Jim Sconyers jim_scon@yahoo.com 304.698.9628 Remember: Mother Nature bats last.
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, Elena Saxonhouse <Elena.Saxonhouse@sierraclub.org> wrote:
From: Elena Saxonhouse
<Elena.Saxonhouse@sierraclub.org> Subject: Fw: NEWS: Experts Raise Concerns About New Transmission Line from Coal Country to Eastern Grid To: CONS-ELP-TRANS-LINES-FORUM@LISTS.SIERRACLUB.ORG Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 1:39 PM
Elena Saxonhouse
Sierra Club Environmental Law Program
85 Second St., 2nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 977-5765
(415) 977-5793 (fax)
----- Forwarded by Elena
Saxonhouse/Sierraclub on 10/27/2009 10:39 AM -----
Brian Smith <bsmith@earthjustice.org>
10/27/2009 10:27 AM
|
To
| "'Elena.Saxonhouse@sierraclub.org'"
<Elena.Saxonhouse@sierraclub.org>, Abigail Dillen <adillen@earthjustice.org>,
Virginia Cramer <virginia.cramer@sierraclub.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| NEWS: Experts Raise Concerns About New
Transmission Line from Coal Country to Eastern Grid |
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 27, 2009
Contact:
Virginia Cramer, Sierra Club 804-225-9113 x 102
Abigail Dillen, Earthjustice 212-791-1881 x221
Experts Raise Concerns About New Transmission
Line
from Coal Country to Eastern Grid
PATH would make grid less reliable, increase air pollution
RICHMOND, VA -- In the latest of a series of setbacks
for the proposed Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH), engineering,
air and electric experts submitted testimony finding that (contrary to
developer claims) the line would actually make the eastern grid less
reliable and lead to increased air pollution. Proposed by American
Electric Power (AEP) and Allegheny Power, PATH is a high-voltage transmission
line which would be constructed through West Virginia, Virginia and Maryland,
at a cost of more than $1.8 billion to ratepayers.
The experts, testifying on behalf of the Sierra Club,
include George Loehr and Hyde Merrill, nationally renowned electric experts,
Chris James of Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. (a former EPA employee and
Director of Air Planning for Connecticut), and Robert Fagan, also of Synapse,
a mechanical engineer and energy economics expert. Their testimony concludes
that the line is not needed; that cheaper, simpler alternatives are available;
and that “[r]ather than increase reliability, PATH would actually
make it worse.”
“It’s like running an extension cord down the
block to plug your toaster into a neighbor’s outlet rather than plugging
it into an outlet in your own kitchen,” said George Loehr. If PATH is
constructed, he testified, “major East Coast cities like Philadelphia,
Baltimore, Washington and Richmond would become more vulnerable to interruptions
and blackouts, either from natural phenomena or from terrorist attacks”
on transmission lines.
The expert testimony
also validated concerns raised by environmental and community groups about
increased pollution from coal-fired power plants. Chris James, an expert
with over 20 years of experience in state and federal air programs, determined
that air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions would increase as a result
of PATH, making it more difficult for Virginia, Washington D.C., and Baltimore
to meet air quality standards, and contributing to eastern smog and haze.
He explained that because electricity garners a higher price on the east
coast, PATH would provide an incentive-- and an opportunity-- for coal-fired
power plants in West Virginia and the Midwest to increase their output
and sell more electricity to east coast cities. Increased pollution would
follow.
“PATH is a
boondoggle for ratepayers and a gift to coal companies,” said Abigail
Dillen of Earthjustice. “We urgently need a smart electric grid that supports
wind power and other clean energy projects, but AEP and Allegheny Energy
are trying to sell us on lines that will only help dirty old coal plants
to ramp up profits – and pollution.”
“We keep hearing from AEP and Allegheny the mantra that
this line will shore up our electrical grid and is desperately needed to
keep the lights on. Now we have a clear, documented explanation of why
that’s not true,” said Elena Saxonhouse, with the Sierra Club.
The expert testimony was submitted by the Sierra Club
as part of formal proceedings before the Virginia State Corporation Commission.
The Commission has the authority to approve or deny PATH in the state.
The Commission is accepting public comment until January 12, 2010, hearings
begin January 19, and a decision is expected sometime before May 2010.
Sierra Club is represented in the Virginia PATH proceedings
by the non-profit law firm, Earthjustice. The Club is also a party in the
Maryland and West Virginia PATH proceedings and expects to submit similar
expert testimony in those states.
Additional Materials:
Proposed PATH route
http://www.pathtransmission.com/maps/pdf/WV_Publication_Map_3-30.pdf
Full testimony
George Loehr http://www.earthjustice.org/library/references/loehr-testimony.pdf
Hyde Merrill http://www.earthjustice.org/library/references/merrill-testimony.pdf
Chris James http://www.earthjustice.org/library/references/james-testimony.pdf
Robert Fagan http://www.earthjustice.org/library/references/fagan-testimony.pdf
|