Allen

Dealing with the profile of fine particles is nothing new. If I can find it, I could show you research that was done at the University of either Wisconsin, Minnesota or Northwestern, (I can't recall which) 60 years ago that shows the various particle sizes, and the fines which ones can in fact penetrate the lungs and will not be expelled. This doesn't sound to me like anything new. 

Tobacco smoke particles are an average of 0.25 microns for example. 

In my work as an engineer, I used particle counters myself 45 years ago in certifying clean rooms. 

Clean rooms, as defined by the original Air Force standard required us to measure the amount of particles in a room sampling of air at 0.3 µm levels. That USAF standard, for example, calling for a class100 clean room, meant the system must take a normal cu. meter of air at 25.0 million particles of 3 microns down to 100. 

I used to have a business certifying clean rooms, having among my clients JPL. 

So I would challenge any standard that stops at 25 microns. The finer particles are equally dangerous, and in many respects, much more so. 

I'd be happy to get into this more deeply. 

Allan


Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:39 PM, "Allen Johnson" <allen@christiansforthemountains.org> wrote:

Allan,

The EPA has a pollution particulate standard for 2.5 and 10 microns. However, more recent research in Europe and some in the United States is pointing to much smaller particulates, sometimes called nano-particles or ultrafines, as especially toxic when in large concentrations.  These particles are so small that they rather than being expelled by the lungs, they are absorbed into the lungs and circulatory system, and can pass through the placental and brain barriers. Dr. Michael McCawley at WVU is doing a lot or research on these particles, and has a particle counter for ultrafines.

 

Our work with Dr. Michael Hendryx on mountaintop removal seems to be pointing to MTR-related air pollution as more hazardous than water pollution to community health.

 

Back to climate change, we need to push hard for policy that restricts using the atmospheric “commons” as a free sewer. That includes carbon.

--Allen Johnson

 

From: cclwv@googlegroups.com [mailto:cclwv@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Allan Tweddle
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:22 AM
To: cclwv@googlegroups.com
Cc: cclwv@googlegroups.com; Gary Zuckett CAG; WVEC Email List; Don GARVIN; Vivian Stockman; Janet Keating; Sierra Club Environmental Comm.; John Barry; James Kotcon
Subject: Re: Op-Ed in today's Gazette

 

Colleagues

 

First, thank you Paul and Regan for your kind words. I'm better, but not 100% yet. 

 

I believe  part of my condition is caused by the air quality of the area. As and engineer who is dealt with air quality issues for 50 years, including air sampling for pollution conditions around manufacturing operations all the way through to design and clean rooms, I am very familiar with the process and the technical details of air-quality.

But I do not have the instruments or the support staff to evaluate air-quality here as I used to have and my career days in California and Ontario.

I do know however that I have often driven near the railway tracks that charge through Charleston and seen, in the proper sunlight conditions, the fine particulate dust blowing off the railcars as they passed through town. I've inquired, but that's never been analyzed, never been measured and is an unknown. 

 

But one doesn't need sophisticated instruments to see that that dust is being dispersed all on the communities through which these trains, sometimes it very high speeds, traverse.

That brings me to a point I want to make. Air-quality is definitely a local issue. The EPA can establish national standards, and the local agencies can then implement a plan to measure against those standards. But in my opinion the evaluation of very close proximity conditions in West Virginia are never taken into account unless the public rises up and demands them.

That also applies to climate change. There is yet another article in the Charleston Gazette today describing how carbon dioxide levels in the upper atmosphere Have already passed 350 ppm last year and are approaching the 400 ppm. Scientists consider the 400 parts, if achieved on a consistent basis to be very seriously detrimental to life as we know it all over the planet including in West Virginia.

 

Addressing the issue and pressing for action requires a strong voice here in West Virginia. And I personally believe the economic opportunities that exist for addressing climate change are out there and need to be described to our policy makers repeatedly.

 

While CCL is working diligently at the national level to seek logical and incremental steps towards controlling climate change, given the political barriers, we must be doing more at the state level in my opinion.

That is why I have proposed to WVEC, CAG, OVEC, and others that we come together and join forces to mount a single voice to address climate change in West Virginia.

It is an issue that is complex and crosses all of the constituencies of the entire environmental movement in West Virginia. To be successful, the legislatures got to know that there is a large constituency, a coming together of all of the organizations, to force them to pay attention to not just the dangers of doing nothing, but of the economic opportunities that are out there for addressing climate change.

 

if we can come together somewhere in sometime in October, and begin to develop a comprehensive plan, then we will be ready to present our thoughts to the legislature in January.

But I must look to each of the leadership of the various organizations to talk to one another and decide where they would like to do this.

 

However, I need to hear from the leadership of each of the organizations. Is there interest in coming together in the manner I am suggesting? Or is there an alternative concepts?

I'd like to hear from the leadership to know if this is making sense, and if so let's plan a specific time and meet, probably here in Charleston, To begin thinking about how to plan and implement a new voice of reason for addressing climate change here in West Virginia.

I can offer a venue for such a meeting that is easy and convenient to reach. I must ask for permission from Temple Israel for such a meeting, but I believe Rabbi would approve such a gathering as long as it's not on the Sabbath.

Please, let me hear from you

 

Allan

Sent from my iPhone


On Sep 9, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Regan E Quinn <reganequinn@frontier.com> wrote:

bravo

On Sep 9, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Paul Epstein wrote:



Good work both of you! Hope you're feeling much better, Allan.


Paul Epstein

304.343.5074

 

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Jim Probst <probstfurnituremakers@gmail.com> wrote:

It's been a good couple of days for Charleston CCL with Alan's excellent op-ed on Sunday and I got one published in today's paper. 

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Citizens Climate Lobby of West Virginia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cclwv+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cclwv@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Citizens Climate Lobby of West Virginia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cclwv+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cclwv@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Citizens Climate Lobby of West Virginia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cclwv+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cclwv@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Citizens Climate Lobby of West Virginia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cclwv+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to cclwv@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

_______________________________________________
EC mailing list
EC@osenergy.org
http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec