Yes - why not both? Good letter now, more legalistic response soon. Becoming obvious that getting TrailCo to the WV line is critical to the whole proposal.
 
Jim Sconyers
jim_scon@yahoo.com
603.969.6712

Remember: Mother Nature bats last.


----- Original Message ----
From: James Kotcon <jkotcon@wvu.edu>
To: ec@osenergy.org
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 12:28:43 PM
Subject: [EC] Fw: Allegheny Energy Files Proposal on Pennsylvania Transmission Project

Bill, et al. 

I think we should file a response in PA to let them know that we oppose TrAILCo and their proposed approval of the 1.2-mile segment between the 502 Junction and the WV State Line.  We have filed appeals of the WV certificate approval, and a premature approval of the PA segment would bias consideration of our appeals.  Further, it would be useful to fully document TrAILCo's behind-the-scenes negotiations and tactics, and their efforts to cut some opponents out of the process, while buying off others with legalized bribes (using ratepayers money to do it), as happened here.  I can draft a letter to that effect, if you think it is useful.  Alternatively, a formal legal response might be more appropriate.

Whaddya Tink?

JBK

>>> Letty Butcher <multiflora123@yahoo.com> 9/11/2008 9:20 AM >>>


--- On Wed, 9/10/08, Wojtowicz, Ralph <wojtowicz@metsci.com> wrote:

From: Wojtowicz, Ralph <wojtowicz@metsci.com>
Subject: Allegheny Energy Files Proposal on Pennsylvania Transmission Project
To: "Wojtowicz, Ralph" <wojtowicz@metsci.com>, cesunlight@earthlink.net, multiflora123@yahoo.com, roecalvert@hughes.net, michael@troutdesign.com, billgolemon@frontiernet.net, bgkessinger@comcast.net, kward@wvgazette.com, news@hampshirereview.com, news@moorefieldexaminer.com, news@grantcountypress.com, WVBiker98@aol.com
Cc: mpisciotta@citynet.net, bwest@pecva.org, thomas@theshepherdstownobserver.com, cesunlight@earthlink.net, news@morganmessenger.com, news@dominionpost.com, newsroom@therepublicannes.com
Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 7:45 PM

Please forward.

Allegheny Energy Files Proposal on Pennsylvania Transmission Project

GREENSBURG, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 10, 2008--Allegheny Energy, Inc.
(NYSE:AYE) announced today that its Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company
(TrAILCo) subsidiary filed a motion with the Pennsylvania Public Utility
Commission to defer any decision on a portion of its proposed transmission line
project, the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line.

The request will allow the company to pursue a more collaborative process to
explore whether there are new and creative alternatives to the proposed 36-mile
portion of the 500 kilovolt line in Greene and Washington counties and related
facilities.

The company's motion also requests that the Commission timely approve a 1.2
mile section of 500 kilovolt line extending from the West Virginia border to a
new substation in Greene County, Pennsylvania known as 502 Junction. This
portion of the project addresses critical reliability concerns that could
adversely impact the mid-Atlantic region, including Pennsylvania electric
customers, as early as 2011.

The motion is intended to be considered in conjunction with exceptions filed
today by TrAILCo in response to two Administrative Law Judges' recent
recommendation that the company's application be denied in Pennsylvania. In
its exceptions, TrAILCo also explicitly asks the Commission to reverse the
recommended decision of the Judges and approve the 1.2 mile segment between the
West Virginia state line and 502 Junction.




     


_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC@osenergy.org
http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec