If I was going to write a rebuttal, I’d offer several
factors and thoughts as follows.
First, the planet crisis of climate change is a huge
gap in Hamilton’s discussion...and that is the realities of worsening climate
change due to coal GHG emissions. The implicit denial is very
significant.
The only technological answer that has been offered
for many years by the coal industry, and the MOC’s, is the Carbon Capture &
Sequestration, (CCS), approach. But it has gone no where because it is
technically not feasible at most power plants due to the volumes of emissions,
the lack of geologically appropriate substructures, and because the cost of
CCS.
CCS will take a significant percentage of the plants
power to function, hence not only an added capital cost of the plant, but its
operating costs, AND, a reduction of available power to sell. CCS is
neither technically of financially feasible.
Secondly, the cost of the alternatives, solar, wind,
have been dropping so rapidly that, according to some reports, now solar demand
power plants can compete with any and all coal fired power, and win. Some
reports say that while solar is still more costly than gas, it’s getting
competitive there too, and will be in the very near future.
One recent article reported on how China has stopped
the construction of any new coal fired power plants, but is planning, and
already building, several huge Concentrated Solar Power plants...one predicted
to be the largest in the world.
(I personally was technically and financially involved
in the construction of 9 CSP plants for SCE in the Mojave Desert in the mid
1980’s, when the fossil fuel nayslayers like Hamilton screamed
that “these plants will never pay for themselves until oil gets to be $14. per
barrel”!)
The global trends from Germany to China to Canada are
away from coal. Canada has now shut down all coal fired power plants
nation wide, and has more jobs in renewable energy than the entire fossil fuels
industries combined...oil, coal and gas!
The Ontario Power Authority that manages all the power
generation in that Province used to be Arch Coal’s biggest
customer!
Third, Hamilton’s job is to protect and advocate
for the coal companies and their shareholders...and pay lip service to miner
safety and their families plight as the mines close...but
miners can be retrained into
clean safe jobs especially in the renewable energy economic sector. We
mine silica in West Virginia. There is a refining plant in Alloy WV that
then ships it out of State to pharmaceutical companies, and yes, to the
manufacturers of solar cells.
According to a recent article that I read
recently, (but have not looked to find it yet), 1 of 6 jobs created in the US
was in renewable energy. And the US is headed to the same statistic about
renewable energy jobs vs. the fossil fuel industries that I cited above has been
achieved in Canada.
Why does the
Leadership not pursue the jobs that will be created by transitioning to solar
cell manufacturing, installation and maintenance?
We know the
answer. The political clout of the Coal Association in WV is only
surpassed by the NRA!
My thoughts
Allan
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [EC] Coal Isn't Over - Chris Hamilton
posted as a "comment" a
few moments ago:
Read and reread this commentary by a coal industry
representative, and note one thing: Nowhere in this does the author once mention
the impact on coal of the discovery of massive amounts of natural gas in the
Marcellus Shale. No, forget the fact that major utilities across the
country voluntarily converted from coal to natural gas -- solely because of its
cheap price - $2/mcf, down 80% from its peak $13/mcf in 2008. No, it wasn't the
market. It was "artificial manipulation" of electric markets by those evil
bureaucrats who came to power in 2009 (you're supposed to read that as Jan 20,
2009, i.e., Obama). And disregard the gross expansion of debt by Peabody
and the other major coal companies in the years 2011 and following, blindly
expecting the good times to roll on forever; nope, that played no role in
putting the entire industry in bankruptcy. One cannot help but observe
that, if this commentary is the most intellectual power the coal industry can
bring to the topic, it's no wonder they've gone bust. But the industry's
future is, despite the dim bulbs at the helm, not hopeless. Their best
hope for the future? The world is scheduled to go from 7 billion folks to
9 billion over the next 20 or so years; the coal industry may just hang on to a
niche in that ever expanding world. If only they will take off the
blinders and look at the world with eyes open and an actually functioning
intellect.
_______________________________________________
EC mailing
list
EC@osenergy.org
http://osenergy.org/mailman/listinfo/ec