The bigger issue to me is whether continuing to use natural gas should include massive expansion of infrastructure.
From: ec-bounces@osenergy.org [mailto:ec-bounces@osenergy.org] On Behalf Of Paul Wilson
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 11:32 AM
To: WV Chapter Energy Committee
Subject: [EC] from UCS ask a scientist: Does UCS agree that natural gas is a good "bridge" to meet our energy demands while better more earth friendly options are developed?
Ask a Scientist
Matt S. of Kennesaw, GA, asks "Does UCS agree that natural gas is a good "bridge" to meet our energy demands while better more earth friendly options are developed?"
Once accepted as conventional wisdom, the notion that we have to significantly increase our use of natural gas to transition the US power sector to low-carbon energy sources is now plainly wrong. Investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency have accelerated rapidly as costs decline and performance and reliability improve. This trend, combined with the growing awareness of the significant risks posed by an overreliance on natural gas, makes it clear that natural gas has at most a limited and complementary role to play in the move to a truly clean energy system. READ MORE
--
Paul Wilson
Project Healing Waters Fly-fishing
Sierra Club Military Outdoors
504 Jefferson Ave
Charles Town, WV 25414-1130
Cell: 304-279-1361
"There is no forward until you have gone back" ~Buddha
"In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous" ~ Aristotle
JUSTICE, ONLY JUSTICE, SHALT THOU PURSUE. Deuteronomy 16:20
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7639 / Virus Database: 4598/12386 - Release Date: 06/08/16