARD@yahoogroups.com; 'WV Chapter Energy Committee'
Subject: [EC] Utilities want higher charges placed on rooftop solar customers“To be sure, any customer who purchases less electricity than the average is ‘subsidized,’” Young wrote. “It is the average rate structure, not net metering, that shifts costs among retail customers.”
http://www.wvgazettemail.com/article/20151005/GZ01/151009735/1102
_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC@osenergy.org
http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec