UPPER MONONGAHELA RIVER ASSOCIATION
WV/PA
MONONGAHELA AREA WATERSHEDS COMPACT
Date: October 4, 2010
Governor Joe Manchin III
State of West Virginia
1900 Kanawha
Boulevard, E.
Charleston, WV 25305
RE: Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of Marcellus Shale
Gas Development
Urgent action is needed to protect the watersheds of West Virginia. A
similar situation as severe exists in southwestern and northeastern
Pennsylvania. Hundreds of thousands of acres in these States are in various
stages of exploration and development in the Marcellus shale for natural gas
extraction.
The attention that this overall situation has received, or is planned to
receive, by State governments is inadequate in the view of more than twenty
watershed groups and conservation organizations. And, the program review in the
Office of Oil and Gas as well as the Panel recently selected by WV-DEP to study
the situation are not an adequate response given the magnitude of the problems
at issue. The Morgantown Dominion Post newspaper was quick to see the
substantive bias in affiliations of the Panel members (6 of 9 represent the gas
industry under review), as described in the enclosed Editorial. There may well
be some changes in State laws needed by the industry; however, the issues faced
by the common citizens are extensive and severe and not appropriately
represented by the panel. Nor are these issues being adequately addressed by the
two State governments, given current practices or plans. The Editorial states
“the fox has been put in charge of the hen house.” Watershed and
conservation groups are explicitly and conspicuously absent from the
Panel.
The WV/PA Monongahela Area Watersheds Compact was formed on August 17,
2010, with a second meeting taking place in Morgantown on September 22nd. This
new Watershed Compact includes the Upper Monongahela River Association (UMRA)
and other groups that have operated for many years. UMRA has coordinated
monthly meetings on these gas well drilling issues for two years with interested
and affected parties including industry and government representatives.
Some eight Resolutions have been approved by this Compact to date, four at each
meeting. These eight Resolutions are attached to this letter for your use. We
believe these represent an essential response, in part, to the current issues
involving Marcellus shale development and extraction in West Virginia.
We seek the implementation of remedies for the current problems in the
Monongahela River watershed, the current problems in Wetzel and Marshall
counties, and the projected problems on the horizon for our State and for
Pennsylvania relative to natural gas exploration, development, production and
transmission particularly in the Marcellus shale. We are convinced that the
long-term condition of our Region is at significant risk at this time, so
remedies are needed as soon as they can possibly be put into effect.
We seek (1) a meeting with you, (2) a review and adjustment of the
composition of the Marcellus Panel recently appointed, and (3) positions for
conservation groups such as ours on the various Advisory Committees within State
government that deal with the diverse aspects of water resources, water quality,
sediment prevention and erosion control.
Further, we request that our Compact or some of its members be represented
on the new Panel and on the appropriate Advisory Committees. We also
feel it is reasonable to ask for a response from your Office regarding the eight
resolutions attached. Otherwise, the input and participation of the
public including our diverse watershed groups and conservation organizations
will not be fairly and appropriately served and citizens of our region will be
further harmed and under represented.
Respectfully submitted,
Duane G. Nichols, Compact
Co-Chair Barry
G. Pallay, Compact Co-Chair
and
President of
CLEAR and
Vice President of UMRA
WV/PA Monongahela Area Watersheds
Compact Upper Monongahela River
Association
330 Dream Catcher
Circle 109
Broad Street, P. O. Box 519
Morgantown, WV
26508 Granville
WV 26534-0519
cc: WV/PA Watershed Groups, US-EPA, US-ACE, USGS, WV-DEP, Gov. Rendell,
PA-DEP.
Attachments (2). Editorial and Resolutions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ATTACHEMENT 1
Morgantown Dominion Post, Page 10-A, Monday, September 27,
2010:
EDITORIAL: “Task force far too up to its task”
“Lopsided appointments of gas industry reps cause for concern about
drilling”
Talk about putting the fox in charge of the henhouse. And in this case,
it’s a hungry fox to boot. At least that’s the perception we got from last
week’s appointment of six natural gas company representatives to a new
nine-member task force to help the state better regulate the industry. We
realize that this panel, appointed by the state’s director of the Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP), will not actually be writing the regulations and
legislation on how to regulate this industry. Or at least that’s what we are
being led to believe.
The DEP’s staff will be charged with that task, while this panel will
attempt to reach a consensus on the issues. That might not be too hard to do,
considering the only real differences of opinion will come from the lone
representative of the West Virginia Environmental Council and an advocate for
landowner’s rights. The ninth member of the panel is a coal industry lawyer, who
represents the West Virginia Coal Association.
No one should overestimate the scope and authority of this task force,
however, we can assure the DEP and this group that we’ll be watching.
Clearly, the state needs to determine how to better regulate our booming
natural gas industry. We also understand the logic of considering a dual
regulatory system — one for conventional gas drilling and another for the
burgeoning Marcellus shale drilling.
And no one is questioning why there should be industry representatives on
this task force. However, the number of appointments of executives and lawyers
for this industry is weighed far too heavily in the industry’s favor.
