I'm not sure how you approach this? It nearly requires a discussion as the reasons for each edit are numerous, and there are lots of opinions as to why they should remain or be edited differently that could be addressed.

17c-11-5 a) is confusing in the wording of "as far right a practicable". The rest of the clause is redundant with other traffic laws. Therefore a) serves no purpose.

17c-11-5 c) does not increase bicycle safety, but rather adds an unnecessary burden upon cyclists to use a facility that may not be safe in all situations, and may be a significant hindrance.  Examples abound, but some include: safe passing of other users of a side path can limit practical speeds to as low as 5mph whereas the cyclist could be traveling 25mph or more on a roadway; sidepaths often do not provide as direct route of a route as a roadway; sidepaths may have intersections with roads which increases cyclists more so than being on a roadway. 

amendent to 17c-7-3 (1)  sets a measurable definition rather than relying on an opinion of what a "safe distance" is.  On any roadway less than 14' in width (nearly all roadways in WV), it would already be required of a car to cross the center line of a 2 lane road to make a safe pass as prescribed by AASHTO guidelines of 3' passing and 3' of operating space of a bicycle and an 8' vehicle.   (not sure if this next part if valid) Its not expected that an officer be able to distinguish 4' from 3'6", but they should be able to identify from 2', which some may currently be perceived as a safe distance under current law.

Ryan Post
LAB Certified Instructor


On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Frank Gmeindl <frank.gmeindl@comcast.net> wrote:
Thanks, Gary.  Just so we're all using the same version, attached is the latest.


On Mar 18, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Gary Zuckett wrote:

Right, we should send them the entire document which makes a good case for the changes. The bill itself is not a good advocate…
 
Gary Zuckett
 
From: Frank Gmeindl [mailto:frank.gmeindl@comcast.net] 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 3:07 PM
To: Kasey Russell
Cc: Steve Fowler; Gary Zuckett; Bike Board
Subject: Re: Emailing: 2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc
 
Did they read the rationales provided in WV Connecting Communities Legislative Agenda: Proposed Bicycle Legislation Changes or just the draft bill? 
 
 
On Mar 18, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Kasey Russell wrote:


Thoughts?

Thanks, kasey

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Webster, Brent <brent.webster@charlestonwvpolice.org>
Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:54 AM
Subject: FW: Emailing: 2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc
To: "Russell, Kasey" <russell.kasey@gmail.com>

Kasey,
Please review Lt. Williams’ response and opinion. I agree with him. Pay particular attention to his thoughts in yellow. I never thought about that when I first read the strike throughs.  Thanks
 
 
 
 
Brent L .Webster
Chief of Police
City of Charleston
 
From: Williams, Shawn 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 10:47 AM
To: Webster, Brent
Subject: RE: Emailing: 2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc
 
My only concern is someone like ***** who expects us to measure 4 feet or less on all vehicles passing a bicyclist. Also, if you take Washington Street for example, at four feet you will be forced to cross the double yellow line in the opposing lane. I think the words safe and reasonable are better than an actual distance.
 
Under 17C-11-5, taking the “a” and “c” out, undercut safety for cyclist in my opinion.
 
Shawn
 
From: Webster, Brent 
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 10:36
To: Williams, Shawn
Subject: FW: Emailing: 2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc
 
 
 
Do you have any thoughts on this?  She wants an honest opinion so don’t hold back.  Thanks
 
 
Brent L .Webster
Chief of Police
City of Charleston
 
From: Kasey [mailto:russell.kasey@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 3:22 PM
To: Webster, Brent
Subject: Fwd: Emailing: 2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc
 
Chief Webster, would you be able to offer me your opinion on a proposed state law requiring motorists to pass cyclists at a four foot distance. My new nonprofit is behind this legislation. We would be willing to drop the four to three. 
I would love to hear your perspective. 
Thanks, kasey

Sent from my iPhone


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Gary Zuckett" <garyz@wvcag.org>
Date: March 15, 2013, 6:32:01 PM EDT
To: "Kasey Russell" <russell.kasey@gmail.com>
Subject: Emailing: 2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc


Kasey,

Here is the draft 2 of the bill. Can you look it over too?

Thanks

G

Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or link
attachments:

2013R2708.wpd 1A AREDRAFT OF 2708.doc


Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent
sending or receiving certain types of file attachments.  Check your e-mail
security settings to determine how attachments are handled.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

 
 
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6178 - Release Date: 03/15/13


_______________________________________________
Bikeboard mailing list
Bikeboard@bikemorgantown.com
http://wvcompletestreets.org/mailman/listinfo/bikeboard