With
all due respect to these industry appointees, some who have served in public
regulatory roles, too, these appointments raise eyebrows.
Yes, they bring diverse outlooks, technical knowledge and pragmatic advice
to the table, but they also bring their industry’s primary goal to the head of
the well: Their profit margin.
No one here is opposed to that, but regulation of this industry must
balance a return on investment with reasonable regulation and oversight.
Otherwise, these drilling operations may pose dangerous risks to our
state’s aquifer, our waterways, our roads, our landscape and landowners’ rights.
This panel’s lopsided make-up leads us to believe there’s reason to fear
all of that.
We urge the DEP to review the composition of this panel and even appoint
someone who isn’t a stakeholder to this task force before the chickens come home
to roost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
RESOLUTIONS
[ADOPTED
AUGUST 17TH AND SEPTEMBER 22ND 2010]
WV/PA MONONGAHELA AREA WATERSHEDS
COMPACT
We recognize the value of mineral extraction, including coal, oil, gas and
water, in the Monongahela basin and adjoining areas, when conducted
responsibly. But, the current and projected levels of Marcellus shale
drilling for natural gas production and the manner in which it is being
conducted poses very serious problems for most all of West Virginia and
Pennsylvania.
RESOLUTIONS, FIRST WV-PA WATERSHED MEETING, AUGUST 17,
2010
1. The West Virginia and Pennsylvania DEPs must enact commensurate and
enforceable standards and rules/regulations and adequate penalties to protect
regional water resources from potential hazards caused by mineral extraction and
oil and gas drilling, including but not limited to sedimentation, water
withdrawal, organic and inorganic chemicals and thermal effects.
2. The West Virginia and Pennsylvania DEPs must hire an additional and
adequate number of inspectors and other staff to effectively monitor and enforce
regulations governing mining and the oil and gas well industries.
3. The Upper Monongahela watershed groups advocate that closed-loop systems
for containment of blowback water be required at all new construction gas well
drilling sites rather than the open pit system of containment.
4. If open pits exist or are absolutely necessary, these should provide
sufficient natural or geosynthetic protection to both contain the blowback water
and to prevent its percolation into the soil or groundwater beneath the pit
should the containment liner become ruptured. Further, we advocate the usage of
regulations typically found in state dam safety statutes in order to ensure that
blowback pits are properly sited and constructed, and that emergency
contact/notification procedures are implemented when an accident involving the
release of blowback water occurs.
RESOLUTIONS, SECOND WV/PA MONONGAHELA AREA WATERSHEDS
COMPACT
5.West Virginia and Pennsylvania rivers and streams frequently experience
very low flows because of reduced rainfall. At these critically low flows, water
withdrawals for Marcellus Shale gas well activities threaten aquatic life in
many streams. And, more generally, the waters of both States must be shared
among the diverse uses from agriculture to industry to recreation to domestic
use. This includes both surface and sub-surface water resources. Therefore, the
withdrawal of water from any source for high volume applications as Marcellus
Shale drilling, fracking or other operations must be regulated and require
permits from an appropriate State agency.
6. The Program Review in the Office of Oil and Gas of the WV DEP is clearly
useful with a projected Final Report date of December 2010. However, this Review
of oil and gas exploration and production activities in West Virginia is
inadequate in and of itself. The issues and problems of this industry sector are
huge and diverse and they directly involve many other agencies of State
government; and, these problems are interrelated to the other extractive
industries. A state-wide review is urgently needed, one that is directed from
the Office of the Governor. And, a Special Session of the WV Legislature would
appear to be called for to address these problems and issues that include the
protection of our water, air and land as well as our roads, our scenic values
and quality of life. Each extractive activity should be responsible for the cost
of all the environmental and socio-economic impacts resulting from its
activities, taking into account both short and long-term impacts.
7. The issues and problems affecting WV and PA as a result of the current
and projected levels of activity for coal mining and natural gas production are
of an inter-state or national character. Here in northern WV and southwestern PA
we have many such operations that cross state lines. One major issue is the
drinking water for approximately one million people in southwestern Pennsylvania
that comes from the Monongahela River, which drains most of northcentral WV.
This and the other streams will likely increase in their total loads of
pollutants. Therefore, the US Environmental Protection Agency in conjunction
with the US Army Corps of Engineers, the US Geological Survey and other federal
agencies should prepare a “guidance document” and respond quickly to the water
and aqueous waste problems of the extractive industries now affecting New York,
Pennsylvania, West Virginia and other States.
8. An Interagency Task Force study within the United States government is
needed to examine the existing problems posed by the extractive industries in
the United States. This would aim to establish a viable long range Planning
Office that can anticipate many of the problems such as those posed by Marcellus
Shale gas exploration and production. The focus would be on environment impacts
and socio-economic dislocations such as public infrastructure damages and
domestic disturbance problems.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NOTE: The above Resolutions were adopted by consensus at the First and
Second WV-PA Watershed Group Meetings on August 17, 2010 and September 22, 2010
at the Morgantown Airport. These meetings were organized and conducted by the
representatives of various watershed and conservation groups in cooperation with
the Upper Monongahela River Association (
www.uppermon.org).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>